More

Bruco Eastwood, Colorado School Shooter, Has Already Filled Maximum Sentence, Will Not Serve Time In Prison

Bruco Eastwood

First Posted: 10/05/11 05:32 PM ET Updated: 11/10/11 12:26 PM ET

Associated Press

GOLDEN, Colo. -- A man charged with attempted first-degree murder in the shooting and wounding of two eighth-graders at a Colorado middle school was found not guilty by reason of insanity Wednesday.

UPDATE:

Bruco Eastwood received the maximum possible sentence Thursday morning for possession of a weapon on school grounds. The Denver Post reports that, as Eastwood has already served 626 days in confinement, the sentence has already been fulfilled. He will remain in the state mental hospital until doctors determine he is sane enough to leave.

EARLIER:

Bruco Strong Eagle Eastwood, who was armed with a rifle, was tackled and held by two teachers shortly after the February 2010 attack at Deer Creek Middle School that recalled memories of the 1999 mass shooting at nearby Columbine High School.

Eastwood was charged with a total of 15 crimes. Jurors found him not guilty by reason of insanity on all but one charge: possession of a weapon on school grounds, which carries a sentence of up to 1 1/2 years in prison. Sentencing will be Nov. 15.

After the verdict, Deborah Weber, mother of one of the wounded students, said she was disappointed because she felt prosecutors proved that Eastwood was sane at the time of the shootings

"I don't think that people should confuse mental illness with insanity, which is of the legal kind," Weber said. "I don't think that legal insanity should absolve someone of doing time."

Defense attorney Katherine Spengler said she would appeal that conviction.

Eastwood, who has been at the Colorado Mental Health Institute in Pueblo since the summer of 2010, struggles to understand why he did what he did, Spengler said.

"Mr. Eastwood is an extremely ill man ... and he is incredibly remorseful about what he did, and we're glad that the children are recovering," Spengler said.

She said he continues to get treatment at the state hospital.

District Attorney Scott Storey said Eastwood will remain at the state hospital for an indeterminate time until he is deemed legally sane and released. His case will be reviewed every six months.

Storey added that the average stay in the state hospital for homicide cases is 7 1/2 years and that in Eastwood's case, it could be less.

"It was a case that had to be tried," Storey said afterward. "You can't have somebody come onto our school grounds and shooting at students ... He's profoundly mentally ill. I respect the jury's verdict, but I don't agree with it .... I have no regrets for taking this case to trial.

"There are certain cases that just outrage me to the core. This is one of them."

During the trial, defense lawyers showed jurors portions of Eastwood's rambling journal that referred to mutants or transformers that were taking over his body.

"They want me to have nothing. Instead, they have me suffering, alive but in pain," Eastwood noted in one entry.

Eastwood had written in his notebook before last year's shooting that the voices were becoming more threatening. The notebook included doodles of a man under attack.

Prosecutors told the jury that Eastwood knew the difference between right and wrong when he shot the two children as they were leaving their school.

"He yelled that they were going to die," Alexis King said. "He knew it was wrong, and his behavior can't be excused."

Prosecutors said Eastwood approached a group of students and asked, "Do you like going to this school?" before shooting student Reagan Weber in the arm.

He then aimed at Matt Thieu, who was running away, prosecutors said. Thieu suffered a chest wound the size of a saucer plate.

Teachers David Benke and Norm Hanne were hailed as heroes for tackling the shooter and holding him until deputies arrived.

At issue during the trial was whether Eastwood knew the difference between right and wrong at the time of the shootings.

Chief Deputy District Attorney Steve Jensen said testimony indicated that Eastwood knew it was wrong to take his father's gun. After the shooting, Jensen said that during two hours of videotaped questioning with investigators, Eastwood repeatedly said he knew what he did was wrong, that he had hatred and anger.

"We had a videotape where we covered extensively the defendant's state and whether he knew the difference between right and wrong," Jensen said.

But Jensen said that state law prohibits the prosecutors' own doctor from personally examining a defendant on behalf of prosecutors. Three other doctors who examined Eastwood testified that he was legally insane.

Dr. Steven Pitt, who studied the 1999 Columbine High School shootings, testified that there were several indications that Eastwood was sane but that he couldn't render a final opinion about whether Eastwood could distinguish right from wrong because Pitt hadn't personally interviewed Eastwood.

"The first question the jury sent out was, `Why didn't Dr. Pitt interview the defendant?'" Jensen said, adding that the judge could not legally explain why. "So this left a bit of a void ... Obviously this had a big impact."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST DENVER

