iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Tunisia Elections 2011: Ennahda, Moderate Islamist Party, Leads Many Constituencies

Tunisia Elections

PAUL SCHEMM   10/24/11 06:17 PM ET   AP

TUNIS, Tunisia — A moderate Islamist party claimed victory Monday in Tunisia's landmark elections as preliminary results indicated it had won the biggest share of votes, assuring it will have a strong say in the future constitution of the country whose popular revolution led to the Arab Spring.

The Ennahda party's success could boost other Islamist parties in the North Africa and the Middle East, although Ennahda insists its approach to sharia, or Islamic law, is consistent with Tunisia's progressive traditions, especially in regards to women's rights.

Party officials estimated Ennahda had taken at least 30 percent of the 217-seat assembly charged with writing a new constitution for the country. Other estimates put the party's share from Sunday's vote closer to 50 percent. Official results are expected Tuesday.

International observers lauded the election as free and fair while emphasizing that the parties in the new government must work together and safeguard the rights of women.

There were no official announcements of domestic results Monday, but Tunisian media outlets posted tallies from individual polling stations, making it clear that Ennahda or Renaissance Party was now the dominant political force in the country, coming in first in nearly every constituency.

Ennahda did take half of the 18 seats reserved for Tunisians living abroad in official preliminary results released Monday. Two center-left parties took seven other seats between them – a distributon of seats expected to replicated domestically.

"Ennahda has taken first place on the national level and at the level of the constituencies," said Abdel Hamid Jelassi, the party's campaign manager at a triumphant press conference outside its headquarters amid cheering supporters.

In the half century since its 1956 independence from France, Tunisia has been practically a one-party state until Tunisians kicked out President Zine El Abidine Ben Ali in January after a monthlong popular uprising. Nine months of unrest, further demonstrations and political wrangling in the country of 10 million preceded Sunday's vote, which saw a huge turnout.

The constituent assembly elected will have an incredibly important role in building Tunisia's new democracy. It will not only appoint a new interim government but write the constitution that will determine how the country will function.

Tunisia's elections coincided with declarations in neighboring Libya by its new leaders that the country has been liberated from the yoke of longtime dictator Moammar Gadhafi. Libya's new leaders also announced plans with a sharply Islamist tone that could rattle their Western backers.

Ennahda says it wants Islamic law, to be the source of the country's legislation, but also insists that the country's progressive personal status code is compatible with its ideals and that it respects all religions and creeds. The party's ability to gain votes by moderating its message in a country with a progressive social history could be a model for Islamist parties elsewhere.

"Islamist groups are learning to play politics in the sense of moderating their message and moving to the center," said Philip Howard, a professor at the University of Washington and the director of the Project on Information Technology and Political Islam. "They start out fundamentalist but then become content to participate in party politics and move to the center, giving up some of their radical politics."

Habib Bourguiba, who led Tunisia to independence, was a staunch secularist, and helped shape what was outwardly one of the more Westernized societies in the region, with a progressive personal status code for women – and harsh repression for Islamists.

When asked why they voted for Ennahda, Tunisians cited everything from protection of Islam to the hope that the party could deliver jobs, to the fact that it once severely repressed by the government.

"Ennahda was never with Ben Ali," said Mohammed Husseini, a taxi driver in Tunis. "All the other politicians benefited from him in one way or another."

The election was widely praised by the different teams of international observers who came to watch the contests, who described as fair with only a few minor violations that had no effect on the outcome.

"This election to me was hands down the best, most promising election I have ever witnessed, including those I have seen in the United States," said Jane Harman, a former nine-term congresswomen from California with the National Democratic Institute's delegation of observers.

She congratulated the Tunisians, then cautioned the apparent winners not to roll back the country's famous achievements for women.

"The world is watching to make certain that the government that emerges respects the rights of women, continues to uphold the family status law in Tunisia – as all the parties pledge to do – and that women play a very meaningful role in the future of the country," she said.

U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton also encouraged the election's winners to work together and protect human rights.

"We encourage the Constituent Assembly to operate in a transparent and inclusive manner as they undertake this new democratic responsibility and fulfill the Tunisian people's aspirations for accountability, wider economic opportunity and respect for universal human rights," she said in a statement.

The one party that was most vociferous in its commitment to protect the status of women from Ennahda did suprisingly poorly in the polls.

The Progressive Democratic Party was one of the only legal opposition parties under Ben Ali. It appears to have faded during the campaign and in a downcast press conference, party officials said they appeared to have come in fourth place.

