iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Keystone XL Pipeline: State Department Holds Final Public Hearing

Pipeline

First Posted: 10/07/11 05:12 PM ET Updated: 12/07/11 05:12 AM ET

WASHINGTON -- Environmentalists, union laborers, farmers and businessmen gathered in the nation's capital on Friday to take part in the State Department's final public hearing on construction of the proposed Keystone XL pipeline, which would carry crude oil from the tar sands of Alberta, Canada, more than 1,600 miles to oil refineries along the Texas Gulf Coast.

The issue at hand is whether the project will win the approval of the State Department, which has purview over any infrastructure projects that cross a U.S. border and, having completed its final environmental assessment in August, has sponsored a slew of public hearings in states along the proposed route of the TransCanada pipeline.

At a demonstration sponsored by the Laborers' International Union of North America (LIUNA), pro-pipeline members wore orange, in contrast to the blue worn by environmental advocates, and cheered, "We understand the need for renewable energy -- we're not there now. It's about jobs!"

Advocates of the pipeline say its construction will create jobs, while critics cite concerns over greenhouse gas emissions, as well as a history of leaks in an existing TransCanada oil pipeline known as Keystone 1.

Maura Cowley, co-director of Energy Action Coalition, was one of more than 45 anti-pipeline advocates who testified against construction on Friday.

"It's the end of a long process which has been filled with a lot of corruption between TransCanada and the U.S. State Department," Cowley said in an interview with HuffPost on Friday. She was referring to the investigation surrounding oil lobbyist Paul Elliott, who failed to disclose that he had previously served as an aide to Secretary of State Hillary Clinton when he registered as a foreign agent to lobby the department on behalf of TransCanada.

"But what we saw today was, once again, everyday Americans from young people to indigenous people to Nebraska farm owners all came out and said that this is not the wave of the future, that people want to see a clean energy economy that creates jobs, but that they don't want to see this pipeline expanded," said Cowley.

Susan Luebbe, a Nebraska farmer who spoke at Friday's event, said TransCanada had contacted her hundreds of times about building the pipeline through her family's land, but she rejected its requests for fear the oil pipeline would leak. Also testifying on Friday was Michael Klink, the Indiana civil engineer who warned HuffPost's Tom Zeller that he observed a litany of problems when he worked as a construction inspector at pumping stations along the existing Keystone pipeline as it was being built in 2009.

Randy Thompson, another farmer from Nebraska, said, "We feel like we're being thrown under the bus" for a project that will benefit only industry.

A final decision from the Obama administration on whether to approve the Keystone XL oil pipeline is expected before the end of the year.

WATCH video of the event from ThinkProgress:

CORRECTION: An earlier version of this story misspelled the last name of Maura Cowley, co-director of Energy Action Coalition.
FOLLOW HUFFPOST GREEN

WASHINGTON -- Environmentalists, union laborers, farmers and businessmen gathered in the nation's capital on Friday to take part in the State Department's final public hearing on construction of the p...
WASHINGTON -- Environmentalists, union laborers, farmers and businessmen gathered in the nation's capital on Friday to take part in the State Department's final public hearing on construction of the p...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 195
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (5 total)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:01 AM on 10/11/2011
This is a great example how some people can get hundreds of millions of dollars for "speeches".
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Stephen R Concklin
Climate Activist
01:12 PM on 10/10/2011
I was arrested on September 2nd at the White House and I intend to return for a November 6th White House action. It is time to bend the arc of energy use toward renewables.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Andrew Harvey
Don't F with the Jesus
04:35 AM on 10/10/2011
Great, soon this will be over and we can get back to real news.

With all the people protesting, I wonder if these liberals have anything better to do.

"Lets all protest the oil companies that keep our cars going, and while we're at it, let protest the banks that lend us money."

When are you guys going to start protesting the iPhone store that uses underpaid Chinese labor to make their products? or the Birkenstock factory for using animal hides in its sandals?
07:00 PM on 10/23/2011
I guess you missed the part of this story, which is KEY, that states it is going to take more energy to produce oil from this "venture" than we will gain from the oil extracted. That reminds me of ethanol, it's production is the same and those who are subsidized are the only real winners.

This IS real news. Anything that impacts this many people should be swept under the rug or given a mere mention??

The real problem these days is that nobody cares about anything anymore. It's all about "me and mine" AND the almighty dollar.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Andrew Harvey
Don't F with the Jesus
08:57 PM on 10/23/2011
No, I didn't miss that point. Perhaps you don't know, but crude oil makes a lot of stuff aside from gasoline. Some of the output from the tar sands will be made into fuel, but other parts make the plastics you use every day in your life, like the keyboard you're typing on.

