More

Frito-Lay Goes Green: Companies Discover Benefits Beyond Helping The Environment (PHOTOS)

First Posted: 10/14/11 01:44 PM ET Updated: 12/14/11 05:12 AM ET

Big companies are discovering that going green does not just mean saving trees, but dollar bills, too. By becoming more sustainable, they are increasingly cutting costs and having a positive social impact.

Snack company Frito-Lay has recently unveiled one of the greenest manufacturing facilities in the U.S., called the Near Net Zero Facility. Senior Director of Sustainability Al Halverson, who headed the company's green effort, told The Huffington Post that the company spent 10 years reducing the environmental footprint at their 27-year-old building in Casa Grande, Ariz.

The company reduced 50 percent of its greenhouse gases so far as it works toward taking their production facility "off the grid."

Halverson said the company has almost reached all of its goals. "We are running the plant on landfill gas. We are burning wood waste in order to generate steam. We send less than one percent of waste to landfills. ... We are looking at upgrading our truck fleet. We have two electric trucks currently delivering locally."

Where it is economically viable, the company is looking to use this new building as a learning platform for introducing green practices to their other 36 plants around the country.

Phillips Lighting has also been working on sustainable projects, and received the 2011 Leader of Change Award by the Foundation for Social Change and the United Nations Office for Partnerships.

Harry Verhaar, senior director of Energy and Climate Change at Philips, told HuffPost that Philips Lighting, which makes use of LED technology in their products, was surprised and honored to receive the award.

"For about eight years, global warming has become a more prominent issue in the business sector. We've highlighted how relevant lighting is, since it contributes to 19 percent of global electricity and nine percent of global energy consumption," Verhaar said.

"In making lighting more efficient, we save money, we make an ecological contribution by preventing environmental degradation and carbon emissions and it also has social benefits. For example, we've found lighting improves the effectiveness in schools. So schools can reduce their energy bills, but mostly their learning effectiveness is improved and that is what schooling is all about," he said.

Philips Lighting North America CEO Zia Eftekhar added, "Much of this evolution process was the economic aspect -- to save money. By saving energy, the next aspect became the social consciousness and the environment. The most consequential part of that is what is the impact on lifestyle. For example, the city of Boston has gone through a whole change of their old technologies that brings in better visibility at night. So it isn't just saving energy, it is enhancing safety and comfort."

While some companies are making an effort to go green, a new tendency is emerging where companies "greenwash" consumers by claiming they are sustainable when they are not. The Nature Conservancy Chief External Affairs Officer Glenn Pickett told HuffPost there is an advantage for companies to increase their environmental performance, because it can save them money and win business as people become more inclined to buy green products, but some companies may not always follow through with their green claims.

He said transparency is key for consumers wanting to avoid being deceived, and used the work the Nature Conservancy was doing with DOW Chemical company as an example. "We're looking at opportunities for the company to see conserving nature as good for the environment and for their bottom line. And this will become more transparent as we work more on the project."

Dr. M. Sanjayan, lead scientist at the Nature Conservancy, added in an email to HuffPost that it is hard to pinpoint exactly what greenwashing looks like. "Labels are one obvious area," Sanjayan explained. "So when you see all these labels on consumer products and particular food products that claim green credentials or the word '100 percent biodegradable' on plastics -- where it takes say 100 years in full sunlight for that to actually happen."

Topping the 2011 Global 100 list for the most sustainable corporations in the world is energy company Statoil ASA in Norway. The list ranks corporations based on which has been the most proactive in managing environmental, social and governance issues.

Check out the slideshow below of some companies that say they are going green:

---

FOLLOW HUFFPOST GREEN

Big companies are discovering that going green does not just mean saving trees, but dollar bills, too. By becoming more sustainable, they are increasingly cutting costs and having a positive social im...
Big companies are discovering that going green does not just mean saving trees, but dollar bills, too. By becoming more sustainable, they are increasingly cutting costs and having a positive social im...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 27
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
09:27 AM on 12/06/2011
What did Frito Lay do with the Frito Bandito ? Is he retired or just taking a siesta ?
09:01 PM on 10/14/2011
and soylent green is people
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
John Galt IV
Esse quam videri
08:10 PM on 10/14/2011
Wasn't SOLYNDRA once a " green company?"
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
malander
07:38 PM on 10/14/2011
Just came back from the Intel campus in Chandler AZ. Low water use landscape and solar panel roofs over car parking spaces. Nice to see a company not squandering opportunities.
photo
flashfyre
Honore de Balzac
07:05 PM on 10/14/2011
Their foods are not green, but they are reducing carbon footprint, likely with tax breaks we paid for. Oh well.

