More

HuffPost Social Reading

SXSW Eco: Sustainability And The Carbon Zero City, By The Numbers

Sustainability Steffen

First Posted: 10/ 6/2011 9:19 am Updated: 12/ 6/2011 4:12 am

AUSTIN, Tex. -- Replacing fossil fuels with clean energy alternatives such as wind and solar is an important aim. But if the end goal is sustainability, that swap is simply not enough, according to Alex Steffen, author and former Worldchanging editor.

As the global population continues to multiply, energy demands will become "truly gargantuan" -- beyond any quantity that can be easily or cleanly fulfilled, Steffen told a packed room on Tuesday at the inaugural SXSW Eco conference in Austin.

So Steffen's hope rather rests on how this expanding population is distributed, or more specifically, the lower energy needs that come with the higher influx of people into cities. After all, he said in the conference's opening keynote, it is the kind of communities in which we live that determine our energy use. "The denser places get, the lower the amount of energy people use to get around it," he said.

Urban life affords an array of efficiencies, from public transportation and walkability to shared walls. Other SXSW speakers mirrored Steffen's pro-urban sentiments; so do the numbers -- starting with zero.

Zero -- While "carbon neutral" is a popular slogan for sustainability, Steffen prefers "carbon zero." Also the title for his book, this nomenclature "gives a sense that we're doing an equation," he said. "We know that we're always going to have some emissions. The question is, what are we doing to balance those out?"

350 -- Leading scientists warn that 350 parts per million is the maximum concentration of atmospheric carbon dioxide allowable if we want to fend off runaway climate change, and the consequential human and natural disasters.

500 -- "We need 350," said Steffen. But the roadblocks to reaching this lofty goal are rampant. Current atmospheric carbon dioxide levels are already around 394 parts per million. "If we continue on the path we're on," Steffen said, "we have almost no chance of slowing down any sooner than 500 parts per million."

80 Percent -- A popular stand-in trajectory getting tossed around is an 80 percent reduction in emissions by 2050. Steffen calls this an "absolutely perfect political goal," noting that it "requires us to do nothing" yet still sounds like a "big number." "We need to be thinking much more along lines of 100 percent reduction net by 2030," aka carbon zero, he said.

3 billion -- The global population is expected to rise an additional 3 billion by 2050, noted Mark Tercek, president and CEO of the Nature Conservancy, in Wednesday's SXSW conference keynote. An estimated 2 to 3 billion more people will also start living the middle class lifestyle by that time, further increasing burdens on the planet's land, food, water and energy.

2 -- If we continue with "business as usual," said Steffen, then we can expect energy demands to double by mid-century. He suggests our business model needs some serious revamping.

250,000 -- Every day, the world's cities grow by about 250,000 people -- or the equivalent of a city the size of Seattle every three days. People are flocking to urban spaces for the same reasons our ancestors did, said Steffen. It's where they can find education, job opportunities and health care. "Cities offer this great combination of more wealth and less dying," Steffen said. "And most people will take that opportunity when given it."

90 Percent -- By 2050, approximately 90 percent of the world's people will reside within or near a city. "We live on an urban planet," said Steffen. "if we're going to do anything that changes the overall trajectory of humanity's impact on the climate, it has to change what happens for these folks."

250 million -- There are currently more than 250 million vehicles on U.S. roads, noted Bob Perciasepe, deputy director of the Environmental Protection Agency, during a separate SXSW panel discussion on Wednesday. Every year, a chunk of that fleet is replaced with cleaner vehicles, he told the audience. If we can simultaneously reduce the total miles driven with those cars, then it's a "double win" for the environment, said Steffen. It's also a win for people's health and their pocketbooks. Steffen calls cars "mobile money pits."

1 -- With more stuff consolidated in one place, Steffen calls compact communities the "number one strategy" for tackling climate change. "The most climate friendly trip we are every going to take is the trip we never had to take because we were close to what we wanted," he said.

9 -- The carbon equation need not always be balanced to be favorable for the future. Choosing to travel a mile by train rather than car, for example, is equivalent to driving up to 9 fewer miles, noted Steffen. The reason: the carbon footprint of driving goes beyond just what comes out of the tailpipe to include everything from the manufacturing of that car to the concrete upon which its driven, Further, when your only form of transportation is a car, "everything you need becomes a trip," he said. Meanwhile, people who take transit may tend to plan ahead and consolidate their errands.

