iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Apollo 20 Initial Results Show Rising Math Scores, But Questions Remain

Roland Fryer Apollo 20

First Posted: 10/12/11 04:32 PM ET Updated: 12/12/11 05:12 AM ET

An ambitious experiment created by Harvard economist Roland Fryer to export and scale the practices of high-performing charter school chains to public schools in Houston appears to be bearing early fruit, according to Fryer's findings in a recent report. But the results are preliminary, and the method has its critics.

The three-year project, called Apollo 20, is focused on turning around nine low-performing public schools in Houston using five practices Fryer found to be effective in New York's top charter schools. Apollo 20 aims to close the black-white achievement gap, and, as Fryer said during a presentation made in Houston, "boil down charter school successes into translatable, scalable practices for public schools."

"When charters were first established, there were two goals: to educate kids in bad schools and be an incubator for best practices," Fryer told The Huffington Post. "This paper shows that can be effective in a short time."

"Have we closed the achievement gap?" he continued. "Of course not."

First-year test scores in Apollo 20's schools showed some gains, with an increase in standard deviations of .234 in middle school math and .368 in high school math. But the program had little effect on reading scores.

"I've been in education a long time," Houston Independent School District Superintendent Terry Grier told HuffPost. "I've never seen that type of progress in one year," he said of the math score improvement.

The Apollo 20 study comes as economists and educators alike seek cost-friendly solutions to improving low-performing urban schools, turning to charter schools for recipes for success.

Charter schools are often touted for allowing more innovation than traditional public schools, and charters such as KIPP and Harlem Children's Zone often send to college some students who otherwise would have had few chances at success.

These schools follow a strain of philosophy known as "no excuses": In the words of New York Times columnist David Brooks, they "create a disciplined, orderly and demanding counterculture to inculcate middle-class values."

Apollo 20 aims to replicate the successes of this educational philosophy -- without the charter school structure. Fryer isolated five factors he found successful in "no excuses" charter schools to replicate in Houston: extended learning time; changes in leadership and teaching staff; extensive tutoring; a data-driven approach to teaching; and a culture of high expectations.

While Apollo 20 stresses these practices, some criticize them for being too punitive and discipline-oriented.

"The 'no excuses' philosophy, with its discipline-based approach, assumes that the parents who are receiving this treatment have lost faith in the utility of education, or that somehow they're unmotivated and they've walked away from schooling their kids," said Luis Huerta, a professor at Columbia University's Teachers College.

Fryer presents his strategies as a cost-effective alternative to more standard interventions to close the achievement gap, such as class size reduction. Those interventions, Fryer wrote, produce "a fraction of the impact of our fully loaded treatment."

Apollo 20 schools receive $2,042 more in funding per student than local public schools. The project is financed by government grants and an extra $14.4 million from private donors.

The project began after Grier, at the beginning of his tenure in Houston in early 2010, learned that several schools in his district were failing at a rate that required them to implement federally-mandated turnaround plans.

"One of the options was to lock doors and let the students go elsewhere. I thought, we don't want to do that," Grier said. Another option was to turn them over to charter school chains, but the best ones, Grier said, wanted to start schools from scratch. So he began searching for successful turnaround plans that could be accomplished within the parameters of traditional public schools.

But he had little success until one of his associates asked Grier if he'd heard of Fryer. "I read around, called his phone. I said, 'Would you be willing to partner with us to see if we could turn around nine schools?" Grier recalled.

The next day, Fryer flew down to meet Grier in Houston. That meeting led to the founding of Apollo 20, which now serves 7,000 kids in nine schools. The program included hiring nine new principals, replacing more than half of the targeted schools' teachers with new ones (who were screened for embodying the "no excuses" philosophy) and hiring 257 tutors.

Now, Fryer said, "the biggest limit to scalability is the supply curve." For example, "It took us forever to find nine principals that we thought had the 'no excuses' philosophy."

But Gary Miron, a professor at Western Michigan University's College of Education, worries that the "no excuses" philosophy drives some students out. Miron noted Apollo 20 had built on the KIPP model. "One of the concerns about KIPP is that so many students are leaving," he said.

Grier said Apollo 20 schools lost between 2 and 3 percent of their students last year. He blames that loss on bad publicity.

"That's because this was being promoted by the critics of the program as being punitive," Grier said. "We're seeing these schools' [enrollment] level off."

Huerta, the Columbia Teachers College professor, said he was unsure whether Fryer's five ingredients for charter school-style effectiveness were what actually made the charter schools successful to begin with.

"It's important to separate the marketing hype -- that these organizations have used to self-promote their franchises about what they claim makes them effective -- from the actual practices that may actually make a difference in raising students' learning curves," Huerta said.

Fryer countered that his ingredients accounted for 40 percent of variance between charter and public schools in his earlier New York-based charter study. "Let's figure out what's the most effective for kids," Fryer said. "I don't want to have coffee shop debates of what might be."

