iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Hybrid PACs: Super PACs And Traditional PACs Can Merge

First Posted: 10/06/2011 12:16 pm Updated: 12/06/2011 4:12 am

WASHINGTON -- The Federal Election Commission announced new rules Wednesday allowing traditional political action committees to open a segregated account for a super PAC, which can accept unlimited contributions from corporations, unions and individuals to spend directly on elections.

The new rules came about after the FEC lost the court case Carey v. FEC. That ruling stipulates that PACs can operate two banks accounts, one for the unlimited super PAC money and another for the limited traditional PAC money, and use money from each account to pay for administrative functions in amounts proportional to the activity of each account.

National Defense PAC had originally petitioned the FEC for an advisory opinion on the spending mechanism, but after FEC did not give an opinion, the PAC took its case to court -- and won.

Traditional PACs are mostly used to make contributions to elected officials or to other PACs. Super PACs cannot make these contributions, but can spend money on electoral efforts, including advertising, direct mail and grassroots mobilization.

“This is a fantastic opportunity for grassroots & citizens PACs ... to significantly enhance their electoral & political advocacy, and they’d be nuts not to hire a campaign finance lawyer to help them navigate through this," Dan Backer, National Defense PAC's counsel and the principal attorney for DB Capitol Strategies, said by email. “I think folks have so far radically underestimated the profound changes that Carey v FEC will have on the entire PAC landscape.”

The new FEC rules give guidance on how to register and disclose contributions for a hybrid PAC. This guidance includes a new form letter to be appended to PAC registrations announcing the intention of forming a PAC and super PAC under the same umbrella and new directions on how to use the current disclosure forms to differentiate unlimited contributions from limited contributions.

This new guidance is one of many directions from the FEC on how to use the current disclosure forms in new ways that they weren’t originally intended.

The Campaign Legal Center’s Paul S. Ryan told HuffPost, “Even before this stipulation there was confusion about how to use the FEC’s registration forms. The forms are very out of date now.”

“The FEC is trying to fit the new rules into their old reporting system,” Backer told HuffPost. “An update will be needed soon if the FEC hopes to continue providing understandable transparency for PAC activities.”

There is currently already one hybrid PAC in operation. Efficient America PAC formed after the Carey v. FEC ruling was handed down, but before the new FEC rules were issued. This committee plans to use its hybrid activities to reach out to voters to educate them about energy efficiency legislation and contribute to supportive lawmakers.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
 
 
  • Comments
  • 45
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bill Roth
I wrote it so it must be true....
11:10 AM on 10/13/2011
Wow! So do you think the US Supreme court is acting on behalf of the great laws of this land to provide fair justice to the people of this great country as a whole? Money needs to be removed from elections now! Politicians could simple write their on bio on their stances to why they should be Pres. Sen. Rep. Gov. or whatever office they wish to hold. The voters could read these Bio's and decide which one will do the best job based on the this literature. Short debate with both party candidates and no T.V. adds. Like a current reality program. Could call program... Searching for a Leader.... The next President... Only with commercials that cleverly dis credit one candidate or both for something they said they would do but, didn't. Problem being is that people would have to read. To make it fair bio's would be written at 4th grade reading level. Might be a stretch for most candidates to achieve but, with help from their staffs they could reach the 4th grade level in a few years.
03:14 AM on 10/11/2011
With all this new PAC money, why don't they just come out with a simple rule, "anything goes"? Little by little, they've managed to errode any rule of campaign finance and now all of our congress is a bunch of puppets for various multi-national corporations.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
invmartyc
Am I not turtle enough for the turtle club?
10:06 AM on 10/07/2011
PACs have ruined politics in America by essentially buying Washington. They should not be legal and campaign contributions should be limited like they used to be. We don't need our policy makers in bed with special interests like many, if not all of them, are now!

Leave no billionaire behind-Vote GOP 2012
09:02 AM on 10/07/2011
WORST Supreme Court ruling in YEARS!! Since $$ = POWER, corporations now have much more power than citizens who VOTE!! And we already thought Congress had been bought?? Just wait. We ain't seen NOTHING yet!! Maybe are 'Free Enterprise' system needs some tweaks??
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
p456
Walking Tall.
07:28 AM on 10/07/2011
The Koch Brothers and others bought the congress for a little over $3 billion in 2010, now they figure another five billion should get them the senate and white house. I figure if they spend about ten or twelve billion they can have the entire government under their control. Wall street is certainly in on the fix to starve the middle class out of existence. Better wake up America before it's to late.

