iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Social Security COLA Increase Coming In 2012

Social Security Cola Increase

STEPHEN OHLEMACHER   10/19/11 10:33 PM ET   AP

WASHINGTON — That didn't last long. About 55 million Social Security recipients will get their first increase in benefits next year since 2009 – a 3.6 percent raise. But higher Medicare premiums could erase part of it.

For some, higher Medicare Part B premiums could wipe out as much as a fourth of their raise from Social Security, according to projections by the trustees who oversee the programs.

Medicare is expected to announce 2012 Part B premiums as early as next week. The premiums, which cover doctor visits, are deducted automatically from monthly Social Security payments.

The Social Security Administration announced the pay increase Wednesday, offering a measure of comfort to millions of retirees and disabled people, many who have seen their retirement accounts dwindle, home values drop and out-of-pocket medical costs rise in the years since their last raise.

Starting in January, 55 million Social Security recipients will get increases averaging $39 a month, or just over $467 for the year. In December, more than 8 million people who receive Supplemental Security Income, the disability program for the poor, will get increases averaging $18 a month, or about $216 for the year.

In all, 1 in 5 U.S. residents stand to get a raise from the cost-of-living adjustment, or COLA.

Advocates for seniors say the raise is welcome and overdue.

"It may be cold comfort, however, once they see just how high next year's Medicare premiums will go," said Max Richtman, president and CEO of the National Committee to Preserve Social Security and Medicare.

The annual cost-of-living adjustment is tied to an inflation measure released Wednesday. The measure, which was adopted in the 1970s, produced no COLA in 2010 or 2011 because inflation was too low. Those were the first two years without a COLA since automatic increases were enacted in 1975.

Monthly Social Security payments average $1,082, or about $13,000 a year.

Medicare Part B premiums must be set each year to cover 25 percent of program costs. By law, they have been frozen at 2009 levels for about 75 percent of beneficiaries because there has been no increase in Social Security payments.

That means the entire premium hike has been borne by the remaining 25 percent, which includes new enrollees, high-income families and low-income beneficiaries who have their premiums paid by Medicaid, the federal-state health care program for the poor.

The 2009 premium levels are $96.40 a month. Most of those who enrolled in the program in 2010 pay $110.50 a month and most of those who enrolled in 2011 pay $115.40.

In May, the Medicare trustees said they expected the Part B premium to be $106.60 a month in 2012, a figure that could change when the actual premium is set. At that rate, about a quarter of Medicare beneficiaries would see their premiums go down. The rest would pay $10.20 more each month, erasing about a fourth of Social Security COLA for the average recipient.

An Obama administration official suggested the Part B premium could be lower than the projection, but did not reveal the amount.

"The administration will have an announcement about premiums in the days ahead that we believe will alleviate some of these concerns," said the official, who spoke on condition of anonymity. The official was not authorized to speak publicly about the upcoming announcement.

AARP Executive Vice President Nancy LeaMond said the COLA "underscores the importance of Social Security as the only guaranteed, lifelong and inflation-adjusted source of retirement income for most Americans."

"Unfortunately," she added, "the increase announced (Wednesday) will not completely ease their burden. Medicare premiums are also expected to rise for many. And with the decline in housing values, deep losses to retirement and savings accounts, and skyrocketing health and prescription drug costs, millions of older Americans continue to struggle to make ends meet."

The amount of wages subject to Social Security taxes will also go up next year, resulting in a tax increase for about 10 million workers, the Social Security Administration said. This year, the first $106,800 in wages is subject to Social Security payroll taxes. Next year, the limit will increase to $110,100.

Workers pay a 6.2 percent Social Security tax on wages, which is matched by employers. For 2011, the tax rate for workers was reduced to 4.2 percent. The tax cut is scheduled to expire at the end of the year, though President Barack Obama wants to expand it and extend it for another year, an effort that Congress is likely to approve.

Federal law requires the program to base annual payment increases on the Consumer Price Index for Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers, or CPI-W. Officials compare consumer prices in the third quarter of each year – the months of July, August and September – with the same months in the previous year.

If consumer prices increase from year to year, Social Security recipients automatically get higher payments, starting the following January. If prices drop, the payments stay unchanged.