Party leader Maya Jribi said the PDP still had faith in its center-left ideology and would work in the opposition.

"We are in a democracy, and the minority plays the role of the opposition, and we will do this role in the right way and we will ask the assembly to meet the needs of Tunisians," she said. "We will play a role in the new constitution and assure it has a separation between religion and state."

Next to her, Nejib Chebbi, the party's historic founder, congratulated Ennahda, while stressing that it had a lot to do if it was going to address the country's myriad problems.

"We congratulate the party who won and we wish it good luck in fulfilling its promises to meet the needs and demands of the poor and the unemployed in just the next nine months or a year," he said.

Sayed Ferjani, a member of Ennahda's political bureau, said the party already had been contacted about future coalitions. "We are contact with everybody, even Chebbi (of the PDP) started contacting us on the eve of the election," he said.

After 23 years in power, Ben Ali was overthrown Jan. 14 by a monthlong uprising, sparked by a fruit vendor who set himself on fire to protest police harassment. The uprising was fueled by anger over unemployment, corruption and repression and quickly inspired similar rebellions across the Arab world.

The autocratic rulers of Egypt and Libya have fallen since, but Tunisia is the first country to hold free elections as a result of the upheaval. Egypt's parliamentary election is set for next month.

Tunisia's economy and employment, however, have only gotten worse since Ben Ali fled to Saudi Arabia because tourists and foreign investors have stayed away.

______

Associated Press writer Bouazza ben Bouazza contributed to this report.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST WORLD

TUNIS, Tunisia — A moderate Islamist party claimed victory Monday in Tunisia's landmark elections as preliminary results indicated it had won the biggest share of votes, assuring it will have a ...
TUNIS, Tunisia — A moderate Islamist party claimed victory Monday in Tunisia's landmark elections as preliminary results indicated it had won the biggest share of votes, assuring it will have a ...
Filed by Clare Richardson  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 455
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (5 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Joe Goforth
contempt for the status quo
12:43 PM on 10/26/2011
I love the way that western politicians and media paint this as democracy. This country is 99% Islamic so you have your freedom of choice- anything you like as long as it's Islam and Sharia law. Isn't democracy wonderful! Stay tuned for the the next democratic Caliphate in north Africa.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:03 AM on 10/26/2011
Is it true that the more Islamist a country is, the more anti Western, anti liberal democracy and anti American it is?

I'm trying to think of an exception to that rule and coming up empty.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Abdul-Halim Vazquez
12:51 PM on 10/26/2011
Not understanding why you are wrong is very very different from successfully proving that you are right.

That said some contrasting examples which come to mind are countries which are arguably "anti-American" without being Islamist (e.g. Cuba, Venezuela, China). In Japan and in SOUTH Korea there is a certain amount of anti-Americanism which is clearly linked to the US military presence.

If we look among Muslim majority countries some regimes which have been more "anti-American" weren't substantially theocratic or Islamist... Bathist Iraq under Saddam, Ghaddafi's Libya, Egypt under Nasser, Iran right after the coup again Mosadeq. On the other hand, Saudi Arabia, one of the most theocratic Muslim countries is our close ally.

At the other extreme, according to some accounts Turkey is the most anti-American country in the world while at the same time being an extremely secular country.

So I'm kind of wondering if you have ANY actual evidence to support your original contention.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:23 PM on 10/26/2011
You give three examples that you claim as evidence that Islamism is not consistently correlated with anti Americanism:

1. Regimes prior to the rise of revolutionary Islamism: Two regimes were based on the notion of Pan-Arabism: Saddam and Ghaddafi. The Islamists were seen as competitors by both. The only thing they agreed on was anti Americanism. The Shah repressed the Islamists until Khomeini. All three cases argue for my thesis. As Islamism rises, so does anti Americanism.

2. Saudi Arabia is not our close ally, except in one narrow sense--our interests converge on the desirability of keeping oil prices relatively low and production high.

Ideologically, Saudi Arabia and Iran are the two most dedicated enemies the US has in the world. US policy regarding Saudi Arabia should be reversed, identifying the Kingdom as a state sponsor of terrorism, for starters.

Any Presidential candidate who proposes to do that would get very serious consideration from me.

