Occupy Wall Street Protesters Hold On To Zuccotti Park For Another Day

Occupy Wall Street

First Posted: 10/14/11 12:04 PM ET Updated: 12/14/11 05:12 AM ET

NEW YORK -- The announcement came in the middle of a General Assembly meeting early Friday morning at the Occupy Wall Street protest in Zuccotti Park, where thousands had gathered in anticipation of an attempt by the police to clear the site.

"We have breaking news," said the speaker. "We can stay."

High-fives, cheers. For hours, protesters had been bracing themselves for a showdown with the police and mass arrests. Now it looked like the encampment in Zuccotti Park would live to see another day.

The conflict between the company that owns the park and the protesters began on Tuesday, when Richard B. Clark, chief executive of Brookfield Properties, wrote a letter to Police Commissioner Ray Kelly in which he requested police assistance in clearing the site. "After weeks of occupation, conditions at the park have deteriorated to unsanitary and unsafe," Clark wrote.

On Wednesday, New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg announced that the protesters would have to temporarily leave the park to make way for sanitation workers, who would be cleaning the site later in the week. Workers had not cleaned up the park since the occupation began.

The protesters generally saw this as a pretext for kicking them out -- a point of view that gained traction on Thursday, when Kelly said they would not be allowed to return with their sleeping bags and other items. Many protesters vowed to resist eviction by forming a human chain around the site.

In the meantime, they took it upon themselves to show that outside sanitation help wouldn't be necessary. Grabbing brooms and filling up water buckets at local restaurants, they threw themselves into a frenzy of sweeping and tidying. A coalition of civil liberties lawyers supporting the protesters wrote a letter to Clark in which they insisted that the protesters had long been addressing his concern about cleanliness. The lawyers also offered to meet with the company.

Before dawn on Friday, protesters prepared for the arrival of the police and sanitation workers by warning one other about the possibility of mass arrests and by apprising one another of the presence of lawyers.

At around 6:30 a.m., the park was filled with people. A series of speakers rallied them for the confrontation everyone still believed was in store, and in what has become a Zuccotti Park tradition, the crowd repeated every few words each speaker said so that people on the outer edges could hear. In fact, the crowd was so big that every few words were repeated three or four times.

The news came first in waves of tentative talk – "Did you see that tweet?" – and finally with the big announcement, "We can stay." In a press statement had made its way to a speaker at the General Assembly, a spokesperson for Brookfield Properties said that, for "the time being," they were "withdrawing their request from earlier in the week for police assistance during their cleaning operation."

The statement continued: "Brookfield believes they can work out an arrangement with the protesters that will ensure the park remains clean, safe, available for public use and that the situation is respectful of residents and businesses downtown, and we will continue to monitor the situation."

After the General Assembly adjourned, a group of protesters set off on a march down Broadway and according to some reports at least a dozen were arrested. Many others stayed in Zuccotti Park. Among them was Cecilia Blewer, 55, who had marched Wednesday with a group of parents and teachers. She picked up a broom and got back to sweeping. "There's always work to be done," she said.


FOLLOW HUFFPOST NEW YORK

NEW YORK -- The announcement came in the middle of a General Assembly meeting early Friday morning at the Occupy Wall Street protest in Zuccotti Park, where thousands had gathered in anticipation of a...
NEW YORK -- The announcement came in the middle of a General Assembly meeting early Friday morning at the Occupy Wall Street protest in Zuccotti Park, where thousands had gathered in anticipation of a...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 4,937
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (53 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Stacey Jones
You can’t break away what you cannot change
05:31 PM on 10/16/2011
The guy in the cover photo is kinda hot! I like him.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
I Think
01:21 PM on 10/16/2011
Thank you Gentle Giant,
Thanks to each of you that is spending time protesting against the 'donations' made to politicians by corporate and special interest groups.
Thank you Gentle Giant,
keep your cool,
if they can incite you to fight back, they will have won.
Gandhi - remember Gandhi.
12:17 PM on 10/16/2011
I have read many of the posts here and I am so confused.
The "right" seems so opposed to the OWS movement.
The "left" seems so excited about it.
The OWS movement, as I see it, is a protest against the lack of representation by the government officials we have elected to represent us.
Some want taxes better spent, others want taxes redistributed. Some want lower taxes, some are willing to pay more if it is truly being spent to improve the "American way of life". Others have different agendas, but in general it is just people saying "I'm mad as heck and I'm not going to take it any more".
This general statement has been the core of the "left" and "right" stance for some time now.
You can agree or disagree on the way the OWS is going about their protest, but how can you not agree with their stand and their right to band together so their voices can be heard?
12:23 PM on 10/16/2011
The right is opposed to spoiled children who think the cookie jar should never be empty.
The left is excited because they think they can pressure someone to fill the cookie jar for free.
12:29 PM on 10/16/2011
The "tea party" it self is based on people uprising because they felt that they were being taxed without representation.
You are against uprising.......... if it doesn't suit your needs. That's the way they felt in England.
photo
Almondo
Agnostic Realist Tradevknaught
01:30 PM on 10/16/2011
Bagman Perry pays off the Texas debt with a 'cookie jar handout' he whines loudly about while Bagmann collects farm subsidies.

