iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Pinkwashing For Breast Cancer Awareness Questioned

Breast Cancer Pink

KEVIN BEGOS   10/11/11 07:10 PM ET   AP

PITTSBURGH — The country is awash in pink for breast cancer awareness month – and some women are sick of it.

While no one is questioning the need to fight the deadly disease, some breast cancer advocates are starting to ask whether one of the most successful charity campaigns in recent history has lost its focus.

"The pink drives me nuts," said Cynthia Ryan, an 18-year survivor of breast cancer who also volunteers to help other women with the disease. "It's the cheeriness I can't stand."

Activists have even coined a new word: pinkwashing.

They say that's when a company or organization does a pink breast cancer promotion, but at the same time sells and profits from pink-theme products.

Some of the pink products have generated plenty of discussion among breast cancer advocates.

A Smith & Wesson 9mm handgun with pink pistol grip? The manufacturer says a "Portion of the Proceeds Will Be Donated to a Breast Cancer Awareness Charity."

You can get the "Pink Ribbon Combo" at Jersey Mike's Subs, or the Sephora Collection Pink Eyelash Curler. One year, there was a pink bucket of Kentucky Fried Chicken.

The San Francisco group Breast Cancer Action has led the campaign to question pink products, but executive director Karuna Jaggar said it isn't saying all such products are bad.

She said there's no doubt that when the pink ribbon campaigns started about 20 years ago there was still a great need to raise awareness.

"At one time, pink was the means," Jaggar said. "Now, it's almost become the end in itself. In its most simplistic forms, pink has become a distraction. You put a pink ribbon on it, people stop asking questions."

Breast cancer activists agree that the use of a ribbon to promote awareness evolved in stages. They note that in 1979 there were yellow ribbons for the American hostages in Iran; in 1990, AIDS activists used red ribbons to call attention to victims of that disease; and 1991 saw the first major use of the pink ribbon, when the Susan G. Komen Foundation gave them out at a New York City race for cancer survivors.

But the ribbon symbol may tie into a far older tradition, according to the American Folk Life Center at the Library of Congress. It notes that various versions of the song "Round Her Neck She Wore A Yellow Ribbon" have been popular for 400 years, all with the theme of displaying the ribbon for an absent loved one.

And it's clear that too many loved ones are still lost to the disease, despite many advances in diagnosis and treatment. The National Cancer Institute estimates that about 40,000 women will die of breast cancer this year, and 230,000 new cases will be diagnosed.

But Jaggar, of Breast Cancer Action, wonders whether more awareness is what's needed to reduce those numbers.

And Breast Cancer Action does take exception to products it considers potentially harmful – like a perfume the Komen Foundation introduced this year, "Promise Me." Jaggar said the perfume contains some possibly toxic or hazardous ingredients, and Breast Cancer Action asked that Komen discontinue its sale.

Federal regulatory agencies don't consider small amounts of those ingredients to be a threat, and Komen's scientific and medical advisers didn't believe there was any problem. But Komen said that to allay any concerns the next batch of "Promise Me" will be reformulated without the ingredients that were criticized.

Leslie Aun, a spokeswoman for Susan G. Komen for the Cure, based in Dallas, said the advocacy group isn't apologizing for all the pink.

"Research doesn't come cheap. We need to raise money and we're not apologetic about it," Aun said.

Komen, founded in 1982, has contributed $685 million to breast cancer research and $1.3 billion to community programs that help with mammograms, transportation and other needs, Aun said.

Komen would love not to have to do marketing, but that's simply not realistic, she said.

"We don't think there's enough pink. We're able to make those investments in research because of programs like that," Aun said.

Samantha King, a professor at Queens University in Ontario and author of the book Pink Ribbons Inc., said that at first people warned that she'd get hate mail for writing critically about the pink campaigns.

"And in fact the opposite was true," King said. "I had underestimated the level of alienation that many women felt."

King said she felt the Komen Foundation crossed the line a few years ago, when they partnered with KFC on the pink bucket of fast food.

"What's next, pink cigarettes for the cure?" King asked. "I think this really speaks to the fact that they've lost sight of their mission. Their primary purpose appears to be to sell products."

But perhaps not, said Ryan.

Over the last two years she's worked with homeless women who have breast cancer, in her hometown of Birmingham, Ala. Some of the women have an advanced stage of the disease, no health insurance and no place to call home. Yet when Ryan recently asked two of them what they wanted to help promote awareness among other homeless women, the response came quickly.