3. Turkey has been friendly to the US precisely to the extent that Islamism was repressed there. Now that Islamists are in full control, democratic safeguards and pro American policy are both vanishing in the drive to re constitute the Ottoman reign.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
03:13 PM on 10/26/2011
I another comment you say this:

"I don't think there is a consistent definition of Islamist. But again, if you are starting with a population where the overwhelming majority of people are religious Muslims then the laws produced by a democratic system would reflect Islamic values."

So let's define Islamism.

The crucial difference between Islam the religion and Islamism the political ideology is the issue of secularism. An Islamist country and a country with Islamic values are two very different things—especially in their view of secularism.

To speak with any precision about the two, you cannot lump them together in an unelaborated phrase like "Islamic values".

For example, America has many Christian values embedded in its system of law because it has always had an overwhelming majority of Christians. But America is not structurally a Christian country and the Bible is not the highest source of authority in the same sense that Iran and Saudi Arabia are Islamic countries and Sharia is the highest authority.

That is the fundamental difference between a Muslim majority country with Islamic values and an Islamist country. Because every other facet of society is built upon the fundamentals, the difference between the two is enormous, as the examples of Kosovo and Saudi Arabia demonstrate.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Abdul-Halim Vazquez
01:07 PM on 10/27/2011
Are you just talking about Muslim majority countries or worldwide?
If you are just talking about Muslim majority countries, your assertion has two sides. Are you willing to name some Muslim-majority countries which you would say are less-Islamist and pro-democracy?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
01:59 PM on 10/27/2011
Sure. Just after you answer the last question I asked you.
Charles W Noble
Reason with eachother
10:34 AM on 10/26/2011
I think we're not seeing the forest from the trees here. Bottom line: THE PEOPLE OF TUNISIA VOTED! That's a very good beginning. Now, we need to make sure that happens year after year after year. A democracy is a constant battle because people love power. So, they are very hesitant to let it go. That is why it is important to have term limits and it has to be rock solid. There also has to be a system of checks and balances to make sure that the president can't just go to war when they feel like it or create laws to punish enemies. Those things are things that can expand over time, but a democracy is the surest way for people to have serious and passionate debate about issues without resorting to violence. It is the greatest gift the people of Tunisia can provide to their progeny.
Peabodies
We are the Many. They are the Few.
06:06 PM on 10/25/2011
This is not all what the Tunisians in the streets wanted. They were a secular country to begin with. Who´s behind this turn of events? Parties that need an enemy [the muslims] to continue the military industrial complex overreach of peoples´monies? It doesn´t make sense. Watch Libya, Egypt, Syria "electing" so-called "moderate islamists", one after the other, the "Caliphate" Glenn Beck was salivating about.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sstevens37
I have the right to hate you
11:19 AM on 10/25/2011
religion has no place in government or law...period
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
The Knocker
a mind is a terrible thing to waste
01:46 PM on 10/25/2011
Perhaps you are not aware that every pres. in the US is sworn in on the bible. Not to mention that the U.S constitution was developed by religious people.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sstevens37
I have the right to hate you
02:43 PM on 10/25/2011
yes...developed by religious people that understood the concept of separation of church and state
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
08:43 AM on 10/25/2011
There are 18 seats in the new 217-member assembly reserved for those living outside the country.

