More

Areva Idaho Uranium Plant: French Company Granted Federal License By Nuclear Regulatory Commission

JOHN MILLER   10/12/11 09:31 PM ET   AP

BOISE, Idaho — France's state-owned nuclear reactor builder on Wednesday won a U.S. license to build and operate a gas centrifuge uranium enrichment plant in Idaho, a key step in the company's plans to expand production of nuclear fuel in the United States.

The federal Nuclear Regulatory Commission's license for the $3 billion Eagle Rock Enrichment Facility authorizes Areva SA to enrich uranium for use in the manufacture of nuclear fuel for commercial power reactors. The project could supply 104 U.S. nuclear power plants, company spokesman Jarret Adams said.

The plant near Idaho Falls could be in operation by 2014, but Areva hasn't given final word on when construction will begin. That's because an ongoing review of planned capital investments by new Chief Executive Officer Luc Oursel and his management team has put a final decision on hold.

A vote on whether to begin building the plant in 2012 is due by Dec. 31, said Adams, who is based in Bethesda, Md.

The facility's full output would cover about a quarter of demand from U.S. nuclear power plants, although Areva does have competition. A newly built enrichment plant operated by Urenco USA in New Mexico is up and running, with the NRC in August giving the go-ahead for the facility to double its capacity to process nuclear fuel.

Areva's project previously received a $2 billion loan guarantee from the U.S. Department of Energy.

Nuclear power opponents who have been fighting the enrichment plant since Areva won tax concessions from the 2008 Idaho Legislature contend there's already plenty of nuclear fuel in the U.S. The Snake River Alliance also points to Germany's and Switzerland's separate decisions to phase out nuclear energy by 2022 following the meltdown in Japan earlier this year.

"There is not, never has been and never will be a need for this dangerous uranium enrichment factory," alliance executive director Liz Woodruff said. "There is an ample supply of enriched uranium worldwide today and the government has seriously miscalculated the need for more of it."

The NRC said it will inspect Areva's site during construction.

Republican U.S. Rep. Mike Simpson, who represents the district where the plant will be built, said Areva has a strong safety record.

"The technology that Eagle Rock will use has been well proven in numerous locations in the United States and Europe," he said.

He added that the plant will create hundreds of new jobs for eastern Idaho. The desert region just southwest of Yellowstone National Park is already home to the Idaho National Laboratory, where employees since 1949 have conducted research into nuclear energy and still work on projects ranging from national defense to next-generation nuclear reactors.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST GREEN

BOISE, Idaho — France's state-owned nuclear reactor builder on Wednesday won a U.S. license to build and operate a gas centrifuge uranium enrichment plant in Idaho, a key step in the company's p...
BOISE, Idaho — France's state-owned nuclear reactor builder on Wednesday won a U.S. license to build and operate a gas centrifuge uranium enrichment plant in Idaho, a key step in the company's p...
Filed by Chris Gentilviso  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 37
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
PoloniumMan
"It worked." J. Robert Oppenheimer
08:18 AM on 10/14/2011
The nuclear industry is going to provide customers 3,000 MW of additional capacity without building a single reactor. This is being accomplished by switching from gaseous diffusion enrichment to gas centrifuge; the latter being much more efficient process.
photo
PoloniumMan
"It worked." J. Robert Oppenheimer
08:14 AM on 10/14/2011
Makes sense for the French to enrich the uranium here in the US. Enrichment requires a lot of electricity and they would rather use our cheaper electricity here in the US to enrich and sell their nuclear generated electricity to the Germans.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Joffan
Time is an illusion. Lunchtime doubly so.
01:04 PM on 10/14/2011
The French enrich their domestic uranium (and more) cheaply at a dedicated nuclear-powered enrichment plant in France, Georges Besse. This was diffusion-based but is being replaced by Georges Besse II to use centrifuge technology - thereby freeing up roughly two reactors for grid generation.
photo
PoloniumMan
"It worked." J. Robert Oppenheimer
04:55 PM on 10/15/2011
Yes, a switch from diffusion to centrifuge will free up more electricity than a decade's worth of solar and wind installation.
05:24 PM on 10/13/2011
Does Areva also have a plan to take over long-standing nuclear waste disposal issues from our antiquated once through fuel cycle, and assume responsibility for reopening Yucca Mountain from the Federal Government? It has a $30 billion industry generated trust fund to work from (and will save the taxpayer a $300-500 million/year penalty for failing to develop a disposal plan). Will it also be pursuing better containment systems in "temporary" spent fuel storage pools in light of Fukushima and lesson's learned. Lacking a permanent or cost-effective waste disposal or recycling plan, spent fuel pools continue to grow in size and density in the US (and make insuring nuclear power plants difficult if not near impossible). I suppose the plan is to simply push more nuclear fuel through the front door, and leave accumulated waste (from mining, enrichment, fuel fabrication, spent fuel, and decommissioning) on the back stoop for future generations to deal with (at about 3,000 generations). And why not. When we can't decide on whether cost effective CFLs are a good thing or not (a la Bachman's "Light Bulb Freedom of Choice Act"), sounds like an excellent plan to me. Our political system seems capable of doing nothing else than pushing off to another day tough decisions that we can't make today.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Joffan
Time is an illusion. Lunchtime doubly so.
05:27 PM on 10/14/2011
It's an interesting question whether the Feds would be willing to open up waste handling to commercial ventures like Areva. Certainly they couldn't really do much worse than the federal government have done so far.

