More

Wall Street CEOS May Be Held Liable If Their Bank Breaks Volcker Rule

Wall Street

First Posted: 10/08/11 12:07 PM ET Updated: 12/08/11 05:12 AM ET

WASHINGTON (Dave Clarke) - Regulators are considering holding Wall Street chief executives legally liable if they allow certain types of proprietary trading on their watch.

Regulators due to reveal the Volcker rule proposal next week are expected to ask whether CEOs should have to certify, or "attest," that their bank has put in place the proper systems to make sure no proprietary trading is taking place.

The idea is that holding CEOs personally accountable will add a strong deterrent effect to the Volcker rule.

The rule, called for in last year's Dodd-Frank financial oversight law, bans banks from trading for their own profit in securities, derivatives and some other financial instruments.

The bank industry is already balking at the legal burden and compliance headache that would come with a CEO certification.

"The whole Volcker rule proposal envisions having an army of nannies overlooking the work of the people who actually work with customers," said Wayne Abernathy, a senior official with the American Bankers Association. "How much more does an attestation bring that that doesn't bring?"

A CEO certification approach may be similar to 2002's Sarbanes-Oxley law.

That law, put in place after major accounting scandals at Enron and Worldcom, has the power to send executives to prison and make them pay multimillion-dollar fines for submitting false certifications on corporate disclosures.

It is unclear if regulators will seek CEO imprisonment or hefty fines as potential penalties for violating the Volcker rule. Whatever regulators might put in place, fines would be a far more likely punishment if any are ever doled out, banking lawyers said.

Supporters of the proposal contend it would force the CEO to be more involved and accountable.

"Placing personal and legal responsibility directly with a corporation's top executive is key to ensuring financial firms comply with the Volcker Rule and stop engaging in the risky activities that led to billion-dollar taxpayer bailouts," Sen. Carl Levin said in a statement to Reuters.

The crackdown on proprietary trading, which has some exemptions, is known as the Volcker rule after former Federal Reserve Chairman Paul Volcker, who championed the reform.

The rule will mostly impact large banks including Goldman Sachs, JPMorgan Chase and Citigroup.

Supporters contend that large banks whose customers receive deposit insurance from the government should not be engaging in risky trading activities that could put these deposits in jeopardy.

Despite banks' concerns, regulators may go easier on the issue of CEOs' legal liability than the industry's worst fears.

In January the Financial Stability Oversight Council, the panel of regulators headed by the Treasury Department, released recommendations for enforcing the Volcker rule.

Included in this list was requiring a CEO to certify their compliance efforts' "effectiveness."

A draft of the rule to be considered next week by regulators does not explicitly call for a CEO certification and instead solicits feedback on whether it should be in a final rule.

The draft, first posted online by the American Banker on Wednesday, could be changed before the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp meeting on Tuesday and the Securities and Exchange Commission meetings on Wednesday on the proposal.

Banking lawyers say the certification could work similarly to Sarbanes-Oxley.

"The idea is they want to have a human being on the line saying it is true," said Bradley Sabel, a partner with Shearman and Sterling law firm.

But even some critics of the banking industry who argue the government has not done enough to respond to the 2007-2009 financial crisis question whether upping a CEO's legal responsibility will make much of a difference.

"I count myself among those who would like some CEOs' heads on a stick but I don't think this is the right way to go about it," said Cornelius Hurley, director of Boston University's Morin Center for Banking and Financial Law. "At the end of the day he is going to rely on the representations of his advisers anyway and all this does is make sure he doesn't sleep at night."

(Reporting by Dave Clarke, Editing by Matthew Lewis)