Ennahda took nine of the seats. Four went to the Ettakatol or "forum" party and three to the Congress for the Republic — both ideologically center left.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Phaedrah Ellison
Facts are stupid things - Ronald Reagan
08:38 AM on 10/25/2011
Who are we to criticize what form of government is elected in by any of the new democracies emerging across the Arab world? Our democracy is run by the highest bidder.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kodimirpal
teacher
09:56 AM on 10/25/2011
Do you mean to imply that the US is a plutocracy and not a democracy in the strict definition of the term?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Phaedrah Ellison
Facts are stupid things - Ronald Reagan
02:08 PM on 10/25/2011
If we arent there, we are pretty close to it. The concentration of wealth in our nation and the gap between the rich and not-so-rich is enormous. Politicians are beholden to corporations and the wealthy few who are willing to finance their campaigns in order to gain further influence and its clear, the influence they purchase via campaign donations is in all likelihood -not- for the greater good.
07:46 AM on 10/25/2011
I feel bad for the women and the Christians. See Egypt.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kodimirpal
teacher
09:57 AM on 10/25/2011
You have picked up a mustard seed and calling it Himalya
photo
cmon really
I comment therefore I am
11:11 AM on 10/25/2011
Well if you were the mustard seed in that country it would seem like the Himalayas to you I'm sure.
07:40 AM on 10/25/2011
As the world watches the Tunisian elections, as significant as they are, I'm wondering: what would have happened if Tunisia's former president Ben Ali did not leave, if he tried to stay in power by all means? What would the Middle East be like now? How would the course of the Arab Spring have flowed? Feel free to share your opinions.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
08:33 AM on 10/25/2011
Most Americans would still not know where Tunisia is. :)
12:04 PM on 10/25/2011
And if Saudi Arabia's relations with the US and Europe was as wonderful as Iran's for example you'd think they would ask for his extradition to stand trial at some point in time ?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
nappyman
Hatred is gained as much by good works as by evil
07:18 AM on 10/25/2011
As long as they have a functioning democracy there is nothing wrong with this. Because people in the end will vote for the guy that makes their lives better and I have a feeling many of these Islamist parties will lose their luster in a few years.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kodimirpal
teacher
08:06 AM on 10/25/2011
Would you say the same thing about the so called functioning US democracy? Have people in the end in the US vote for a President who would mind his own business and not poke his nose into the political, economic and military affairs of developing nations? Would you have the feeling that many Americans will lose their lustre and go for a more moral, disciplined and faith filled society because as right now we are heading towards more and more profligacy?
Impossible to understand why we bother so much about another nation's culture, laws and how they run their own form of democracy, as long as they do not attack our nation and commit aggression on our soil.We got to get rid of our superiority complex and arrogance
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
nappyman
Hatred is gained as much by good works as by evil
08:15 AM on 10/25/2011
Because of money. We didn't gain our way of life through hard work alone. Not saying it is right. Just saying why.
11:39 AM on 10/25/2011
if we lieave them alone they hijack planes or try to assasinate ambassadors they are like bad kids and need constant supervision i know it sucks always keeping on eye on them but someone has to
11:42 AM on 10/25/2011
They will lose their "luster", just like they have in Iran. You have to wonder why the left praises Egypt and now Libya, knowing that women, gays and Christians will be oppressed and s.l.a.u.g.h.t.e.r.e.d. I've studied it and understand the outcome is not a good one.
01:59 AM on 10/25/2011
OK, so they want Sharia law. So be it. Don't they get to make their own way in the world?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kodimirpal
teacher
07:19 AM on 10/25/2011
The following are some of the regulations given in the Quran which may form part of the laws of a Muslim nation, Do they hurt you in nay way?

Please tell me how it goes against any non-Mslims concern

[5:6] O you who believe, when you observe the Prayers, you shall: wash your faces, your arms to the elbows, wipe your heads, and wash your feet to the ankles. If you were unclean due to sexual orgasm, you shall bathe.

[2:173] He only prohibits for you the eating of animals that die of themselves (without human interference), blood, the meat of pigs, and animals dedicated to other than GOD. If one is forced (to eat these), without being malicious or deliberate, he incurs no sin. GOD is Forgiver, Most Merciful.

[4:36] You shall worship GOD alone - do not associate anything with Him. You shall regard the parents, the relatives, the orphans, the poor, the related neighbour, the unrelated neighbour, the close associate, the travelling alien, and your servants. GOD does not like the arrogant show-offs.

[2:195] You shall spend in the cause of GOD; do not throw yourselves with your own hands into destruction. You shall be charitable; GOD loves the charitable

[2:280] If the debtor is unable to pay, wait for a better time. If you give up the loan as a charity, it would be better for you, if you only knew

Note : First numeral indicates the Chapter Number and the second numeral Verse number
08:34 AM on 10/25/2011
You took those verses out of context.
09:15 AM on 10/25/2011
Sounds like the Tea Party in many cases, especially all the GOD stuff.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LIbislife
03:04 PM on 10/25/2011
so long as people are not forced into it.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
01:41 AM on 10/25/2011
"It cannot be emphasized too strongly or too often that this great nation was founded, not by religionists but by Christians, not on religions, but on the gospel of Jesus Christ." - Patrick Henry

"Providence has given to our people the choice of their rulers and it is the duty as well as the privilege and interest of a Christian nation to select and prefer Christians for their rulers." - U.S. Supreme Court Chief Justice, John Jay

