iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Obama Sends Military Advisers To Central Africa To Help Fight Lord's Resistance Army

Obama Troops Central Africa

MARK S. SMITH and BRADLEY KLAPPER   10/14/11 10:55 PM ET  AP

WASHINGTON — Intervening in a volatile and brutal crisis, President Barack Obama said Friday he has dispatched 100 U.S. troops to central Africa to support a years-long fight against a guerrilla group accused of horrific atrocities. Obama said they were sent to advise, not engage in combat, unless forced to defend themselves.

In a letter to Congress, Obama said the troops will act as advisers in a long-running battle against the Lord's Resistance Army, considered one of Africa's most ruthless rebel groups, and help to hunt down its notorious leader, Joseph Kony.

The first of the troops arrived in Uganda on Wednesday, the White House said, and others will be sent to South Sudan, the Central African Republic and the Democratic Republic of the Congo.

While the size of the U.S. footprint is small, Obama's announcement represents a highly unusual intervention for the United States. Although some American troops are based in Djibouti and small groups of soldiers have been deployed to Somalia, the U.S. traditionally has been reluctant to commit forces to help African nations put down insurgencies.

It demonstrates the Obama administration's escalating attention to and fears about security risks in Africa, including terror networks, piracy and unstable nations. The move was intended to show some engagement to lessen the impact of one of the worst protracted wars in Africa.

Obama declared his decision to send troops as in keeping with the national security interests of the United States. The White House announced it in a low-key fashion, releasing the Obama notification and justification of the troop deployment that the president sent to congressional leaders.

There are and have been other U.S. forces in Uganda in the past and that will likely continue during and after this mission. The numbers have fluctuated, based on requirements, but generally there have been fewer than 100 troops.

Pentagon officials said the bulk of the fresh deployment will be of special operations troops, who will provide security and combat training to African units. The move raises the profile of U.S. involvement on the continent – and represents an apparent victory for administration officials who have argued for more robust intervention in humanitarian crises.

The change in policy could reflect the long-standing concerns of a number of high-ranking Obama advisers left scarred by the U.S. failure in the 1990s to intervene to stop the genocide in Rwanda and the belated action to finally halt the violence in Bosnia. For a current parallel, the Lord's Resistance Army's 24-year campaign of rebellion, rape and murder represents one of the world's worst human rights crises today.

"The request for forces long predates today's announcement," Pentagon spokesman George Little said. "This effort is specifically an extension of the Lord's Resistance Army Disarmament and Northern Uganda Recovery Act of 2009, which President Obama signed into law on May 25, 2010. Until recently, the required forces were not available to fulfill this requirement."

Richard Downie, an Africa expert at the Center for Strategic and International Studies in Washington called the case "somewhat exceptional. There are few more clear-cut cases of evil in the world today than the Lord's Resistance Army."

Downie noted that the U.S. has once before, at the end of 2008, sent advisers and logistical backup to help the Ugandan army root out the LRA. Intelligence leaks, poor cooperation between the Ugandan and other African armies, and bad weather hampered the operation.

Since then, nearly 400,000 people in northern Congo have been displaced due to the LRA's activity, he said. Downie cautioned that the operation shouldn't be viewed as short-term. Even if the LRA is disbanded quickly, the effects of years of war will require lengthy rehabilitation efforts.

Coming off the administration's successful, if limited, intervention in Libya, the Uganda deployment represents a continued effort by Obama to use military force for humanitarian protection in areas where atrocities are occurring. Sending 100 troops may not be significant in terms of military numbers, but the composition of the force gives the United States a new counterterrorism foothold in a region of the world with terrorist networks, pirates and unstable nations.

A special forces unit can be highly effective beyond what the number of soldiers might suggest. They are highly skilled in disrupting insurgency networks by discovering where rebels are based and how they procure guns, money and other logistical support.

Obama's letter to Congress said the deployment "furthers U.S. national security interests and foreign policy and will be a significant contribution toward counter-LRA efforts in central Africa."

