More

Identity Theft Bust Exposes Need For 'Smart' Credit Cards

Smart Credit Card Fraud

First Posted: 10/10/11 05:54 PM ET Updated: 12/10/11 05:12 AM ET

When authorities announced Friday that they had charged more than 100 people in a massive identity fraud operation, they did not just blame the alleged thieves. They also blamed the credit card companies.

At a press conference, Queens district attorney, Richard A. Brown, accused U.S. credit card companies of “putting too much money into marketing and not enough into security” and claimed they “would rather take the losses” than invest in proven security measures, according to The New York Times. Deputy Inspector Gregory T. Antonsen, the commander of the New York Police Department’s Identity Theft Squad, told reporters the bust showed the need for computer chips implanted in credit cards to deter fraud.

Experts say the United States is far behind Europe in adopting smart cards, which require cardholders to enter a personal identification number on a keypad, similar to a debit card transaction. Smart cards deter fraud because they contain computer chips that encrypt transaction information and require thieves to not only steal card data but also know the cardholder’s PIN, experts say. The card's computer chip also has the potential to generate one-time-only passwords for more secure online commerce, experts say.

"It makes it much harder to commit fraud," said David Robertson, publisher of The Nilson Report, an industry trade publication.

While European banks have issued millions of smart cards to consumers, U.S. banks still rely largely on credit cards with magnetic stripes, which are more vulnerable to thieves, experts say.

That partly explains why fraud in the United States accounted for a growing proportion of global fraud losses last year, according to a study issued by The Nilson Report last week. The U.S. loses 9 cents to fraud for every $100 worth of credit and debit card transactions, while the global average is 4.5 cents, according to Robertson.

U.S. banks have been reluctant to issue smart cards because it would require retailers to make expensive upgrades to their payment systems, which they have been reluctant to do, said John Hall, a spokesman for the American Bankers Association.

“The chip technology is certainly more secure but if you can’t use your chip card anywhere it doesn’t do anyone any good,” Hall said.

But that may start to change as credit card companies try to compel retailers to accept the new technology. In August, Visa announced that retailers who do not support smart cards by 2015 would be liable for fraudulent transactions. Meanwhile, MasterCard has said ATM owners must accept smart cards by 2013 or they will be liable for fraud stemming from their machines.

For retailers, smart cards are one of several new forms of payment that require expensive upgrades to their terminals, including payment systems that allow consumers to wave their mobile phones over a card reader, according to Joe LaRocca, senior asset protection adviser for the National Retail Federation.

The cost of transitioning about 15 million retail terminals to accept chip-based cards is between $12 billion and $15 billion, Robertson said. Retailers believe banks should help fund the conversion, LaRocca said.

The effort to compel retailers to accept chip-based credit cards represents a significant shift in the attitude of the credit card industry, Robertson said. Historically, card issuers have made such large profits that fraud was viewed as a cost of doing business, he said. But now, the credit card industry is becoming less profitable and fraud is becoming less accepted, he said.

The push also reflects a concern that thieves will increasingly focus on exposing vulnerabilities in magnetic-stripe credit cards in the United States as the rest of the world adopts the more secure smart cards, Robertson said.

Smart cards might have deterred the widespread fraud operation detailed Friday by authorities in New York, Robertson said. The crime ring, dubbed "Operation Swiper," involved thieves who posed as retail workers and used skimming devices to steal credit card data, then programmed that data into the magnetic stripes of blank credit cards, authorities said. The scheme netted an estimated $13 million in fraudulent purchases. New York police called it the largest identity theft bust in U.S. history.

However, smart cards may not be immune to hackers, either. Last year, researchers at Cambridge University found they could make a payment using a smart card without knowing the card’s PIN by using a device to intercept communications between the card and the terminal.

The researchers concluded that smart card technology “is seriously flawed” and “should be considered broken.”

FOLLOW HUFFPOST TECH

When authorities announced Friday that they had charged more than 100 people in a massive identity fraud operation, they did not just blame the alleged thieves. They also blamed the credit card compan...
When authorities announced Friday that they had charged more than 100 people in a massive identity fraud operation, they did not just blame the alleged thieves. They also blamed the credit card compan...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 129
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4  Next ›  Last »  (4 total)
12:02 AM on 11/22/2011
This is a company which has a Smart Card with Biometrics . There is a very informative Audio Interview by the CEO with a lot of facts. The size and scope of the needs with the heath care industry is amazing! http://www.equitygroups.com/stock-discussion/BSKS/
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rybalaw
04:13 PM on 10/13/2011
I am an attorney who represents numerous truck drivers on their traffic tickets. I often take their credit and debit cards over the phone as payment. I guess I will be put out of the traffic ticket business by these new rules.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
heboprotagonist
Excuse me, your caps lock is on. Please fix.
11:09 PM on 10/11/2011
I work retail. I had a guy the other day with a MasterCard that had a tiny display and keyboard built into it. He had to enter the amount of the transaction and a pin before it was swiped.

No extra technology required on the part of the retailer.