Social Security payments increased by 5.8 percent in 2009, the largest increase in 27 years, after energy prices spiked in 2008. But energy prices quickly dropped and home prices became soft in markets across the country, contributing to lower inflation in the past two years.

As a result, Social Security recipients got an increase in 2009 that was far larger than actual inflation. However, they couldn't get another increase until consumer prices exceeded the levels measured in 2008. This year, consumer prices in July, August and September were 3.6 percent higher than those measured in 2008, resulting in the COLA.

___

Online:

Social Security Administration's COLA site: http://www.ssa.gov/cola/

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON — That didn't last long. About 55 million Social Security recipients will get their first increase in benefits next year since 2009 – a 3.6 percent raise. But higher Medicare pr...
WASHINGTON — That didn't last long. About 55 million Social Security recipients will get their first increase in benefits next year since 2009 – a 3.6 percent raise. But higher Medicare pr...
Filed by Alexander Belenky  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 1,716
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (19 total)
07:01 PM on 12/18/2011
It's a da*n game... you give from one hand and take it back with the other.
...and people that are pis*ed off over not getting a COLA for the last two years have every right to be.

This is BS!

I don't know what the heck is going on in this country but I sure don't like it!
Obama has proved to be an ineffective joke... and there was such a chance for him to make a change and he jumped the shark plus lied to us about what he was going to do.

For instance, Medical Marijuana..... huh, OBAMA, what happened to that promise?

As far as 2012 Gingrich has no real chance of being nominated and none of getting elected.
The circus, which I call the Republican Candidates is sad .....we're going to have four more years of say one thing and do another.

I really disappointed beyond words about Obama.
photo
unionave
Old Codger
02:06 PM on 12/12/2011
Our government has continually encroached the lives of the American citizens . The decision on what Social Security pays should totally reside with the Social Security Administration and not with politicians . The SSA has all the information it needs for these decisions and the money for far in to the future . But SS has been a political tool used mainly by the Republican right wing corporatist because it puts money in circulation which props up wages levels . Something the corporatist want lowered .
06:12 AM on 12/06/2011
I am Thomas Walpole of Woodmere N. Y. in 2009 oil prices were $2.578, President Obama did not give a raise to Social Security for lack of inflation in 2009.If I need to remind the President in 2010 the price of home heating oil went up from $ 2.58 in 2009 to $ 3.99 and at times $ 4.19 a gallon,that is $1.41,most of the heating year more a gallon than 2009 in 2010.I have a 275 gallon oil tank in 2009 to get it full was $707, in 2010 it was $1098.25 so I want to know wher was I going to get the other$ 391.25 to fill the oil tak that cold winter when I had to get oil I still owe the oil company $ ii00 from 2010 ? I thought %10 was slight and %5 was posible THe least I looked at was %2 the most was % 20 and %17 was probally the figure that WOULD GIVE THE GOVERENMENT THE INCOME FROM TASXES BECAUSE PEOPLE WOULD HAVE MONEY TO S P E N D also they would feel more relaxed, Mabe ,PRESEDENT OBAMA you want the people that are retired and spent their whole lives making this land posible for YOU TO HAVE YOUR JOB I would say that %17 or %16 would do the UNITED STATES GOVERENMENT MORE GOOD AS WELL AS THE SOCIAL SECURITY RECIEPENTS BRING THE COUNTRY TO A BETTER ECONOMY . SINCERLY THOMAS F WALPOLE
03:28 PM on 12/01/2011
I don't know why your raising Social Security and Medicare...just reach into the Chase Bank and take the money out of your account without your signature. They are making a lot of money by just taking your deposit with your so called "secret credit and debit card numbers. Then they sell customer lists with all your private bank information without your signatures...I call that stealing especially when it is the money you supposidly "saved" by the government for the old timers...this Ol' Lady lost nearly $2000. on magazines I would never order. Now I do not get a raise. Get out your ration stamp books that we used during WWII.
photo
jmslotnick
mother of 3 & 2 are twins.
05:06 PM on 11/17/2011
The increase will be practically nothing because Medicare will increase the monthly rate well over $10.00 a month which to me is terrible because the Medicare has cut medical service coverage so much it is terrible. Monthly payment has doubled since about 1998 from 48.60 to the present $96.40 for Part B. I would not care so much if their service coverage had not been cut as much as it has. Sad for those of us who have to rely completely on Medicare as insurance coverage.














































































































