71 Percent -- Sales rose 71 percent on New York City streets that were closed to traffic, according to the city's transportation commissioner Janette Sadik-Khan. "People shop more when they slow down," said Steffen. "All of this stuff has economic benefits."

40 -- Slowing down is also an example of how a minor environmental change can bring a major health benefit. As Steffen pointed out, if a pedestrian is hit by a car traveling at 40 mph, they have an 80 percent chance of dying. However, if that same car was going 20 mph, that person has a 5 percent chance of dying. "We need to create spaces where cars understand they share the road," said Steffen. Of course, the health consequences of driving go beyond accidents -- for both driver and pedestrian. "Cars are one of leading causes to almost all of our biggest health problems," said Steffen, nodding to a list that includes obesity and high blood pressure, as well as asthma and other known health effects of air pollution. In fact, a slightly longer walk might save more time in the end than a shorter drive. "That walk adds life expectancy, so the time spent walking is not wasted," Steffen added. "It's time you would've spent dead."

94 Percent -- Young adults with a four-year college degree are about 94 percent more likely to live in close-knit urban neighborhoods than their less-educated peers, according to a recent study. “The goal is no longer dream homes," said Steffen, "It’s dream neighborhoods."

6 -- "We need a different relationship to stuff," Steffen said. His example: the home drill. In its entire lifetime, the tool may be used a total of just 6 to 20 minutes. Every hole it drills, he noted, becomes ecologically -- and economically -- very expensive. Car-sharing programs have tapped into the benefits of more people getting more use, but we've only hit the "tip of the iceberg" in terms of the kindergarten lesson's potential, said Steffen. What's more, the use of smart sensors and meters can push people to use those things they do have differently, added Steffen, especially when their results can be measured relative to others. "Comparison will change behaviors quickly," he said. "No one wants to be the outlying energy hog."

90 Percent -- And if a family wants to compete with the Jones in terms of their energy use at home or work, they could take advantage of the estimated 90 percent reduction in energy use attained by buildings that enlist sunlight for lighting and heating, and breezes and shade for cooling, noted Steffen. With the millions of new buildings that will be needed to accommodate a growing U.S. population, better design and construction could keep a substantial amount of climate-changing carbon dioxide out of the atmosphere.

77 Percent -- San Francisco boasts the highest rate of recycling, composting or reusing in the country: 77 percent. "There's a whole suite of things that make for a sustainable city," said Melanie Nutter of the San Francisco Department of Environment during a discussion panel on Wednesday. The department has been working to help America's greenest city become a Zero Waste city by 2020.

1980 -- The year the entire globe needed to start eliminating carbon emissions, according to Steffen, was 1980. The "second best" time, he added, is now.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST GREEN

AUSTIN, Tex. -- Replacing fossil fuels with clean energy alternatives such as wind and solar is an important aim. But if the end goal is sustainability, that swap is simply not enough, according to Al...
AUSTIN, Tex. -- Replacing fossil fuels with clean energy alternatives such as wind and solar is an important aim. But if the end goal is sustainability, that swap is simply not enough, according to Al...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 41
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
12:05 AM on 10/10/2011
Excellent Summary of one of the inaugural event's speakers. Here's a quick summary of the final day's keynote from EcoLeader's Blog: http://ecoleader.wordpress.com/2011/10/06/sxsw-eco-how-to-make-a-difference-incl-brief-video/
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Cayce58
07:25 PM on 10/08/2011
Here's the future Sarahcuda. At 2 degrees warming 9 billion tons of carbon in permafrost is melted and subjected to bactewrial action. As we type, Siberia is having a heat wave and permafrost has subsided into lakes. Its a nightmare. The lakes look like fishtanks with bubblers and every bubble is methane, the wild card, the end of our culture, 20 t9imes the greenhouse gas as CO2. So we go to 3 degrees. At 3 degrees we no longer have enough vegetation to counteract the bacterial action (accelerated by warming) of the 9 gigatons of carbon i n the worlds soil and the carbon cycle reverses. We go straight to 6 degrees. No choice, no chance of change. Some of your children and most of your grandchildren are dead or simply never were. 6 degrees is the earths last extinction event and we are headed there again.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Penocea
What you are, the world is ...
08:21 PM on 10/06/2011
"An estimated 2 to 3 billion more people will also start living the middle class lifestyle by that time, further increasing burdens on the planet's land, food, water and energy." In other words: Poverty or Death is better for the planet.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Joseph Furtenbacher
No one you know...
04:29 PM on 10/06/2011
'COURSE people should have every luxury they want nearby... even the ones they don't know they need yet...

