iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

GOP Primary Date Change Could Mean Less Transparency For Early State Voters

First Posted: 10/05/2011 11:25 am Updated: 12/05/2011 4:12 am

WASHINGTON -- With the Republican primary campaign moving up into January, voters in the early voting states could be left in the dark about who is funding the millions of dollars expected to be spent by the independent groups backing individual candidates.

Super PACs, the new type of political committee created after two court rulings allowed independent political groups to raise unlimited contributions from corporations, unions and individuals, could use a loophole in current Federal Election Commission rules to keep their donors hidden until after early voting states have already chosen a GOP presidential candidate.

Under FEC rules, super PACs can choose to disclose their fundraising on either quarterly or monthly schedules. Nearly all super PACs are currently registered as quarterly filers, which allows them to only disclose twice in election off-years.

If super PACs remained registered as quarterly filers, they would be required to disclose their donors before the primaries. But if the groups switched to a monthly filing schedule, which they are allowed to do at any point in time, they would not required to file pre- or post-primary disclosure reports for each individual state primary or caucus. And if these Super PACs switched to monthly filing in December or January, they would be able to avoid any disclosure until after early state GOP primaries, as currently scheduled.

“I can’t think of anything that makes a better case for more frequent campaign finance disclosure,” said Bill Allison, the editorial director at the Sunlight Foundation, a pro-transparency nonprofit that supports real-time campaign contribution disclosure.

After spending more than $60 million in the 2010 election cycle and working to elect a broad range of candidates, super PACs have begun to form with the sole intention of supporting individual candidates for the 2012 presidential election. There are 12 candidate super PACs operating in the Republican primary and at least one with the sole intention of supporting the reelection of President Barack Obama. The fundraising plans for these groups are expected to swamp all previous records for independent political committee spending in the next election.

Only a few of these groups have disclosed any contributions this year. Restore Our Future, a pro-Mitt Romney group, reported raising $12.2 million in the first half of the year, and Priorities USA Action, a pro-Obama group, reported $3.1 million in contributions. A report released on Tuesday by Democracy 21, the Campaign Legal Center and the Center for Responsive Politics examined the close ties between the candidates' campaigns and the super PACs supporting them. The report showed that the donors to these super PACs are more-often-than-not donors who have contributed the maximum allowed to their desired candidate’s campaign committee.

In a statement on the report Democracy 21 President Fred Wertheimer said, “The presidential candidate Super PAC exists for one reason: to serve as an arm of the presidential campaign for big-money donors to launder unlimited contributions to support the presidential candidate and thereby evade and eviscerate the contribution limits for a presidential candidate enacted to prevent corruption."

While candidate-specific super PACs are new to the election scene, this type of disclosure evasion is not.

In the 2004 Democratic primary an independent group registered under the section 527 of the tax code was used to run vicious ads against the insurgent candidacy of Vermont Gov. Howard Dean. The most famous of the ads, run by Americans for Jobs, Health Care and Progressive Values, featured a close-up of Osama Bin Laden with a voice-over explaining that Dean lacked the military and foreign policy experience necessary to deal with terrorists intent on destroying western civilization.

WATCH the anti-Dean ad:

During the 2000 Republican primary between George W. Bush and Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.), a group calling itself Republicans for Clean Air spent $2.5 million on ads attacking McCain’s environmental record in California, Ohio and New York. The group was formed so quickly that no one knew anything about it. It even misspelled the word “Republican” on its letterhead. After McCain effectively lost the nomination bid, the donors, the millionaire, Bush-backing Wyly brothers, step forward to the public.

On Friday, Florida announced that it was jumping ahead of the early primary states of Iowa, New Hampshire, South Carolina, and Nevada to hold their primary on January 31. South Carolina has already announced a new date of January 21 for their primary, and Nevada announced a move to a date that is contingent on the yet-to-be-determined new date selected by New Hampshire.

Earlier on HuffPost:

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
 
 
  • Comments
  • 22
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
wandering girl
grownup
02:30 PM on 10/05/2011
you know, I honestly don't believe the people who would vote for these candidates even care about "transparency in campaign contributions." but they'll certainly raise a fuss about the opposite party.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
wa-st-concerned
01:51 PM on 10/05/2011
Disclosure alone - even daily disclosure - is NOT the cure for this problem. Most voters don't have a clue as to who actually "owns" these PACs with "patriotic" sounding names who are just fronts for corporate malfeasance.

