More

Obama Jobs Plan Pitch: President Disconnects Rhetoric, Reality

Obama Jobs Plan

ERICA WERNER   10/10/11 07:04 PM ET   AP

WASHINGTON — In President Barack Obama's sales pitch for his jobs bill, there are two versions of reality: The one in his speeches and the one actually unfolding in Washington.

When Obama accuses Republicans of standing in the way of his nearly $450 billion plan, he ignores the fact that his own party has struggled to unite behind the proposal.

When the president says Republicans haven't explained what they oppose in the plan, he skips over the fact that Republicans who control the House actually have done that in detail.

And when he calls on Congress to "pass this bill now," he slides past the point that Democrats control the Senate and were never prepared to move immediately, given other priorities. Senators are expected to vote Tuesday on opening debate on the bill, a month after the president unveiled it with a call for its immediate passage.

To be sure, Obama is not the only one engaging in rhetorical excesses. But he is the president, and as such, his constant remarks on the bill draw the most attention and scrutiny.

The disconnect between what Obama says about his jobs bill and what stands as the political reality flow from his broader aim: to rally the public behind his cause and get Congress to act, or, if not, to pin blame on Republicans.

He is waging a campaign, one in which nuance and context and competing responses don't always fit in if they don't help make the case.

For example, when Obama says his jobs plan is made up of ideas that have historically had bipartisan support, he stops the point there. Not mentioned is that Republicans have never embraced the tax increases that he is proposing to cover the cost of his plan.

Likewise, from city to city, Obama is demanding that Congress act (he means Republicans) while it has been clear for weeks that the GOP will not support all of his bill, to say the least. Individual elements of it may well pass, such as Obama's proposal to extend and expand a payroll tax cut. But Republicans strongly oppose the president's proposed new spending and his plan to raise taxes on millionaires to pay for the package.

The fight over the legislative proposal has become something much bigger: a critical test of the president's powers of persuading the public heading into the 2012 presidential campaign, and of Republicans' ability to deny him a win and reap victory for themselves.

"He knows it's not going to pass. He's betting that voters won't pick up on it, or even if they do they will blame Congress and he can run against the `do-nothing Congress,'" said Sherry Bebitch Jeffe, a senior fellow at the University of Southern California's School of Policy, Planning and Development.

John Sides, political science professor at George Washington University, said Obama's approach on the jobs bill is "more about campaigning than governing."

"He's mostly just going around talking about this and drawing contrasts with what the Republicans want and what he wants and not really trying to work these legislative levers he might be able to use to get this passed," Sides said. "That just suggests to me that he is ready to use a failed jobs bill as a campaign message against the Republicans."

The president's opponents aren't exactly laying it all out, either.

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., tried to force a vote on the bill last week, innocently claiming that the president was entitled to one. McConnell knew full well that the result would be failure for the legislation and an embarrassment for Obama.

House Speaker John Boehner, meanwhile, claimed that Obama has "given up on the country and decided to campaign full-time" instead of seeking common ground with the GOP. But Boehner neglected to mention that Obama's past attempts at compromise with Republicans often yielded scant results, as Obama himself pointed out.

The approach for Obama, who is seeking a second term in a dismal economy, is far different than the one he took when running for president. He criticized the GOP then, but talked about ending blue-state and red-state America, replacing it with one America, fixing the broken political system, and fundamentally changing Washington.

That ended up being change he could not bring about, and now analysts say Obama may have little choice but to campaign more narrowly by attacking opponents rather than trying to bring people together.

Obama's attempts at compromise with the GOP on the debt ceiling and budget won him little in the way of policy, instead engendering frustration from Democrats who saw him as caving to Republican demands.

The new, combative Obama isn't looking for compromise. He's looking for a win. And if he can't get the legislative victory he says he wants, he has made clear that he's more than willing to take a political win.

It is, he acknowledges, a result his campaign for his jobs bill is designed to achieve.

