iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

U.S. District Judge Emmet Sullivan Decides On Polar Bear Ruling

MATTHEW DALY   10/17/11 08:11 PM ET   AP

WASHINGTON — A federal judge has thrown out a key section of an Interior Department rule concerning the threat to polar bears posed by global warming.

U.S. District Judge Emmet Sullivan ruled Monday that the Bush administration did not complete a required environmental review when it said the bear's designation as threatened in 2008 could not be used as a backdoor way to control greenhouse gases blamed for global warming.

The Obama administration agreed with the Bush administration a year later, saying that activities outside of the bear's habitat such as emissions from a power plant could not be controlled using the Endangered Species Act.

The Center for Biological Diversity, an environmental group that filed a lawsuit over the 2008 rule, said the decision puts the fate of the polar bear back in the hands of the Obama administration and Interior Secretary Ken Salazar.

"The Obama administration has the chance to do right by the polar bear," said Kassie Siegel, an attorney for the group. "They need to decide whether the polar bear gets all the protections that other endangered species get, or whether they want to re-adopt a flawed Bush administration decision that exempts greenhouse gases" and other pollutants from the Endangered Species Act.

Sullivan's decision directs the Interior Department to respond by Nov. 17 with a timetable for when it will complete the required environmental review. Sullivan left an interim 2008 designation intact while the case continues.

In a related ruling Monday, Sullivan upheld a ban by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to ban imports of sport-hunted polar bears as trophies. Safari Club International and other U.S. hunting groups had sought permission to allow bear carcasses to be imported from Canada.

The Humane Society of the United States hailed the ruling, which it said rejected "the Orwellian claim that killing polar bears is somehow good for polar bears."

Jonathan Lovvorn, the group's senior vice president and chief counsel for animal protection litigation, said that just as the United States does not allow importation of tiger skins and baby seal fur, "American conservation law prevents American hunters from bringing home the heads and hides of imperiled polar bears shot in other countries."

The Fish and Wildlife Service said in a statement that it is reviewing the decision to determine the agency's next steps.

In June, Sullivan upheld a 2008 decision by the Fish and Wildlife Service to place the bear on the endangered species list as threatened because of melting sea ice.

Environmental groups had sued, saying the polar bear needed more protection under the Endangered Species Act. The state of Alaska and hunting groups argued that the listing was unnecessary.

Along with the listing, then-Interior Secretary Dirk Kempthorne created a "special rule" stating that the Endangered Species Act would not be used to set climate policy or limit greenhouse gas emissions, which contribute to global warming and melting ice in the Arctic Ocean.

It was that aspect of the rule that Sullivan set aside on Monday.

The polar bear is unique among species protected under the Endangered Species Act because it is the first to be designated as threatened because of global warming.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST GREEN

WASHINGTON — A federal judge has thrown out a key section of an Interior Department rule concerning the threat to polar bears posed by global warming. U.S. District Judge Emmet Sullivan ruled M...
WASHINGTON — A federal judge has thrown out a key section of an Interior Department rule concerning the threat to polar bears posed by global warming. U.S. District Judge Emmet Sullivan ruled M...
Filed by Joanna Zelman  |  Report Corrections
 
