iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Citigroup Paying $285 Million To Settle Charges Of Misleading Buyers Of Mortgage Securities

Citigroup

MARCY GORDON and DANIEL WAGNER   10/19/11 07:24 PM ET   AP

WASHINGTON — Citigroup has agreed to pay $285 million to settle civil fraud charges that it misled buyers of a complex mortgage investment just as the housing market was starting to collapse.

The Securities and Exchange Commission said Wednesday that the big Wall Street bank bet against the investment in 2007 and made $160 million in fees and profits. Investors lost millions.

Citigroup neither admitted nor denied the SEC's allegations in the settlement.

"We are pleased to put this matter behind us and are focused on contributing to the economic recovery, serving our clients and growing responsibly," Citigroup said in a statement.

The penalty is the biggest involving a Wall Street firm accused of misleading investors before the financial crisis since Goldman Sachs & Co. paid $550 million to settle similar charges last year. JPMorgan Chase & Co. resolved similar charges in June and paid $153.6 million.

All the cases have involved complex investments called collateralized debt obligations. Those are securities that are backed by pools of other assets, such as mortgages.

Citigroup's payment includes the fees and profit it earned, plus $30 million in interest and a $95 million penalty. The money will be returned to the investors, the SEC said.

In the July-September quarter, Citigroup earned $3.8 billion. CEO Vikram Pandit this year was awarded a multi-year bonus package that could be worth nearly $23.4 million if performance goals are met.

At the height of the financial crisis in 2008, regulators worried that Citigroup was on the brink of failure. It received $45 billion as part of the $700 billion government bailout.

In the civil lawsuit filed Wednesday, the SEC said Citigroup traders discussed in late 2006 the possibility of buying financial instruments to essentially bet on the failure of the mortgage assets being assembled in the deal.

Rating agencies downgraded most of the investments that Citigroup had bundled together just as many troubled homeowners stopped paying their mortgages in late 2007. That pushed the investment into default and cost its buyers' – hedge funds and investment managers – several hundred million dollars in losses.

Among the biggest losers were Ambac, a bond insurer, and BNP Paribas, a European bank. Ambac had sold Citigroup protection against losses on the investment, allowing Citigroup to bet against it.

Hedge funds had asked Citigroup to sell them investments that would decline if the housing market crashed. Citigroup did so, and wanted to get in on the action, the SEC said.

Citigroup bet that the investments would fail, but never told investors it had done so, SEC enforcement chief Robert Khuzami said in a conference call.

"Key facts regarding how the structure was put together were not made available to (investors), and they suffered losses as a result," he said.

Even though Citigroup designed the investment to fail, it told investors it had been designed by an independent manager, the SEC said. Citigroup's marketing materials said the investments were picked by Credit Suisse. In an email about the deal, one Citigroup banker asked another not to tell Credit Suisse that it was designed for Citigroup to profit.

Credit Suisse "agreed to the terms even though they don't get to pick the assets," the email said, according to the SEC's complaint.

Credit Suisse also reached a settlement with the SEC. Two divisions of the bank agreed to pay a $1.25 million civil fine. It will also return $1 million in fees and pay $250,000 in interest. They didn't admit or deny the charges.

Credit Suisse declined to comment on the settlement.

The SEC also filed charges against Brian Stoker, a Citigroup employee it said was mainly responsible for putting together the deal. Stoker will contest the charges, according to a statement released by his lawyer.

___

AP Business Writer Pallavi Gogoi in New York contributed to this report.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Money newsletter!
WASHINGTON — Citigroup has agreed to pay $285 million to settle civil fraud charges that it misled buyers of a complex mortgage investment just as the housing market was starting to collapse. T...
WASHINGTON — Citigroup has agreed to pay $285 million to settle civil fraud charges that it misled buyers of a complex mortgage investment just as the housing market was starting to collapse. T...
Filed by Maxwell Strachan  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 259
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (10 total)
ajwriter
Healthy equilibrium, healthy democracy
07:46 PM on 12/05/2011
Not enough has been done to date to remove the perverse incentives that led to banks making half of their money from various overcharges and fees just before the meltdown, nor enough to give consumers the kind of recourse that would have alerted regulators and made for course corrections at the level of every consumer interaction along the way (preventing the meltdown).

