iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Nevada Caucus Date: Nevada Moves Date To Feb. 4

STEVE PEOPLES and CRISTINA SILVA   10/22/11 07:20 PM ET  AP

MANCHESTER, N.H. — Nevada Republicans have shifted their presidential caucuses to early February, a move that ends an increasingly bitter standoff among rival states and for the first time clarifies the path to the Republican presidential nomination.

There will be no voting before Christmas. That's despite warnings from New Hampshire's top election official that Nevada's initial insistence to host its contest in mid-January could force the Granite State to schedule the nation's first Republican primary election in roughly six weeks.

But facing boycott threats from campaigns, incentive offers from the Republican National Committee, and the private blessing of the Mitt Romney campaign, Nevada Republicans voted Saturday to set their caucuses for Feb. 4. It will be the West's first stop in the race for the Republican presidential nomination and the fifth contest overall, after Iowa, New Hampshire, South Carolina and Florida.

"The candidates are anxious to come here and campaign and don't want to have the heat put on them by New Hampshire to stay away," former Nevada Gov. Bob List, a national Republican committeeman, said before Saturday's vote. "We have to eat a little crow perhaps in some people's minds, but I think in the end it's a win-win."

The calendar scramble had consumed Republican officials in early voting states and complicated candidates' decisions about travel, the timing of television advertisements and the distribution of limited resources. But with New Hampshire now free to settle on its preferred date of Jan. 10, the final puzzle pieces appear to have fallen into place.

Iowa will keep its Jan. 3 caucus date despite Nevada's move, Iowa GOP chairman Matt Strawn said Saturday.

The Republican presidential contenders are free to shift their campaigns into high gear with the first stop on the road to the GOP nomination set for Iowa in just 10 weeks.

"Now you'll see the campaigns ramp up very quickly," said Michael Dennehy, a New Hampshire Republican operative who led Sen. John McCain's political operation four years ago and was a central player in the Granite State's boycott push in recent weeks.

Nevada's shift ensures the state won't suffer penalties expected for states that violated national party rules by skipping ahead to boost their political influence. Nevada Republicans also stand to earn some perks at the party's national convention in Florida next August. As part of negotiations in recent days, the Republican National Committee promised Nevada delegates they could sit on the floor "in the best positions," and would have prime hotel space if they made the change, according to Nevada GOP Chairwoman Amy Tarkanian.

"This will be well worth it," she said. "We will be the good guys in the end because we don't need to be New Hampshire's pinata."

Republican Nevada Gov. Brian Sandoval endorsed the move, saying it would allow the state GOP to focus on its principal goal – winning elections.

"The move preserves Nevada's first-in-the-West standing and creates a scenario where all candidates will likely compete here," he said in a statement.

The RNC would not comment on its specific role in the discussions, but Chairman Reince Priebus, who had called for a compromise, praised Nevada's decision.

"Nevadans should be proud of their Republican leaders," he said. "They have restored their state's key role in the nomination process and in the 2012 presidential election."

The Romney campaign also played an active, but private, role in the flap.

Campaign officials initially encouraged Nevada to schedule its caucuses before Florida, hoping that Romney's popularity in Nevada would fuel a victory there and create momentum heading into the critical Florida contest. But sensing a political backlash in New Hampshire, Romney representatives in recent days encouraged key Nevada Republicans to settle on a later date.

The Romney campaign would not discuss its actions publicly when asked Saturday, but did not dispute its role.

New Hampshire officials were clearly happy.

"It's a win for the process and it's certainly a win for New Hampshire," said Phyllis Woods, a RNC member from the Granite State. "Going forward, we really want to have Nevada as an ally. We really don't want to have enemies as we go into the next primary calendar."

Also Saturday, Nevada Democrats said they would hold their caucuses on Jan. 21.

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, who helped obtain the state's third-in-the nation status in 2008, decried the GOP's move.

"I'm deeply disappointed that the Nevada Republican Party has caved to the will of the Republican National Committee and New Hampshire," he said in a statement.

