iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Ryan Park: Solar Energy's Future Remains Bright

First Posted: 10/17/11 12:29 PM ET Updated: 11/22/11 12:49 PM ET

Spending less on one's monthly energy bill -- that's appealing. Saving the environment at the same time, says Ryan Park, "that's icing on the cake."

In an August video interview, Park, director of business development for California-based REC Solar and a recent finalist on the reality television show The Bachelorette, told HuffPost that he sees solar as an "important piece of our energy future."

Two months later, many critics would question such optimism. The recent failure of another California solar panel manufacturer, Solyndra, which received half a billion dollars in loan guarantees from the federal government before crashing, has left the viability of solar under intense scrutiny.

In a recent follow-up interview, Park acknowledged the Solyndra bankruptcy has "cast a shadow over the whole industry," but added that the response to a single company's demise was "way overblown." He said Solyndra's failure was "not indicative for the future real winners," suggesting the current state of the solar industry is analogous to technology industry during the dot-com era, when several companies rose rapidly while others experienced dramatic demises.

As Thomas Maslin, a senior analyst for the North American solar power sector with IHS Emerging Energy Research, told HuffPost's Tom Zeller last month that such competition is just a sign of the solar industry "becoming more mature."

While Solyndra's concept of a lightweight, quickly installable panel was initially attractive, Park thinks it "never had a chance," especially as the price of more conventional silicon panels plummeted. In the end, the more efficient technology won.

"It's unfortunate that our government placed financial bets on the wrong technologies, but the good news is the industry as a whole is advancing rapidly down the cost curve," said Park, noting that during his 10 years in the business he's seen the solar cell prices fall from around nine dollars a watt to below three dollars a watt.

"Imagine where we'll be in 10 more" years, he added. "It's exciting."

It should come as no surprise that Park's house is fitted with solar panels and a tankless water heater. (People who watched the latest season of The Bachelorette may remember Park's long-winded pitch of the latter technology while on a date with Ashley.) He also drives a Prius, which he said he plans to replace soon with an all-electric car.

As Park told HuffPost, studies have shown that over 30 percent of electric vehicle owners also have solar electric systems. If the two are paired -- with the car, in effect, charged by the sun -- then the cost of driving a mile is 80 percent less than traveling by gas-powered car.

"It makes financial sense and environmental sense," he said.

The solar industry still has a ways to go, according to Park. But he is hopeful, especially when thinking about today's youth. He recently awarded a prize at the Solar Decathlon in Washington, D.C., and describes REC Solar's school installations with infectious enthusiasm.

For the Athenian School, a prep school in Danville, Calif., Park's team formed a large 'A' out of solar panels on the hillside overlooking the school's sports complex. "That's going to be there for 30-plus years," he noted. "It's like their school mascot, garnering energy."

"When I was growing up, I didn't even know what solar was," said Park. "But for these students, solar is no longer the exception but rather something we should definitely have."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST GREEN

Spending less on one's monthly energy bill -- that's appealing. Saving the environment at the same time, says Ryan Park, "that's icing on the cake." In an August video interview, Park, director of ...
Spending less on one's monthly energy bill -- that's appealing. Saving the environment at the same time, says Ryan Park, "that's icing on the cake." In an August video interview, Park, director of ...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 62
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
vetxcl
10:27 PM on 10/26/2011
Science marches on: http://cleantechnica.com/2011/10/18/new-super-powered-organic-solar-cells-%e2%80%93-we-can-has-solar-powered-laptops-nao/
10:00 PM on 10/25/2011
One way to increase the range of electric vehicles is to wrap them in thin-film solar cells. Just like some people do with advertisement on cars. Lots of cars just sit in parking lots during the day while the owner is at work. While the car is in that parking lot it should be recharging too. There should be away of taking advantage of all that heat that builds up in cars during the summer months. Maybe a sterling engine could used to make electricity in that hot car.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Robert Fanney
Scribbler
11:32 AM on 10/19/2011
Solyndra is just a side-show that solar haters like to use to bash the industry. True, the government picked a bad horse to run in this race. But less than 3% of all seed funds went to Solyndra. There's still 97% of the government's money working to advance far more successful technology. And, if we were smart, we'd be spending twice as much. The winners in solar will create vast new industries and that means jobs, jobs, jobs. But due to the current bent of the House (TPers), we have fallen behind both China and India. That's your conservatives, fighting every day for an American decline.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
vetxcl
10:27 PM on 10/26/2011
Insight!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ShawnRay
03:16 AM on 10/19/2011
The best green program I have used was the green ammunition issued to the military. the exchanged the lead core with steel. They do not wound - they exterminate.
10:15 PM on 10/18/2011
Yeah. I heard about this great solar tube company in California. They turn sunlight into energy they have the backing of President Obama. I saw him make a speech on it. Solar is the future, we need to pour millions...
Oh...
Never mind.
Genders
Love, Tolerance, Enlightenment
04:37 PM on 10/18/2011
"Two months later, many critics would question such optimism. The recent failure of another California solar panel manufacturer, Solyndra, which received half a billion dollars in loan guarantees from the federal government before crashing, has left the viability of solar under intense scrutiny."

