More

HuffPost Social Reading

Facebook, Google, Twitter Get In On Election 2012 Action

By BETH FOUHY   10/11/11 08:54 AM ET  AP

NEW YORK -- Social media companies have "friended" the 2012 presidential contest at a level almost unimaginable just four years ago, hosting debates and sponsoring presidential town halls while remaining indispensable tools for candidates looking to connect with voters in the digital sphere.

Giants like Facebook and Google cast their involvement as civic engagement, saying they are eager to help facilitate the national political conversation and encourage people to vote. But their stepped-up political presence comes as those companies and others hire lobbyists, form political action committees and nurture their relationships with lawmakers whose policy decisions affect the companies' bottom line.

"The exposure – being branded as `the' place to go for social media – has huge economic consequences for these companies," said Heather LaMarre, a journalism professor at the University of Minnesota who studies politics and the Internet. "When they appear to be socially active and engaged in democracy, they develop a vast well of good will with the political elites who have the ability to make or break them in the future."

Facebook, by far the largest and most influential of the online social networks, formed a PAC this month to make contributions to candidates. The company also spent $550,000 for 21 lobbyists in the first half of this year to help it navigate potential legislative battles over privacy, patent and regulatory issues. That figure is small compared to other media companies of its size, but well on its way to double the $350,000 it spent in all of 2010, according to the Center for Responsive Politics, which studies political money and influence.

At the same time, Facebook has boosted its visibility in the presidential contest. The company is scheduled to co-host a Republican primary debate in New Hampshire with NBC's Meet the Press show days before that state's first in the nation primary. Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg interviewed Obama at the company's Silicon Valley headquarters last April.

The company is stocked with political veterans. Sheryl Sandberg, Facebook's chief operating officer, worked for then-Treasury Secretary Larry Summers under President Bill Clinton. The company also recently hired Joel Kaplan, a former domestic policy adviser to Republican President George W. Bush, to head its public policy office in Washington.

Showcasing both sides of the political divide has helped Facebook stress its neutrality. "The color of the site is blue, but the color of the company is definitely purple," Facebook spokesman Andrew Noyes said.

Google, the leading Internet search company, has spent $3.5 million on lobbying so far this year while its PAC contributed $345,000 to candidates in 2010. It, too, has become a prominent player in the presidential race, cohosting a GOP primary debate with Fox News in September and planning another with public television and the Des Moines Register before the Iowa caucuses.

Paid political advertising on Google, already popular in 2008, surged in 2010 after Republican Scott Brown's strategic use of Google ads helped fuel his upset victory in a special election to replace the late Democratic Sen. Ted Kennedy.

Google, like Facebook, does not want to be viewed as partisan. "Our products aren't political, it's about connecting voters to information," spokesman Jake Parrillo said.

YouTube, the popular video sharing site owned by Google, has also boosted its political profile. The company this week launched a dedicated politics channel where users can watch campaign-related videos and compare candidates' statistics, like which one has the most video views, subscribers and shares.

Ramya Raghavan, news and politics manager at YouTube, said viewers can expect candidates to do more live streaming of campaign events on the site and posting episodic content, almost like a television series.

Twitter, barely a player in the 2008 campaign, has become a go-to digital hub for political conversation in 140-character bursts.

Obama and all the GOP presidential candidates have Twitter accounts, as do 85 senators and at least 360 House members. Former New York Democratic Rep. Anthony Weiner even saw his career unravel over Twitter, after sending a sexually suggestive photo to a woman using the site.

Twitter does not lobby yet or have a PAC, but has begun to ramp up its political and policy presence in Washington. The company recently hired Colin Crowell, who recently worked as senior counsel to Federal Communications Commission Chairman Julius Genachowski, to run its global public policy division. Adam Sharp, a former Democratic staffer on Capitol Hill, has worked with members of Congress to use Twitter more effectively.

Twitter recently began to accept paid political advertising, which will appear in users' Twitter feeds with a purple icon that includes information about who purchased the ad.

Twitter's political influence was all but cemented in July when Obama sat for a live Twitter town hall at the White House. He began by tweeting a question – "In order to reduce the deficit, what costs would you cut and what investments would you keep?" and replied to questions submitted to him through the site.

