iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Lawrence Lessig's New Book On Political Corruption Offers Protesters A Possible Manifesto

Lawrence Lessig

First Posted: 10/05/11 03:54 PM ET Updated: 12/05/11 05:12 AM ET

The protesters occupying Wall Street have been famously without a formal manifesto. But if they wanted one, firebrand Harvard Professor Lawrence Lessig's new book about how money has corrupted Congress might be a contender.

Lessig had hoped to lay the underpinnings for a popular mobilization in his book. Instead, on the day of the book's publication, he is headed to what could be that movement's nascent heart. "I'm going to go down there and hang out and do whatever I can," he told the Huffington Post on Wednesday, from the train.

Lessig's contention in his book "Republic, Lost: How Money Corrupts Congress -- and a Plan to Stop It" is that Congress's overwhelming addiction to special interest money is at the root of the problems facing the country and the unprecedented levels of disillusionment with government.

In a Thursday morning blog post on The Huffington Post, Lessig cheered on the protesters. "#OccupyWallSt, Then #OccupyKSt, Then #OccupyMainSt," he wrote, calling the mass arrests on Saturday possibly "the first real green-shoots of this, the American spring."

But at the same time, Lessig said he is worried that the protest "will become too diffuse and not focused" on that root issue. "The key messaging strategy here is to try to get people to focus on what is the core problem," he said.

Similarly, for a protest to work, it needs to grow, he said. This one will only grow "if a wide range of people can be part of it." And that means coalescing around an issue "as fundamental as the corruption of the system," he said.

"People realize that it's a show; it's a charade," Lessig said of the modern American political process. "When you just look a little bit deeper, it's clear that what's driving both parties is whatever is the thing that's going to maximize the money."

For instance, he said: "What Americans can rally around is that this totally corrupt system brought about this financial crisis -- and now, astonishingly, it's bought Congress enough that Congress couldn't even respond to the crisis. That's something to be terrified about."

Lessig said the movement should appeal to people from the left and right alike. "I'm a cross-partisan advocate here," he said.

That doesn't mean averaging things out and being left with some "mush in the middle," he said; it means giving both sides a chance to fight for what they believe in.

"It's obvious why Congress being bought troubles the left," he said, citing a range of issues including health care and climate change where reform has been blocked by moneyed interests.

"But I think that people on the right have to recognize that the things they want they will never get either," Lessig said. A simpler tax system, for instance, is not in the cards as long as both parties in Congress continue to see monkeying with the tax code as the easiest way to milk the special interests. Smaller government is an impossibility as long as Congress is incentivized to "maximize the number of people whose chains they can pull," he said.

Lessig said the ultimate example of Congress's warped priorities is the extraordinary amount of energy members devoted this spring, in the midst of an economic crisis, to the issue of bank swipe fees -- as chronicled by HufPost's Ryan Grim and Zach Carter.

"The number one issue they focused on is bank swipe fees," Lessig said. "That's only because bank swipe fees was the issue that dumped the most money into campaigns."

Lessig has little hope for the supercommittee charged with coming to a consensus on deficit reduction.

The "super-Congress, were it not for the fact that it's just as tied to special interests as Congress, could have exercised independent judgment in a way that broke critical spending and taxing logjams," he said. "But they too will have internalized the recognition of where they can touch and where they can't touch."

Two grassroots political organizations -- one from the right, one from the left -- recently announced they had found agreement on $1 trillion in deficit reduction by targeting wasteful spending, ineffective programs and massive giveaways to special interests. But, Lessig said, "The reason why none of those happen is that each of those things that those sides agree about are exactly the triggers that flush cash into the process."

Members of Congress "just recognize what they need to do to flush the money into the system," he said. "Nobody has to tell them, nobody has to order them, they're just good money maximizers."

In his book, Lessig outlines long-term measures to reverse the corrupt power of money -- most notably a new constitutional convention.

But the first step is mobilizing the electorate -- which is why he's so excited about Occupy Wall Street.

That's not to say that he's overly optimistic. "There are a thousand other steps that have to happen afterward," he said. But, he said, "there's some issues you fight whether you believe you're going to win or not."

Related Video:

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
The protesters occupying Wall Street have been famously without a formal manifesto. But if they wanted one, firebrand Harvard Professor Lawrence Lessig's new book about how money has corrupted Congres...
The protesters occupying Wall Street have been famously without a formal manifesto. But if they wanted one, firebrand Harvard Professor Lawrence Lessig's new book about how money has corrupted Congres...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 59
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
09:40 PM on 10/13/2011
It's the only way.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
EvanRavitz
09:59 PM on 10/06/2011
My agenda: 1. FDR's unrealized Economic Bill of Rights http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=effDfpKYcVo 2. Direct democracy to KEEP what we win by keeping the people in power. The best project for direct democracy is led by Mike Gravel: http://Vote.org
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
reviewingthesituation
Southern liberal feminist
08:05 AM on 10/06/2011
Watched "Prohibition" on PBS. Eerily similar to the conflict between today's inflexibile religious right and the country's realities. And the 1929 crash had the same Wall Street villains. The only difference was that then there was little regulation and today we have unenforced regulations. And government-insured deposits means people haven't lost their life savings as they did when a bank could just blow your money and close its doors.