Spent fuel pools were not an issue at Fukushima. This is now fairly certain. The only lesson to learn from this is to add sensors to the pools to ensure that any future incident doesn't suffer the same error of focus. And the state of spent fuel pools really doesn't affect the insurance, which is as straightforward now as it was last year.

Miracles take a little time, but fixing the political system really seems impossible.
03:03 PM on 10/13/2011
Idon't know about you but if it is made by the French, except for cookware, I don't trust if. And now they will be enriching nuclear fuel here.
01:15 PM on 10/13/2011
Seems a lot of folk are making comments about something they know little to nothing about. Surprise, surprise... Please learn a little about what you are damning before spouting nonsense and fear-mongering. There are no perfectly safe sources of energy. Nuclear power has killed far fewer people than oil, coal, or gas. There are ways of safely disposing of waste (or reprocessing). Often, politics gets in the way of progress because they tend to pander to the ignorant masses.

Also, bear in mind that there is more to just free sunlight when it comes to solar power. There are toxic materials involved with manufacturing panels along with the necessity of mining for said materials. Wind isn't much better. People never account for the cost of maintaining giant generators over the years and the material cost (again, mining) that goes into it. There are also the environmental impacts that wind power has on local wildlife and weather patterns. Those things can get pretty noisy and disruptive.
03:03 PM on 10/13/2011
So let's see. There are safe ways of safely disposing of waste for nuclear power, but not for solar panels? Windmills affect weather patterns? You have to mine for solar panel material, but not for uranium? And guess what? Politicos pander to wealthy contributers, not ignorant masses. Tell you what, we'll pay the liabilities for wind/solar if you pay the ones for nuclear (instead of making us subsidize it). If your comment were any more slanted, it would slide right off my computer screen.
11:37 PM on 10/13/2011
Nuclear gets no current subsidies. Wind/solar $hundreds of billions worldwide mostly as lucrative feedin tariffs.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
observingstupiditydaily
Nice to be important,but more important to be nice
10:28 AM on 10/13/2011
"Areva's project previously received a $2 billion loan guarantee from the U.S. Department of Energy."

So without the loan guarantee how exactly did Areva win the bid or was there no bidding involved?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
01:08 PM on 10/13/2011
What bidding do you think should have taken place?

Areva decided to build an enrichment facility in the US. Various states and regions offered then incentives to chose their area for the plant. Areva decided on Idaho. Then they applied to the DOE under the energy loan guarentee programa dn applied to the NRC for a license.

