iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

SAT Officials To Testify At NY Cheating Ring Hearing

Test

FRANK ELTMAN   10/25/11 05:07 PM ET   AP

FARMINGDALE, N.Y. — A security firm run by the former director of the FBI has been retained to review security – and will recommend changes – on standardized testing procedures following an SAT cheating scandal on New York's Long Island, officials with the nonprofit organizations behind the tests said Tuesday.

The officials from The College Board and Educational Testing Service made the announcement at a hearing of the New York state Senate's subcommittee on higher education. The ETS administers the SAT on behalf of the Princeton, N.J.-based College Board.

Sen. Kenneth LaValle, the subcommittee chairman, convened the hearing after seven current or former students at Great Neck North High School were arrested last month. Authorities said six of the students had an older college student who had attended the high school take their exams in their place in a quest for better scores.

The scandal surfaced when teachers at the school heard rumors of the scheme earlier this year and found that some of the student scores were far better than their high school grades had been previously.

LaValle and others have questioned test security procedures in the wake of the scandal, particularly focusing on the allegation that the accused impersonator, 19-year-old Samuel Eshaghoff, allegedly posed as a female during one of the tests. Eshaghoff also is accused of accepting payments of up to $2,500 for taking the tests. He and the other six, who are accused of misdemeanors, have all pleaded not guilty.

LaValle noted in remarks at the start of the hearing that there is increasing pressure on students to perform well on the tests, which are used by many universities as criteria for admission.

"Education is critically important," LaValle said. "It gives one a ticket to their success. This committee and our legislature and our society cannot tolerate where one group of students play by different rules that give them an advantage over other students. Sadly, the losers in this are the honest, hard-working students who play by the rules."

He said he will introduce legislation early next year to change existing laws that sometimes prevent the College Board or ETS from notifying schools when allegations of cheating have been confirmed.

Nassau County District Attorney Kathleen Rice, who filed criminal charges in the Great Neck case, said her investigation has widened to other high schools – both public and private schools – and more arrests are expected. She was initially expected to testify at the hearing, but withdrew because of potential conflicts with the ongoing investigation.

Former West Virginia Gov. Gaston Caperton, who is now the president of The College Board, said the cheating scandal has prompted an international review of security testing procedures. He said Freeh Group International Solutions, LLC, which was founded by former FBI director Louis J. Freeh, has been retained to assist with security concerns.

Caperton insisted that impostors taking SATs for another student is a rarity. He said security changes being considered include a review of what would be acceptable ID information and possibly using digital photography at testing sites. He did not provide a timetable for when Freeh's company would make recommendations, but appeared willing to accede to whatever changes are suggested.

LaValle sought assurances that the cost of any security upgrades not be passed along to students taking the test. Caperton's spokesman, Peter Kauffmann, said it is too early to know whether additional costs would be incurred.

The College Board, which charges $49 for the test, has faced criticism from some educators over fees. This year it says it granted fee waivers to 350,000 students – an increase of 77 percent in the last four years – because of the weak economy.

Bernard Kaplan, the principal at Great Neck North, criticized the lack of security procedures employed by the College Board and ETS. But he said he could not answer questions, citing the ongoing prosecution case involving his school. He noted that Eshaghoff did not allegedly take the tests at Great Neck North, but went elsewhere so he wouldn't be recognized. Some senators have questioned the effectiveness of allowing students to take the exam at locations other than at their own high schools; something that is currently permitted.

"Many, many educators have come to believe that the SATs are over used, over emphasized, and generally given much more credibility than they warrant," Kaplan said. "In fact, what SATs measure best is how well you will do on your next SATs."

Kaplan added: "Very simply, ETS has made it very easy to cheat, very difficult to get caught, and has failed to include schools in the process."

Another critic of standardized testing contended that more can be done to improve test security.

Bob Schaeffer of FairTest, said photos of all students should be taken when they arrive at a school to take the SAT, something that Caperton said is now being considered.

"As the Great Neck scandal demonstrates, the current level of security is inadequate," he said. "Savvy students can circumvent these minimal protections with relative ease, particularly by using modern technologies to forge identity cards, covertly copy exam materials, or secretly transmit correct answers."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST COLLEGE

Filed by Rebecca Harrington  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 2
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
01:04 PM on 10/25/2011
Cheating is not limited to our educational institutions. Cheating is now the American way of life.

Americans are forced to vote on electronic voting machines where results can be manipulated instantly and winners determined far in advance. Many still believe the 2000 election was "stolen" by manipulation of results on these electronic voting machines. Instead of insuring security of future elections by using only independent mechanical machines for voters, all secure mechanical voting machines were replaced across the country with "hackable" electronic voting machines. These machines which can be remotely accessed, entered, and yield altered results in less than 5 minutes are now the only machines used for all America's elections.

America's cheating epidemic coincides with the dishonesty and hypocrisy of our elected officials and our government, neither of which is honest with the people whose best interests they are supposed to represent. We have become a country of special interests and corruption. Honesty is punished; dishonesty is rewarded. Each successive administration pardons the transgressions of the preceding one. Each validates and increases it's own powers, doing away with the checks and balances that kept us a free democracy and envy of the world.

How can we in good conscience prosecute these 7 people when they are the least of this country's problems? This prosecution is just a pretense, trying to indicate that cheating is not tolerated when in effect cheating has become the American way of life.
12:50 PM on 10/25/2011
Cheating is nationwide and not limited to the SAT's. Cheating has become part of America's culture.

I find it interesting that this cheating incident has been uncovered in one of the wealthiest areas in NY. This suggests that a good number of us who are making the most money are those of us who learned early on how this game is played.

Reader's Digest ran an expose of this a year or two ago. The cheating is NOT limited to the SAT exams. Cheating is rampant on LSAT and MCAT (national pre-law and pre medical) exams, LICENSING EXAMS, GRADUATE PAPERS, PHD submissions, and all forms of advanced degree studies. Professional test-takers and paper writers advertise their services and make a living by doing this.

Some of us would argue that such cheating is an answer to America's "AFFIMATIVE ACTION" programs. The results of these cases is the same - less qualified and unqualified people enter the professions and make more money than those more qualified but honest individuals who are shut out because they are ethical.