(Other points of similariy were almost laughable. The drys wanted more enforcement when it became apparent many were ignoring the law, but they didn't want to pay more for law enforcement. The close-the-border crowd wants to seal the border, but they don't want to "grow" federal law enforcement to make such enforcement even remotely feasible. )
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JPETERB
08:50 AM on 10/06/2011
"Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it. In the first stage of life the mind is frivolous and easily distracted, it misses progress by failing in consecutiveness and persistence. This is the condition of children and barbarians, in which instinct has learned nothing from experience."
George Santayana, The Life of Reason, Volume 1, 1905
US (Spanish-born) philosopher (1863 - 1952)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
reviewingthesituation
Southern liberal feminist
09:50 AM on 10/06/2011
I heart existentiialism.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
hearmeloudandclear
02:22 AM on 10/06/2011
Money - corruption - power ...

...Is that why some crave going to Washington (though they tell you how awful that place is - and spout things like "too much government" - blast government at every opportunity...)

It's NOT Washington that is the problem -- it is the stench of those power-hungry, money-hungry folks who pretend to be protecting and working for the people while they are chasing $$$$.

Greed turns out to be not just a negative word - but a word that seemingly defines those whose total focus resembles that of an addict who lies in order to meet his ends to the point of even being dangerous, destructive to anyone in his/her path -- who stops at nothing to meet his own ends -----not too different from the DC crowd dressed in nice suits.

Remember - Sarah quit her job...(just a little 'insignificant' job as Governor of Alaska...for MONEY.

Money talks...and it's talking 24/7 to our elected officials....that's how we arrived at where we are now.

What if they REALLY were "christians?"


OBAMA 2012 -- VOTE
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
09:48 PM on 10/05/2011
Clearly government of the people, by the people, for the people, should be reconstituted to government of the rich, by the rich, for the rich,
photo
wolfdancer
Republicans -this is why we can't have nice things
09:12 PM on 10/05/2011
A long term goal like tax payer funded elections is great. But, the short term goal should be to raise taxes on the top 1%. Transfer of wealth has been tilted to them for 30 years. Time for a course correction and the sooner the better.
09:12 PM on 10/05/2011
I'm ready for a People "Spend-Out'!

Calls for a general strike will not work because people will not risk their jobs when there is such a surplus of labor in this country.

However, every American who is fed-up with the so-called job creators and their desire for plutocratic and corporatist rule can send a strong message by spending NOTHING on a series of days...not even a penny.

It is long past time to send the message about who the real "job-creators" and "profit-creators" are in this country.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
eehd
Happy Festivus!
08:12 PM on 10/05/2011
Dan, you are selling the protesters a book? How capitalist of you.
heckmepitus
Truth, justice and the American way
08:05 PM on 10/05/2011
Space alien alert, just look at that head
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
OliverEdwards
07:49 PM on 10/05/2011
How about adding to this list of companies that we should boycott:
Citibank
Goldman Sachs
Apple
Starbucks
Ben and Jerry
Microsoft
GM
Wells Fargo
UPS
FedEx
Whole Foods

Check out how much the CEOS of these companies make. Every single one of these companies is considered "rich". Some of you may say only boycott Banks but are these other groups not obscenely wealthy.

Who needs them?

Who else should we add.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Clifton Middleton
Plant It Everywhere
08:12 PM on 10/05/2011
We need to do more than boycott, we need to claim what is the universal birthright of every man, woman and child, that is, a claim to a share of the common treasures of the earth. The source of all wealth comes from the earth. No individual can claim the water or the air or any of the resources under the earth. That is our inheritance, the people's economic base and should not be controlled by corporations or governments.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Mark Twaine
11:14 PM on 10/05/2011
You mean I'm rich? Wow! This protest worked fast. How can I claim my share of the Earth's resources?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MDZamboni
07:47 PM on 10/05/2011
Constitutional amendment that takes the money out of the picture. Go, sign, say thanks to Dylan Ratigan.

www.getmoneyout.com
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MDZamboni
07:46 PM on 10/05/2011
www.getmoneyout.com
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Clifton Middleton
Plant It Everywhere
07:46 PM on 10/05/2011
People's Manifesto
Free Market Hemp to restore fuel independence and create jobs
Nationalize the oil, gas and coal to fund universally desired entitlements
10 Percent Wealth Tax on everyone and everything to eliminate all debt public and private.
We can do this right quick to restore the economy and the create a new and more perfect union with the common covenant of Universal Birthright. Let's vote on it.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Arturo Reaza N
Sooner or later we shall overcome.
01:37 AM on 10/06/2011
this sounds about right...could you elaborate further regarding hemp though?
photo
Sunlogic
What Liberal Media!?
07:34 PM on 10/05/2011
In my opinion, we need to get the third parties involved by openly inviting them to debates. We need better ideas than the two parties have given us, which is the same old - same old. The two parties are indistinguishable; you can't tell one from another. The only capacity that the two parties can work together is the Commission on Presidential Debates. Interestingly you haven't seen a third party candidate in the debates since 1992 when Ross Perot ran. 1996 came along, and the commission changed the rules only for the third parties again proving the two "major" parties can work together only in this capacity. Look at ballot laws from state to state. The two parties are automatically put on state ballots, but third parties have to petition and fight frivolous law suites in courts to get on ballots. This needs to end. The link below shows who runs this organization; the co-chairmen being one Republican and one Democrat. It is very suspect that since 1992, there hasn't been one of the third parties in the "debates".

http://www.debates.org/index.php?page=commission-leadership