Now why would there have been any kind of bidding involved?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
observingstupiditydaily
Nice to be important,but more important to be nice
01:35 PM on 10/13/2011
The article said they won, perhaps you know the criteria for that?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Always Thinkin
Nogoodnik
01:01 AM on 10/13/2011
I'm sure Republican Mike Simpson is going to demand this be stopped because a STATE RAN corporation is doing this and surely it will fail as the government can't do anything right and lead to socialism and communism and stamp out free market enterprise. Right? Or I'm guessing just ours which he is a part of.
11:39 PM on 10/12/2011
http://www.odt.co.nz/opinion/opinion/181975/fukushima-unlikely-stop-those-eyes-prize

A recipe for fun: 1st world dumps nuclear, 3rd world nuclearizizes apace. Yayy. Bet that's gonna work out great. Incompetence, graft, and face-saving are absolutly irrefutable reasons to ban nuclear power forever everywhere.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Endogenous Light Nexus
There actually is light within you
02:59 AM on 10/13/2011
Not to mention natural disasters, crime and terrorism, and the old standbys ignorance and stupidity which is why there is even nuclear power in the first place.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
CaptD
Freedom From Nuclear Fascism...
11:22 PM on 10/12/2011
Good Luck Japan & the USA
We all are now on the DOLE thanks to the BIG's (Oil, Gas, Nuclear and Coal)...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
CaptD
Freedom From Nuclear Fascism...
11:20 PM on 10/12/2011
The future is being BOUGHT by the Nuclear Industry industry, instead of being GREEN!
11:40 PM on 10/13/2011
nuke industry is broke. No money to buy anything.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
CaptD
Freedom From Nuclear Fascism...
11:17 PM on 10/12/2011
Yet more Nuclear Crappola packaged in Nuclear Baloney for all to enjoy!
NOT!
Where is our oversight?
Where is our VISION for the future?
Where are our Leaders?

The Nuclear Industry has Bought our Congressional leaders and paid for our President's Campaign, thanks to the SCOTUS!...
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
GeeziePeezie
Here comes the Sun
10:46 PM on 10/12/2011
"The NRC said it will inspect Areva's site during construction."
That's like the fox guarding the henhouse...
photo
realsurfin
Pardon me, can you help out a fellow American
09:49 PM on 10/12/2011
what happened to giving these kind of contracts to American companies... or do we always insist on sending all our cash out of the country?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
06:23 AM on 10/13/2011
What do you mean? There is no 'contract'. Areva made the decision to build a facility in the US to supply the US market.

Do you have a problem with all the foreign car companies that have built plants in the US?
photo
realsurfin
Pardon me, can you help out a fellow American
07:58 PM on 10/13/2011
in some cases i do... jobs are one thing.. but money is leaving the country faster than its coming in. That is a fact. If we don't stem the tide we are going to be totally broken and a third world country.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ClarcKing
Citizen
08:47 PM on 10/12/2011
It is my understanding that we have enough stockpiled nuclear "waste" that is uranium enriched and can supply US energy requirements for 1,000 years.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Andrew Harvey
Don't F with the Jesus
08:58 PM on 10/12/2011
Something tells me that if that were possible, they'd be doing it already.
photo
PoloniumMan
"It worked." J. Robert Oppenheimer
01:53 AM on 10/13/2011
The reactor that would have used spent nuclear fuel as its fuel was under development at Idaho National Laboratory. It was canceled by Clinton in 1994.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ClarcKing
Citizen
09:37 AM on 10/14/2011
If it were feasible, and beneficial to the population, our superiors/elitists would kill it; as they have a different agenda, antithetical to American ambition and aspirations.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
06:25 AM on 10/13/2011
Assuming you mean spent fuel, it still requires treatment which includes sending it back through an enrichment facility. But currently the US doesn't allow processing of spent fuel.

Also depending on the current cost of uranium ore and electricity, it is often cheaper to enrich new uranium than to process spent fuel.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Joffan
Time is an illusion. Lunchtime doubly so.
05:34 PM on 10/14/2011
Actually there's no explicit ban on reprocessing, but no commercial concern would touch it because the government might U-turn again and ban it, and the government chooses not to reprocess at the moment.