"Let us look forward to the time when we can take the flag of our country and nail it below the Cross, and there let it wave as it waved in the olden times, and let us gather around it an inscribed for our motto: "Liberty and Union, one and inseparable, now and forever," and exclaim, Christ first, our country next!" -- Andrew Johnson
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Sheldon archer
Facebook name is Yuyun Archer
05:41 AM on 10/25/2011
Thomas Jefferson made an interpretation of the 1st Amendment to his January 1st, 1802 letter to the Committee of the Danbury Baptist Association calling it a "wall of separation between church and State." Madison had also written that "Strongly guarded. . . is the separation between religion and government in the Constitution of the United States."
Treaty of Tripoli. In Article 11, it states:
"As the Government of the United States of America is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion;..."
In a letter to Horatio Spafford in 1814, Jefferson said, "In every country and every age, the priest has been hostile to liberty. He is always in alliance with the despot, abetting his abuses in return for protection to his own.
Jefferson said, "And the day will come when the mystical generation of Jesus, by the supreme being as his father in the womb of a virgin, will be classed with the fable of the generation of Minerva in the brain of Jupiter" (April 11, 1823).
In 1785, when the Commonwealth of Virginia was considering passage of a bill "establishing a provision for Teachers of the Christian Religion," Madison wrote his famous "Memorial and Remonstrance Against Religious Assessments" in which he presented fifteen reasons why government should not be come involved in the support of any religion.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:19 AM on 10/25/2011
There is an ignorance in America of all things not American. Many in America look at NYC, SF, LA and Miami as foreign countries and not appropriately American. Most Americans had never hear of Islam before 9/11 and seem to be uninterested in learning anything about it. But what is most damaging to America is the lack of any perspective of their own politics and policies.

Every candidate for president in the US must emphasize their Christian faith. They are sworn in on the Bible. Your money and court rooms are full of references to god. America has the smallest percentage of the population in the industrialized world who believe in evolution. As your economy fails this trend with accelerate. Just look at the fundamentalists running for the Republican nomination this year.

The Arab spring is throwing off the last vestiges of Western colonialism. It will be messy. It will take a generation to settle in. But the process now turns political and economics will rule. This will be the fastest growing part of the world for the foreseeable future. And regardless of how ignorant Americans are of the region they will regret not being part of this future economically. Culturally; no strip malls so who cares. :))
This comment has been removed due to violations of our [Guidelines]
01:32 AM on 10/25/2011
Great point on the economy. I think the Iranian revolution was sold to people through the media in such a way that there is very little room for any US politician to get close to that country without spooking their base. All these years Europeans and now Russians and Chinese have benefited from the ever expanding Iranian economy which is based on industrial production larger than any country around it, and US has been sitting out. Sanctions have been in place because Reagan could not bear the fact that an Islamic country wants to have normal relations without being used as a tool.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:11 AM on 10/25/2011
The US sanctions and the invasion by Saddam have made the Iranians determined to never have to rely on anyone else ever again any more than they have to.

As a result, they have built a very large industrial base where they can make everything from consumer goods to sophisticated missiles and war ships.

As a result, everyone on the earth except the US has a vibrant trade with Iran that is very profitable for both sides.

This is very similar to all the trade the US loses from the Cuba embargo.
12:13 AM on 10/25/2011
The "Arab Spring" is looking more like a a scheme by radical Islamist to over throw their governments who were not as radical as they are, and issue in Sharia Laws. Brilliant scheme that that the west backed by providing Libya with weapons. This administration in this country should be ashamed putting this country in danger from these radical groups who are emerging from this recently so called free countries. We should have never supported this rebels in Libya and the people in who wanted freedom across the middle east.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:36 AM on 10/25/2011
"We should have never supported this rebels in Libya and the people in who wanted freedom across the middle east."

America got away with supporting the dictators, and still do, as long as they possibly could. Now you're locked out of what will be the fastest growing economies. Bad timing, huh?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:17 AM on 10/25/2011
There is absolutely NOTHING the US can do about the locals finally destroying the last vestiges of colonialism.

No matter how many Americans we send over there to be killed, the US can NOT possible win by force. The colonial days are LONG OVER.

If the US wants influence in the ME it will have to do ...

- Throw Israel to the wolves and when the war starts cripple Israel as much as possible (yes take sides against Israel)

- Kill off the remaining dictators and let the locals decide how they want to live.

- Yes, that means killing the Saudi King and his princes.

In other words instead of trying to slow down the inevitable future, take a lead in helping the rebels succeed.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:48 PM on 10/24/2011
"They start out fundamentalist but then become content to participate in party politics and move to the center, giving up some of their radical politics."

Sounds like good advise for the Christian radicals running for the Republican nomination in the US.