More

California Clean Drinking Water Bills Signed Into Law

California Clean Drinking Water

  First Posted: 10/13/11 08:39 PM ET Updated: 12/13/11 05:12 AM ET

This article comes to us courtesy of California Watch.

By Bernice Yeung

From arsenic to E. coli bacteria, contaminants flow from the water taps of hundreds of communities across the state. But seven bills signed into law Friday by Gov. Jerry Brown seek to improve access to clean drinking water in California, particularly for residents in rural and disadvantaged communities.

"Clean drinking water is a basic human right," Brown said in a statement. "The bills I have signed today will help ensure that every Californian has access to clean and safe sources of water."

According to clean-water advocates, the legislation addresses a longstanding need. A study [PDF] by the Pacific Institute found that between 2005 and 2008, 1.3 million residents in the San Joaquin Valley had nitrate-polluted water coming from their faucets. Nitrates can cause death in vulnerable populations such as babies, and they also have been associated with cancer. Surveys by California Rural Legal Assistance and the Community Water Center in Visalia also found that low-income Californians who have access only to polluted water spend between 4 and 10 percent of their household income on bottled water for cooking and drinking.

"The legislation is extremely important because it's a step forward in realizing that really disadvantaged communities don't have access to clean water," said Esmeralda Soria of the California Rural Legal Assistance Foundation, which lobbied for four of the bills. "They have been bathing, cooking and drinking contaminated water or buying expensive bottled water. These are small steps toward these communities having more access to funding that will in the long term give them access to cleaner water. These communities see that there's hope in the near future of having clean water."

The bills range from translating water contamination notices to removing logistical barriers to funding water infrastructure improvements.

The bills signed into law are:

  • AB 54: Allows water agencies to begin construction on ailing systems as soon as an application for state funding is accepted, rather than waiting several months or more for the money to be received. The legislation also would create new assistance and increase transparency of small, community-run mutual water agencies by providing training to board members. It also would require them to provide basic information to regional agencies about their operations.
  • AB 938: Requires drinking water alerts to be translated when 10 percent or more of water district customers speak a second language.
  • AB 983: Makes it possible for "severely disadvantaged communities" to obtain 100 percent grant funding for water infrastructure improvement projects. Currently, these communities can qualify only for up to 80 percent in grants and must take out the remaining 20 percent in loans that residents may have difficulty repaying.
  • AB 1221: Allows state-recognized tribes and nonprofit organizations (such as mutual water agencies) access to the state's Cleanup and Abatement Account to pay for pollution mediation. Although these organizations pay into the account in the form of pollution fines, they do not currently qualify for cleanup money.
  • SB 244: Requires cities and counties to consider the infrastructure needs - including clean drinking water access - of disadvantaged and unincorporated communities in urban planning efforts, including general plan updates.
  • AB 1194: Makes adjustments to and clarifies drinking water laws to ensure that state public health laws conform with the federal Safe Drinking Water Act. For example, the California Department of Public Health now will interpret laws involving human consumption of water to include cooking and food preparation. Failure to comply with national drinking water statutes could have resulted in a loss of about130 million in federal funds.
  • AB 1292: Authorizes the issuance of revenue bonds, which will be deposited into the Safe Drinking Water State Revolving Fund so the state can satisfy federal matching requirements under the Safe Drinking Water Act.

In combination, the package of legislation will be a boon to public health, advocates and legislators say.

Assemblyman Jose Solorio, D-Anaheim, introduced legislation that would improve water quality served by small community-run water districts after learning that a 90-family community in his district was relying on a deteriorating system with unhealthy levels of nitrates.

"Santa Ana is a modern, urban city in Orange County, one of the wealthiest in the country, and we always thought everyone received water from the city, but unbeknownst to me, there was a problem with a mutual water district," he said. "I was hearing from educators that the water was so bad that some kids weren't brushing their teeth and some were not attending school because they didn't want to take baths, the fear was so great."