GET CORPORATE MONEY OUT OF ELECTIONS, NO lobbying in congress and SHUT the eternally swinging corporate revolving door.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Billie Burk
01:25 PM on 10/05/2011
why go thru all the trouble of primaries just to pick someone for Obama to beat
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
catlady628
Needs lint roller :)
01:18 PM on 10/05/2011
Money really is the root of all political ev!l.

www.getmoneyout.com
01:13 PM on 10/05/2011
They were going to be in the dark anyway.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sylvia wadlington
Kindle Writer
12:50 PM on 10/05/2011
Republican primaries are always run like political auctions. Democrats should sit back and watch the show, and can count the money after. This is the only stimulus for our economy we are going to get from republicans so anything anyone can do to drive up the bidding and keep the big money players bidding against each other to get the winning bid to purchase their candidate should be tried. Also the tactics here should be studied, because most of what is successful in fighting each other will be used by them in fighting us.
photo
Phil Jennerjahn
2012 Republican Nominee for U.S. Congress
12:47 PM on 10/05/2011
Why does HuffPo even care about technical GOP 2012 details? You already have your false messiah running in 2012. Let us worry about our own candidates ourselves.
Tea for me
Lipton only:>) Proud Lib/Prog Dem
12:58 PM on 10/05/2011
??? And you think only those voting a certain way should have any interest or knowledge about what's happening??

Do you really live in America? Understand freedom of the press? Understand try...try...trying...to develop an informed electorate??

Better get on the exercise bike and get some oxygen....not foxygen....flowing to the brain cells.

Tea
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jimfl
12:31 PM on 10/05/2011
The GOPT wants to DO WAY WITH SOCIAL SECURITY VOTE FOR A DEM
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
The Mask
Saguaro worshipping desert Druid
12:31 PM on 10/05/2011
Why are the conservatives having primaries at all? When it comes down to it, a couple of handfuls of uberrich are going to get together in a smoky room, swig some good corn liquor, have a swap and exchange bidding war with the candidate who'll do the most of what they want, and it will be settled.
01:12 PM on 10/05/2011
Plus a few secret handshakes...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
oldarmy6
12:17 PM on 10/05/2011
Yawn.
photo
field-man
The 2nd Amendment
12:10 PM on 10/05/2011
I can expect a article like this in a Leftie paper, as if the Democrats dont have "Super Pacs"
but you wont let us know about that will you.
photo
NVEd
I love mountains.
12:38 PM on 10/05/2011
Funny, I thought I read about one supporting President Obama but then I read the whole article.
photo
field-man
The 2nd Amendment
12:39 PM on 10/05/2011
ONE?
Tea for me
Lipton only:>) Proud Lib/Prog Dem
01:04 PM on 10/05/2011
Ummm.....since this is about Republican primaries to get Republican nominee for president....the PACs involved....the article's focus is correct.

It did bring up one announced PAC support for the president, but this article isn't about Democrats...it's about primary dates and reporting time for Republicans and Repub. PACs

Read for information....comprehension much?

Tea
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
scat
There, it is no longer empty
12:00 PM on 10/05/2011
and if they even have them sooner. There will be super secret money. Please.

Public financed elections, no contributions from anyone or anything should be allowed. You want to run for Pres? Here is $10 mil, use it wisely.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Foxrocks
Level III Thermographer
11:56 AM on 10/05/2011
Democrats don't have any super PACs?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
The Mask
Saguaro worshipping desert Druid
12:27 PM on 10/05/2011
The article is about the primaries and the requirements of disclosure. Now I'm sure that if the democrats were holding primaries for the President in January, the super PACs of the dems would have been discussed.

Of course, being On-topic isn't as much fun, now is it?
Tea for me
Lipton only:>) Proud Lib/Prog Dem
12:46 PM on 10/05/2011
The foxygen just shrivels up their comprehension ability....reasoning probably wasn't there to begin with.

Tea:>)
11:53 AM on 10/05/2011
How much of this secret money is going to come from the Koch Brothers? If you are familiar with a recent article in Bloomberg News, you will know that the Koch Brothers engaged in secret trade deals with Iran.

How many of these secret trade deals are still going on?

Isn't trading with a known sponsor of international terrorism a treasonable offense. By accepting laundered secret donations from the Koch Brothers, isn't the GOP committing treasons?

These are questions we need to start asking.
photo
An experiment
I don't want the world, just your half.
11:46 AM on 10/05/2011
If you can't win the game fairly. Cheat!