Copyright 2011 Thomson Reuters. Click for Restrictions.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Money newsletter!
WASHINGTON (Dave Clarke) - Regulators are considering holding Wall Street chief executives legally liable if they allow certain types of proprietary trading on their watch. Regulators due to re...
WASHINGTON (Dave Clarke) - Regulators are considering holding Wall Street chief executives legally liable if they allow certain types of proprietary trading on their watch. Regulators due to re...
Filed by Maxwell Strachan  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 443
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (14 total)
08:43 PM on 10/11/2011
Peacefully support the protesting! Do what the Banks hate the most - Join A Large Credit Union!
The leading lobbyist of the Banker's Association of American literally HATES Credit Unions!
They are in gross violation of the Constitution and Bill of Rights criminally violating 'the other 90%' rights forever and have been able to keep everyone 'in the dark' too long about Credit Unions! They 'managed', with tons of your money greazing their pockets bribing them and hounding them thru lobbying for the last bill that was 'passed' to STILL keep everyone inhibited from being able to FREELY join a credit union. It is easy to 'get around' and EVERYONE should do it to peacefully help fight this 'battle-of-the-bulge' with the Too Big To Fail Bankster's!
Simply JOIN A LARGE CREDIT UNION! YOU CAN DO IT, JUST PUT YOUR MIND TO THE FACT THAT YOUR ARE FREE TO! The Largest and Best credit union is NFCU - Navy Federal - it is World-Wide and all your banking needs are for FREE, credit card interest rates are always low - and only now has the Banks the 'edge' w/their FREE, TAX-PAYER LOANS from the fed abling them to offer the only slightly higher interest rates to 'entice' your 'in' and RAPE you in fee's, fine's and high interest charges on credit card servises. They ALL depend on one thing: "A Fool And His Money Is Soon Departed" -
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Runey
anti-religionists, converge and amass
07:12 AM on 10/11/2011
"At the end of the day he is going to rely on the representations of his advisers anyway and all this does is make sure he doesn't sleep at night."

That alone garners my support.
11:43 PM on 10/10/2011
I'm fine with putting people in Jail if they knowingly broke the law.

Now how about all the people who lied on mortgage applications to take out more than five times their salary?
GM1966
Living The Dream
02:56 AM on 10/11/2011
They should have been denied loans based on a false application. If the banks did their due diligence then those loans wouldn't have been approved. It's up to the banks to verify the information on the loan application.
08:22 AM on 10/11/2011
And if someone robs a bank, we should also blame the bank for not having better security. When caught, the bank robber shouldn't be punished because if the bank had been better at its business the robbers evil intent would have been unsuccessful. Right?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
11:20 PM on 10/10/2011
CEO's going to jail would be good. If corporations are people too then the CEO as the ultimate personification of the corporation should pay the penalty for any crimes committed by their hirelings. And the corporation would be measured for good behavior for the CEO to get time off his sentence.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
stargazer13
To Love One Is To Love All
10:03 PM on 10/10/2011
Oh Please !

to big yo fail so we had to bail and now their to big to jail is that it ?

What EVER ~~~
06:19 PM on 10/10/2011
Absolutely they should be accountable!
03:21 PM on 10/10/2011
Time to round up the CEOs of all the big banks.

Not nice federal prisons though but state prison with the other criminals.

Not to late not to prosecute these sociopaths.
photo
webwzrd
Reality is liberal indoctrina­tion.
12:04 PM on 10/10/2011
I'll believe it when I see it.
photo
Inkosi
The gods themselves rage aginst stupidity
12:31 PM on 10/10/2011
Ditto!
photo
BeerLover
Carpe Diem!
10:49 AM on 10/10/2011
When I see the word "MAY"..... I already know they WILL NOT be.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Dennis
No matter how cynical I get I can't keep up.
09:11 AM on 10/10/2011
Hold Wall Street CEO's responsible? Why start now?
photo
webwzrd
Reality is liberal indoctrina­tion.
12:00 PM on 10/10/2011
Because it's never too late to do the right thing.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Lex Anton
Freedom doesn't exist in America.
08:51 AM on 10/10/2011
How can they go to prison when the officers of wall street are corrupted by wall st? Silly media.
photo
BeerLover
Carpe Diem!
10:50 AM on 10/10/2011
I like your micro-bio!!!
08:35 AM on 10/10/2011
Why aren't they in prison now for the crimes that wrecked the people of this nation...or was that another maybe !
photo
Inkosi
The gods themselves rage aginst stupidity
12:34 PM on 10/10/2011
Wall Street will do whatever it wishes. They write the laws and the congress passes them.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jcaunter
Profile: schizoid, INTJ, IQ145
08:29 AM on 10/10/2011
May be = never. We've learned this schtik already, thanks.
photo
celestialmotion
Everything has it's beauty,not everyone sees it
08:20 AM on 10/10/2011
When I read the headline " Wall street CEO's will be held liable " I could hear Stephen Colbert's voice and was waiting for the punchline.
Weird , wild.
photo
Inkosi
The gods themselves rage aginst stupidity
12:36 PM on 10/10/2011
As long as all that money is in politics, they will NEVER be held accountable for anything.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
zedthewizard
08:10 AM on 10/10/2011
MAY

sucks

i like

WILL BE