The Lord's Resistance Army has been pushing westward since it began its attacks years go, and the administration and human rights groups say its atrocities have left thousands dead and have put as many as 300,000 Africans to flight. They have charged the group with seizing children to bolster its ranks of soldiers and sometimes forcing them to become sex slaves.

Kony is wanted by the International Criminal Court under a 2005 warrant for crimes against humanity in his native Uganda. A self-styled prophet, who mixes Christian mysticism with politics, he is believed hiding along the Sudan-Congo border.

The deployment drew support from Sen. James Inhofe, R-Okla., who has visited the region.

"I have witnessed firsthand the devastation caused by the LRA, and this will help end Kony's heinous acts that have created a human rights crisis in Africa," he said in a statement. "Today's action offers hope that the end of the LRA is in sight."

But Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., while praising the goal of combating the Lord's Resistance Army, cautioned that some past deployments with humanitarian goals resulted in unintended tragedies.

"For this reason, it is essential for the president to consult with Congress about any deployment of our military forces into harm's way," McCain said. "I regret that this was not done in the case of today's announced deployment of U.S. troops to central Africa, and I urge the president to keep Congress and the American people fully informed."

Obama's letter stressed the limited nature of the deployment.

"Our forces will provide information, advice and assistance to select partner nation forces," it said. "Although the U.S. forces are combat-equipped, they will ... not themselves engage LRA forces unless necessary for self-defense."

Most of the troops will deploy to regional capitals to work with government officials and military commanders on countering the rebels and protecting civilians, Pentagon officials said.

In recent months, the administration has stepped up its support for Uganda, which has played a key role in battling extremists in Somalia.

In June, the Pentagon moved to send nearly $45 million in military equipment to Uganda and Burundi. The aid included four small drones, body armor and night-vision and communications gear and is being used in the fight against al-Shabab, an al-Qaida-linked group that U.S. officials see as an increasing threat and that African peace-keeping troops in Somalia have been battling to suppress.

At the State Department, officials portrayed the new troop deployment as part of a larger anti-LRA strategy that dates to the Bush administration but also includes legislation passed by Congress this year.

Victoria Nuland, a department spokeswoman, said the U.S. troops will aid in "pursuing the LRA and seeking to bring top commanders to justice." The broader effort includes encouraging rebel fighters to defect, disarm and return to their homes, she said.

The administration briefed human rights activists ahead of the announcement, and the groups' officials were encouraged.

"These advisers can make a positive difference on the ground by keeping civilians safe and improving military operations to apprehend the LRA's top commanders," said Paul Ronan, director of the group Advocacy at Resolve.

Col. Felix Kulayigye, Uganda's military spokesman, said of the troops: "We are aware that they are coming. We are happy about it. We look forward to working with them and eliminating Kony and his fighters."

___

Associated Press writers Ben Feller, Matthew Lee, Lolita C. Baldor, Erica Werner and Donna Cassata in Washington and Godfrey Olukya in Kampala, Uganda, contributed to this report.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST WORLD

WASHINGTON — Intervening in a volatile and brutal crisis, President Barack Obama said Friday he has dispatched 100 U.S. troops to central Africa to support a years-long fight against a guerrilla...
WASHINGTON — Intervening in a volatile and brutal crisis, President Barack Obama said Friday he has dispatched 100 U.S. troops to central Africa to support a years-long fight against a guerrilla...
Filed by Eline Gordts  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 7,890
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (174 total)
03:13 AM on 11/15/2011
Obama's Africa policy is world war on behalf of his British puppet masters. Currently, the governments of Europe are collapsing left and right. To be expected, both Papandreo and Berlusconi have been replaced by technocratic banker's dictatorships. Instead of propping up the nationalist fascists like Hitler and Mussolini as in the 1930's, this time the international bankers are inserting bankers to head the governments! Both Monti in Italy and and the new ECB head Draghi are former Goldman Sachs employees or current advisors. The global financial system is exploding in the trans-Atlantic sector, just as economist Lyndon LaRouche forecast and the international bankers-- the British empire-- are pushing for world war and global genocide with their puppet Barack Obama. Only by ending the imperial powers centered in London can we defeat the evils of "globalization." Obama must be removed from office immediately before the 2012 election and then there are real water and rail development projects available for the people of Africa, America and Asia. These have been animated and developed by the LaRouche Political Action Committee. Understand this and we can win against the red coats and destroy the oligarchy forever! After all, who needs an oligarchy once mankind begins a full expedition into nearby space and beyond?