___

Silva reported from Las Vegas. Associated Press writer Tom Beaumont contributed to this story from Iowa.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
Filed by Melissa Jeltsen  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 235
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (6 total)
04:00 PM on 10/23/2011
New Mexico is the Land of Enchantment. Nevada is the Land of Unemployment. You go Harry! “Mr. President this state is lost”
10:45 AM on 10/23/2011
I have only lived in Nevada (Clark County) for the past 12 years having moved from a state with primary elections. I attended two Democratic caucuses. Both events were dominated by union thugs and believe me when I say you had better tow their line. No more for me, down with union scum.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
FreedToChoose
...lest my wife says I'm not.
08:58 AM on 10/24/2011
Yeah! Let's return to company stores and unsafe working conditions.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
librldem
Snarking for Merika n jebus! Glory!
09:23 AM on 10/23/2011
Caucuses are not representative of anything like actually voting, they are shout spew events for the lowest IQ of a state.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
mmkay
Holy Sith! 'mkay?
07:51 PM on 10/23/2011
Carcass, in other words.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
librldem
Snarking for Merika n jebus! Glory!
09:28 PM on 10/23/2011
That's the word I was looking for mmkay!
laurelphot
your micro-bio.
09:22 AM on 10/23/2011
This Pot of Republi Can'ts wasn't worth the gamble.
laurelphot
your micro-bio.
09:21 AM on 10/23/2011
Nevada 's Bluff fails. They just couldn't buy the pot.
laurelphot
your micro-bio.
09:19 AM on 10/23/2011
Nevada folds.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
scriibe
Liberal but not PC
08:38 AM on 10/23/2011
I really wish states would leave primaries alone. Here in Ohio, the primary used to be held in early May, making the walk to the polling place a pleasant experience. But the powers that be stupidly moved it to early March, making the walk a difficult, sometimes treacherous thing. In 2008, we had freezing rain the day of the primaries and the Democratic outcome was not decided until June (supposedly, the move to March was to make the Ohio vote more significant.). This year they have made it more difficult to get an absentee ballot. It is clear Governor Kasich cares more about making it harder for people to vote Democrat than he is for our Constitutional right to vote.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
alafonse
It's definitely a crap-shoot.
07:54 AM on 10/23/2011
The entire republican process has been like a huge soap opera: dramatic lies, breath-taking near-death scenes, love-hate relationships, and you could stop watching for months and then take up right where you left off without missing anything worthwhile.
07:48 AM on 10/23/2011
The GOP is so fractured, so confused, so desperate, that all of the states want to be the first to get it over with, like a prostate exam. They want the picking to be over with quickly, in the hopes that a viable candidate will emerge and they'll have the better part of a year to try to make him at least something of a challenge to Obama.

All the GOP hopefuls are melting away like ice cream in a desert. Bachmann- toast. Perry- buh bye. Cain- currently getting baked, soon to burn and get tossed. Paul, Gingrich, Santorum, Huntsman? Never got up to bat.

So that leaves Mittens. Conservative christians will either have to hold their noses and vote for him, or, more likely, will just stay home. Since he's been branded by his own party as Obama lite and a RINO, the baggers won't vote for him, since, as their reasoning goes, he would just be Obama in a caucasian body. So the far righties stay home.

The OWS movement is a big x factor, but I'm fairly confident that the 99%ers aren't going to vote republican. They may not be happy with the dems, but they have nothing but contempt for the right, which, as an institution, supports Wall Street and is obstructing jobs creation.

Not looking good for the GOP in 2012
photo
eyeforeye42
Do the right thing for the right reason
07:33 AM on 10/23/2011
This caucus and primary stuff is turning into a real boondoggle. Talk about turning off voters. Mind you the media loves the money the politicians throw at them. The only group that does well these times seems to be the media advertisers. Oh to be a sign maker in these times. Of course the day after they are pleading for subsidies as their business dries up
06:37 AM on 10/23/2011
The only thing I figure is someone is afraid they might not be the front runner much longer, Romney, Perry, Cain and Paul have shown me good reason not to vote for them. And I won't. I sure hope we get a new front runner.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
shieldsray
01:09 AM on 10/23/2011
Good move for everyone concerned!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ausscyn
12:56 AM on 10/23/2011
This was all a ploy by Romboid! He changed the date to get Huntsman to back out, so he'd have all the Mormon votes. Romboid is scared of Ron Paul, & he should be!!

RON PAUL will take Nevada!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
yweston
We Won!!!! So Get Over It....
06:00 AM on 10/23/2011
I would probably listen to Ron Paul's ideas if his son (Rand) did NOT tell Rachel Maddow that he wanted to change parts of the "Civil Rights" Law to allow businesses to discriminate if they want to. As an African American woman, of course, I find that thought process dangerous. And Ron Paul raised him...So I'm suspicious of both of them.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
NHBQ
It's the Supreme Court, Stupid!
09:58 AM on 10/23/2011
When I heard Rand Paul's discussion with Rachel Maddow, I found it very troubling. It made me sick that anyone in this century could tout an idea like that. It also made me wonder about his upbringing. Like son, like father?
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
natchez
10:04 AM on 10/23/2011
We all should be suspicious of them....Ron Paul nicknamed "Dr No" the "grandfather of the TeaParty"....Paul may have afew good ideas but that does not make up for his deep seated beliefs that I feel would be a disaster for our country, and #1 on that list would be his stance on Civil Rights!

I believe in our President and have faith in his patience in dealing with the RIGHT...as all of their hypocrisy is coming to light as well as who their financial backers are and when all is said and done who will benefit the most from a Republican President......not the middleclass or poor that is a given!
06:46 AM on 10/23/2011
I don't think it's Paul, I think it's Santorum.
glyngcgb
I Feel More Like I Do Now, Than I Did Before
11:53 PM on 10/22/2011
Let's see..., campaign in Iowa, New Hampshire, and South Carolina....., or campaign in a state with gambling, strippers, hookers, and lots & lots of booze. Well that was a no brainer, wasn't it?
rockymtnal
The spaces between your words make the most sense.
11:38 PM on 10/22/2011
The way states are moving their primary and caucus dates earlier and earlier, why not just combine them with the off-year congressional elections and hold the primaries two years ahead of the presidential election?

And, yes, I am being facetious.