More

Artists Sue Auction Houses Over Royalties Law

10/20/11 07:59 PM ET   AP

LOS ANGELES — Famed New York painter Chuck Close and other artists are suing Sotheby's, Christie's and eBay, contending the auctioneers willfully violated a California law requiring royalty payments on sales of their works.

The three federal suits filed Tuesday seek class-action status to represent many other artists and demand unspecified royalties and damages – which could total hundreds of thousands of dollars given current art prices.

The suits were filed on behalf of Close – best known for his enormous photorealistic paintings – along with Los Angeles artist Laddie John Dill, and the estate of late sculptor Robert Graham. Graham's works include the ceremonial gate for the Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum that was commissioned for the 1984 Olympics and features nude statues modeled on some of the athletes.

A foundation of late California painter Sam Francis also is named as a plaintiff in the suits against Christie's and eBay Inc.

The Los Angeles Daily Journal first reported some of the suits.

The 1977 California Resale Royalties Act grants artists or their estates 5 percent of the proceeds from resale of their works if the sale is made in California or the seller is a resident. The law applies only to original paintings, drawings, sculpture or glasswork by living artists or those who have been dead for less than 20 years.

The lawsuits contend the auctioneers engaged in a "pattern of conduct" intended to conceal that the sale or seller was in California.

"We believe that we have meaningful defenses to the claims asserted and they will be vigorously defended," Sotheby's said in a statement Thursday.

"Although Christie's has yet to be served with the complaint, it views the California Resale Royalties Act as subject to serious legal challenges. Christie's looks forward to addressing these issues in court," the company said in a statement.

An email seeking comment from eBay was not immediately returned.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST ARTS

LOS ANGELES — Famed New York painter Chuck Close and other artists are suing Sotheby's, Christie's and eBay, contending the auctioneers willfully violated a California law requiring royalty paym...
LOS ANGELES — Famed New York painter Chuck Close and other artists are suing Sotheby's, Christie's and eBay, contending the auctioneers willfully violated a California law requiring royalty paym...
Filed by Priscilla Frank  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 9
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
02:29 PM on 10/23/2011
The artist as creator of and artwork always retains the copyright ( its even better when they file with the copyright office) and the right License it unless they transfer the copyright. If you purchase an image you're entitled to hang it on a wall and stare at it and the artist still can still sell copies of it, put it on tee shirts, etc. This California law should be challenged.
03:12 PM on 10/24/2011
If you buy from ethical artists, you do not have that problem In fact most of the unethical practices are done by the sellers of art and not the artists themselves.
photo
me again
I'm not wrong....
08:30 AM on 10/22/2011
A ridiculous law. The artist makes their money with the initial sale of the piece. While images of the work should remain intellectual property, it is unimaginable to keep giving the artist a cut every time the piece is sold, whether it is in CA, or anywhere else, period.
03:11 PM on 10/24/2011
;you give royalties to musicians, writers, actors, why not artists,
photo
Hoonieman
Enjoy yourself; it's later than you think ..
10:25 PM on 10/24/2011
Well, here's some sad news for songwriters 'n publishers ..(see below)

The online music stores and the big 5 record companies (Corps) have been lobbying congress to strip songwriters 'n publishers of their royalties for years now and have gotten what they've paid for. Greed wins again ..

Beware fellow creative people .. soon they will completely do away with all "intellectual property" .. of course that would make many folks here very happy ..

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/44761240/ns/technology_and_science-tech_and_gadgets/t/supreme-court-no-royalties-internet-music-downloads/#.TqYbqeVtXww
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Thomas Nagano
"TK" Copy to Come
06:30 AM on 10/22/2011
The collector, gallery, museum deal the product; the Artist lives the process.

- "TK"
06:04 AM on 10/22/2011
That's a bullshit law. Once you sell it, all the rights should belong to the buyer!
03:10 PM on 10/24/2011
and you must not be an artist - why give it to writers, actors, musicians, and not artists
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Annette Hammond
If only everybody knew
10:55 PM on 10/21/2011
It's about time.