iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Gas Pipelines: Big Business But Lightly Regulated?


First Posted: 10/22/11 02:29 PM ET Updated: 12/22/11 05:12 AM ET

by Nicholas Kusnetz, ProPublica

The gas pipeline industry is hardly glamorous. But it is lucrative and loosely regulated.

Last weekend, two oil and gas pipeline companies announced they would combine to create the biggest such firm in the U.S. when Kinder Morgan offered more than $20 billion to buy El Paso. If the deal goes through, the companies say, the behemoth would become the continent's fourth largest energy corporation.

While the pipeline business has operated largely, well, underground, several recent accidents have drawn attention to safety and the web of regulations that governs the nation's 2.3 million miles of gas pipelines. A growing controversy over a plan to build a major oil pipeline from Canada's Tar Sands to Texas has also spotlighted industry practices.

On Monday, the Senate passed a pipeline safety bill that would increase fines, hire more inspectors and implement stronger safety standards. The industry has supported the measure, but some advocates have called for larger changes.

Here's a primer on the industry and its regulations.

The Regulations

The system that regulates natural gas pipelines is complex and, critics contend, lax.

"There isn't much regulation and it doesn't really work," said Rick Kessler, who sits on the board of the advocacy group Pipeline Safety Trust. Kessler is also a federal lobbyist on energy issues, but he does not represent pipeline companies.

To build a pipeline to transport gas from Pennsylvania to New York, company X would have to seek a permit from the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission and prove that the line is needed. If the company convinces FERC of the need and that the proposed route is appropriate, the government could grant company X the right to seize property through eminent domain if it can't work out deals with landowners.

If the pipeline were not going to cross state lines a state commission would generally oversee the siting of the line. Texas is one of the more industry-friendly states on siting. It grants companies relatively wide latitude to seize property for new lines.

Once a line is approved, a different agency takes over to handle safety issues. The federal Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration sets minimum safety standards, which states can supplement. If a pipe crosses state borders, enforcement generally falls to the federal government, while most states inspect lines that don't leave the state.

But whether the regulators are from Washington or the states, "They don't come out and necessarily walk the pipeline," said Richard Kuprewicz, a former pipeline engineer for Arco who is now a consultant.

In fact, it is generally the pipeline operators themselves who inspect their own lines and report problems. Most government oversight involves checking the paperwork, making sure that things are up to code.

"It's compliance with the regulations," Kuprewicz said. "It's not, 'Are you safe or not.'"

The pipeline industry points to its safety record. Despite several high profile accidents - such as the explosion that killed 8 people in San Bruno, Calif., last year - the number of incidents has not changed dramatically in recent years. There are typically about 275 gas pipeline accidents a year that kill 10 to 15 people and injure about 65 to 70. There was a jump in the number of accidents on transmission lines from 2002 to 2004, but the numbers have generally held steady since then, according to PHMSA.

The industry group for interstate transmission lines, the Interstate Natural Gas Association of America, did not respond to requests for comment.

Lydia Meigs, a spokeswoman for the American Gas Association, which represents the utilities that operate most of the 2 million miles of shorter distribution lines (the type of lines involved in recent high-profile accidents) said the industry is best suited to enforce best practices.

Critics disagree, pointing to the San Bruno explosion, where the operator didn't run tests that could have detected the faulty weld that eventually failed.

There's also an entire class of pipelines that is largely unregulated. There are an estimated 200,000 miles of gathering lines - pipes that lead from wells to processing plants - in sparsely populated areas for which PHMSA does not set safety standards (the agency does regulate such lines in higher density areas). Most states do not regulate these lines either, so there is no reporting on any leaks that may be found. Siting is generally worked out by energy companies and landowners.

These rural gathering lines are considered to be low risk not only because relatively few people live near them but also because they are generally smaller and operate at lower pressures than the lines that send gas from state to state. But in March, a federal advisory committee found that newer gathering lines, particularly those in shale gas development areas, are running at higher pressures and that operators should be required to submit safety reports. PHMSA, the federal regulator, is now considering whether to issue new regulations to cover these lines.

Currently, PHMSA has 125 inspectors to cover 290,000 miles of gas and liquids lines, while about 300 state inspectors oversee the remaining 2.2 million miles, according to PHMSA.

The Business

The industry is dominated by a handful of companies, including El Paso, Enbridge and Williams Gas Pipeline, according to Fadel Gheit, an oil and gas analyst with Oppenheimer and Co.