It's great that these investors will get their money back, but after-the-fact litigation should be rare and rarely necessary if laws help consumers have the power to keep things honest in their daily dealings with banks.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sf1000000
Screw being nice its highly overrated
10:37 AM on 10/21/2011
What a polite word, "misled" or " misleading"...it's not offensive to the ears or to the people you say it about, like saying "opps I had an accident" you say that when you spill your drink,
But why pay $285 MILLION (drop in the old bucket) if you are not guility? I mean YOU Only MISLED investors,..not LIKE YOUR OUT AND OUT RIGHT LIED TO THEM IS IT OR IS IT?
Let's stop with thie politcial correctness shall we? Bush lied about WMD as did Cheney and sent then Sec of State Powel to the UN to repeat that lie..Citi LIED to investors, or how would they have KNOWN to bet against the very product they have constructed and packaged to their investors..Innocent men sing it to the heavens that they are Innocent...Citi bank Paid...but in reality how much did they make on the Deal?
OWS is more than right about these banks and what is going on and RIGHT In front of us...Misled, no lied and cheated and of course NO one went to jail just a little slap bad Citi bank..no dinner for you...
An all the time down in DC the Republicans and Dems are sit and look the other way..none of them with the courage or the moral back bone to force the clean up of WS..and the good people on WS the ones that play by the RULES what about them?
photo
sfizi
The Great Seal of the Winged Skull 81
07:17 PM on 10/20/2011
Misleading ? more like scam rob and lie just put the responsible in jail for a while and same thing for bank of america and other similar bank pigs, crack down the politicians involved as well...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rschli7137
10:25 AM on 10/20/2011
Citigroup....$285 million
Goldman Sachs....$550 million
JP Morgan Chase....$153.6 million
Several others under investigation.
These fines are but a small pittance of the damage to our economy, the lives they've ruined, and the deep recession they've helped create!
Yeah...let's get rid of all regulations!
So very sad that so many people were lied to, taken advantage of. I was brought up to trust people in these positions. After all, they're well educated, they are there to serve your best interests, they are there to help you find the American Dream. Turns out they're only there to fill their pockets with your money at any expense. R.I.P. American Dream.
Now, maybe, some will realize what the protesters are protesting. I'm an older man, fortunately I was able to find that dream. I sympathize and support anyone who wants this type of skullduggery to be eliminated.
photo
des946
Consultant
10:57 AM on 10/20/2011
And in spite of all of the frauds, malfeasances . . . and all of the BILLIONS of dollars 9actually at least a TRILLION dollars) in economic damage; and all of the continuing economic damages, unemployment, foreclosures, etc., etc., etc. . . . The CEOs and upper management who ORCHESTRATED, and perpetualted all of this CRIMES, have continued to receive their EXORBITANT salries, bonuses (record bonuses), etc. up until the current time.

THAT is the basis of the OWS demonstrators "complaints. It defies common sense that all of this has been allowed to continue on; AND that the government has been issuing "guarantees of immunity from prosectuion for these CRIMINALS as a part of the TOKEN SETLEMENTS todate. That is the personificatioon of CORRUPTION in business and in government.
ajwriter
Healthy equilibrium, healthy democracy
07:50 PM on 12/05/2011
That's a really good point. Where's the evidence that these exorbitant salaries result in better performance? Beyond a certain level, I would argue the exorbitant salaries themselves create perverse incentives that run counter to shareholder interests. Now, in this crisis, is a good time to solve the salary problem, because I'll bet companies can find good talent that is just interested in a good job even if it doesn't involve astronomical sums.