Pink handbags.

That answer promoted Ryan to take a hard look at her aversion to pink.

Now, she's not sure whether it's her place – or anyone else's – to proclaim that a particular pink-themed product is acceptable, or not.

"I'm conflicted," Ryan said, adding that she still worries that many people buy the pink products without really knowing where the money is going.

Jaggar said that different women will make a variety of choices. The point is to have them consider what the best choice is, instead of buying a pink product blindly.

For example, the lingerie company Aerie, based in Pittsburgh, draped thousands of bras on one of the many steel bridges in the city, to heighten awareness. Aerie said $1 from every sale during October will be donated to a breast cancer charity, up to $50,000.

Jaggar said that's the type of detail shoppers should pay attention to, and decide whether $1 out of a $20 or $30 sale is enough.

Jani Strand, a spokeswoman for Aerie's parent company, American Eagle Outfitters, said company officials feel strongly that it's a good thing to get young women talking about breast cancer.

Aerie's target audience is 20-year-old women, and Strand said the things that get that age group excited about a cause are different from what attracts older women.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST HEALTHY LIVING

PITTSBURGH — The country is awash in pink for breast cancer awareness month – and some women are sick of it. While no one is questioning the need to fight the deadly disease, some breast ...
PITTSBURGH — The country is awash in pink for breast cancer awareness month – and some women are sick of it. While no one is questioning the need to fight the deadly disease, some breast ...
Filed by Amanda L. Chan  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 16
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
xgomazx
I am We
07:11 AM on 10/17/2011
Even though I am a cancer survivor. And I can certainly empathize with anyone who has contracted any of the many forms of cancer. I outright refuse to either participate in, or donate to, this sexist awareness event.
Despite the fact that more men are both be diagnosed and die from prostate cancer then women will of breast Cancer we do not see nearly the publicity or support for prostate cancer as we do for breast cancer.
See many people wearing blue ribbons for a month or more at a time? Teams decked out in blue? TV ads? TV shows?
The media paying as much attention to it as breast cancer?
You dont and you wont because the publicity comparison isnt even close
This tells me we are supposed to value a womans life more then a mans?
So long as we value a womans life more then a mans I will not offer support to this almost gender specific event.
I will donate for cancer research. but you will never see me with a pink ribbon or writing a check for breast cancer specifically until the same amount of attention is paid to the mostly mens cancer as to the mostly womans cancer.
photo
Mary Aspinwall
Homeopathy lover and health educator
03:49 PM on 10/14/2011
Looking at the causes of cancer needs a lot of joined up thinking. I highly recommend a novel called "Gain" by Richard Powers if you want to make some sense of how the choices we made led us here.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
02:07 PM on 10/14/2011
I have breast cancer, treated and hopefully eradicated. There is nothing heroic, uplifting, inspirational or brave about me. I am not a role model for grit or determination, or any of those other qualities that seem to be applied breast cancer survivors whether or not they fit. And believe me there were times when I was anything but brave, or inspirational, or even gracious about my predicament. I'm not a hero, I'm just an unlucky woman who happened to develop a nasty disease through no fault of her own, and who is dealing with the fallout as best she can. Stop with all of the pink ribbons and all of the rest of the hoopla around breast cancer. Though well-intentioned, it elevates this disease to some sort of glamorous and trendy "rock star" status among diseases, and categorizes me as one of its groupies. I refuse to be defined by this disease, and I don't want to "marked" by pink ribbons as one of it's victims. I am so much more than the sum of some cells gone crazy. The commercialization of breast cancer benefits the companies selling products, I'm not so sure it benefits me or women like me.
02:07 PM on 10/14/2011
I am going to have to admit that I have been a bit oblivious of this concept that makes complete sense! While I just learned the idea pf "pinkwashing" I did normally avoid those products that falsely claim that they are in support of a cause yet did not have much revenue going towards the cause. I do like the idea of companies using production costs to donate rather than create these pink products but that is a highly idealistic thought. Hopefully through educating people in the importance of being aware of cancer awareness they can get the idea that because a product claims to be in support does not mean the proceeds are going to support....the Hello Ladies have created a pretty great list on the ways in which to observe breast cancer month, and if anyone has any other ideas in doing so that do not involve supporting false pink products I highly recommend suggesting it > http://www.skinnyscoop.com/list/hello_ladies/ways-to-observe-breast-cancer-awareness-month
nancynancy
Atheist.
01:56 PM on 10/13/2011
It's time to take down the pink ribbons and end breast cancer awareness month. It is a myth that early detection "saves lives." The result of a quarter of a century of Breast Cancer Awareness Month is that breast cancer is overtested, overdiagnosed and overtreated.
01:53 PM on 10/13/2011
it's the most popular color choice amongst women, is it not? not surprising that people would see a huge cash cow possibility out of this. it's wrong, but in this society greed trumps all, every time.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
db025
10:04 PM on 10/12/2011
Can't wait to see what colors they come up with for the big campaigns against prostate, colon, and testicular cancers.