Kinder Morgan, for example, currently operates more than 37,000 miles of lines, carrying not only gas but also oil and carbon dioxide. Last year, the company had a net income of $1.3 billion on $8 billion in revenue.

The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission sets guidelines for what companies can charge to transport gas. The rates are based on market supply and demand and on the amount of money the company has to spend to build and maintain the line. A gas producer such as Exxon will generally buy a certain amount of transmission capacity and negotiate a rate within FERC's guidelines.

"It's like buying a seat on a flight," Gheit said.

It's a relatively predictable industry, Gheit said, because supply and demand don't fluctuate wildly from year to year. When a company builds a line, it generally locks in long term contracts.

Increased gas development has led to a push for new lines. FERC has approved dozens of new projects over the past couple of years. The Interstate Natural Gas Association of America says that, due to projected increases in production and consumption, the industry will need to build 35,600 miles of transmission lines and 414,000 miles of gathering lines by 2035, at a cost of nearly $140 billion dollars.

Key Pipeline Stats*

Miles of all types of pipelines, gas and liquid - more than 2.5 million

Miles of federally regulated gas transmission andgathering lines - 321,000

Miles of gas distribution lines - about 2 million

Miles of unregulated gas gathering lines - about 210,000

*Source: Pipeline and Hazardous Materials SafetyAdministration

FOLLOW HUFFPOST GREEN

by Nicholas Kusnetz, ProPublica The gas pipeline industry is hardly glamorous. But it is lucrative and loosely regulated. Last weekend, two oil and gas pipeline companies announced they would combi...
by Nicholas Kusnetz, ProPublica The gas pipeline industry is hardly glamorous. But it is lucrative and loosely regulated. Last weekend, two oil and gas pipeline companies announced they would combi...
by Nicholas Kusnetz, ProPublica The gas pipeline industry is hardly glamorous. But it is lucrative and loosely regulated. Last weekend, two oil and gas pipeline companies announced they would combi...
by Nicholas Kusnetz, ProPublica The gas pipeline industry is hardly glamorous. But it is lucrative and loosely regulated. Last weekend, two oil and gas pipeline companies announced they would combi...
Filed by Joanna Zelman  |  Report Corrections
 
 
  • Comments
  • 37
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
05:43 PM on 10/23/2011
We have pipelines in this country? Think of the risk! We have to regulate these people out of business. Next we go after them electrical wires running all over hells half acre. My gosh this country is just one big accident waiting to happen. And airplanes flying over the whole mess. Where the heck are the FEDs?
photo
techBob
whatever happened to peace, love and understanding
03:13 PM on 10/24/2011
I have a natural gas pipeline running through my rural NJ backyard. They are adding a second line now 57 years after the first. Destroying a 250' swath of forest through state parks and sensitive habitats. You joke but adequate regulation is not a joke. Lives are at stake and the gas is not even for this region but being shipped overseas to the highest bidder. We have no say in this and were given $1 and told whether we cash it or not we have been paid in full for the easement, but you can bet some politician is sitting on a pile of cash he/she got to turn a blind eye.
The US will be just one big industrial waste site once big-business has had it's way with our natural resources for the price of a few bribes.
07:29 AM on 10/23/2011
Did not the Government also regulate and inspect off shore oil rigs -
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
06:50 PM on 10/22/2011
Let me get this straight.

We already have 2.5 million miles of gas and oil pipelines criss-crossing this country.

And Keystone XL is considered "risky" with it's additional 1,700 miles!?

So I'm supposed to believe that increasing the total number of pipeline miles by 0.068% is going to result in a national tragedy!? That's nuts.

Seems to me this article proves the opposite of what it's trying to advocate.

Hey, we already have 2.5 million miles of pipelines! And they seem to be working pretty well, as accidents are very rare. So another 1,700 miles of Keystone isn't going to change things much, one way or the other.

Go Keystone!
06:05 AM on 10/23/2011
I work in the industry. Just people whining about anything and everything.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
03:58 PM on 10/23/2011
It's worse than people whining. Guys like Kennedy are professional fear-mongerers.

The environmental movement used to be a responsible civic organization. They targeted things that were causing real damage, and had low cost alternatives. (Like leaded vesus unleaded gasoline).

Now they dream up hypothetical catastrophes, or they take small accidents and spin them up into catastrophes. Their is very little correlation between real catastrophes (i.e. superfund cites) and the "problems" that the environmentalists bring up. It's sad, they've regressed to childish grabs for attention, when they were once real adults.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
observingstupiditydaily
Nice to be important,but more important to be nice
07:05 AM on 10/23/2011
In your opinion is there a difference in the commodities that are transported through the pipelines?