I guess that was an even "smarter" card.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
J P P
I think ergo I am agnostic and not conservative.
10:12 PM on 10/11/2011
Spain, for example, has had this stuff for years...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
wilray
50,000 Screaming Fans (Ignore that other number)
06:27 PM on 10/11/2011
I see that a number of people are confusing smart cards with RFID cards. They are not the same. First smart cards do not have a magnetic strip on them. To tell if you have a RFID card look on the card for something that looks like a radio wave. Smart cards actually have a computer microprocessor in them. So they are actually more like SIM cards, the card that many persons use for their wireless. With the SIM card when you go from one device to another all your updated information travels with you because the card itself has been update. The smart chip acts similarly. It is not a read only magnetic strip that is easily duplicated.

http://www.howstuffworks.com/question332.htm
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jmoser1973
It is what it is.
05:44 PM on 10/11/2011
Of course every system has a flaw and there is no hack proof system. Some of you are nitpicking. If the facts prove that there is far less theft with smart cards then we should make that move. This will keep the common thief from stealing your cards. I managed a convenient store for years and so many cards are stolen and used at the gas pumps. We had to install a program that prompts the pump to ask for the zip code when they use a card without PIN. Sounds good right? Well some people have had the card for years and moved a couple times and don't know which zipcode they need to use. In the age of paperless billing, people aren't as quick to change their address with these companies. So they complained to us about that. But that simple idea made a dramatic drop in theft out at the pumps.
Every little bit will help. If you would rather wait around for a full proof plan, then keep waiting.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
03:38 PM on 10/11/2011
The charges for "smart card" technology will be passed along to the consumer, just like everything else. I, for one, do not believe the technology is smart. If this is the same technology I read about previously, the smart card chips can be read through a pants pocket or regular purse/wallet by a thief standing close to you, and we've requested regular cards for most accounts.Metal card holders have been becoming more popular because of this flaw.

That said, CASH is becoming king again, anyway.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
wilray
50,000 Screaming Fans (Ignore that other number)
06:04 PM on 10/11/2011
No, it's not the same technology as RFID (radio frequency identification). RFID already exist within the U.S. For example Chase cards are RFID cards.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
03:06 PM on 10/11/2011
I'll be using cash, as I have been for the last five years after getting ripped off by credit card companies and banks.

My cell phone company used to do the same until I ditched them for Net10. MUCH better.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
03:01 PM on 10/11/2011
Smart credit cards? They don't mean "smart" in the sense of a benefit to YOU, but to credit card companies and corporate ad agencies who use all of your information to make more money from you.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jmoser1973
It is what it is.
05:35 PM on 10/11/2011
the credit card companies don't want to make the switch.
02:15 PM on 10/11/2011
See this video for an idea of exactly how "secure" RFID credit cards are:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X034R3yzDhw
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:14 PM on 10/11/2011
The fed gov should offer the infrastructure for electronic transactions. Letting a bank run this system puts a predator in the center of every transaction.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
03:02 PM on 10/11/2011
That is the DEFINITION of a banker - a predatory middleman.
02:13 PM on 10/11/2011
This article has its technology dangerously confused:

Adding PIN numbers to credit transactions is a good idea. However, it does NOT require "smart chips" in the cards, and would be fairly easy to implement with current equipment in most stores.

"Smart chips" aka RFID tags do NOT make things safer- in fact they make your information more vulnerable to be read wirelessly. Crooks can steal your credit card info without ever looking in your purse.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Aurealeus
A Little Off Center
02:08 PM on 10/11/2011
"U.S. banks have been reluctant to issue smart cards because it would require retailers to make expensive upgrades to their payment systems, which they have been reluctant to do, said John Hall, a spokesman for the American Bankers Association. "

"The cost of transitioning about 15 million retail terminals to accept chip-based cards is between $12 billion and $15 billion, Robertson said. Retailers believe banks should help fund the conversion," LaRocca said.
_______________________________________________________________________

I use a $12 (smart card) terminal everyday to access my secure government computer.

Now I'm no high-techie and I understand that there are underlying setup/startup cost in transitioning but I cannot understand why or how it would cost retailers (give or take) up to a million dollars per retail terminal to transition, when my smart card identifies me basicly the same way for around twelve bucks.
03:35 PM on 10/11/2011
do the math. divide 15 billion by 15 million. answer is not a million.
photo
thereisonlyoneparty
more amazing than you
01:11 PM on 10/11/2011
Smart cards are the future.

Oh yeah, and the technology has already been broken.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
OnandUpwards2011
12:49 PM on 10/11/2011
There is endemic of not only the credit card industry but all areas of the American banking system at large.

Investment in technology has high initially costs however the long term benefits always outweight those short term costs but unfortunately too many members of senior management have short termism tunnel vision and will not commit to these costs even if it provides better customer service and lowers costs in the long run. It's astonishing to me the lenghts these pathetic people will go to save a buck now even if it costs 20 later.

This isn't the only technology that's missing here: Basic things like inter-accounts transfers between two different banks online, pin pads for online banking users (so you are required to enter you pin using this pad making before any online purchases) all old news in Europe but no sign of them happening here....the American banking system here is just wayyyy too behind. It's really unfortunate.