The "almighty dollar" is what we use to make production decisions in this world. If it makes money, then it's servicing someone on some way, sometimes in ways that aren't immediately obvious.
photo
SpookyAnnya
RN for higher teachers' salaries
11:47 PM on 10/09/2011
It's the Aquifer and the pipeline being a target for bombs. Do not build another Keystone pipeline.
07:54 PM on 10/09/2011
Posted on October 9, 2011 by stevieslaw
Myron Pipes In
Myron, my fire-eating red-headed cousin, does not often find his name and the word compromise in the same sentence. He is particularly hard on the filthy rich, waiters and idiots. It is not all that unusual for Myron to throw one of each through a plate glass window in any given month.
When he called me to suggest a compromise on the Keystone XL pipeline project, I was stunned.
“I had a great idea for the project,” Myron told me. “But I don’t know how to publicize it.”
“I’ll put it on my blog, cousin,” I said. “That way ten or twelve people this year will read about it.”
“It’s a start,” said my cousin. “A very, very small start.”
Myron’s compromise is simplicity itself.
1. Build the pipeline. It will create tons of good paying jobs in the middle of a jobs recession.
2. Have the oil companies pay for the pipeline construction using their very large pool of government subsidies. They won’t miss it.
3. Don’t connect the pipeline to anything in Hardisty or in Houston/Port Arthur. Keep it empty and shiny.
New jobs. No new taxes. No environmental mess. It’s a win, win, win.
photo
ILoveFiction
That's unbelievable!
06:19 AM on 10/09/2011
"behind the scenes, former Republican officials and other insiders are trying to shift the GOP's focus back to acknowledging climate change is real."

So says Mason Inman.

Meanwhile, the Democratic Administration is letting the oil industry do its environmental impact statements.
photo
ILoveFiction
That's unbelievable!
09:38 PM on 10/08/2011
Did you know there is already a Keystone pipeline and this lady from Canada told the State Department it never spilled more than you or I spill while putting gas in our car?

Do you think the State Department figures it's OK to lie if you are a lobbyist from Canada? Is that a new rule?

Just wondering.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
fireofenergy
Promote freedom AND science
07:43 PM on 10/08/2011
I believe that excess co2 will cause GW, however, I also believe a lot of people would greatly appreciate the jobs.
it is a shame that the XL is the only way to create jobs because all of our treasonous leaders won't re-enact trade tariffs... Closed cycle nuclear is much better, and even robotically mass produced solar and lifepo4 batteries... but again, treason gets in the way!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
fireofenergy
Promote freedom AND science
08:03 PM on 10/08/2011
Well, maybe I'm being a little harsh. Hopefully, the advanced energy research will lead to these sources, especially that of the robotically mass produce GaAs fresnel arrays and LiFePO4 (or better) batteries
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Linda Edmondson
wounded warrior.org+ CLICK
06:39 PM on 10/08/2011
Simply do not build this pipe line. That is the message. It has not been proven safe. There is too much at stake, for it to span completely across this country. How can anyone garantee that it will not cause untole amounts of damages. This is a gamble. Lets not take it, too much will be lost. That can't be fixed.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Linus521
In wildness is the salvation of mankind
09:59 PM on 10/08/2011
The greatest damage will result in the construction of the pipeline, killing multi-thousands of acres of boreal, wetland, riverine and grassland ecosystems. Ecosystems are the economy of our living Earth, in the eco-nomics of all life, including man's. Ecosystems are all integrated and all ecosystems have loops and feedbacks to both the climate and the very atmosphere, and all ecosystems, altogether create the very life zone of Mother Earth, the biosphere.

Essentially, killing ecosystems destroys the Earth's ability to create and sustain all life. Ecosystems and their biological diversity are the real Earth, the life giving physical body of Earth.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Linda Edmondson
wounded warrior.org+ CLICK
10:31 PM on 10/08/2011
Thank You ,LInua521
I just tweeted the Whitehouse with my message to not support this pipe line. Please everyone do the same.
photo
ILoveFiction
That's unbelievable!
11:41 PM on 10/08/2011
Even the very atmosphere!

Imagine that!
03:59 PM on 10/08/2011
This Albertan would just as soon see our raw resources refined here and then sent south, rather than sending jobs south. My country needs to stop just being a supplier of natural resources and start diversifying by creating finished products.
12:14 PM on 10/08/2011
We need to stop reproducing. Humans are the worst things on the planet !
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Linus521
In wildness is the salvation of mankind
10:03 PM on 10/08/2011
Yes, humans are killing Earth with their own too much. No issue and nothing is as vital to the great continuum of life as man's Zero Population Growth. Many scientists maintain, each day Earth becomes more like Mars. This pipeline will kill multi-thousands of acres of boreal, wetland, riverine and grassland ecosystems -- in the eco-nomy of all life, including man's.
nothingchanges
too soon old, too late smart
11:44 AM on 10/08/2011
What the average American seems unable to understand, is the reverence politicians hold in general for historical leaders, over their constituency.

