More

Philips Electronics Plans To Cut 4,500 Jobs

Phillips Electronics Job Cuts

First Posted: 10/17/11 09:06 AM ET Updated: 12/17/11 05:12 AM ET

Philips Electronics has all but abandoned hope of selling its TV business by the end of the year, leaving a question mark over how quickly it can divest its loss-making problem child.

"The global TV market has deteriorated, and obviously the sooner we complete this the better, but we first need to finalize the negotiations, and whether we can do that this year or into the first quarter of 2012, there are some uncertainties with that planning," Chief Executive Frans van Houten told reporters on Monday.

Philips -- the world's biggest lighting maker, a top three hospital equipment maker and Europe's biggest consumer electronics producer -- said negotiations to sell off most of its TV business to Hong-Kong based monitor-maker TPV were intense, constructive and taking longer than expected.

"For the eventuality that a final agreement cannot be reached, Philips will consider its alternative options," van Houten said in a statement on Monday.

Van Houten told reporters the companies were still talking but if negotiations were finalized, it could then take months to close a deal due to regulatory hurdles.

Both Philips and TPV said on Monday there was no agreed timeline to close the deal.

Van Houten also said it was too early to outline a backup plan for the TV business, which makes up less than 10 percent of group sales and has gone from being a global leader to a drag on the Dutch company.

The unit has notched up almost 1 billion euros in losses since the beginning of 2007, when competition with lower cost Asian rivals began to intensify.

"The TV negotiations are taking longer than expected, and there's no final agreement, which is a clear negative," said Rabobank analyst Hans Slob.

"That Philips says the negotiations are 'intense' doesn't sound very good either, and it looks like there is a clear chance they won't strike a deal," Slob added.

Other analysts have said management's tone and language suggest the TV deal is just delayed, and could still happen, but perhaps at a higher cost.

"Certain details and terms of the deal, which were initially agreed upon and which took into account the global TV market, will be under pressure now that the underlying flat screen TV market has weakened significantly," said Sjoerd Ummels an analyst at ING.

"Clearly what we don't want is Philips to say they can't sell the TV business and they intend to restructure it while they look for another buyer, or just close it down," said a London-based analyst who spoke on condition of anonymity.

On Monday Philips reported falling third-quarter profit due to higher restructuring and raw material costs and sluggish European growth and said it would focus on operational and overhead cuts as part of its 800 million euro cost saving plan.

Philips said it would aim to cut 4,500 jobs as part of the restructuring scheme to boost profit and meet its financial targets. That is about 3.7 percent of its non-TV workforce of just over 120,000, which had already been reduced by a 2009 program to cut 6,000 jobs.

Despite reiterating the firm's 2013 financial targets of 4-6 percent sales growth, and a margin on earnings before interest, tax and amortization (EBITA) of 10-12 percent, Van Houten said Philips had a long way to go.

"We are not yet satisfied with our current financial performance, given the ongoing economic challenges, especially in Europe, and operational issues and risks. We do not expect to realize a material performance improvement in the near term," he said in a statement.

The firm reported third-quarter net profit of 76 million euros, down from 524 million euros a year ago on sales of 5.394 billion euros, down from 5.46 billion euros.

Analysts in a Reuters-commissioned poll had expected third-quarter net profit of 53.8 million euros on sales of 5.341 billion euros.

The Dutch firm halved its third-quarter earnings before interest, tax and amortization (EBITA) to 368 million euros, down from 648 million euros a year ago, just beating analyst expectations for 334 million euros.

Higher restructuring and acquisition-related charges as well as higher raw material costs weighed on the firm's earnings at its entertainment and consumer lighting units.

Philips made a shock 1.3 billion-euro second-quarter net loss on writedowns at its lighting and healthcare units, due to weak consumer demand in Europe and North America, so analysts were not surprised by the third quarter results.

In the past seven months, Philips has issued two profit warnings, slashed its long-term growth targets and been hit by the combination of low-cost Asian rivals, rising raw material costs, sagging consumer confidence, sluggish construction markets and government budget cuts in the healthcare sector.

Philips's shares, which have tumbled almost 40 percent over the year, were trading up 1.45 percent at 15.08 euros at 1037 GMT.

Philips competes with Samsung and LG Electronics, among others, in consumer electronics, and with General Electric and Siemens in the hospital and lighting markets.