Obama 2012.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Cherylana GarrityStavrou
There's something wrong with being right
10:12 PM on 10/06/2011
Whew! You know, it takes a lot of money to smear Obama, and I was getting a little concerned that it wasn't going to happen... ;-)
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mcartri
04:37 PM on 10/06/2011
There is no "u" in "money", "power" or "hope". There is a "u" in what the limo's tires crush: bUgs. "Don't Tread on Me" is now an empty slogan for we bugs.
04:30 PM on 10/06/2011
Why don't we just call off elections and just stick price tags on offices and stop kidding ourselves?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Freedom and Peace
War is a bankruptcy of policy
04:06 PM on 10/06/2011
Here is Ron Paul's PAC speaking truth...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XKfuS6gfxPY

A must see for all of those who still CARE about this country and want PEACE.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
05:00 PM on 10/06/2011
SPAM/FLAGGED
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Freedom and Peace
War is a bankruptcy of policy
06:03 PM on 10/06/2011
PEACE is SPAM?

Wow, what has this country become?
03:09 PM on 10/06/2011
Bah..
Lets just cut all this noise and stealth funds just make the whole American democratic process more transparent.
Instead of wasting money on this voter at the poll charade we can just have corporations and individuals vote directly with their checkbooks. Candidates receiving the Biggest prize gets the job.
We can pass laws this way too.Works out about the same anyway and we could help pay down the deficit.
03:02 PM on 10/06/2011
Yes we are in a pickle, our democracy has been bought and "we the people" are merely votes to be counted. I don't buy that reality and most who comment here on HP, and the thinkers who protest Wall Street greed and influence, don't either. I'm working on a way to use market forces, i.e., capitalism, to fundamentally change our political system and eliminate money politics. It can happen, we can fix the system and I'm looking for people who have the same vision. Visit my site often and bookmark it - I'm updating it as fast as I can: http;//www.NewPoliticalSystem.org
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LynxAlexiaBlack
To all the world I am but one to me that is enough
03:17 PM on 10/06/2011
following you on Twitter now. your site has a powerful message lets see if we can move it forward
04:30 PM on 10/06/2011
You could join with Dylan Ratigan, getmoneyout.com and the OWS people. You're all going after the same problem in different ways.
photo
trumbull desi
If I have something pithy to say, see below
02:58 PM on 10/06/2011
Personally, this smacks of treason to me.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
05:03 PM on 10/06/2011
100% agreement here.
03:23 AM on 10/11/2011
Agreed! I don't see what the difference is between outright bribbery and this. Then there's multi-national corporations that can donate $$$ for a candidate who will promote policies to help their own home country, which means American congressmen who're looking out for the interest of other nations over our own.

Between the debt and our campaign laws, someday we may well be the only nation that's toppled by another w/o firing a single shot in defense.
photo
trumbull desi
If I have something pithy to say, see below
06:52 AM on 10/11/2011
Fanned!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
mrclark
I search for the America I believed in as a boy.
02:40 PM on 10/06/2011
The system of bribery of our politicians continues unabated under the Supreme Court's activist decision that money is a form of free speech for corporations. When Mr. Roberts and his cabal can introduce me to a walking, talking corporation who can vote, and serve in our military I will possibly agree that they should have the same rights as average citizens. These rulings put forth by these conniving ideologs make a joke of our Bill of Rights in their pursuit to empower a few at the cost of the masses.
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
GeorgeBurnsWasRight
My micro-bio is running on empty.
02:44 PM on 10/06/2011
Talk to Romney; he somehow sees corporations as people.
04:32 PM on 10/06/2011
I dated a corporation for a while. It got weird...
photo
The Anti-Con
Conservatism is the devils work
11:21 PM on 10/06/2011
since his job was taking companies out would that make him a serial killer then?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Bogey907
Overfed, long-haired, leaping gnome
02:31 PM on 10/06/2011
Co-mingling of funds is the first step in concealing financial treachery.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
05:05 PM on 10/06/2011
Actually, you hit the nail right on the head.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ronniesbrain
man is the only animal that blushes, or needs to.
02:30 PM on 10/06/2011
I wouldn't have a problem with unlimited contributions, as long as all of those contributions went into a central fund and was distributed equally among the candidates. What I am not in favor of is
a system the encourages politicians to be bought by private organizations. There are many ways the system can be altered, but it needs to be done now. We have to stop the ability of the super rich to control our government. This is part of what the Occupy Wall Street is about. Also check out the petition that Dylan Ratigan/MSNBC is circulating to "Get The Money Out of Politics.