410.00
photo
janmB
loves life
02:11 PM on 11/07/2011
The truth is that, according to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office, Social Security is fully funded until 2052, at which point, assuming no increase in productivity growth rates or dramatic demographic shifts, benefits would need to be reduced by a whopping… 20%

Social Security, Medicaid and Medicare benefits are protected IF the so-called “super committee” fails to reach an agreement later this fall. The concern is that a fast-track committee process will deny Americans a voice in the discussion about critical tax, health and retirement issues. Also is a concern about the potential use of a trigger that would arbitrarily cut provider payments under Medicare, which could unfairly shift costs to seniors. More From AARP - CEO A. Barry Rand
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
robert horwitz
06:07 PM on 10/29/2011
If you think that you have it bad now just vote Republican. They will take the rest of your money to a Casino and dump it into a Slot Machine.
09:39 AM on 10/23/2011
As much as it seems to pain some people, Americans who have worked all of their lives paid into the Social Security system. When I worked, and I worked for 44 years, I was paying for the World War I I crowd. I didn't resent it because I understand Social Security. Now that I am retired myself I am getting Social Security. Of course it is not meant to live on exclusively but some unfortunate Americans don't have pensions!!! I myself have a tradional pension though. A 80 or 90 year old person can't work and shouldn't have to worry about that anymore. Mean spiritedness won't get younger people anywhere!!!!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
twoshoes4u
09:03 PM on 10/20/2011
Oh goody we're getting a COLA increase AND a Medicare premium increase. Meanwhile the Bloodsuckers on The Hill will slide their annual raise by over Thanksgiving. They have never missed a raise. Good to hear that the Bloodsuckers have sent $135M to date to the Libya "rebels." Nothing but good news out there folks!
03:35 PM on 10/20/2011
The real story here is why is the SSA claiming on their website that the last increase was in 2009 when in fact it was in 2008. Last year the media was reporting that it was the second straight year without a cola increase and I kept saying bullshit it's the 3rd straight year. If you want to see who's right just pick any social security recipient at random and check their SSA electronic deposits for 2008 and compare them with the deposits for 2011. I've already checked mind since a lot of people think I'm wrong. So the question is: Did the SSA make a mistake when they said they gave the increase in 2009 or did they do it intentionally?
07:59 AM on 11/28/2011
YOU ARE ABSOLUTELY RIGHT. THE LAST INCREASE "WAS" 2008. AND I ALSO THOUGHT WHEN YOU GET A CHECK, SAY IN THE MONTH OF DECEMBER, THAT CHECK IS FOR THE MONTH OF JANUARY.
photo
Pod-gers
Jeremy Lin = Game Change
01:28 PM on 10/20/2011
The good news is there will be a COLA increase, the bad news is that is not reflective of actual inflation.

http://www.chrismartenson.com/crashcourse/chapter-16-fuzzy-numbers
What if it’s true, as Kevin Phillips recently stated in an article in Harpers’, that “[e]ver since the 1960s,

That’s what we’re going to take a look at here, by examining the ways that inflation and Gross Domestic Product, or GDP, are measured.

Inflation has two components. The first is the simple pressure on prices due to too much money floating around. The second component lies with people’s expectations of future inflation. If expectations are that inflation will be tame, they are said to be well-anchored. If people expect prices to rise, they tend to spend their money now, while the getting is still good, and this serves to fuel further inflation in a self-reinforcing manner. The faster people spend, the faster inflation rises. Zimbabwe is a perfect modern example of this dynamic in play.

Accordingly, official inflation policy has two components – the first is regulating the money supply and the second is anchoring your expectations.

And how exactly is this anchoring accomplished? Over time, this has evolved into little more than telling you that inflation is a bit lower, or even a lot lower, than it actually is.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
hangdogit
Progressive with some Libertarian (abolish DEA).
12:20 AM on 10/20/2011
Instead of handing out 3.6% more free cash to freeloaders, let's reduce SS by that amount each year until it is zeroed out! Yes, that will take awhile, but we've all got to tighten our belt (except us of course)!