(Additional reporting by Aaron Gray-Block; Editing by David Cowell)

Copyright 2011 Thomson Reuters. Click for Restrictions.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Money newsletter!
Philips Electronics has all but abandoned hope of selling its TV business by the end of the year, leaving a question mark over how quickly it can divest its loss-making problem child. "The glob...
Philips Electronics has all but abandoned hope of selling its TV business by the end of the year, leaving a question mark over how quickly it can divest its loss-making problem child. "The glob...
Filed by Jillian Berman  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 43
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Altario
Among nerds, I'm cool.
08:31 AM on 10/18/2011
People blaming Phillips. Or any other country or manufacturer. You buy the cheap stuff that comes from these poorer countries, then whine when the companies that produce high priced items are forced to lay off workers or scale back wages, then in yet an even more hypocritical turn, go about whining that there are poor people in these third world countries. You are the problem.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
vippy
Carpe Diem!
08:33 PM on 10/17/2011
Read today that October's job figures turned out better than expected.  No mentioning of the mass layoffs still to come, Lowe's is closing 20 stores.  I am certain Home Depot is soon to follow.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
authorized-user
No right way to do a wrong thing
07:31 PM on 10/17/2011
Philips learned a valuable lesson, a great TV doesn't improve the programming.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
04:56 PM on 10/17/2011
It's a Dutch company, people. Phillips, which owns the business cannot compete, and is losing money. I am guessing the negotiations run along the line of TPV wanting the Phillips brand name, and trying to obtain the factories dirt cheap. TPV could probably completely replace the Phillips product line by expanding in Hong Kong, if they even need to expand production. Phillips, on the other hand, needs to unload a money-losing business arm.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
becky bradshaw
"In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth
09:25 PM on 10/17/2011
Globalism will force the Dutch economy to eventually match the cost of production. Other conclusions are political evasions.

So what does Philips and their employees do now? It would be like the 49ers admitting they can't play football, quitting the NFL, and entering a spelling bee.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
04:33 PM on 10/17/2011
That's it. Time to occupy Phillips. Capitalist pigs! They don't care about the 4,500 they've exploited.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rae112754
03:17 PM on 10/17/2011
How many Obama supporters does it take to screw in a light bulb..............???
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
becky bradshaw
"In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth
04:00 PM on 10/17/2011
Globalism has been resulting in the equalizati­on of living standards across the planet. This may be good for the poorest societies, but it is horrible for Europe. If this path continues, our future can be seen in the slums of India, a few amazing mansions surrounded by slums with millions and millions of people living in homes made from cow dung and cardboard boxes. Citizens forced to share a single porta-potty with more than 15,000 strangers.

Reference: http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5hHdMQpJvmg9tTgmcnq5siN22EKiQ?docId=CNG.8c9e8d5c51e25bb0c9c0a7f18739c401.491
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
04:32 PM on 10/17/2011
globalism is bad for wealthy countries that manufacture. Wait a minute....didn't the US manufacture a while back?
07:17 PM on 10/17/2011
Dear Becky,

The issue is standard of living for the third world have not increased in most places, they have decreased. The main reason for this is that the US has a huge debt, that uses all the worlds capital to fund our government.

While our standard of living has decrease also, due to the fact that we are no longer making anything.

So the service and government economy that everybody throught was going to be great is not working as to create wealthy you need energy and manufacturing.

We want to increase our standard of lving, allow us to use the least expensive form of energy, and lets put america back to work making stuff instead of doing an enviromental report.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
05:00 PM on 10/17/2011
6,001 ! One to hold the bulb and the other 6,000 to rotate the ladder.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
becky bradshaw
"In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth
09:15 PM on 10/17/2011
I sit in one of the dives
On Fifty-second street
Uncertain and afraid
As the clever hopes expire
Of a low dishonest decade.

W H Auden
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
becky bradshaw
"In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth
03:12 PM on 10/17/2011
Philips "was instrumental in the launch of TSMC (Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Corporation), now the world's largest contract chip maker.

Morris Chang, the founder and chairman of TSMC, successfully convinced Philips to invest in TSMC and use its factories to manufacture Philips' chips, making the European giant an original investor and early customer.

Philips' name was just as important as its money to TSMC. Adding Philips to the list of TSMC investors helped convince government officials in Taiwan, other investors and other potential customers to work with and invest in TSMC early on.

