More

HuffPost Social Reading

Virginia Rometty Becomes IBM CEO As Sam Palmisano Retires

Virginia Rometty

By JORDAN ROBERTSON   10/25/11 10:28 PM ET  AP

SAN FRANCISCO -- IBM Corp. ushered in the first female CEO in the company's 100-year history on Tuesday.

Virginia "Ginni" Rometty, a veteran at the technology giant famous for its conservative corporate culture, will take over as CEO from Sam Palmisano, IBM announced.

Palmisano has been CEO for nearly a decade and turned 60 this year. He will stay on as chairman.

Rometty, 54, takes over on Jan. 1. She is currently in charge of sales and marketing at the company based in Armonk, N.Y.

After she takes over the helm at IBM, women will be in charge of two of the world's largest technology companies. Last month, Meg Whitman was named CEO of Hewlett-Packard Co. Whitman had previously joined eBay Inc. when it was a fledgling startup during the dot-com boom and guided it to become an Internet auction powerhouse. She also ran unsuccessfully for California governor last year.

While Whitman's HP is a sprawling company in disarray, Rometty will inherit a finely tuned IBM whose focus on the high-margin businesses of technology services and software has helped it thrive.

Their appointments are "setting a fabulous example" in the promotion of female executives, said Jean Bozman, an analyst with IDC who has followed both companies closely for years.

"It is a good sign," Bozman said. "It does create an environment in which more of these high-ranking women executives can see that's within reach. The more that happens, the more normal that will be. I think this might be a great sign that we've turned a corner. Certainly the Baby Boomers have wanted this for a long time."

HP, of course, had another female CEO, Carly Fiorina, but her tenure ended in acrimony when she was forced out in 2005 over disappointing financials and the fallout from her hard-fought battle to buy Compaq Computer.

IBM's move was unexpected. Palmisano had tamped down earlier talk of his retirement, insisting that he wanted to stay on as chief. In rare public comments, he said last year that he was "not going anywhere" and that there's no formal policy at IBM dictating when a CEO should retire.

Palmisano in a statement said that Rometty has led some of IBM's most important businesses, and was instrumental in the formation of IBM's business services division. She oversaw IBM's $3.5 billion purchase of PricewaterhouseCoopers' consulting business in 2002, which is a key element of a strategy that has made IBM a widely copied company. She is "more than a superb operational executive," Palmisano said.

"She brings to the role of CEO a unique combination of vision, client focus, unrelenting drive, and passion for IBMers and the company's future," Palmisano said. "I know the board agrees with me that Ginni is the ideal CEO to lead IBM into its second century."

Bobby Cameron, an analyst with Forrester Research who has worked with IBM in various roles over the years, said that in meetings with Rometty is "engaging" and inquisitive. Her interest in emerging technologies, not just the established sales leaders, is an important characteristic. Cameron thinks she's an ideal choice to continue Palmisano's work.

"I think she's smart. She asks questions; she doesn't just come in with an agenda, and she's interested in the leading edge, not just what's driving volume – all those things are important for a CEO to have," Cameron said.

Palmisano has the same characteristics, Cameron said.

"I think it will be more of the same, and I think that's a good thing," he said.

IBM shares fell $1.16, or 0.6 percent, to $179.20 in extended trading, after the change was announced.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST TECH