OH, wait!

Maybe I can.
11:35 AM on 10/12/2011
If all the companies that chunk their pink stuff into the world instead donated the production cost to the appropriate fund, would we not be further ahead in finding the cure? Because I think the "Breast Cancer Awareness" campaign has been sucessful. I get it. It is hard to imagine anyone who has not got it. It's kind of hard to imagine any one of these companies that have pink stuff on the market have not got it...in the form of money in their pockets. I think the pink stuff is desensitizing the issue which is that women are dying....May God have grace on them all.
11:23 AM on 10/12/2011
I really agree with the author, but it really applies to a lot of so called fundraising work. There are some big organizations or businesses that advertise as giving a portion of all profits to a charity, but when you read the fine print or do some research, they hardly give anything to the cause and it is just really a way to increase their own sales. Like McD's says they give a portion of every happy meal to support Ronald McDonald Houses for the Children's Hospitals, but when you read the fine print, they really only give ONE PENNY FOR EACH MEAL- even my little kids thought that was pretty stingy! It does turn you off from wanting to donate to certain causes when you find out that certain causes with big name celebrity type advocates that are supposed to support different things, and more than 75% is going to the celebrity for being the spokes person. I know of at least one big name organization that does this in the name of fundraising for a child's disease.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Daliah Davis
What!
08:56 AM on 10/12/2011
I just wish all the other cancer's had as much attention as Breast Cancer does, it's not the only cancer that kills!!!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:27 AM on 10/12/2011
I absolutely agree with you! I have always hated that breast cancer is the only cancer highlighted, save prostate cancer for men....My mother actually is just finishing treatment for breast cancer and she past a display this weekend of all pink things and said she hates that this cancer is the only one getting support. She is also a survivor of colon cancer. CANCER needs to be researched...period. One is NOT more important than another.
07:59 AM on 10/13/2011
That is so true. Most people don't even know that lung cancer kills many more women each year than breast cancer does, or that the #1 killer of women is heart disease. In the competition for
fundraising dollars, these facts are obscured. Susan B. Komen Foundation has done a tremendous job of raising money for this particular cause, but one result is that everyone now thinks that breast cancer is the biggest problem out there.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
altheschrod
I'm pedaling hard.
06:30 AM on 10/12/2011
So far I haven't seen any reference to the fact that most white womens boobs have pink nipples--which goes along with the campaign.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Sharon Hanson
Skeptical of the *pseudo-skeptics*
01:54 AM on 10/12/2011
Today I saw a mention of the Komen Foundation and declined to buy the product. It was pink too. I am refusing to buy anything associated with the corrupt marketing and exploitation of women from now on. After watching Cut Poison Burn I will not donate to these insatiable organizations that will not support a cure or as another mentions help to prevent cancer. The trillion dollar cancer industrial complex is being exposed and I am glad. Next it's Washington where we can work to dismantle the FDA or at least reel them in.
10:32 PM on 10/11/2011
As a victim of breast cancer myself, I feel that the line needs to be drawn with toxic substances being used such as perfume or KFC. The focus needs to be on PREVENTION but because cancer is a huge money maker, the focus is on TREATMENT. My own experience has shown me that if I want to prevent cancer in my body, I need to educate myself and take action. Iodine deficiency is the number one cause of breast and thyroid cancer in this country. I hope people will educate themselves on the tragedy of the American diet and the conspiracy perpetrated on us by the pharmaceutical companies.
08:14 PM on 10/11/2011
Enough is enough already with the pink stuff. As if any of these so-called participating companies really contribute much to beast cancer research. Most of the money is going into their pockets for these dumb products. It's embarrassing to any grown up person with a real health problem.