p.s. Better slap on another coat of greenwash; your gray is starting to show through...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
nellre
growth is not sustainable
03:56 PM on 10/06/2011
My town recycles all the trash. We throw it into the bin, they sort it out and recycle it.
photo
RMForbes
Ask me about industrial hemp
03:29 PM on 10/06/2011
Allowing our farmers to grow industrial hemp as a major rotation crop to rejuvenate their farmlands would produce over a trillion tons of hemp biomass every 4 months. An acre of hemp produces more usable paper pulp than 4 acres of old growth forest. It takes 50 years or more to regrow a forest while hemp can complete it's growing cycle in as little as 100 days. It's shameful that we flush paper products created from our forests which are the lungs of earth when we have a far superior green product that is being held from the market by the corporate greed of the forest products lobby (for one). The strong long bast fibers from hemp can be pressed into studs and particle boards for building materials that are more heat, mold and pest resistant than softwood forest products. Termites won't touch hemp. We could significantly reduce deforestation around the world by growing hemp as a major rotation crop.
04:13 PM on 10/06/2011
Pulp can be made from pine with a 10 - 15 year thining. It could take 25-30 years for a final harvest but that would be for sawlogs, not pulp.

I don't know where you're getting your 50 years to regrow numbers at but that is not accurate for a modern tree farm.
photo
RMForbes
Ask me about industrial hemp
04:34 PM on 10/06/2011
Hemp short fiber pulp can be converted to superior paper products using only a fraction of the caustic chemicals needed to convert softwood fibers into paper products. We could leave our forest to grow and absorb tons of carbon out of the atmosphere daily instead of "thinning" them out. Superior building materials can be grown in local farms and manufactured in local factories across the country which would lower consumption of fossil fuels which can also be replaced with advanced biofuels produced from hemp biomass. I'm sorry that your business may become extinct because of our need to move toward a green economy.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Riley Secrist
photo
Wanderland
Barbie arm candy
02:30 PM on 10/06/2011
Do you have a comment, or are you spamming?
02:17 PM on 10/06/2011
Why does earth get a little warmer every year in the NH summer months when we are further away from the Sun receiving 7% less radiation then cool off 6 months later during the SH summer when we are closer to the Sun? (7% is a HUGE difference compared to the theoretical difference of greenhouse effect owed to human CO2.)
photo
Wanderland
Barbie arm candy
02:30 PM on 10/06/2011
It's because of the angle at which the sun's rays hit the northern hemisphere.
08:36 AM on 10/07/2011
That can't be because they hit the SH at the SAME angle 6 months earlier/later. The only difference is that between perihelion and aphelion, a little over 3 million miles.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
beckjr2000
been there done that & tired of it
02:01 PM on 10/06/2011
And next year everyone will win the lottery!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
01:36 PM on 10/06/2011
The studies I've seen show that in the US (a) energy use is flatlining, often declining and (b) that efficiency alone could slash 80% of energy consumption immediately using current materials and techniques. We need to focus on the US reality, not generalize across the planet.

This "there will be gargantuan demand" mantra is all part of the pyramid scheme of multinational corporations churning the market for more money and monopoly power for themselves. Why the singular obsession with transportation when more than 40% of GHG emissions come from structures? Where are our PACE loans to get every structure net zero?

Its very difficult to power a skyscraper from its rooftop (or provide food or water for it), so his "urban density" program relies entirely on total ecosytem slaughter of millions of acres of wilderness for remote, centralized Big Energy buildouts. Nature doesn't care if it's dynamited, bulldozed and paved into oblivion for small dirty gas wells or gigantic sprawling Big Solar and Big Wind and Big Transmission - it dies and that's what matters.