SAN FRANCISCO -- IBM Corp. ushered in the first female CEO in the company's 100-year history on Tuesday. Virginia "Ginni" Rometty, a veteran at the technology giant famous for its conservative corpor...
SAN FRANCISCO -- IBM Corp. ushered in the first female CEO in the company's 100-year history on Tuesday. Virginia "Ginni" Rometty, a veteran at the technology giant famous for its conservative corpor...
Filed by Ramona Emerson  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 45
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
02:52 PM on 12/18/2011
Good girl!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
michelleobamaok
Are Racial and Religious Intolerance the New Gay?
05:28 PM on 12/02/2011
IBM Gets First Female CEO...........dayuuuum. What year is it again? 1980?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Gorgeous Gail
03:40 AM on 10/27/2011
Maybe Virginia can spur some life into IBM by revamping the dress code, having all women wear dresses or skirts, nylons and high heels. Seems like a female kind of decision.
11:47 PM on 10/26/2011
To me it's not about her being the first women. IBM was just way over due. I want to know how much did he get when he retired, how much is she going to be making, and is she going to be sending jobs oversees.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
billywms
11:00 PM on 10/26/2011
So What!--Why do people make a big deal about "first female ceo" or "first black president"-Race Doesn't Matter!--If you make a big deal out of what someone does because they're female you are basically saying i don't expect you 2 be great because you're female so i will make a big deal out of what you do as i expect nothing of you--Sexist!
02:08 PM on 11/25/2011
Life is simple while complex, the dynamics at play are as follows when citing "firsts":
-noting a genuine accomplishment
-noting a "breakthrough" in the "glass ceiling"
-patronizing the person as finally being the "qualified" embodiment of said demographic
-noting an organization or field has "allowed" one of "them" behind the curtain
-making an indictment on the delay of said "first" or the unlikelihood due to hidden, unspoken, understood norms, practices, protocol, or proceedures
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
hman570
06:42 PM on 10/26/2011
Another CEO that will not be paying taxes anytime soon!!!
10:15 PM on 10/26/2011
not real sharp are you? If you think for one moment they pay no taxes at all then you are just a sad dolt
12:47 PM on 12/06/2011
So true. All those deductions they didn't earn. In addition, I saw absolutely nothing there showing her qualifications. Although it amazes me how few CEOs are female (closed door politics), it doesn't mean we don't want to know what her qualifications were for the job.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Amalek
Highly decorated HP warrior
03:34 AM on 10/26/2011
IBM is a pretty good example of how America can compete in the modern economy. You provide high end software and services - sell ingenuity and brainpower, not hardware that is easily copied and better made in China.
03:02 PM on 10/26/2011
If by "ingenuity and brainpower", you mean firing Americans and hiring cheap foreign workers, sure. Not particularly ingenious, but very lucrative for big shareholders like the IBM executives.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jabailo
(Participant) Texeme.Construct()
10:50 PM on 10/25/2011
IBM's knowledge products are really the only 21st century value added technology coming out of Big Tech today.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Amalek
Highly decorated HP warrior
03:31 AM on 10/26/2011
Name an IBM product.

They have become a services and software company.  Not that there is anything wrong with that.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ScottV
Missouri Yellow Dog Dem
10:49 AM on 10/26/2011
Yes but the IBM Power series running AIX is the beast of the computing world. Don't take their hardware line for granted, kicks anything HP ever put out in the can.
10:15 PM on 10/25/2011
Sam left IBM while he was ON TOP....his foot ON TOP of the necks of present and former IBM workers. He should have his retirement celebration in the countries whose economies he grew at the expense of the United States. This man put profits above patriotism and respect for the individual. He is a great businessman but a terrible leader. Please do not honor him as he retires but hope that a better generation of leader..(not Ginny Rometty) will take his place. Hopefully someday IBM will have leadership that sees beyond the value of corporate shares and cares and respects people and diversity as during the time of the Watsons. How many millions does a CEO deserve or need and at what price and expense to the detriment of thousands of Americans?
10:41 PM on 10/25/2011
If you are an IBM employee, it's time for you to find another job.

If you are an IBM shareholder, it's time for you to sell your shares.