- Summer Shields
One of Six LaRouche Democrats running for U.S. House of Representatives

http://larouchepac.com/campaigns
http://larouchepac.com/infrastructure
http://larouchepac.com/
01:14 AM on 10/22/2011
I know I'm not versed in the politics of all of this, nor have I read more than a few of the other comments below, but I feel like if there is any hope of us helping, than it's a good thing. Check out Invisiblechildren.com as well as http://www.lracrisistracker.com/. These two places will give you a lot more information on the LRA as well as the history behind the war there. As far as I'm concerned, Mr. President, House of Reps, and Congress, this is a great decision. Thank you for the action you have taken to stop the LRA.
05:21 PM on 10/17/2011
I find this action disturbing for the following reasons: 1) Obama releases the story on a Friday--the old DC trick of dumping such news on slow days; and 2) he's claiming authority based on Article II powers and not the Wars Powers Act. This is not how our laws should operate. Obama is a 'better' Bush than Bush ever was. Instead of hope and change, he's given us more of the same. What a phony.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
VanDoin it
02:01 PM on 10/17/2011
Here is the reason why we are there! You Liberals Hate Bush because of the WAR for OIL rant! But then Obama gets us in 3 more War fronts, now this being #4 and all say, oh it is a justified Humanitarian effort! Bull$hit! This is a joke! Obama is a joke! Obama is just like Bush! War for Oil. First of all we have already been building secret Military bases in Africa, and getting ready to unload more drone attacks. But we the "United States" are not doing this for humantarian reasons, but we are there for the investment of OIL! I just LOVE the double standars you dems have for this "President" It's ok because Soro's may just fund Obama's BILLION DOLLAR CAMPAIGN becasue of this one act... Just a thought...

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=356321
11:45 PM on 10/18/2011
You're silly. It has nothing to do with oil. Anyone who actually knows how this all came about knows that. You obviously will think whatever it is you want to think anyway, there's no changing that, despite the facts. The US has been aiding Uganda in helping them fight the LRA for years now, this is just the first time you've heard about it. Also, this isn't a war. You really need to calm down.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
VanDoin it
03:48 PM on 10/20/2011
Lets try this again...

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=356321
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Slash14
Liberalism makes me laugh!
10:17 AM on 10/17/2011
Why not go after the Somalia pirates who are hurting the world community??
12:57 AM on 10/17/2011
Still playing world police, America?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Slash14
Liberalism makes me laugh!
10:15 AM on 10/17/2011
I thought Obama was going to be the president of Peace...Ha Ha Ha
11:47 PM on 10/18/2011
This all came about because of a bi-partisan bill passed UNANIMOUSLY in Congress. Criticize Obama all you want, you'll find your reasons to not like him no matter what he does. But at least know that you don't fully blame the President for something that was backed 100% by Congress...
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
chuck nathaniel
Your micro-bio is pending approval
06:36 PM on 10/16/2011
I think the US has a responsibility to help fix the conflicts they have helped instigate. I'm not sure this is the right approach, but I do believe the responsibility is there. Isolationism from problems we have created is not responsible.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:46 PM on 10/16/2011
An adult can discussion can be had about the idea that failed states pose a risk to Civilization and the US.