LaMarre of the University of Minnesota noted that a presidential visit to Twitter or Republicans participating in a Facebook-sponsored debate was essentially "picking winners and losers in the industry."

She added, "It's not intentional, they're the popular sites and it's where the people are now. But there are hundreds of social networking sites out there. By partnering with the big ones, politicians reinforce these companies as institutions."

Sam Weston, a digital communications specialist who has worked in Democratic campaigns, said social network sites were interested in presidential politics as much for the coolness factor as for business reasons.

"For all these companies, the primary reason is cultural relevance," Weston said. "This will be one of the most discussed topics of the next year. It makes sense for them as they pursue their own agenda, to be the primary place where people talk about politics."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST TECH

NEW YORK -- Social media companies have "friended" the 2012 presidential contest at a level almost unimaginable just four years ago, hosting debates and sponsoring presidential town halls while remain...
NEW YORK -- Social media companies have "friended" the 2012 presidential contest at a level almost unimaginable just four years ago, hosting debates and sponsoring presidential town halls while remain...
Filed by Catharine Smith  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 47
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
05:55 AM on 10/12/2011
I am hoping that ITMTF Intertainment Media INC would ventures in to this. FaceBook to but it politely is really bad. I think that any Company could replace Facebook at anytime.
A matter of fact I think FaceBook has screwed up my IE Browser and I would like it removed from there
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
03:13 AM on 10/12/2011
Getta outta my face, Facebook!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
BudMax77
It's okay to be "The Last Angry Man!"~
01:02 AM on 10/12/2011
I don't claim to know much, but I'm 80 years old and have been voting regularly since age 21. The only time in my life that I actually chose a winner was during the second administration of Ronald Reagan......and that was when I lost my life savings out in California due to the S & L fiasco, I've never really liked politicians of any ilk, but after that devastating blow to a lifetime of hard work just makes me hate their lousy guts. I'm hoping and praying these young folks occupying Wall St. will get recognition and bring some semblance of power back to the people.
11:34 PM on 10/11/2011
Facebook will have no influence on me in this election. When one works professionally wth felons, being on facebook can be a danger to both self and family.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
election2012
An independent voice for the greater good.
09:30 PM on 10/11/2011
Earlier in the year I predicted that Social Media will have a increasing impact on upcoming elections - based on research that sites like LinkedIn, Facebook and Twitter boast some of the most politically active subscribers.

Sites like Facebook have the potential to engage more people in the democratic process and, perhaps, ultimately increase voter registration and turnout.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mary katzianer1963
08:28 PM on 10/11/2011
OBAMA HAS THIS GENERATION BELIEVING THAT THEY ARE IN CONTROL. THEY ARE THE MOST IGNORANT GENERATION. GO AHEAD VOTE FOR ANOTHER MISTAKE(OBAMA) BECAUSE YOU BELIEVE IN HIS LIES.OR IF YOU REALLY WANT TO CHANGE THE WORLD MAKE THE CHANGE TO SOMEONE WHO ISN'T A POLITICAL MESS .HERMAN CAIN IN 2012
photo
Marxistslayer
Tempest in a TEA POT!
10:49 PM on 10/11/2011
You go girl! Raising Cain 999- 2012!
08:11 PM on 10/11/2011
I really think your the fool if you don't because if your not rich your in the same catagory.
07:06 PM on 10/11/2011
once again the ignorance and stupidity of the country is shown
thatgirljd
It must be really easy to be a liberal!
07:04 PM on 10/11/2011
Obama got the younger generation vote, that is why this country is so screwed up. People shouldnt be able to vote until they have paid taxes for 10 years!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
roadking01
a dem trying to make a difference
06:24 PM on 10/11/2011
well i post on hp,fb,and twitter but i still can't get any damn badges...rolmao. all dems please vote in 2012.
07:05 PM on 10/11/2011
why so can make another great mistake like in 2008?
photo
Marxistslayer
Tempest in a TEA POT!
10:51 PM on 10/11/2011
roadie, quit twittering you twitt!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PtaRay
Admitted liberal, defender of the fringe democracy
06:15 PM on 10/11/2011
The bottom line is MORE AMERICANS MUST GET INVOLVED IN THEIR GOVERNMENTS ELECTIVE PROCESS.
oBAMA ASKED FOR OUR VOICES.. HE GOT EM.
Now America, what do you do with your voice now you seem to be using it.
We know the tea party and the GOP are radocalized and they want to mandate your womens rigfhts, they want to ban contraceptives, they want to kill your voice in the work place.
Wall street stole your retirement funds, took tax money to pay off their scams and now they blame you who speak out of anger for being a mob?
moving money from stack to stack is not narion productivity, it is personal wealth and hoarding.