Since then, however, Philips has transformed its business, exiting the chip industry by selling off most of its chip division in 2006 to private equity investors, which renamed it NXP Semiconductors.

TSMC brought a new model to the chip world in the 1980s called "foundry," or contract chip manufacturing business."

Reference: http://www.pcworld.com/businesscenter/article/149795/original_tsmc_investor_philips_sells_off_final_shares.html
photo
blueyesinbhead
Agree with me, and everything will be fine
02:30 PM on 10/17/2011
I have already been there done that with Philips. I was working for a sister company of Philips in 1994 when they closed our place down. And where did the jobs go? Why Mexico of course. Thanks NAFTA. And most of all, THANK YOU PHILIPS. Some things just never go out of style huh Philips.
Greed>The People
02:24 PM on 10/17/2011
I'll bet the executives will get a big bonus for making stupid strategic mistakes.
MrStat1
I believe in the rule of law
02:40 PM on 10/17/2011
Stupid is a value judgement. What may seem stupid to you may be smart to the board of directors.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Eric Shin
i like big butts I cannot lie
12:51 PM on 10/17/2011
Lights out!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gerald4
licensed mechanical and electrical engineer
11:11 AM on 10/17/2011
How do you think that any of the US or European manufacturing businesses could ever possibly even consider creating any jobs in the USA or Europe if they are hamstrung with many times more expensive labor costs, ten times more expensive electrical energy that is required to be generated in compliance with the EPA, health care payroll tax costs, unemployment payroll tax costs, social security and medical care payroll tax costs, environmental manufacturing costs, fringe (holiday and vacation) benefit payroll costs, OSHA compliance payroll costs, union labor work rules, anti-business laws, and general anti-business attitudes that make manufacturing products in the USA many many times more costly than manufacturing the same product in almost any other foreign country? Taxes on profits are a small factor compared to the other costs.

US manufacturing businesses must therefore take advantage of the US FREE TRADE TREATIES created and then ratified by the Democratic and Republican members of the US Congress and then signed into law by US presidents that ECONOMICALLY REQUIRES US Businesses to offshore US jobs and/or import foreign made products (including parts and sub assemblies for assembly in the USA) in order to meet the US CONSUMER'S DEMAND for the absolutely LOWEST POSSIBLE PRICE for each product, without the US manufacturing business going bankrupt by using US labor and US environmental manufacturing costs.
photo
portfolio
money is the barometer of a society's virtue
12:05 PM on 10/17/2011
"How do you think that any of the US or European manufactur­ing businesses could ever possibly even consider creating any jobs in the USA or Europe"

*closer to market
*safer investing climate
*better infrastructure
*more productive workforce due to
*higher capitalization per worker

As you rightly point out, there are some perverse incentives to locate plant operations overseas.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gerald4
licensed mechanical and electrical engineer
12:56 PM on 10/17/2011
The USA must face the truth.

*closer to market - International Transportation costs are very low!
*safer investing climate - The Value of the US dollar is falling each time thet the US government prints currency (US Bonds and US Dollars)
*better infrastruc­ture - Businesses need low cost utilities, not "Infrastructure" to serve the workers. Remember the "COMPANY TOWNS" at the Coal Mines, Steel Mills, Canneries, etc,
*more productive workforce due to - Less productive work force due to US labor rules.
*higher capitaliza­tion per worker - ??? - lower plant construction costs in foreign countries.

I think that unemployed US citizens should blame me and all of the other US citizens for electing both Republican and Democrat US Congressmen and Senators that created all of the "FREE TRADE" legislation created during the past 30 years that legally allowed and ECONOMICALLY REQUIRED that almost all non-government jobs in the USA be moved to foreign nations by removing the import tariffs that protected the USA jobs (or actually the pay scales, benefits) of the US worker and allowed businesses to take advantage of the lower labor, electricity and EPA manufacturing regulation compliance!

To be fair, George Bush and most all of the elected Republican and Democratic US Congressmen and Senators were also in favor of NAFTA, so I guess the US workers were just sold out for lower cost consumer products.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
03:26 PM on 10/17/2011
It's no longer closer to market.
Infrastructure in China has increased dramatically.
What in Europe is a safe investing bet?