Talking up the bill in an appearance last month with African-American news websites, Obama said: "I need people to be out there promoting this and pushing this and making sure that everybody understands the details of what this would mean, so that one of two things happen: Either Congress gets it done, or if Congress doesn't get it done, people know exactly what's holding it up."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON — In President Barack Obama's sales pitch for his jobs bill, there are two versions of reality: The one in his speeches and the one actually unfolding in Washington. When Obama accus...
WASHINGTON — In President Barack Obama's sales pitch for his jobs bill, there are two versions of reality: The one in his speeches and the one actually unfolding in Washington. When Obama accus...
Filed by Elyse Siegel  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 2,044
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (29 total)
  1 of 1  
COMMUNITY PUNDITS
Beatriz09 12:51 PM on 10/10/2011
Uh ... where to start, AP/HP? Imho, almost NOTHING is true in this article. First of all, when Obama says "pass this bill now", what he means, OF COURSE, is: start the usual congressional procedures in order to be able to pass it. That means: taking the time to rewrite the bill and create a House and Senate version of it, taking the time to negotiate the details of that version with the members of each  Read More...
07:55 PM on 10/11/2011
I stopped reading this article when it said something about Obama campaigning rather than governing.

So when he's the peacemaker he's soft and not a proper forceful president and when he takes a hard tone he's campaigning not governing.

I just feel like some criticism nowadays ain't even holdin up man....It all sounds like people are trying too hard to discredit this guy. With Bush, oh it was easy. With Clinton, we just got in his pants. But this guy....

I know a good nation must rely on self criticism of its institutions. But our self criticism is of the sixth grade "OMG Bobby'll never date me cause Im so fat!" type. You know what I mean?
photo
The Corporate Champion
Conservative, because someone's got to do the work
04:12 PM on 10/11/2011
Good article; one of the better ones I've read on this site.
12:02 PM on 10/11/2011
I keep hearing supporters of this "jobs bill" talking about employing teachers.

This is a great talking point because most everyone will agree that teachers are very important to our society and deserve our support and respect - just like policeman and firefighters. However, I don't hear anyone asking the question of whether we NEED more teachers than we have at this time. I have no doubt that just asking this question will create a firestorm, but I would like to know more about the need before we start talking about a cure.
10:20 AM on 10/11/2011
The true reality that the Presi dent is missing is the real problem with the economy. Yes people are upset because they lost jobs, but lost jobs are the result of a bad economy. The economy is driven by people having certainty and confidence in the future. The Presi dent believes that creating jobs will instill confidence and certainty which will get the economy moving. The problem with this belief is that it is backwards.

People first gain confidence and certainty. This brings about the feeling that they can safely spend more money, without worry of putting themselves into a financial bind. This increased spending is then translated into higher demand, which then turns into job creation.

The Presi dent has increased uncertainty and lower confidence with the health care bill and the increased government spending. The vast majority are affraid everyone's taxes will go up to pay for all of this. The jobs bill is just viewed as more government spending, higher deficits, and increased debt. To most Americans, this means even higher taxes to pay for everything. If this passes, the economy will slow down further, not grow.
08:13 AM on 10/11/2011
Wow Republicans have been stuck on this posting all night! To bad independents aren't! Lmao!
photo
ColoLibertarian
He can't lead a hungry dog to a bone
07:56 AM on 10/11/2011
This one termer has become so impresssed with himself that he believes that America is willing to accept his lies as truths.

Sorry _Barry, we deserve better.
07:49 AM on 10/11/2011
I don't whether the people have become more aware of political rhetoric when they hear it or that Obama is the first president that has made it so obvious.
07:47 AM on 10/11/2011
He needs to be DISCONNECTED from the White House. He has no leadership ability and no understanding of how to create policy that would bring about hope or change.
I guess we should have seen all the other things he has run and how we brush have done, problem is, this country is the FIRST thing he has ever been in charge of....we elected an incompetent individual. Doesn't matter how nice a guy he may be, he doesn't have the skill set to be POTUS.
photo
ColoLibertarian
He can't lead a hungry dog to a bone
07:59 AM on 10/11/2011
It will be a lomg, long time before Americans elect another former community organizer to anything importanat. lol
photo
guveqzero
Inventor and Innovator
07:31 AM on 10/11/2011
Not a very good critique of the situation. The jobs bill is essentially a conservative one, with no real progressive ideas. For Republicans to deny the bill is to show their true intentions, that they are not believers in their own policy. But, it also shows that Obama is not a progressive. He is right, however, to call them out and show that they are liars.
09:33 AM on 10/11/2011
Conservative? Put down the green man. extending ue handout for another year? Subsidizing jobs with taxpayer money? These are leftest, socialist dreams.
07:31 AM on 10/11/2011
Beatriz. How long did you stay awake to make up the "facts" in your post?