Susana De Anda of the Visalia-based Community Water Center said the legislation signed into law - such as AB 938, which requires translation of water pollution warnings - will have a significant impact on the residents with whom she works. In Tulare County, for example, a Spanish-speaking resident named Guadalupe Nunez received a number of notices telling her not to drink the water, De Anda said. But because she couldn't read them, she saved them in a folder and continued consuming what came from the tap. She learned of the health risks only when she brought the notices to a community meeting where someone translated them for her.

"This is a great day for water rights advocates," De Anda said. "Every Californian is closer to the human right to safe drinking water. The bills are tangible examples of how we're moving in the right direction."

The legislation primarily will involve changes to the way the California Department of Public Health and the State Water Resources Control Board do business. Both agencies acknowledge that the new laws will improve water quality and wastewater treatment throughout the state, "especially in the case of those from economically disadvantaged areas," Kathie Smith, spokeswoman for the state water board, wrote in an e-mail.

Matt Conens, spokesman for the state public health department, wrote in an e-mail that the legislation signed by Brown "will help ensure that every Californian has access to clean and safe sources of water. Protecting the water we drink is an absolutely crucial duty of state government."

Bernice Yeung is an investigative reporter for California Watch, a project of the non-profit Center for Investigative Reporting. Find more California Watch stories here.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST SAN FRANCISCO

 
 
  • Comments
  • 13
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
08:50 PM on 10/15/2011
ban fracking especially in the northeast where 75 million people will suffer polluted drinking water....
photo
runswithscissors
I think, therefore I am not a conservative
12:50 PM on 10/14/2011
It most other states, a horde of baggers would have shot it down. Glad at least one state is still governed by the sane.
IWantTofu
Evolution. Now a political position.
08:48 AM on 10/14/2011
Typical left wing radical, putting ahead the health and safety of the general populus at the expense of the profits that a few are making by socilizing their pollution costs. Gov. Brown needs to bring back the policies of the governor that was leading California when Meg Whitman and her husband came to the state, because at that time, it was the land of opportunity and a great place to live. Not quite Meg's quote but pretty close.
photo
abbienormal
What hump?
08:28 AM on 10/14/2011
Kudos.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
05:40 AM on 10/14/2011
Great step forward, but I don't see anything in there about stopping fluoride from being added. We get enough of the stuff from our toothpastes. Throw that into the bill and pass it for the other 49 states and I would have no choice but to say the gov is doing exactly what we pay it to do.
photo
PunisherWarJournal
Freedom of speech is pending approval...
03:52 AM on 10/14/2011
Wow, good to know he's done something GOOD for California, for once.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Sunwyn Ravenwood
Farewell my friends, time to go...
03:42 AM on 10/14/2011
So nice to hear some GOOD news for a change. Great work, Californians!
02:56 AM on 10/14/2011
I love my governor. I'm so glad I did everything I could to elect him and not Meg Whitman. Dream act, equal rights for transgenders, clean water. All in a couple of weeks. Other states might criticize us but we know what's right and what's going to be beneficial in the long run. Californians will come out of this economic mess stronger than before. Best state in the US!
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Agentprovokatur
03:07 AM on 10/14/2011
Thank goddess that Corporatist Harridan Meg Whitman only ended up with a $150 Million scrap book entitled "How I Wasted My Money on a Failed Bid for Governor". She would have probably vetoed the bills and then tried to privatize all the water supplies in California because THAT'S working out so well for the people (i.e. corporations) in many countries that have bought into that Chicago School BS.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rontheking
Everyone is behaving splendidly! splendidly!
02:18 AM on 10/14/2011
Yes indeed...what can Brown do for you? This man is a special politician...he actually has integrity and cares about the People....
photo
Brazil 66
"Stop the world I want to get off"
12:35 AM on 10/14/2011
Jerry Brown you’re the greatest governor ever. California is so fortunate to have voted in such a smart person who knows how to govern such a wonderful state and its people. God bless you. Governor Brown.
IWantTofu
Evolution. Now a political position.
08:51 AM on 10/14/2011
His greatest fault, breaking up with Linda Rohnstadt.
photo
runswithscissors
I think, therefore I am not a conservative
12:48 PM on 10/14/2011
Can you send him to Florida after his term is up? We could use some serious help here.