They are far more likely to pay attention to Woodrow Wilson, Salmon P. Chase, James Madison, Grover Cleveland, William McKinley, Benjamin Franklin, Ulysses S. Grant, Andrew Jackson, Alexander Hamilton, Abraham Lincoln, Thomas Jefferson, or even lowly George Washington (in that order) then to any living individual.

Politicians have a different sense of perspective then most of us.

They view their world through "green" colored glasses.
photo
miaontia
56%'er that votes...
11:20 AM on 10/08/2011
Why no mention of Solyndra on the Front Page today? Is it starting to hit a little too close to the White House for you guys?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
CraigNazor
04:18 PM on 10/08/2011
Solyndra was a $500 million loan gaurantee gone bad in an attempt to help a new American company compete with the technologies of the future. The Keystone XL pipeline is a multi-billion dollar giveaway of both money and land to a huge, rich foreign corporation to support an old technology that is killing us. (If Obama OKs this, it will do far more damage to his Presidency than the Solyndra loan gaurantee.) Which do you think is bigger news? Hmm - that's a tough one...

Is this hitting too close to the truth for the global warming deniers?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lw1
Jobs! Jobs! Jobs!
05:31 PM on 10/08/2011
Solyndra was run by a republican and the gop Walton family were major investors that put it on Bush's agenda. It was a matter of timing that it got approved under Obama a it was a Bush program.

DOE loan guarantee program creates jobs, protects taxpayers
• The loan guarantee program has issued guarantees worth nearly $38 billion to more than 40 projects in 38 states. These investments will directly create 66,000 jobs.
• In addition to solar manufacturing, DOE is investing in nuclear power plants, advanced vehicle manufacturing, biofuels, and renewable energy generation. Overall, solar manufacturing represents 3.4 percent of DOE’s total portfolio.
• Solyndra’s $535 million guarantee represents just 1.4 percent of DOE’s total portfolio.
• DOE has set aside $2.5 billion to cover any losses resulting from loan defaults to help protect and decrease risk to taxpayers.

http://www.americanprogressaction.org/issues/2011/09/pdf/solyndra_brief.pdf
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
fireofenergy
Promote freedom AND science
07:58 PM on 10/08/2011
Finally, Sheees, Next time, try investing ten times that amount into robotic GaAs fresnel array factories... (and limit the profits). Only in that way will solar compete with China, be cheap enough to create UNLIMITED INSTALL JOBS and not convert too much light into infrared (heat).
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
10:15 AM on 10/08/2011
The moneyed interests will win this one as they always do. I think that these public hearings are all for show. Get Money Out.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
BizSamurai
Think lightly of yourself and deeply of the world
11:09 AM on 10/08/2011
I do not think they will win this one. Tanker ships up and down the west coast if anything.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
11:50 AM on 10/08/2011
I hope you are right. Not that tankers leaking into the ocean is better but......
11:59 AM on 10/08/2011
-

I've been to four public hearings. Trust me -- the Unions have won. All of the environmental furor in the last few months have been a complete waste of time and energy.

Because President Obama does not FEAR the environmental movement because no matter what he does, environmentalists will support him -- ALWAYS. He knows they'll be mad for a while, but they can't STAY mad at him. It's like some kind of sick, dysfunctional relationship.

Given the choice of saving Barack Obama's presidency or the life of a Baby Seal, the president will ALWAYS win with environmentalists -- even though he's no where near as cute & cuddly.

Controversial yes, but incontrovertible nonetheless.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
12:31 PM on 10/08/2011
I think you are right--unfortunately.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
CraigNazor
04:31 PM on 10/08/2011
First, we are on the same side, but I disagree with your analysis. I have witnessed two hearings, and the opposition is just getting fired up - we may win this yet. Being an environmentalist, and given the fact that, in America, there are only two effective choices for President, I will always vote for one of the two candidates that best represents my views (no surprise there, I hope). Given the present crop of environment-hating Republicans, that will probably be Obama. But this election, if Obama OKs this pipeline, instead of going to Obama, my hard-earned MONEY will be going to groups like the Sierra Club, the NRDC, 350.org, and the many other organizations that are fighting to stop anthropogenic global climate change, the worst threat that human civilization has ever faced. This battle is far from over, and, as the earth gets hotter, we will eventually win. The only question is how much damage we can avoid by acting sooner rather than later.
10:10 AM on 10/08/2011
I stand with Randy.
Speaking as a Nebraskan we don't need this pipeline for jobs. Nebraska has the 2nd lowest unemployment rate in the nation. Hell the 4 out of the 5 top states with the lowest unemployment rate in the nation are at risk for having this thing built in out backyard. WE DON'T NEED YOUR DIRTY JOBS!