iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

NCAA To Pay Athletes? NCAA Considering $2,000 Payments To Student Athletes

By FREDERIC J. FROMMER   10/24/11 06:40 PM ET   AP

WASHINGTON -- NCAA President Mark Emmert backed a proposal to allow conferences to increase grants to student athletes by $2,000, "to more closely approach" the full cost of attending college, beyond the athletic scholarships athletes receive for tuition, fees, room, board and books.

Emmert told the Knight Commission on Intercollegiate Athletics on Monday that the proposal will be finalized this week and he'll ask the NCAA Division I Board of Directors to support it at their meeting Thursday. He noted that student athletes have limited opportunities to work outside the classroom and playing fields, and that the current model of athletic scholarship hasn't changed for 40 years.

Emmert says he'll also ask the board to allow colleges and universities to provide multiyear grants, instead of year-to-year scholarships.

"We are going to create a model that would allow – probably ... up to $2,000 in addition to" tuition, fees, room and board, books and supplies.

Emmert said he expected all of the Bowl Championship Series conferences to adopt it – at least those six that get automatic bids to BCS bowl games – because they have the revenue stream to afford it.

"Will schools underneath that?" he asked. "I don't know. So you don't want to put a conference or a school in a position with a mandatory expense, and the only way to pay for it is to cut scholarships."

One university president on a later panel said he opposed the proposal. Boise State president Robert Kustra urged supporters of the plan to look at the support that Division I student athletes receive, and compare it to "the rest of our students, who are making minimum wage, collecting tips, trying to find their way into their next semester at the university ... Go back and examine the life of a student athlete in intercollegiate sports in America today, and see how privileged they are to be where they are and the opportunities they have."

Kustra also warned that the proposal will give some schools a competitive advantage over others.

"You just heard President Emmert say that some conferences will, some conferences won't. Well gee, I wonder who will, and I wonder who won't," he said to laughter. "I think I know the answer to that. The haves will, and the have-nots will try – I'll try – but many will not be able to. And so what you're doing, then, is fueling a little bit more of this BCS/anti-BCS debate." Bosie State belongs to the Mountain West Conference, which does not receive an automatic bid to a BCS bowl game.

Another panelist, LSU Chancellor Michael Martin, said in an interview after the meeting that he was undecided on the proposal.

"I think institutions like us could clearly afford it," he said. "I'm not sure all can. Also right now, we're very sensitive on our campus to the fact that the faculty have gone three years without any salary adjustment. And then to say that every student athlete gets $2,000 at the same time that we may have to go another year without one, only builds up that tension between faculty leadership and the administration and athletics. So I want to think carefully about the unintended consequences of expanding additional resources on athletes at a time when the rest of the institution has been so heavily taxed by budget cuts."

Emmert's proposal comes as momentum builds for providing student athletes with additional help in defraying the costs of college. The Big Ten, for example, has floated the idea this year of paying athletes to cover expenses, and last month, the National College Players Association, an advocacy group, said that players should receive a portion of new revenues, like TV contracts. The group calculated the average scholarship shortfall for men's basketball and football at the Football Bowl Subdivision level was around $3,200.

The group's president, Ramogi Huma, called Emmert's proposal "an important and positive step" but not far enough.

"With record TV revenues, the cap should be raised to the full cost of attendance and funding should be guaranteed," said Huma, whose group has collected 339 petitions from current athletes at five schools supporting that position.

Emmert said he would also bring a proposal to the board – probably in January but possibly as early as this week – for a freshman "academic redshirt" model where some students would receive athletic scholarships but not participate in sports. They would spend a year of academic preparation getting their grades up to where they need to be.