fair tax policies and healthcare costs, remove the profit schemes using sick people as human capital. AND GET RID OF THE SCAM WE HAVE CALLED "CITIZEN UNITED".
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
06:35 PM on 10/11/2011
No one wants to ban contraceptives.

No one wants to kill your voice in the work place.

You put your money in the stock market, it's not a sure thing.

Can't argue with the bailouts.

I'm a single individual, I own shares, I love that my voice is amplified by allowing those companies I own shares in to have the ability to yell about policies which will increase their business profits and in turn my share price.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PtaRay
Admitted liberal, defender of the fringe democracy
08:02 PM on 10/11/2011
making dollars at the expense of an entire nation is immoral. One needs extra capital to invest in the markets or stocks. most do not have it, too busy eating!!
but I get the need for greed, as the new morality is fee based as is the American dream.
That's why those who have right now can hate so easily those who have been robbed by finacial abuse and the stealing of the tax pater funds by wall street.
but I get your deisre to defend those who buy your allegiance with greenbacks.
06:37 PM on 10/11/2011
sure he asked for our voices but he hasnt changed his stripes one bit....obama is a two bit thug...............leave him in another term and we wont have a country left...he has just about destroyed it....................just look at our economy.....look at the filth on wall street....................look at YOUR CHECKBOOK.....check your taxes in the near future.....

you are NOT better off....socialism NEVER WORKS................period....
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jcajunque
07:03 PM on 10/11/2011
Please tell me WHERE you get this stuff from. Do you know what socilaism is? Obama didn't destroy our economic system, All the past Congresses that passed legislation allowing the deregulation of the financial markets and allow US companies to take all their manufacturing overseas, then bring the goods back into this country to sell them but still be US companies did that. Obama walked into a mess. If McCain had won the election he would have had the same mess. BUT then the Repubs & Tea Party would have worked withe him. Where are the jobs that were going to be created with the FIRST tax cuts for millionaires? Banks keep merging until they are too big to fail. Congresses past allowed that.
07:15 PM on 10/11/2011
My checkbook is fine, my taxes are lower under Obama, and I am working a lot of overtime. As for the filth on wall street? Wall Street are the GOP/TP's favorite people. They are there to make as much money as they can in the shortest amount of time as they can and if they run somebody over making money then so what? To these people money IS their God. The more of it they have the happier they are. They base success on the size of their bank account and how many homes they have and how many yatchs the have and how many toys they have. They don't give a rat's ass about anything or anybody else except money.
But to be honest, I am doing much better under Obama than under Bush.
05:08 PM on 10/11/2011
Watched a television show called, Facebook Obsession. It was stated that Facebook, generated five hundred million for Obama's last campaign. I've never been a real fan of Facebook, and that little bit of information solidified my disike of that site, into hate.
04:10 PM on 10/11/2011
With all the OWS out there these days, this article only gets 5 comments?? This is exactly what they are fighting against!!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
n2oil2552
james
03:56 PM on 10/11/2011
Im hoping that the ....I voted for Obama crowd because my BFF did, doesnt show for the 2012 election, he fooled lots of us who have been voting for along time, but not again!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
decaturdog
Gentleman living in Atlanta
04:36 PM on 10/11/2011
Only you, fool, were fooled - hope you like your crow well donw!
06:30 PM on 10/11/2011
Might come from blindly believing what you read here. Try using some common sense next time.
02:52 PM on 10/11/2011
OWS? sick-em....