I don't see how your last two points create better environments for liquid capital.
12:41 PM on 10/17/2011
Yes. We need to get rid of the minimum wage and offer jobs to the person who bids the lowest on them, starting at $2 hour. We don't need no EPA to stop manufacturing firms from dumping mercury into the rivers or in the air.

===

Did you even read the article, it had to do with CRT television tubes.

Perhaps if Philip light bulbs didn't seem to blow out prematurely, they might get better sales in the US? My experience is that their incandescent and CFL bulbs fail quickly while consuming more power than comparable bulbs so I refuse to buy them.
photo
baxtron
tek phlarpt
10:07 AM on 10/17/2011
can profits ever remain constant? does it always have to rise every year?
photo
Mister Grumpy
An Angry American
10:04 AM on 10/17/2011
What is lost on Republicans is that it's the lack of demand that is the leading cause of job losses........ which in turn creates less demand and more job losses........

They continue to believe that cutting costs by cutting needed jobs is the way to salvation........ in actuality all it does is create less demand....... which creates more job losses.........

Cutting jobs to reduce costs only benefits the shareholder.........
SeriesSeven
Libs Love Unproven Counterfactuals
12:04 PM on 10/17/2011
Ok, dim bulb...why not come back to reality for a second. Philips is not in trouble because of a lack of demand. It's in trouble because it is uncompetitive with lower cost import alternatives. In your deranged world, are you going to pay more for the same product just because demand is higher?

Of course cutting jobs to reduce costs benefits the shareholders. That's the only group of people that a corporation is legally required to benefit! It's the entire reason for the existence of a business...to benefit the owners. Otherwise, there wouldn't be any businesses! If a company is uncompetitive in a certain division because its labor costs are not comparable to its competitors, then it has 2 choices: 1. Cut jobs 2. Reduce marginal labor costs. Since geniuses like you are ranting for decades about applying grossly burdensome fixed costs to hiring and employment, of course #1 is their only option.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
vippy
Carpe Diem!
02:35 PM on 10/17/2011
Wall Street is the problem.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
vippy
Carpe Diem!
09:44 AM on 10/17/2011
As I said, we have seen nothing yet. The big layoffs are coming whether private industry, federal government or states. The house of cards is collapsing and look at the candidates, promises, promises though nothing they ever promised came through. There should be a way to throw them out of office for incompetence, or shall we say, using Obama's proposal, to procure the senators on a trial basis (voluntarily), same as they are trying to do to the working man! It all points to a "one government for the world - whether by conquest or consent."
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Blutodog
Say what?
10:06 AM on 10/17/2011
Our so called leaders are only concerned about their own jobs. Beyond that they could care less.
photo
Mister Grumpy
An Angry American
10:07 AM on 10/17/2011
Yes, the US is heading for a world of hurt......... but what I will never understand about either party is their love for these Free Trade Agreements........ how's does making someone else's foreign product less expensive than that made in the US help us?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gerald4
licensed mechanical and electrical engineer
06:37 PM on 10/17/2011
Mr. Grumpy:

HOW DO YOU THINK THAT ALL OF THE "FREE TRADE" LEGISLATION THAT CAUSED MOST OF THE US JOBS TO RELOCATE TO OVERSEAS LOCATIONS WAS CREATED?

Under the US constitutional system, any US citizen or any foreign citizen, individual or business can hire professional lobbyists (“to petition the government”) and spend hundreds of thousands of dollars on wine, food, women, song, corporate jobs for their (unemployable) children/wives/girlfriends of the congressmen, vacations, cash, prepaid sexual services, and campaign contributions to entice (bribe) as many of our congressmen as required to create whatever legislation that the clients of the “professional” lobbyists want to have created.

The lobbyists must also spend similar amounts on each of the congressmen's multitudes of congressional aids if the lobbyists want whatever legislation their clients desire to be created, because the elected congressmen and senators do not have time to read or study any of the proposed legislation and they just vote however their aids tell then to vote.

Drinking, womanizing, vacationing, power lunches and other similar activities that the lobbyists provide keep most of our elected representatives busy, and maybe that is why each congressperson needs many congressional aids to do his legislative job and tell the congressman how to vote on each issue.
photo
greenToBlue
A life without AHA moment is the cause of TP think
09:32 AM on 10/17/2011
bUg job cuts ;-)