There's a lot of business research showing that beyond a certain level, exorbitant compensation can actually have negative effects on performance...
11:44 AM on 10/20/2011
One thing, regulaitons were in place so what happened? The banks were gambeling and they should have lost. But the bought and sold politicians on both sides bailed them out. I would have let them fail and then maybe they would lean a lesson.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rschli7137
01:03 PM on 10/20/2011
The problem with letting them fail is that it also takes their millions of customers down with them. These mega-banks not only hold depositer money, but also control investments, pensions, 401K's, IRA's etc. These things are not guaranteed under FDIC.
So I understand Bush & Obama's reasoning for a bailout. Without it, it would have plunged us even deeper into recession, unemployment, and perhaps even depression.
I actually believe we need more regulation, we need people to police these industries, and much, much stiffer penalties when they are caught & convicted.
09:46 AM on 10/20/2011
They get to skate and we get the shaft.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Caseybug
I close my eyes and life gets simpler.
08:56 AM on 10/20/2011
That isn't punishment, that's encouragement.
07:53 AM on 10/20/2011
OK, now will the DOJ seek criminal charges against the crooks? Paying a few million isn't a get out of jail card and will not solve the problem. Putting every manager, including the CEO, involved in the theft will stop the practice. Who benefited more than top management from the crime and had the authority to authorize the act? Put the bums in jail!!!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sunshineclaimsfl
07:51 AM on 10/20/2011
And people like Herman Cain say: Dont blame wall street blame Obama? All you people who are against occupy wall street should tape this article on your walls............Wall street and their corrupt practices is why we are in the shape we are in now and the fact that Citi Bank had to pay 285 miliion in damages is a drop in the bucket next to what it probably profited and more to the point what certain people who work in and with Citi made. These decisions made from the right wing boardrooms of America are not neccessarily for the good of the company. Its for the good of the pockets of those execs who dreamed it up. They profit and should it come back to haunt the company then who pays for it. The company and not them. And if the company or bank is big enough, or too big to let fail then its us paying for these schemes. When do we all say enough is enough.
07:16 AM on 10/20/2011
How about their Reverse 10-1 Stock split- then the stock fell 50%
06:48 AM on 10/20/2011
It is too bad that the people Government is capitalizing off of foreclosures and those who have been cheated by the financial institutions get nothing. The SEC and the Senate Banking Committee did not do their jobs and that who is responsible for the mortgage crisis. Why are the settlements being paid to the United States Government, they were not the ones who were cheated?
photo
des946
Consultant
05:39 AM on 10/20/2011
I suspect that Citi paid the $285 million and the costs of negotiations out of a probable haf billion or billion dollars of PROFITS that ehy got from the FRAUDS related to these matters.

So, why isn't there an accounting for the amount of profits that Citi made from the frauds that the fines are against? So, Citi STILL profitted from the ORCHESTRATED FRAUDS . . . and they undoubtedly were givenimmunities from prsecution for any of the related malfeasances . . . right?
photo
des946
Consultant
03:59 AM on 10/20/2011
LOL . . . another TOKEN settlement that is far from being commensurate to the amount that investors were defrauded, right? And . . . of course . . . Citi does NOT any admission of any type of malfeasances or "wrong doings"involved in any of these matters . . . AND, of course they probably received guarantees of immunity from prosecution for any previous malfeasances in connection with any of these matters.

The scenario is fairly well defined and rigid at this point: The banks pay a TOKEN fine amount, admit tono guilt, and are guaranteed IMMUNITY from prosecution . . .sn't that a wonderful way to WHITE WASH and CLEANSE all of these massive WHITE COLLAR CRIMES. And the BEST PART is that the CEOs and uppermanagement get to keep ALL of their exorbitant salaries and record bonuses . . . the stock holders, in essence, absorb the costs of it all.

This is the personification of ABSOLUTE CORRUPTION by business and government.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Don Clanton
Tough is not enough but it's a good start
03:52 AM on 10/20/2011
And this is justice?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Nathan V
01:06 AM on 10/20/2011
I would've rather seen, "Our CEO and administrative management has been forced to resign, future management has a salary cap, and we will work to impose stricter regulation on the financial industry" instead.

How can companies, and the decisions of a few hundred, cost the economy billions and this is an acceptable resolution?
photo
des946
Consultant
05:40 AM on 10/20/2011
. . . for them to resign WITHOUT ANY "exit packages" of enormous pay . . . and to be indicted and prosecuted for their malfeasances (CRIMES of FRAUD).
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LynnW49
"A great democracy must be progressive." TR
12:50 AM on 10/20/2011
"We are pleased to put this matter behind us and are focused on contributing to the economic recovery, serving our clients and growing responsibly," Citigroup said in a statement.
-------

And we'd like to sell you a bridge.
photo
des946
Consultant
04:02 AM on 10/20/2011
. . . and perhaps I should withdraw all of my savings in Citi, which are at the FDIC maximum amount. I am just damn glad that I did not invest it in Citi stock.