Do you know the difference in the tar sands oil that might pose a problem in the pipeline?

"DilBit" -- a highly corrosive, acidic, and potentially unstable blend of thick raw bitumen and volatile natural gas liquid condensate"
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
03:55 PM on 10/23/2011
Can it spark into a fireball, like methane?

Nope.

Sounds safer then methane to me, and I've got a methane pipeline running into my house.

They've been running the Keystone for a while now. They've had a couple small leaks, but nothing like a catastrophe. In fact, I'd say it's good they've had a couple small leaks, now we know what a Keystone leak looks like, and it's not a big deal.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
blood1
06:08 PM on 10/22/2011
The pipeline industry is busy making deals with landowners. Unbeknownst to many landowner's these leases may be in contradiction to the terms of their mortgage and could actually reduce the value of their property. Some banks in the NE are unwilling to back mortgages based on these leases.

Sadly, HP has decided to move the GREEN folder from Politics to LIFE. Perhaps they are hoping that reader's will assume that GREEN is of no interest to their readers. What's with that?

The information was in a NYT article, but I saw it through ProPublica. Add that to the fact that ALEC is writing legislation that will minimize this risk further. Another whitewash? of the selling of America, one piece / natural resource at a time?
06:08 AM on 10/23/2011
Are you part of the OMB movement? You know, the protesters that want to Occupy Mommy's Basement?
justhinking
I'll listen if you will
05:50 PM on 10/23/2011
Those who generally support the OMB are crippled by their fears. That is distinctly a tea party trait. Blood1 sounds more like someone who has taken the time to become informed. Which shows an intellectual curosity which would be a liberal trait. So it would be more likely that Blood1 would support OWS rather than hanging out in Mom's basement with a bunch of tbaggers.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Linus521
In wildness is the salvation of mankind
03:58 PM on 10/22/2011
If these pipelines are constructed in wild, natural areas, or the Earth's ecosystems, this is the most dangerous event man wages against Earth and himself. The construction projects for any energy source that destroys the real, natural body of the Earth, is the most deadly venture man does to himself and the planet.

Earth and especially man are totally dependent on the natural, wild earth for all life creating and supporting cycles, functions and systems. When man kills ecosystems and their biological diversity or the native plant and animal species that create and maintain the entire ecosystem, he is killing his own lifelines to existence. He is pushing his own specie closer toward extinction, regardless of all other concerns and issues.
09:38 PM on 10/22/2011
Sorry you don't sound like you are from this planet. There are so many more dangerous things than oil and gas pipelines, you should put your focus on them -- try water consumption, ocean acidification, mercury from power plants, to name a few. How about massive wind and solar farms, which use an enormous amount of land for relatively little energy? As the article says, there are two million miles of pipelines already. What is it about this 1800 miles is so much worse than all the rest? Did you protest the REX gas pipeline from Wyoming to Ohio in 2009?: There are many other examples. And just how do you propose to power the planet? Even if we could magically move to windmills and solar plants for 6 billion people tomorrow (we cant, it's a decades long propositions), you still need gas to firm the intermittent renewables. Just how do you propose to get it there? I think we need renewables too but I am not residing in lala land. They are decades away and we are going to continue to need and use energy. We just need to be alot smarter about it. I must say your post doesn't give me hope for that.
photo
ILoveFiction
That's unbelievable!
10:27 PM on 10/22/2011
Those offshore wind farms use an immense amount of land.

And what do you do when you have a big wind spill? Don't believe anybody who says it can't happen!
02:00 PM on 10/23/2011
Golly! I never knew that wind farms were so dangerous. So dangerous that you can't even risk grazing cattle around them? Those corn and wheat farmers in the wind belt must be scared to death that they might lease land and still farm it. Nighmarish!
03:12 PM on 10/22/2011
Add vibration harvesting sensors along the pipeline on the inside, (tucked in the joints?, so as to not be nocked off by pipe cleaning robots) these would be pressure monitors and/or mass flow monitors that can be read by equipment on the outside being caried by personel and cleaning robots to download data. They can be in a mesh network so that any sensor talks with at least 3 or 4 neighbor sensors. Any leak can be detected by audio, differentail pressure drop between sensors or over time, link to outside warning-siren to siganl a problem to nearby communities.

On remote leaks mesh reports back to gas flow control center.
Is it safe?
No
but it can be safer if they implement this almost off the shelf solution.