So this is the Official narrative now? Only the GOP/Tea wackjobs question the need and value of solar power and green energy.

Rooftop solar is the way to go. Cute as the "A" is.
photo
steve11407
pending approval and won't be displayed until ...
02:39 PM on 10/18/2011
Good thing he's not into wind farms. He'd have to shut them down for bats until they hibernate.
photo
SolarPowerGuy
Ph.D., Immunology; Solar power @ home; Green Party
03:13 AM on 10/18/2011
Two thumbs up for Mr. Park!

I installed my residential PV system in 2005. I've been saying for years that solar is an economically-reasonable choice in Sun Belt states -- that we don't need to keep "researching" solar technology, it's time to start rolling it out.

This is the first time that I heard someone ELSE say that.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MrBIgp
If I'm wrong, please show me
12:24 AM on 10/18/2011
The questions which should be asked of any solar project 1. What is the installed cost? 2. What is the maintenance cost? 3. How many KWH a year will it produce? 4. What is the lifetime? Each of these questions is answered with a number and a unit. If the value of the electricity over the lifetime of the installation is less than the installed cost plus the maintenance cost over the lifetime, then it isn't worth it.
10:59 AM on 10/18/2011
The question is bigger than just input and output, it is how do we move forward as a species? Do we keep digging and drilling, or do we move forward with Solar (You know, The Sun) the one source of energy that will always be waiting for us to harness as long as we want.
Forward thinking.
I'm not convinced that our corporate-owned government (yes, all of them) will permit this though. Too much money is at stake for the 1%.
photo
Soulsurfer
Solar Electrician,Longtime Surfin'Fool
11:31 AM on 10/18/2011
Sadly, you are right.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MrBIgp
If I'm wrong, please show me
02:05 PM on 10/18/2011
I went throug my solar energy phase in the 70s, The fundamental problem is energy density - its not enough. We come up with all sorts of ingenius method of harnessing solar energy, but we can't change the amout per square foot we get from th sun. Forward thinking is Nuclear.
photo
Soulsurfer
Solar Electrician,Longtime Surfin'Fool
11:37 AM on 10/18/2011
You should ask those questions of ANY project. With solar, there's many mitigating factors, and no one is saying that it's the right solution for everyone. If you have a lot of trees, type of roof structure, no southern or western exposure to the sun, or if your electric bills are less than a hundred dollars a month. The vast majority of solar companies will screen customers and not try to sell to sites with inappropriate conditions. But make no mistake; Solar is here to stay, and will play an increasing role in providing power and replacing fossil fuel sources of energy.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MrBIgp
If I'm wrong, please show me
04:49 PM on 10/18/2011
"You should ask those questions of ANY project." I agree, and reporters should ask these question of all energy systems.
Reports should also learn the difference between a kilowatt and a kilowatt, and what a capacity factor is.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
Bostontru2u
Keep on Moving...The Left Way.
11:50 PM on 10/17/2011
Google uses Solar Energy. Smart move.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SueMVetforObama2
With Liberty and justice for all
10:13 PM on 10/17/2011
DoD and GSA are putting up a fair amount of PV arrays.

