More

We Look At Nutrition Labels Less Than We Think We Do, Study Says

The Huffington Post     First Posted: 10/25/11 07:13 PM ET   Updated: 12/25/11 05:12 AM ET

You're one of those good people who always makes sure to check the nutrition facts on food packages before buying them, right?

Well, a new study suggests you may think you're good about checking, but you really don't pay as much attention as you think you do.

"The results of this study suggest that consumers have a finite attention span for Nutrition Facts labels: although most consumers did view labels, very few consumers viewed every component on any label," the University of Minnesota, Twin Cities researchers said in a statement. "These results differed from the self-reported survey responses describing typical grocery shopping and health behaviors submitted by the participants."

For the study, 203 people looked at 64 grocery store items on a computer screen. There were three elements on the screen for each item: the Nutrition Facts label, the description of the item including its price and quantity, and a picture of the item and a list of its ingredients. A third of the study participants saw the Nutrition Facts element on the left side of the screen, a third of them saw it on the right side and a third of them saw it in the middle. Then, researchers asked the study participants to say whether they would think about buying the product.

Researchers found that 33 percent of people said that they usually looked at the Nutrition Facts on food packages, 31 percent said they usually look at total fat, and 20 percent said they usually look at trans fat. Twenty-four percent said they usually look at sugar, and 26 percent said they usually look at the serving sizes.

But using eye-tracking technology, researchers found that just 9 percent of the people in the study looked at the calories of the products, and just 1 percent looked at the other things (fats, sugar, etc.).

In addition, researchers found that 61 percent of the people read the Nutrition Facts when they were in the middle of the computer screen, while just 37 percent read them when they were on the left side and 34 percent read them when they were on the right side.

"Any research that adds to our understanding of what would encourage consumers to use the information provided is welcomed," a UK Food and Drink Federation spokesperson told BBC News. However, she added that the transferability of the finding is still unknown because the study is computer-based.

Confused about nutrition labels, and other nutrition buzzwords? Click through this slideshow for definitions of some commonly used terms and phrases.

Antioxidants
1 of 10
Antioxidants are substances that sop up free oxygen molecules, which some believe may prevent the damage that occurs naturally through daily life to our cells and DNA.

When our tissue comes into contact with oxygen as we breathe and eat, a process called "oxidation" occurs which can set off a reaction that permanently damages cells -- and even DNA -- within your body. Although this is a lot of science talk, oxidative stress may contribute to the development of a host of conditions -- including cancer, cataracts, arthritis, stroke and heart disease.

Antioxidants may contribute to the prevention of oxidative stress. Some of the most common antioxidants include Vitamin E, Vitamin C, Uric Acid and Melatonin. They can be ingested naturally through certain foods or be taken in supplement form.
Total comments: 13 | Post a Comment
1 of 10
This Buzzword
Already knew that
Who knew?!

  • 1

  • 2

  • 3

  • 4

  • 5

  • 6

  • 7

  • 8

  • 9

  • 10
Top 5 Buzzwords
Users who voted on this slide
loading...

FOLLOW HUFFPOST HEALTHY LIVING

You're one of those good people who always makes sure to check the nutrition facts on food packages before buying them, right? Well, a new study suggests you may think you're good about checking, ...
You're one of those good people who always makes sure to check the nutrition facts on food packages before buying them, right? Well, a new study suggests you may think you're good about checking, ...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 13
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
munki
Global to Local now Local to Global
01:35 AM on 10/27/2011
Need trAnslation what it really mean...
photo
iRock
and that's all that needs to be said...
10:06 PM on 10/26/2011
I generally try to eat foods that don't come with a nutrition label.
05:08 PM on 10/26/2011
I actually look at very few labels when I go grocery shopping - mostly because there are no labels on fresh fruits and vegetables. When I DO buy processed foods, I tend to look at the labels only when considering a product I've never bought before, and then I compare the protein/fiber/sugar/fat content of the new item to that of the similar item I've chosen in the past.
03:32 PM on 10/26/2011
http://www.foodreview101.com/ If you don't look, how else do you know what you're eating?
02:34 PM on 10/26/2011
I don't know how much to trust the researchers because they found that;

31% look at total fat, and 20% look at trans fat. 24% look at sugar, and 26% look at the serving sizes. Unless I am doing the wrong math this clearly adds up to 101%
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
onionboy
Blessed are the Cheese Makers
03:40 PM on 10/26/2011
You're doing your math wrong. People can look at more than one thing. For instance, everyone who looked at trans fat likely looked at total fat as well.
02:30 PM on 10/26/2011
I read labels all the time. I mostly look at the calories and to make sure there are not a lot of preservatives. http://www.newyorkchick365.blogspot.com
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ranveig Elvebakk
Innovator, author and lecturer on weight and nutri
02:01 PM on 10/26/2011
Looking does not do us much good unless we understand what we are looking at---
12:21 PM on 10/26/2011
I'm a low-carber and I check what's really important (for me, at least).
First, total carbs minues fiber, second trans fats, third ingredient list (the less chemicals, the better, obviously, and almost everything that ends in -ose is sugar).
I completely ignore calories and saturated fats.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Kelly Jade
09:54 AM on 10/26/2011
This doesn't seem like a very good study. I'm a vegetarian the first thing I check is the ingredient list for animal products and I tend to scan very quickly because I've been doing this long enough to have an idea of what I'm looking for, if it passed that test I move to calories, potion size and a few other elements but all of this is done very very quickly. If it doesn't pass one test, I put it down and walk away.
12:52 PM on 10/26/2011
I'm with you on this. Most people with specific dietary needs know where on the label to look for this info and do so quickly like you said. If it passes the test, then investigate further-knowing exactly where to look. Study seems like a waste of time and $.
03:28 AM on 10/26/2011
One problem with the study; when people first buy a given product they are much more likely to read the nutrition label carefully. After that point there is no need to look closely. Many of the people in this study had most likely already checked the labels prior to this research. Not the sharpest study.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
slvrfox857
questionevrthing.blogspot.com
07:17 PM on 10/25/2011
I can't speak for anyone else, but I found this story annoying. Would these researchers like to follow me and watch me read labels, and then ask me what I read-or just use "eye tracking software?" I would pass the test, whether it looked as if my eyes were moving back and forth enough for their software to interpret or not. Who do they think they are?