 
  • Comments
  • 44
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
02:15 PM on 12/15/2011
Isn't there ever enough wildlife killing? When can it all end? The animals are not needed as food, do not overpopulate and are usually on the verge of some kind of catastrophe or extinction anyway. Enough....I hope President Obama and Interior do manage to do the right thing....it's sickening, all the waste of beautiful living things. End the carnage, be humane!!
11:35 PM on 10/18/2011
To be human is to be nourished by the wild country. To know that there is a place where the eagle flies in freedom, the grizzly walks in majesty, and the caribou runs with the wind across the open tundra, lifts the human spirit. Let's not let a few people in Congress, out of sight and out of touch with the American people's commitment to keeping some wild places alive - for ourselves, for all people and for the future --take actions all of us will soon regret. JOHN DENVER, 1995 If Henry John had lived, you can be sure he would be standing in defense of the great Polar Bear. He loved them, he felt, back then that they, like the whale were in jeopardy. They are..and along with the loss of the polar bear will be the loss of all of us. The ice is melting, do we not do anything about it until it is too late and our actions are meaningless? We are all so very connected. What happens to the Polar Bear happens to us. " Lets not wait until the world cries bring it back".. John Denver, Americas Child...peace
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
10:54 PM on 10/18/2011
I’m not clear why it isn’t always prudent to possibly err in the direction of preserving species rather than gamble with their existence in favor of various short-term benefits.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bcmom
Stop breeding puppies
09:19 PM on 10/18/2011
All these environmental rulings have to do with all of us, animal and humans. Otherwise, no one is going to be around, even the Republicans. I know they they think they are immune from climate change since they do not believe in. We are all in the same boat so to speak, or the same small planet. We are killing everything faster and faster. At sometime, it will be too late to stop the destruction.
02:21 PM on 12/15/2011
The Repubs get such a hard-on about saving the country for their kids and grandkids, yet all they do is destroy and take away. They truly are the NO-NOTHING and DO-NOTHING PARTY.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:17 AM on 10/18/2011
If Obama wants to do something about CO2 he should introduce a policy to do something about it and stop trying to find these tricks like he did with health care to try to do things. If you are a Polar Bear I have bad news for you, you are going to die and your species is going to be extinct except in zoos, your habitat may as well already be gone you sources of food will be less abundant and you will dissapear from the earth. This is important because we need to do the same thing with our own habitat as human beings, if we actually looked around we would see that we are in the exact same situation as the Polar Bears and we are doing less for ourselves than we are for them. The government is not going to help us, look at the way the financial crisis was handled, it wasn't it was totally wasted and the same thing is happening with climate change. The Wall Street protesters and environmentalists need to understand this, YOU, your family and your community are the only groups that are going to put an end to the types of behavior that cause these messes. Farm your own food, use your own human powered transportation, put solar panels on your roof, the further you get away from the economic and political system that is failing you, the less susceptible you will be to major shocks that are endemic in it.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MikeWebster
Always happy.
03:51 AM on 10/18/2011
I agree the polar bears are important. On the other hand, Global warming will be killing billions of people around the world within the next hundred years.

I'll bet we won't even be able to sue then, despite the fact that the science is in, and continuing on the same path we are on in terms of GHG emissions, would be the definition of criminal negligence.
02:19 PM on 12/15/2011
People destroy and overpopulate and lead to their own destruction. The animals are victims of people. End the carnage....stop the slaughter of beautiful living things that most people never get to see up close except when they're taking aim.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dclintn648
Conservatism is dread
08:23 PM on 10/17/2011
There is no excuse for killing an animal for "sport". It's not a sport, it's a LIFE you're taking away. It's one thing to eat. It's another to kill for "fun". Sport hunters are the lowest form of life.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jwald1
Badges? I don't need no stinking badges!
02:50 AM on 10/18/2011
I have never understood how seeing the death and suffering of any living being can bring anyone with a heart joy. How does one not see value in life?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
personal beliefs
Things never go according to plan, so plan accordi
11:48 AM on 10/18/2011
that is exactly how I feel about those who have abortions.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
karen lyons kalmenson
i poem/paint, sometimes, i ain't
12:35 PM on 10/18/2011
people of that low type mindset assume superiority to those they kill:(
02:18 PM on 12/15/2011
It's not a sport when one living thing has a gun and the other living thing is pretty much defenseless. In this day and age, end the carnage and find another hobby. Killing things doesn't make you more of a man, that's for sure. But I guess it does get you out of the double-wide for the day!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
06:46 PM on 10/17/2011
If people really want to save the polar bear the best way is to make them legally hunted big game animals. It was duck hunters who saved the ducks of North America from extinction. Hunters have done such a good job of protecting white-tailed deer that they are now overabundant and a nuisance.

If people could legally hunt male polar bears it would provide an incentive to protect females and cubs. The major danger to cubs is male polar bears. Since one male can impregnate a dozen females the hunters could remove half or more of the males without impacting reproduction. It would also mean more food for the females and cubs with less competition.
07:58 PM on 10/17/2011
So, maybe the best way to save the republican party is to start hunting them, huh?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:32 PM on 10/17/2011
Sign me up.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
08:21 PM on 10/17/2011
Your reasoning is totally flawed because their habitat is literally melting under their feet. Bears have to swim hundreds of miles to find food.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:33 PM on 10/17/2011
Piffle.