I'm proud to say I'm part of it.
photo
Soulsurfer
Solar Electrician,Longtime Surfin'Fool
11:39 AM on 10/18/2011
I am too. We're doing numerous VA facilities, FDA and Army too. Here's to being part of the solution, and not the problem.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SueMVetforObama2
With Liberty and justice for all
06:57 PM on 10/18/2011
Yep
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Craig Bovia
Vermont, 1791, women can vote, no slavery allowed
05:57 PM on 10/17/2011
It took Rockerfeller a while to figure out how to own all of the oil in the US. It took Edison a while to figure out how to make the most money possible selling US electricity. Look how long it took Big Health Care to charge $15,000 a year for a family of four. Stop burning dirty coal and wind down our aging nuclear plants and solar is a great value. A gift that keeps on giving. Invest the money necessary to move the technology along and make it happen. Are we going to bat 1,000? Yeah, Right!!!
Cheers and Good Fortune
05:31 PM on 10/17/2011
It is truly unfortunate that Moore's Law does not apply to solar panels.
photo
SolarPowerGuy
Ph.D., Immunology; Solar power @ home; Green Party
11:54 AM on 10/18/2011
Solar PV technology may not improve by leaps and bounds like computers have, but -- have you noticed that gains that HAVE been made in solar PV? They're not trivial.

Around 1970, it took more energy to manufacture a solar panel than you could ever generate from it. America's conservatives hate green energy so deeply, you can still find conservative pundits TODAY publicly claiming that solar is a net energy loss. These same people claim that the battery in a Prius makes it more of an environmental menace than a Hummer.

The truth: in California, solar PV technology that a contractor can install on your house today will recoup the energy used to manufacture it in five years. The financial break-even point on your electric bill will be achieved in about 15 years (this considers any subsidy as money that came from YOUR pocket -- you are a taxpayer, after all). A modern PV system will easily last 30 years.

In recent years, costs have come down quickly. Read the article: "during his 10 years in the business he's seen the solar cell prices fall from around nine dollars a watt to below three dollars a watt."

How about the intangible benefits of solar? Less CO2 and air pollution? As electric cars become practical, a way to stop using petroleum? What are these worth? Trust me, they're not included in the cost analyses.

We are well above the break-even points with solar power technology. Time to roll it out.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Linus521
In wildness is the salvation of mankind
04:58 PM on 10/17/2011
I sure hope that hillside mentioned in this article wasn't a natural ecosystem because if it is, it is now as life supporting and creating as the surface of Mars.

The new alternatives should not rape our natural ecosystems; they should go on roofs, reinvent old factories and infastructures, recycle the old into the new, and all alternatives should go where people actually live, making each home energy efficient without destroying the Earth.

With Obama's constructing over our desert ecosystems with dead solar panel fields, he might as well have slathered up the land with a massive oil spill because oil spills or dead solar panel fields both spell death to the Earth. And, the energy produced from the death of these ecosystems causes more death because the energy has to be piped into where people actually live.

Threatened and endangered species will have to be sacrificed per Obama's wishes, and science compares the extinctions of biological diversity as a threat to mankind, right up there with thermonuclear war as these species create and sustain Earth's ecosystems and are all the reasons man exists. Don't kill our planet for alternatives.

Once the soil is disturbed it's over.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
beckjr2000
been there done that & tired of it
05:36 PM on 10/17/2011
The solar panel field alone for the Blythe Solar Project is suppose to cover 11 sq. miles.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Linus521
In wildness is the salvation of mankind
05:54 PM on 10/17/2011
Exactly, where are these eleven sq miles? Rooftops, on tops of buildings, an abandoned building? If the land is wild and natural, it is an ecosystem and habitat/homes, food, shelter, cover and nurseries for the strands in the web of all life.

If the land is a natural ecosystem, the Earth doesn't care if it is concrete, an eleven mile oil spill or a dead area scoured over with glass panels! Once the soil is disturbed, the stored heat trapping gases will be released into the atmosphere; when the vegetation and trees are deforested, more heat trapping gases are released.