-- THE 1% (and you'll NEVER be one of us)
F4flyr
a Squadron Commander in the War of the Classes
12:42 AM on 10/20/2011
hang...I get social security and VA disability payments...I paid into the system for 50 years and want my money back...don't even want the interest...am I a 'freeloader'?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
hangdogit
Progressive with some Libertarian (abolish DEA).
01:13 AM on 10/20/2011
No -- as a disabled veteran you are a hero!

I am also on SS and paid into it for over 35 years.

My posting was an attempt at satire -- look at the signature -- sorry for any confusion.

To me, SS and Medicare are THE BEST programs that government has ever done -- and even more so as companies drop pensions and health benefits.
photo
Pod-gers
Jeremy Lin = Game Change
01:23 PM on 10/20/2011
Yep, you have stated what many Progressives actually believe.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
ajsgmajc
09:43 PM on 10/19/2011
An average of $39 a month and up to one quarter of that could go to the rising costs of Medicare part B. A "measure of comfort"? I think not.
photo
Stephen1349
The law is reason..free from passion.
08:48 PM on 10/19/2011
Of course they are going to give seniors a COLA this year. They kill two birds with one stone. A big election is coming up in 2012 and they want to be able to give themselves their automatic raise without pissing the old guys off..lol.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
MontanaBanana
I've had it trying to reason with the GOP
09:47 PM on 10/19/2011
The old guys will be voting Democratic with or without the COLA. Why, you ask? Because the GOP wants to take Social Secuirty away for ever and everyone knows that. This is just one of the reasons the GOP will lose ther Presidency. Want another reason? Take a look at the people running for the nomination for the Greeeedy Ollllllld Paaaaaaaaaaarty.
photo
Stephen1349
The law is reason..free from passion.
10:11 PM on 10/19/2011
As a young man a long way from drawing social security..assuming it remains in tact..lol...I commend you on making a very good choice. My family has always voted Democratic for the very reason you stated but in a broader sense. The Republican party has no value system for anything except corporations and the wealthy. It appears that their sole agenda is to destroy the middle class and to put the poor and needy out on the street to starve and die. While my grandmother draws a social security check based on my grandfather's income, she is fairly affluent. I would hate to see her in a situation where that social security check was all she had to live on. I only hope you will encourage your friends and neighbors to vote the vote with you. Take care.
F4flyr
a Squadron Commander in the War of the Classes
12:45 AM on 10/20/2011
MB...F&F4that !!!
photo
K August
Research Alec Exposed
02:43 AM on 10/20/2011
Elections have nothing to do with it. Did you even read the article?
It's all based on inflation etc....
photo
Stephen1349
The law is reason..free from passion.
08:53 AM on 10/20/2011
LOL...are you truly that misinformed? I understand that it is based on inflation. Do you know the index that is used to calculate whether a COLA will be given? Are you telling me that in 2010 and 2009 there was no increase in the cost of living for seniors. Even their medicare premiums went up. Are you telling me that the cost of a gallon of gas was cheaper in 2008 than in 2009. Are you telling me that groceries were cheaper? I am not trying to be rude, madame, but the point of the post was to demonstrate that Congress is entitled to AUTOMATIC salary increases...irrespective of inflation or any other factor. The only time they do not get an increase is when they VOTE to not give themselves one. Can you explain that? Can you explain why THEY got a raise in 2008 and 2009 but seniors didn't get a COLA raise for their social security? I think my point zoomed right over your head. They have been clamoring for months and months that social security is going broke. Some of the Republicans and Baggers even want to dismantle it. But they got raises. Plus, they know that in 2011 and 2012, they have to give COLA increases because it is a presidential election year. Now glue all that in your brain and think about it.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TrgdyAnn
Remember what the Doorman said, 'Feed Your Head'
08:48 PM on 10/19/2011
Well thank goodness. This article makes it look as though our government actually cares about it's people, although I'm sensing a catch somewhere behind this news!