First, you say that Obama didn't really mean what he said. Do you forget he said "all or nothing"?
That has nothing to do with his bill being re-written.
Second, Romney isn't in Congress so his views on anything are irrelevant. Important to note, however, is the fact that Senate Democrats opposed closing the tax loopholes. That was the reason Reid replaced that portion of the bill.
While it is true that there are a few things in this bill that Republicans favor, Obama's "All or nothing" stance is the biggest obstacle in the passing of the bill. McConnell, in asking for immediate passage of the bill, was basically mocking the Senate Democrats for being opposed to closing tax loopholes, a completely opposite stance to what they want the public to view them in.
In summary, the article proves, yet again, that nothing Obama says can be believed.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
moland
Visualize Whirled Peas
07:41 AM on 10/11/2011
He never said "all or nothing." Your whole post is irrelevant.
09:35 AM on 10/11/2011
Yeah he did. We heard it.
06:27 PM on 10/11/2011
Huffington Post, 9/13/11:

"WASHINGTON -- The Obama White House is revising its initial unwillingness to negotiate on the president's job creation plan, saying now that if individual components of the bill came to the president's desk -- as opposed to the bill in its entirety -- he would sign them into law.

The new approach opens up the administration to charges that it no longer views the American Jobs Act as a take-it-or-leave-it bill. But in a briefing with reporters Tuesday, senior administration officials insisted President Obama wasn't backing off his position that he wants the entire bill passed through Congress."

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/09/13/obama-jobs-bill-plan_n_960100.html

“We want them to act now on this package. We’re not in a negotiation to break up the package – it’s not an ala carte menu.” - David Axelrod

I guess you can make the argument that Axelrod doesn't know what Obama wants.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
moland
Visualize Whirled Peas
07:13 AM on 10/11/2011
I would like to point out a couple of inaccuracies in this article:
"When Obama accuses Republicans of standing in the way of his nearly $450 billion plan, he ignores the fact that his own party has struggled to unite behind the proposal."

His own party is considering changes to the bill -- since when is that "standing in the way"?
On the other hand, Republicans have made a point of standing in the way of everything this president proposes that could win him marks politically -- things that could help Americans.

And this one: "...when Obama says his jobs plan is made up of ideas that have historically had bipartisan support, he stops the point there. Not mentioned is that Republicans have never embraced the tax increases that he is proposing to cover the cost of his plan."

Republicans have at times embraced (voted for) tax increases even on the rich, historically. Here's just a sample: http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&cd=1&ved=0CCEQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.cbsnews.com%2F8301-503544_162-20030729-503544.html&ei=oiCUTrHBDKPe0QG55JC-Bw&usg=AFQjCNFjpwu0Hj-pzawz6U9HoXuSQ3ojmg