As the plants and trees evapotranspire cooling water vapor, the entire ll miles will now have a hotter and drier climate, contributing to climate change and more and more C02 and methane released into the atmosphere, defeating the objectives of green and so-called green energy. What is on the surface of Earth changes and influences the very climate. Plus, more devastation for having to pipe the yielded energy.

Alternatives are only earth-friendly when constructed on rooftops or recycling the old infrastructures into the new. Killing the planet, kills the Earth, regardless. A dead solar panel field is as life creating and sustaining as Mars.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
June25
01:04 AM on 10/18/2011
Most grasses grow fine under a moving shade,just look under trees.Ask anyone who ever lived in the desert ,wildlife loves the shade.One jerk joyriding in a SUV does more damage then a whole field of solar panels.They may not pay for themselves in many places,but where they can it is time for overzealous environmentalists to support progress.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Linus521
In wildness is the salvation of mankind
02:24 PM on 10/18/2011
One or two species does not create a living ecosystem. An ecosystem is one, living organism, just like the human body, kept alive and functioning by all its living and life-giving components and parts or biological diversity. Ecosystems are created and maintained by vast diversity and populations of native species of plants and animals, from microorganisms in the soil, all the way woven through the chains of life to top predators like coyotes, mountain lions and wolves.

Killing an ecosystem for anything is the most dangerous event man does. Can a field of solar panels release oxygen, balance the gaseous composition of the atmosphere, sequester the Earth's heat trapping gases, naturally moderate and regulate the climate, create and renew a life giving soil and

purify the air and water, provide pollination, decomposition, the nitrogen cycle, the hydrological system and fresh water, seed dispersal, circulate vital nutrients and the entirety of the Earth's biogeochemistry and all ecosystems altogether create the very life zone of the Earth, the biosphere/ecosphere.

This isn't progress; this defeats the entire purpose of so-called green energy. Upon deforestation of ecosystems, the climate dries out and heats up, and all the stored C02 and methane are released back into the atmosphere, heating up the climate. The problem is, most humans are clueless as to the science of ecology and eco-scientists maintain, the extinctions of biological diversity are a threat to mankind, right up there with thermonuclear war. And you speak of grass/weeds?
04:14 PM on 10/17/2011
What B S in capitol letters . Solar panels are only 17 - 20% efficient they erode and loose efficiency as they get older in 5 years their a dud . What about the mining that is done for the rare earth metals in a Panel? What about the pollution for making the batteries , and the converter , think about it .... the best electricity is the electricity You save by reducing ....
photo
SolarPowerGuy
Ph.D., Immunology; Solar power @ home; Green Party
12:20 PM on 10/18/2011
Oh look, I just wrote this, a few posts farther up:

"Around 1970, it took more energy to manufactur­e a solar panel than you could ever generate from it. America's conservati­ves hate green energy so deeply, you can still find conservati­ve pundits TODAY publicly claiming that solar is a net energy loss."

Hmmmmmmmmmmm.

Solar photovoltaic "farms" installed in the 1980's are still in use. The panels generate 75% of the power they did on the day that they were installed.

You don't HAVE to have batteries in a photovoltaic system, you can connect directly to the power grid. Converters are cheap.

Most solar panels sold today are crystalline silicon, which use NO rare-earth metals.

They're "only 17 - 20%" efficient? What is the efficiency of your current rooftop for converting sunlight to electricity? Zero. What matters is how much more energy a system generates, over its lifetime, than was used to manufacture it -- the energy returned over the energy invested (EROEI). Solar's EROEI is around 5 and climbing. For petroleum? EROEI is around 20, but as it gets harder to drill for oil, this number is falling.

"the best electricit­y is the electricit­y You save by reducing"

This is your most sensible remark. Conservation remains cheaper than consumption. (You'll help me set Cheney straight?)

But try to get with the program. A LOT has changed in 40 years that your sources would prefer you didn't learn.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Edward Standley
opinionated jerk
10:58 PM on 10/19/2011
MIT, cast silicon cells, no metals. Don't use batteries, go grid-tie. How about human and dollar costs of global conflict over other energy sources, nuclear waste disposal costs and dangers? Market speculation on oil and nat. gas? All adds up.