Sorry, but cramming everyone in cities then killing off the rest of the land for energy production is just a COMPLETE waste of time, money and nature and will not help at all. Making every structure very close to net zero for water, power, heating/cooling, etc. will allow people the space to breathe, while more effectively reducing GHGs and cleaning up pollution.
02:22 PM on 10/06/2011
"Making every structure very close to net zero for water, power, heating/co­oling, etc. will allow people the space to breathe"

I.E - caves!

Maurice Strong, "Isn’t the only hope for the planet that the industrialized civilizations collapse? Isn’t it our responsibility to bring that about?"

Maurice Strong is very rich, a good friend of AL Gore and started the UN's initial "Environment Programme". The UN is a very large bloated political organization BTW...
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
03:50 PM on 10/06/2011
only people like you will end up in caves because that corresponds to your human and intellectual capacity (shoe fits), but the rest of us will end up in highly-insulated, comfortable spacious homes that don't waste thousands of dollars a year in energy bills and don't dump all the rainwater into the streets.

suit yourself.

what you can't keep doing is making your cheapness, bad choices and ignorance hurt/cost the rest of us. it's a fundamental libertarian viewpoint that your rights end where mine begin. mine begin with where the land, air, water and ecosystems are poisoned by lazy dummies and the costs of new energy infrastructure is dumped onto me because people like you WASTE all the energy. that is not an option.

conservation used to be a conservative value. how far you have fallen.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Craig Bovia
Vermont, 1791, women can vote, no slavery allowed
12:47 PM on 10/06/2011
So what's the plan???
02:33 PM on 10/06/2011
Drill baby drill! There's ZERO indication that using MORE fossil fuel is going to hurt us because our life expectancy just keeps going UP.

http://www.ssa.gov/oact/NOTES/AS112/fig2.gif (yes, that's the 1918 'Spanish' flu epidemic showing up)
photo
Wanderland
Barbie arm candy
03:02 PM on 10/06/2011
Life expectancy is not a measure of the effects ghgs.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Craig Bovia
Vermont, 1791, women can vote, no slavery allowed
03:08 PM on 10/06/2011
Interesting Logic. Or lack thereof. I have never seen that connection before. Pollution equals longer life. It could be the new Deniers Mantra. You might want to copyright that.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
AndyMannle
12:38 PM on 10/06/2011
Great article! I love the quick list of important numbers. My favorite quote is that walking isn't wasted time because "It's time you would've spent dead."

For comments below about population - it's not the numbers of people that are a problem, it's our impact. So we need to separate people's lifestyle from their energy use (efficiency) and our energy use from environmental impact (clean renewables) - that way we can break the trend of rising standards of living = more energy use = more environmental impact. It doesn't have to be that way if we can adopt more sustainable policies.
11:59 AM on 10/06/2011
great article but falls short as it does not speak to the need for the world to stop procreating past replacement levels. He could have mentioned adoption in the first world and supporting third world birth control.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Craig Bovia
Vermont, 1791, women can vote, no slavery allowed
12:29 PM on 10/06/2011
Great Point, Toni
Cheers
F/F
12:47 PM on 10/06/2011
Want to reduce the world population. Simple, move people to cities. In the cities people have few children.
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
JScott
John Galt's last name is McGuffin-Smithee
11:21 AM on 10/06/2011
So it's the usual corporate meme-yes there will be 3 bil more people we have to have more and such. What if we go for 'no it won't be this usual corporate meme'.
10:31 AM on 10/06/2011
Wow, nothing like trying to CONTROL every aspect of your life.
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
JScott
John Galt's last name is McGuffin-Smithee
11:22 AM on 10/06/2011
Well if we keep poppin out more human then yes that'll happen.
But what if we don't.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Craig Bovia
Vermont, 1791, women can vote, no slavery allowed
12:47 PM on 10/06/2011
It's already happening. We just think we're in control. For instance, almost everybody drives in Los Angeles, unless they are poor or too old, because the Power Families made a deal with Big Oil, rubber and car companies after WWII and paved over the best light-rail system in the World. I was possible to get on a trolley in San Bernadino and travel to the Santa Monica Pier in a little over an hour for around 50 cents. The pave-over forced everyone to get a car. There are many things, some hidden, that control almost every aspect of our lives.
Cheers