Jill Abramson, New York Times' First Woman Executive Editor

newyorker.com:

At nine o’clock on the morning of September 6th, Jill Abramson was riding the subway uptown from her Tribeca loft. It was her first day as executive editor of the New York Times, and also the first time in the paper’s hundred and sixty years that a woman’s name would appear at the top of the masthead. Abramson described herself as “excited,” because of the history she was about to make, and “a little nervous,” because she knew that many in the newsroom feared her.

Abramson, who is fifty-seven, wore a white dress and a black cardigan with white flowers and red trim. Her usually pale complexion glowed from summer sun, but there were deep, dark lines under her eyes. As she entered the Times Building, she waved to the security officers and greeted colleagues in the elevator, something that she had usually been too preoccupied to do. The vast newsroom was quiet -- the place does not really come alive until about ten-thirty -- but there was a hint of apprehension. The few reporters at their pods silently watched their new boss as she walked by.

Abramson put her purse down on a white Formica desk that she occupies in the middle of the third-floor newsroom. Someone had left her a sealed envelope with “Congratulations” written on the front. It contained a cover note from a female editor at the paper along with a laminated letter passed down from that editor’s father. The letter was from a nine-year-old girl named Alexandra Early, who wrote that she got mad when she watched television: “That’s because I’m a girl and there aren’t enough girl superheroes on TV.” The cover note to Abramson said, “Wherever Alexandra Early ended up, I hope that she heard about your new job.”

Read the whole story: newyorker.com

Comments

[PC Contrarian]

06:27 PM on 10/17/2011

Thank goodness more women are running things!

Take for example education; imagine what our public schools would be like if the teacher's were mostly women. Just look at the violent nature of men on display at this school:
"Md. Teacher Accused of Choking First Graders in Court."
http://www.nbcwashington.com/news/local/Md-Teacher-Accused-of-Choking-First-Graders-in-Court-131974543.html

Wait a minute, isn't that a female teacher choking the kids?

[Morrisfactor]

02:07 PM on 10/17/2011

I don't think having a female in charge of the NYT will make much difference. For decades the Times has been quite liberal and quite feminist in it's outlook, articles, and editorials. Perhaps it was mostly men writing those articles, but they were clearly men interested (or mandated) in advancing women's agendas.

I expect (and so far this is true) that little will change in editorial content or views, even with Abramson in charge.

Men will still be bad and the root cause of all that is wrong with the world, women will still be good and angelic.