Freeloading while whining is the bagger mantra.
12:07 PM on 10/16/2011
What we have here is nothing more than a few (very few) kids with nothing to do while waiting for daddy's check or Uncle Sam's tuition money. Plus the typical parasitic rabble that is always looking for an excuse to demand benefits that they never worked for. They are hoping for a riot to start so that they can go on breaking store fronts and stealing goodies. It is no coincidence that these Lumpen parties are taking place in socialist States with high bankruptcy status. Most of these parasites have no idea how the banking system works, or the nuances of a democratic economic system. Why they do have is envy, greed and the need to get something for nothing.
12:17 PM on 10/16/2011
Fanned. Millions of marginally successful people think the system has failed them. Youth joblessness is at Great Depression levels. More than 45 million are on food stamps.

People come to think what they must think when they must think it. So, a person who feels he has failed must come to terms with it. He must find a reason that gets himself off the hook. It must be someone else’s fault.

It was not his fault he failed his chemistry exam. The ‘system’ should provide him with a good job anyway. It was not his fault his house got taken away; the system caused prices to fall...and his job got exported to Mumbai. It was not his fault he didn’t save any money; the banks took advantage of him mercilessly. He may even get a “deficiency notice” — telling him he has to pay the bank for its loss on his foreclosed house.
12:51 PM on 10/16/2011
Fanned. Your final sentence says it all.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
wcritizing
Demand To Publish Results In EACH Voting Place
12:06 PM on 10/16/2011
Regulate Wall street
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Dan Crabtree
11:49 AM on 10/16/2011
Wall street was the largest single contributor to the obama campaign in 08..is this not biting the hand that feeds you.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
wcritizing
Demand To Publish Results In EACH Voting Place
12:06 PM on 10/16/2011
after they took our savings, our jobs and our home equity ? ?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lipps
Capitalist Pig Taxpayer
12:03 AM on 10/17/2011
Barney Frank, Maxine Waters and the Fed did that.
12:13 AM on 10/17/2011
While he "bites" the hands that elected him
11:43 AM on 10/16/2011
What do the protestors think of Steve Jobs, hes was a billionaire or do they pick and choose their billionaires?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Dan Crabtree
11:48 AM on 10/16/2011
well yea but he produced the electronics they need to carry out successful protest
NamVet 822
Still Learning and Growing
12:14 PM on 10/16/2011
LOL...have they every truly visualized their life void of Capitalism?
11:49 AM on 10/16/2011
Of course "they" pick and choose their billionaires. They are not protesting the fair acquisition of wealth from selling innovative products that truly enhance lives. They are not even protesting those in the financial industry (e.g. Warren Buffet) who want a fair system. They are protesting a system in which the wealthiest citizens use their wealth to influence/control policies which unfairly enrich them further while at the same time send the masses into poverty.
photo
TygerLilly
ProgLib deprogramming ,555 GOT TRUTH?
12:00 PM on 10/16/2011
Then why are they not concentrating this protest in the only place that can effect change, Washington??
12:24 PM on 10/16/2011
Warren Buffet doesnt go to the White House all of the time because he wants a fair system he wants to control Obama his puppet. Obama took more money from wall street than all other candidates combined.
11:41 AM on 10/16/2011
I wonder what these protestors think about Obama raising 70 million dollars?
01:04 PM on 10/16/2011
Or his personal wealth which he gained without ever working at a real job and which, of course, is not redistributable to the masses. Let them eat cake.
11:34 AM on 10/16/2011
It is stirring to see so many people out there protesting the absurd system we live with.
My fear is that the 1%, the oligarchy that distribute (or hoard) the resources, are sitting at a spa, waiting for the hoi poloi to run out of steam.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DLee4144
11:29 AM on 10/16/2011
We can only succeed if we change the government. Leave a token occupying force in your meeting place, and get out into the neighborhoods. Hand out flyers, go door to door, talk to people about voting out those politicians who are bought by Wall Street and defend the rich. Meet once a week and get as much media coverage as possible. But we can't make a real change by occupying anything other than voting booths, because the politicians who are owned by Wall Street aren't afraid of our power to occupy anything else.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Honest Babe
11:21 AM on 10/16/2011
Thank you to all those with the courage to represent the rest of us. Our government has sold out to corporate interests and have been unable to break the inertia of upholding the status quo. Our country will not be saved by representatives who refuse to have a real conversation about how to rein in spending and to pay for what we already have spent. It is unconscionable that we would go to war without a way to pay for it, cut taxes even as our country is running headlong into recession, then doing nothing to correct policies that warnings signs were blaring that there needed to be correction. At the same time we are talking about cutting benefits that protect the 99% average person, the benefits to the 1% are sacred cows, even without any evidence that this improves our situation and without any evidence that there is any shared pain. We demand that our government represent "The People", not just the 1%. Reasonable regulation, anti-trust regulation enforced, fair and balanced taxation, and cxonsequences for those whose behaviors have brought this country to its knees. We are sick and tired and we aren't going to take it any more. For those who have not joined, do and make this voice a roar.
NamVet 822
Still Learning and Growing
12:27 PM on 10/16/2011
"Represent the rest of us"? I seriously doubt that! I do agree with some of your comment though and I am glad to live in a country that permits protests but I strongly suspect this "roar" will end up more like a "meow" in a few weeks. As a small business owner I have had to make some really hard decisions over the past two years in order to survive and provide for my family. Our Government has some very hard decisions to make if our Country is to survive. We all are going to have to sacrifice even more.
12:17 AM on 10/17/2011
Like maybe considering that manufacturing products in the USA is good for the economy & the country...Who will pay for the Military when the tax base shrinks???...Oh wait...It already has
11:21 AM on 10/16/2011
"True individual freedom cannot exist without economic security and independence. People who are hungry and out of a job are the stuff of which dictatorships are made."
Franklin D. Roosevelt
http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/quotes/f/franklind134721.html
01:54 PM on 10/16/2011
Precisely what Obama wants. His dream is to become America's first Castro.
12:17 AM on 10/17/2011
And where did you garner this from???
10:49 AM on 10/16/2011
If these protestors want jobs in the future they will have to whitewash their electronic trail and lie about being protestors. No decent employer would hire someone from OWS.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Honest Babe
11:24 AM on 10/16/2011
I would and many more like me would too. There is nothing wrong with free speech. Do you really think that employers have not been hurt or that somehow they are not in agreement that those with extreme wealth are puppet masters of our congress?
11:32 AM on 10/16/2011
Empoloyers do not hire troublemakers just people that are interested in working.
11:38 AM on 10/16/2011
Real employers have the freedom to not hire the OWS protestors. Of course the protestors can work for the MoveON.org subsidized fronts or other communist corps that George Soros owns.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
njgal4obama
All others will be towed.
04:25 PM on 10/16/2011
I would hire in the following order:

A veteran
An OWS protester
Anyone else.
photo
Wmof2011
VoteVoteVote, Kick out the GOPs and TPs
10:28 AM on 10/16/2011
Free the man in the plaid shirt.

And cut all student debt by 90%.
10:34 AM on 10/16/2011
Throw the book at the man in the plaid shirt and double the student debt~
12:20 AM on 10/17/2011
How do you find TEXAS from Las Vegas???

You could East until you smell it...then South until you step in it....& thanks for the last Retard you sent us for President....Keep Perry in your state
10:37 AM on 10/16/2011
And I suppose that you will add not have to pay rent any longer, a free car, and free food for life? No responsibility for your own life? No responsibility to the system that gives you the freedom to protest? No responsibility to the advantages that you have been given as a U.S. citizen?

If this is the next generation then the United States of America is a failure and deserves to die. But, this is only the fake group that the media has portrayed as the 99%. In reality they are the Soros group ginned up on their right to everything free on the backs of those that create money and corporations. Greed for freebies isn't gallant, greed for freebies is just criminals pretending to be patriots.

Poor OWS protesters are going to have such a hard time adjusting to working for a living instead of barking/whining for their living.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Honest Babe
11:26 AM on 10/16/2011
You have obviously put your slant on the movement. But you miss the point that many of the protesters are employed and support those who would like to obtain gainful employment but cannot due to current economic conditions. Others were employed until the economy took their jobs away through no fault of their own. The impression that people are unemployed by choice is misguided.
themotorjunkie
Semper Fidelis
10:27 AM on 10/16/2011
Corporations exist to make a profit. I'm ok with that. what I am not ok with is proft above all else including social responsibility. Face it, most of us have our retirement savings invested in corporations, if they don.t profit, our savings dont grow. What I really have an issue with is the management at many corporations owning a controlling interest. Thus they enrich themselves personally at the expense of the public (shareholders) The wealth created by corporations must flow to all the shareholders and not just the management. How many of you have watched your 401k tank while the CEOs of the companies in which you hold stock have gotten rich? IMO stock options for management need to be preferred (non voting) stock and they ought to be limited in the amount of common stock they may own in a company they work for
11:28 AM on 10/16/2011
Yeh, what you said.
That was a clear articulation of what's wrong with that part of the system.
12:23 AM on 10/17/2011
Good Comment