Filed by Ryan Grenoble  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 344
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (8 total)
03:27 AM on 10/08/2011
Why would the lawyer for the defendent appeal the conviction for insanity when the defense was arguing just that? If the appeal is successful would the appellate court then order a new trial where a conviction for murder might result??? This doesn't make sense.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
GlennWatson
Two million fans
11:28 PM on 10/07/2011
Why would any man think he deserves to be free after shooting children?
10:24 PM on 10/06/2011
We could just Kick babies suspected of mental illness into pits of death like Spartans.. Issue solved
01:04 PM on 10/06/2011
And when he gets out and does kill someone, what then? This person is dangerous and society should be protected from him.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mbrahms26
12:59 PM on 10/06/2011
Now that he has been found not guilty, will he be able to attend Tea Party rallies?
01:43 PM on 10/06/2011
Of course he would....He would have to repent, and swear some kind of oath to vote the way that they want Him to...just look at the Publiicity that they would get....Even the most Grievous mental conditions are cured by becoming a Tea Party Republican....he would fit right in with some of the CRAZY social ideas they have...I'm looking forward to the time he does become a Tea Partyer...Thanks for the comment, it was right on time.
AstorsCatfish
Family entertainment? Bollucks!!
11:29 PM on 10/07/2011
Wow. Two kids get shot and you guys take advantage of the opportunity to put in a plug for your morally high ground! Yes, you really make the other guys look bad!
12:50 PM on 10/06/2011
Okay. He is mentally ill. He took a gun to a school. He shot two people. He probably would have shot more had he not been stopped. Maybe he doesn't belong in prison. Maybe he should be hospitalized for life. I certainly do not understand the reasoning of forgiving him because he has mental issues. All the more reason to keep him if you ask me.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
danrothesq
Absolute brilliance
12:49 PM on 10/06/2011
Well, when he gets out he will return and shoot the rest of them. Don't you think?
12:44 PM on 10/06/2011
I am not in favor of putting insane people to death. However, there are certain actions for which a person gives up the right to ever be in society again. Whether this man committed one of those actions, I cannot say with certainty. However, the issue should be considered. As one who treats sex offenders, the safety of the community is primary.
12:35 PM on 10/06/2011
If the teachers had been armed they could have blown him away and saved future children from being shot, raped or molested after he is released. Our system is so screwed.
12:27 PM on 10/06/2011
A number of posts on here refer to murder and that he should be killed... If you take the time to read before you comment, you will read that he killed no one..It was attempted murder. To the best of my knowledge, I do not think any state, including Texas, much less Colorado sentences anyone to death for that. With the mitigating circumstances of mental illness, he probably wouldnt get life either. Also it was stated in cases like this he will probably be in at least 7.5 years,possibly getting help whereas in prison he would receive none and be turned loose on the population again..sane or not..For everyone concerned, he received the right sentence
11:06 AM on 10/07/2011
To be honest, I don't think 7.5 years will do anything for him. In those 7.5 years he will be medicated and in constant therapy. Who's going to watch him once he's out to make sure he still takes his medications? He was diagnosed a schizo 10 years ago....that just doesn't disappear. He's a looking at a life time of meds and therapy yet GUARANTEED he will not be babysat after hes out. My vote was to put him in the mental hospital for LIFE, where he could get help and we could stay safe. But, I wasn't on the jury. Just a member of one of the victims family. Screw the system.
04:41 PM on 10/07/2011
Jess, I agree with you. He should be somewher for life. But given the crime doesnt carry a life sentence, he is better in a mental hospital for 7.5, as opposed to prison, for probably about the same time, where he will get no treatment and almost guaranteed to come out and do it again..the systems sucks, I agree, but we are stuck with it. Knowing that, I think the hospital is better than prison, at least there he has a possible chance. We cant hold his hand when he gets out to make sure he takes his meds, its true,just I think the odds are a bit more in everyones favor. 7.5 in hospital as opposed to 7.5 in prison.. Even if he got 20 years, he's likely be out in 7.5..Wish it was for life too, but no way is that going to happen with the laws
11:56 AM on 10/06/2011
The CORE of this trial is Punishment.....Do we as in the "Old Days", punish the law breaker unrelated to His or Her's mental condition at the time of the crime, a gathering of lusty mobs craving "Justice", demanding the accused be tied to the stake and burned, not mattering at all if the person is "Crazy" and is unable to tell right from Wrong....seems BARBARIC...Perhaps we should also outlaw any defence that brings forth the mental condition of the accused at the time of the crime, but play the tape all the way through...what if the Accused was your Mother or Child, kinda changes things would you not want a justice system that allowed a Crazy Person treatment as opposed to Punishment....But of course their are "The Effected", what about them, do they the "Right" to force Punishment upon those that they feel deserve to be Punished, regardless of the mental condition of the Law Breaker...The Laws of the United States allow no such standing related to crimes that may have effected them, the "Collective" interruptation of the US Constitution leans toward "Individual Rights" as the basic rights of our Citizens, not some Collective Mandate that demands Justice be handed down to "Satisfy The Masses"....I love our Country, not perfect but much better than any other.
JimOKC
Logic, not ideology...
12:19 PM on 10/06/2011
Ah, but some day in the future YOUR stance may be viewed as barbaric by a people that have learned more about mental illness vs. criminal behavior. Although I agree that truly insane people should be treated as such, I am not so sure about those that lie on the edges of both sanity (know right from wrong) and insanity (have no concept of right or wrong). Those will ALWAYS be hard to judge. Oh, and yes, there are indeed times when punishment are better than rehabilitation, due to the FACT that there are people out there (and I've met them) that don't care about rehabilitation. They ENJOY hurting or killing people, and nothing you or anyone else are going to try to do will change them. I have visited a state prison...have you? LOL.
01:54 PM on 10/06/2011
Actually I have (Not just saying)...X-wife was put in one...from knowing Her She has no desire to Hurt and kill people...Jail or Prison is a mixed bag and yes some are a danger to the public, perhaps forever, but most not so much....I do beieve that at some point in our future our legal system will develop a type "Final Solution" to contain those you describe...perhaps as part of their choice to be "Put to death because they desie it" or from some public mandate.....thanks for the comment.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rexeccoach
11:42 AM on 10/06/2011
From a practicality standpoint one has to ask the question is this person a danger to society? Releasing a person sane or insane who has a propensity to carry out this type of crime is questionable. I, for one, am not comfortable with the argument he will be okay as long as he takes his meds.
photo
undaunted8
Proud American, Father, Veteran, Democrat..
11:19 AM on 10/06/2011
He's not going anywhere for a very long time.......that is unless the mutants and transformers take him away in their spaceship....
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Neil Reilly
11:02 AM on 10/06/2011
Was that jury from Florida?
10:57 AM on 10/06/2011
Again everyone is concerned about the well being of the perpetrator. What about these two children? Reckon they might have nightmares about what happened to them? I suspect it's something that will be in the back of their minds forever.
11:54 AM on 10/07/2011
You couldn't be more right...