____

FOLLOW HUFFPOST SPORTS

WASHINGTON -- NCAA President Mark Emmert backed a proposal to allow conferences to increase grants to student athletes by $2,000, "to more closely approach" the full cost of attending college, beyond ...
WASHINGTON -- NCAA President Mark Emmert backed a proposal to allow conferences to increase grants to student athletes by $2,000, "to more closely approach" the full cost of attending college, beyond ...
Filed by Chris Greenberg  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 38
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bascoda
Illigitimati non carborundum
02:53 AM on 10/30/2011
Paying the athletes on top of the perks they already get is a slap in the face to every student on every campus who isn't there on an athletic scholarship.
photo
spytheweb
Black Democrat
05:04 AM on 10/27/2011
They should get paid, plus a playoff in football.
10:57 AM on 10/26/2011
2 grand eh? That should appease these guys. Surely they will now be willing to reject the several tens of thousands of dollars, free cars, free houses, hookers, etc currently coming their way.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LSULinebacker64
TRUTH, FAITH, & TRUST in your HEART, SOUL, & MIND
10:50 AM on 10/26/2011
When it comes to this paying college players money.... What comes to mind is YES... BUT!! Only if it's to be put on food for them to eat. Being @ LSU coming over from the state of Florida or playing at GEORGIA coming over from the state of California. Playing anywhere in TEXAS from a state off the East or West coast. The extra help I see needed most more than anything is the foods for these students in that area.... Students that are right there at home are just fine. But those cross country are needing it more.... But mostly with that food. Cost of food and where it stands.... Savings costs of those things will pickup the money they have to spend in those other areas....
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:48 PM on 10/25/2011
I think it would be a big mistake. One that will open up a Pandora's box down the road. Pretty soon it'll be $3000.00 then $5000.00. Then they'll say that they can't pay all athlete's that amount of money, then they will have to do some sort of profit sharing, where golf and field hockey will get $2000 and football and basketball will get $4000. Then it will start all over again.
10:13 PM on 10/25/2011
A lot of these football players need bail money for the bar fights and domestic disputes...so pay them something. Of course receiving room and board, tuition, books, etc. comes out to about $25K to $50K a year depending on the school. That's a nice wage in this economy.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
K White
Sashays, flips hair, and throws glitter.
09:26 PM on 10/25/2011
I think an additional two thousand dollars, or even a little more, shouldn't be much of a problem. Dating an All-American football player that follows NCAA rules, but can't afford haircuts, cable TV, clothes and decent transportation isn't much fun. Sure, parents should be able to cover these expenses, but some families really can't afford it. Oh, well. If his hair gets any longer, he will doing press conferences with his helmet on.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
K White
Sashays, flips hair, and throws glitter.
09:29 PM on 10/25/2011
Correction: "...he will 'be' doing press..."
05:46 PM on 10/25/2011
Something like $30 - $50 bucks a week to enable them to buy a pizza and go on a date, makes sense.
Sharing in the profits is goofy. They're getting an education (if they are equal to the opportunity)!
04:21 PM on 10/25/2011
$2000 a game makes a whole lot more sense. The NCAA is basically a huge corporation that refuses to share its profits with the people who make it all possible. It would be interesting to see all of the NCAA football players simply go on strike.
photo
phal4875
The world is run by cats; we just feed them.
08:55 PM on 10/25/2011
Many mistakenly think they have a shot at the NFL, and others just love playing football. They would never go on strike.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Mr Anonymous
Mumpsimus, I am not entertained!
11:05 PM on 10/25/2011
Really, go on strike?

No, I'm not going to get a better education unless you pay me more money.
photo
chiodo08
...why do republicans HATE America?...
10:35 AM on 10/26/2011
ask how many people that have that "better education" standing in the unemployment line is working out....sorry but that don't fly anymore when these schools are banking millions off of THEIR talent.....it's no different than grad students getting grants for their skills
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
madcityy
02:48 PM on 10/25/2011
NO MORE FREE COLLEGE IF THEY GET PAID...................
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
WendellPerrySociety
05:17 PM on 10/25/2011
You obviously know nothing about this topic.
08:13 PM on 10/25/2011
apparently YOU think you do know something so spurt away!
02:22 PM on 10/25/2011
What bothered me when my kid went to college, that she won national merit scholarship and when accepted on athletes scholarship - that merit scholarship was deducted and she received same amount as other athletes...who didn't have this academic scholarship. Who benefited was school because it caused them less to pay my kid scholarship. I was infuriated, that why she was punished to have academic scholarship and great athletic results. It was very unfair, since that additional money she deserved regardless of athletic results and needed for extra expenses which she had. I am OK by not paying students, but taking away they earn by being smarter than average athlete...that blew my mind. We as her parents provided what she needed, extra - like computers, paying summer courses at other university...which her merit scholarship could cover it had she got it.
photo
phal4875
The world is run by cats; we just feed them.
08:57 PM on 10/25/2011
You seem to be complaining that you had to pay for some of your daughter's college education. You may not get much sympathy from the parents who paid for an entire education.
12:27 PM on 10/25/2011
tudent Athletes are for the most part unable to work while attending classes, practices, meetings, personal training sessions, and games. A stipend would be of great assistance to most of the players allowing for them to concentrate on their training and studies.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:37 AM on 10/25/2011
There is sure to be a no-corruption rule attached if schools do decide to pay student-athletes, so that will curtail any and all possible problems with this new, pay-to-play policy.

Maybe the schools could call it a work-study program.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
happyblackman
Gotta have more cowbell baby!
10:32 AM on 10/25/2011
Once the NCAA signed the first telvesion contract for millions of dollars, the notion of a student-athlete went out the window. They instantly became a product to be exploited. How can you increase television revenues with contracts from all major networks, and get bowl revenue, and still force the atletes to abide by rules set when the stakes were lower and the money was fewer. If you play a sport that spectators have to pay to get into to, you deserve to get a stipend. That's from the smallest to largest school. How much to pay is left up to the school.
05:49 PM on 10/25/2011
an stipend yes, one that is EQUAL among all schools...allow them a few bucks to socialize / date (as they could if they were working part time).
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
J-Ho
Fancy boys put Happy Bunny quotes in their bio
09:35 AM on 10/25/2011
$2000 more/year equals less than $50/week. And remember this ruling will give schools their discretion whether they pay out the grant or not. For almost all athletes that will help. most athletes compete in college sports where ESPN doesn't cover. For the very few fortunate, they make that much extra in a week.