The latest tests by NREL are showing 43% efficiency for some of the newer chemistry and designs. It would be great to see panels this good on the mass market. Most of the panels we can buy now are 15% or less.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
organicconnect
03:35 PM on 10/14/2011
This would mean a lot more if they stopped using GMO corn. This new green washing bit only means they can make more profit while selling detrimental products. http://organicconnectmag.com/wp/2011/10/monsanto-whistleblower-says-genetically-engineered-crops-may-cause-disease/
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
03:13 PM on 10/14/2011
Just threw my Frito products into the trash..
photo
bridge to somewhere
That's impossible, even for a computer!
06:59 PM on 10/14/2011
Because burning coal is the only way to make potato chips, right?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
11:02 PM on 10/16/2011
Because mentality like yours, is not sanity.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
John Di Saia
An Opinionated Plastic Surgeon in the OC
02:25 PM on 10/14/2011
So a junk food maker goes green? To improve public health they could just stop making their best selling products. Our arteries will thank them later.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
myrmex
12:57 AM on 12/06/2011
it's all a perspective , their product is not worse than any other product if consume correctly if you want to blame anyone you can blame the capitalist way of always bringing you more for less with no regards to health or envirenomental effect.

If we were to tax junk food and carbon usage correctly then the you get more for less politics of today's obese and asthmatic middle american life would be changed forever.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
zumajim
Reality has a liberal bias.
02:19 PM on 10/14/2011
It's a start, but if they really wanted to make a dent in an environmental problem, they could stop making Fritos altogether, thereby reducing the sheer bulk of the American population. And the country's bad-breath index would drop a few points too.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
01:58 PM on 10/14/2011
The biggest greenwash of them all is permanently destroying thousands and thousands of acres of healthy wilderness like SunPower does. The exact same power could easily (and far more affordably) be generated on or near the the homes and businesses who are being forced to buy the power from their remote, deadly monopoly-owned projects.

There is no excuse for slaughtering wilderness to produce "clean" energy. None.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
alteredstory
Hold on to the center
02:54 PM on 10/14/2011
Actually, there's a pretty good excuse.

Climate change has caused MASSIVE extinctions in the past - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Permian%E2%80%93Triassic_extinction_event

While centralized solar plants aren't THE answer, they are part of it, and they're certainly FAR less damaging than coal plants.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
03:25 PM on 10/14/2011
Nah, they are the same technology with the same net output as rooftop panels in the ratepayer areas that have to buy the power. Definitely and immediately hastening the extinctions of endangered and threatened desert species is not a "solution" to the possibility of AGW maybe hastening the extinctions of species at some point in the future. Come on, now, you are smarter than that.

No excuse to kill wilderness when there is a faster, cheaper, cleaner alternative - LOCAL, DECENTRALIZED, DEMOCRATICALLY-OWNED SOLAR. Nobody is saying "let's do coal." We are saying "Let's do solar right." It's super easy - Germany has it all proven. Feed in tariffs so WE can see the economic and the environmental upsides and Big Energy finally stands down. It's a win on every possible level, while Big Solar is a tiny incremental win, if any win at all.

No contest.
photo
tooncesrocks
my micro bio is empty
07:56 PM on 10/14/2011
no. This is just a way to keep power generation as a megaprofit business. Subsidies given to these corps could have just as easily gone to citizens to help them pay for panels for their home.

such a plan existed in california before it was killed by power companies
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
unclelew
06:49 PM on 10/14/2011
FYI: The newest WalMart in my town has solar panels that cover the entire roof.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
10:59 PM on 10/14/2011
great! now, all we need are decent return on investment for the rest of us, and we can ALL put solar on our rooftops and be paid for it, instead of handing over all our open space and taxpayer/ratepayer money to Big Energy mercenaries.

the solutions are super simple - PACE loans and German style feed in tariffs. it's the misinformation campaigns and the corporate welfare that make the transition hard.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
brokenleoheart
01:49 PM on 10/14/2011
i really don't mind if they make a profit, as long as they take actions in making things more green