Anyone who opposes this action needs to present an argument that failed states are not a risk, or that the cost of moving these conflicts is not worth the advantage gained.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jeff McConnell
ACSM Personal Trainer/ retired LEO
12:28 PM on 10/17/2011
I would like to take up that debate, Voice, but I would submit that it is YOU who should present an argument supporting your contention. I will look forward to considering that and responding.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jeff McConnell
ACSM Personal Trainer/ retired LEO
12:35 PM on 10/17/2011
How did the US help instigate this Chuck?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
chuck nathaniel
Your micro-bio is pending approval
09:39 PM on 10/17/2011
US foreign policy since at least the end of WW2 can be directly traced as one of the causes of this sort of unrest and instability. If you are unfamiliar with what the US did in Africa, learning about the Congo and Lumumba and the CIA might be a good start for you.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
chuck nathaniel
Your micro-bio is pending approval
06:12 PM on 10/18/2011
I've answered that.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
chuck nathaniel
Your micro-bio is pending approval
06:30 PM on 10/16/2011
Doesn't Obama understand that US Military might is only to be used for enriching US-based corporations and arms manufacturers, not for actually helping people in need.
03:38 PM on 10/16/2011
Regardless of whatever side one takes: whether this intervention by the U.S into Central Africa is a justified humanitarian effort or a plan by the U.S to extend their empire and sphere of influence into Africa and more effectively plunder the resources of sovereign nations, this action by our President shows ultimately that I as an individual citizen or the American people as a whole have no power whatsoever to influence American foreign policy. We are trapped in essence.
03:02 PM on 10/16/2011
Before anyone calls these terrorist "Christian" google the LRA read about the Christmas massacre in December 25,2008 189 people killed 120 children abducted and 45 people hacked to death in a CHURCH on Christmas after they went to other towns CHURCHES and killed CHRISTIANS total of 500 CHRISTIANS killed ..........do you really want to call them Christian just because they call them selves Christian? cause if they are I want to be called something else!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:30 AM on 10/17/2011
They are as christian as the christians who fought the 100 years war.

They are as christian as the Germans who fought in WW2.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
02:13 PM on 10/16/2011
Here we go again, getting involved in an inner conflict without full knowledge of both sides and the consequences. This is what we did in Iraq and now we have Al Maliki who is best friends with Iran. Sadam was a tyrant, but he kept Iran at bay and the country was more secular than it is today. It will be interesting to see to what extent Iraq becomes like Iran allowing the muslim imams to dictate policy there.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
01:28 PM on 10/16/2011
Wait. Let me guess.

Obama is a war monger?

Yawn.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
chuck nathaniel
Your micro-bio is pending approval
06:29 PM on 10/16/2011
Yes. That's why we must vote for Herman Cain. Because the GOP want to bring the troops home, dontchaknow?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:47 PM on 10/16/2011
Ah. Did not know that.
barbra1971
Sherry Hunt my hero
01:39 AM on 10/17/2011
Is promise enough for you or you need proof too? How will you get it if yes? We had many promises and things changed after... so we don't believe much in promises anymore. I know difficult situation.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JohnnyAce Okeke
GRAND MASTER SEN$Ei {{-_-}}™
09:44 AM on 10/17/2011
How can this POSSIBLY be good? Especially for Africa? We don't need outside help. {{-_-}}
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
tomcats4al
Change is...A Republican In The White House 2013
12:36 PM on 10/16/2011
Why are we sending US soldiers to Africa to hunt down and kill Christians fighting off a Muslim takeover of their country?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
01:28 PM on 10/16/2011
You call The Lord's Resistance Army christian?

Hitchens is right: religion poisons everything.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
tomcats4al
Change is...A Republican In The White House 2013
02:22 PM on 10/16/2011
You think we should spill more American Blood, this time defending Muslims? What is wrong with you?!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DixieMelody
Iso Blue in Red Idaho
11:55 PM on 10/16/2011
Wasting your breathe.

Facts are like kryptonite to people like tomcats.
12:42 AM on 10/17/2011
im the last person to ever defend islamist movements, but the LRA is just as bad as any of them. They aren't fighting a muslim takeover of their country; they are fighting for the personal benefit of their leader, a man just as crazy and violent as the prophet muhammad.
12:29 PM on 10/16/2011
Pure madness
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:27 PM on 10/16/2011
So the global war of terror is finally going after some Christians. Most Christians support this terror group. Have you ever heard then denounce them ?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
01:30 PM on 10/16/2011
All religion is equally false, all religion has the same potential for violence.

Give them time, and the Amish will try to take over the world.
12:43 AM on 10/17/2011
If the LRA ever attacked a western target, then 100% of american christians would oppose them.