"I think we're onto something, but this is just the end of year one," Grier said. "We're seeing an uptick in students' attitudes. They're having hope again."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST EDUCATION

An ambitious experiment created by Harvard economist Roland Fryer to export and scale the practices of high-performing charter school chains to public schools in Houston appears to be bearing early fr...
An ambitious experiment created by Harvard economist Roland Fryer to export and scale the practices of high-performing charter school chains to public schools in Houston appears to be bearing early fr...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 10
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
William Anton Lee
|Thesis|Antithesis|Thesis| ... Cognitive Evolution
06:12 PM on 10/16/2011
Apollo 20 aims to replicate the success of a specific charter school model called the No Excuses Charter School Model without the charter school structure. Nicely done. The application of scientific principles rather than fear of considered, tested structural change. These changes are five factors:

> extended learning time;
> keeping/hiring staff skilled and committed to the "no excuse" approach;
> extensive tutoring by skilled tutors supplementing teaching staff;
> a data-driven approach to teaching; and
> a culture of high expectations.

This endeavor requires additional sources of funding, as explained here as schools receiving $2,042 more in funding per student than local public schools financed by government grants and an extra $14.4 million from private donors. I'm reminded of Mark Cuban's response when asked should folks at his income level pay more taxes, his response was telling. While I'm paraphrasing, he said yes with the strong caveat that the additional revenues be spent smartly unlike aspects of some current government programs. I'm betting the private donors contributing to the above endeavor feel this is money well spent, both public and private.

One point of concern would naturally be false positives due to a Hawthorne-type Effect. That said, it's encouraging to hear Superintendent Grier conservatively advising this is only year one. With a head up, data driven approach I'm betting continued success is probable.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
12:59 PM on 10/23/2011
So how is this cost effective and scalable, which is the goal of the study?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
William Anton Lee
|Thesis|Antithesis|Thesis| ... Cognitive Evolution
08:18 PM on 10/26/2011
Took a break and missed your response, my apologies.

I'm encouraged to see results. I'm encouraged to see these changes being taken within the public school structure. I'm encouraged to see private sector monies willing to be spent on public education in these very tight economic times. I'm encouraged to hear people like Cuban say people with money would agree to tax increases to cover successful, cost effective programs. All of these components make this scalable. The natural follow-up to all of this would be are there other federal and state programs that are not effective which would best be ended and every dollar once spent on them moved into programs styled after this. My educated guess is yes. My equally educated guess is folks in these less effective programs are in self preservation mode; and on the flipside, the money hawks are way to quick to steal more money from education budgets in order to pay for other government programs whose long-term benefits to society are not near as consequential as education.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
GlennWatson
Two million fans
09:19 AM on 10/13/2011
"Apollo 20 schools receive $2,042 more in funding per student than local public schools. The project is financed by government grants and an extra $14.4 million from private donors."

I'm sorry but how is that scalable? Are we planning to do this with every school?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
grammasher
08:52 PM on 10/12/2011
"Apollo 20 schools receive $2,042 more in funding per student than local public schools." So, when we talk about public schools, we hear, "Throwing more money at schools isn't the answer," but we seem to think it's the answer for charter schools?

". . .which now serves 7,000 kids in nine schools." Is it just possible that schools can be more successful if they aren't so big?

I have no problems with the "no excuses" approach (as a teacher, I used it all the time), but I think there's more to the apparent success of these school.
07:27 PM on 10/12/2011
What exactly is "punitive" about 'no excuses' schools? Is it the high expectations for kids and adults alike? Is it the extended learning opportunities that allow kids who are several grades behind to begin to catch up? Is it the recognition that an orderly school environment is a precondition for learning to take place?

Seriously, I'll tell you what is punitive -- consigning kids to poor-performing schools where they fall further and further behind every year and end up on a path to poverty, prison, or worse.

Kudos to Mr. Fryer for trying something to transform schools that have failed kids for years and years.
04:13 PM on 10/14/2011
I am currently working in a poor-performing school, and I really understand how you feel. What I fail to hear and read about in conversations is social ills that children bring to school. In my case, we have students that are homeless. Some are under DHR care. Many are living in the projects. A few of them are being raised under extreme conditions. The hardworking parents are too tired to show up. Some parents are fearful of schools. There have been five different principle withing the last seven years. Kids are emulated what they see in the streets. For example, we have K-3 children cursing like adults. Place all of these ills upon the shoulders of an mediocre teacher, a good teacher, or new teacher, then, of course, you may have a recipe for failure. There are so many factors that coincide with labeling schools poor or functional. The children are not at fault for these conditions. All major research shows that parental involvement is absent in poor-performing schools. Schools with higher parental involvement do better. Parents of charter schooled children are hands-on parents that have high exceptations, and those home values influence, and thus, motivated charter students to learn. These students are being nurtured in an environment where peers, parents, and teachers have the same goals---success is life.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
01:07 PM on 10/23/2011
What is punitive about these no excuses schools and thousands of others that are held hostage by high-stakes testing, is that math and english are pushed at the expense of other subjects. Where are the classes and programs that inspire the youth? What has happened to the culinary, electronics, computer, autoshop and woodshop programs? Why is extra money not being spent on these things? In California, at least, these programs were sacrifice for the good of the test. That is the real punishment.
07:17 PM on 10/12/2011
Parents are "unmotivated and they've walked away from schooling their kids"...that sums up much of what is wrong in schools.
04:28 PM on 10/12/2011
There is nothing more punitive than wasted potential or students relegated to lives of poverty. Changing administrators, raising expectations, demanding effort...looks like shades of Michelle Rhee to me.

The supply of suitable administrators is bound to be miniscule. Career administrators know you get ahead by making lemonade and image management. This has to stop…