Yes, of course, he is campaigning. Would anyone suggest he should just ask the GOP to help him get something done which may be seen as a great benefit to America ...that might help his re-election.
05:18 AM on 10/11/2011
It's funny how all the positives Obama does gets drowned out by the conservatives. Either Obama is simply shy or the conservatives just have better press. At any rate, the Democrats better start hammering on all the positives to stop the onslaught of negative press by the conservatives. I don't know how many times I've posted most of the positives Obama has done only to be retracted by some conservative who solely focuses on the negatives. The only major mistake Obama made was to extend the Bush tax cuts. That alone wasted 4 years of his presidency but he still managed to stop the free fall of the stock market. His stimulous didn't work because there's no revenue coming in because the conservatives won't allow it. If you listen to the conservatives now, they're starting to back pedal and trying to discretely sell the same plan Obama is calling for under a different name. If republicans don't admit taxes need to be raised, they have no business in public office because they're not really there to help we the people but we the wealthy. What also goes unnotice is the Republican states are the biggest drain on the economy because they won't raise taxes. They simply apply for federal aid to try and balance their budgets. Their cut, cap, and balance plan doesn't seem to be going to well in their states.
07:39 AM on 10/11/2011
You should really read your own post. For starters, Obama has NO positives regarding the economy. Even you admit that the stimulus was a failure, though how you conceive it to be the Republicans fault is beyond imagination. The stimulus was supposed to create jobs. Jobs would create revenue. It is not the fault of conservatives that the stimulus created no jobs. Obama was told beforehand that if he left things alone, the economy would rebound on its own. He refused to listen, wasted several hundred BILLION dollars and unemployment rose to over 9% where it remains.

As far as taxes needing to be raised, as much as I hate to say it, Obama has spent SO MUCH that, more than likely, taxes will have to be raised to fight the deficit, however, there certainly is no reason to raise them now, while he still has the power to spend at will. Wait until spending is reigned in, then see if we really need to raise taxes. After all, they best way to raise revenue is not to raise taxes, but to create jobs. Sadly, that seems to be something a community organizer knows nothing about.
10:58 PM on 10/11/2011
Too bad your so brainwashed, you are not thinking. If it weren't for Obama stepping in it would have been worse. Under Bush 700,000 jobs a month were being lost and the stocks were dropping. They begged for a stimulous. The problem was Obama extended the Bush tax cuts so he has to borrow to save the economy. You forgot about that part where Bush borrowed from China to pay for two wars to the tune of 10 billion a month for 7 years with no tax increases. I know, it's Obama's fault there's no money. You forgot about the fact that 4 trillion dollars less have been coming in thanks to Bush tax cuts while the war cost about 4 trillion. That's 8 trillion dollars the Bush tax cuts have cost this country because Bush had to borrow the money. Now we have China dictating to us how to run our foreign policy. Don't tell me Obama caused all this. The GOP and their short term money schemes caused this mess and they'll be out of office in 2012 by the droves. Prepare to open up your wallet or go to China.
PatrioticUSGlory
Lawyer, Market Analyst, Economist
05:06 AM on 10/11/2011
I could not find anything in the article that wasn't true.
photo
computedtomo
'Bout time this town had a new sheriff.
04:52 AM on 10/11/2011
A European study just concluded that the widespread use of marijuana may have actually caused a lower functional IQ in American liberals.
Wow! Tell me something I didn't know!
PatrioticUSGlory
Lawyer, Market Analyst, Economist
05:07 AM on 10/11/2011
Not all liberals smoke marijuana. And not all liberals believe destroying America is a prerequisite to "transforming" it into some kind of European progressive thing-a-ma-jig.
photo
computedtomo
'Bout time this town had a new sheriff.
04:46 AM on 10/11/2011
"In President Barack Obama's sales pitch for his jobs bill, there are two versions of reality: The one in his speeches and the one actually unfolding in Washington."
That sums up his entire presidency. What he has said, and what he has done are two very different things. The Great Divider.
PatrioticUSGlory
Lawyer, Market Analyst, Economist
05:08 AM on 10/11/2011
Investors Business Daily poll today finds 51% of Americans reject Obama.
07:40 AM on 10/11/2011
Only 51%? I do hope more Americans wake up before November 2012.
Iceneedle
Techie and educator
06:33 AM on 10/11/2011
I do not believe the President realizes the power of being an executive. He is using the same legislative powers as when he was a Senator. What the President has to do, in spite of Congress, is to promote a positive upbeat view of the economy. The people must believe there is a purpose and progress is being made. That is not happening. Government can't make jobs, but government CAN break up banks and make derivatives illegal. That is the power what the President can do, and in turn, would show the President and Congress are for the people.
07:42 AM on 10/11/2011
Where have you been? The President has been telling us since June, 2009 that the economy has been improving. People will start believing it when they go back to work and don't have so much time to catch all the news.