If you believe you could do better, it's time for you to start your own company.
10:54 PM on 10/25/2011
I have started my own company and I do work somewhere else. Have you ever worked at IBM? If not, then you speak from a lack of knowledge without having witnessed the destruction of the corporate culture. Your comments though interesting do not carry much weight.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Amalek
Highly decorated HP warrior
03:32 AM on 10/26/2011
Got canned, huh?
03:04 PM on 10/26/2011
Nope. But saw plenty of highly skilled co-workers get canned so that cheaper foreign workers could replace them. I guess it beats actually producing something innovative.
12:58 AM on 10/27/2011
People losing their jobs is not something to laugh about. Have you ever lost a job?
10:15 PM on 10/25/2011
During 2009 IBM engineers and other types of employees were laid off left with a 4 month package or forced retirement. During his tenure IBM masked the fact that they were laying off over 10,000 workers in 2009 while making record profits. They would only lay off 3000 at a time in different US locations to avoid having to make an announcement under US rulesIBM which was a very progressive company under the Watsons had it's diversity hiring budget cut by 2/3ds. The old "care and respect for the individual" IBM culture was thrown out the window as IBM Global Services absorbed over 60% of the company. For the last decade, IBM managers were told to give raises to only the top third of the company while managers were asked to spin why employees would not receive raises. This while the company continued to increase profits. In 2009 as the financial world was collapsing, Sam Palmisano "stood tall" with President Obama at the White House with a group of CEOs spaeking about jobs and the economy. What hypocrisy! As his company was laying off thousands and financial analysts thrilled at this efficiency sent the stock soaring. Sam and his Board of Directors made millions as thousands who had given 15 years or more to the company were forced into retirement or laid off to make room for cheaper workers.
10:43 PM on 10/25/2011
Do you feel foolish for not having purchased any IBM shares.
10:49 PM on 10/25/2011
I own IBM shares. Am I proud of the way the company has been run? No. Money is not everything. If hell exists I'm sure it is covered in shareholder dollars.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jabailo
(Participant) Texeme.Construct()
10:53 PM on 10/25/2011
Looking back two decades, if you had bought IBM (at the time everyone said Microsoft would obsolesce it) the rise to today would have been nearly similar to having bought AAPL in the last decade (with dividends all along the way) !!
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Amalek
Highly decorated HP warrior
03:32 AM on 10/26/2011
They changed the business.  It is services and software now, not hardware.
photo
geneandeddie59
Internationally unknown
09:54 PM on 10/25/2011
'We rely too much on computers!' --- a director of IBM's data systems division when reviewing computing costs for his group.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
America is an illusion
09:54 PM on 10/25/2011
I hope Obama asks Sam to jump in. The PR wouldn't be great with so many seeing IBM as an evil company for having employees where they actually have clients (eyes rolling), but this is the kind of smart liberals, with a proven track record of vision and success that this admin needs....badly!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tleb
07:44 PM on 10/25/2011
Meg Whitman doesn't even come close to comparing with Virginia Rommety. HP is A LOT smaller than IBM, IBM has divisions as large as HP.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
America is an illusion
09:49 PM on 10/25/2011
HP is A LOT smaller than IBM, IBM has divisions as large as HP.
------------------------------
That's not true, but you get an A+ for speaking with conviction

http://h30261.www3.hp.com/phoenix.zhtml?c=71087&p=irol-newsArticle&id=1499481
http://www.ibm.com/investor/4q10/press.phtml

compare the revenue in FY2010
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tleb
02:47 PM on 10/26/2011
Sorry, I was thinking about the HUGE distance between IBM's and HP's market cap...

After looking at the two companies links you posted, I am EVEN MORE convinced HP is a failure and HP is a "everything that is wrong with corporate American, posses almost zero of the good"
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
America is an illusion
09:50 PM on 10/25/2011
I love IBM...but just thought you would want to know...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
InfinteShibumi
Just breathe...
07:24 PM on 10/25/2011
You didn't need a ThinkPad to be able to see this coming.
05:38 PM on 10/25/2011
Who cares about IBM. The are a foreign company in disguise, with 65%+ of their employees overseas. Watson must be rolling over in his grave....
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tleb
07:51 PM on 10/25/2011
So a global services company should be doing all their work from the USA? Why would you say Watson would be rolling over in his Grave?

Currently,IBM employs more than 425,000 employees (sometimes referred to as "IBMers") in over 200 countries, with occupations including scientists, engineers, consultants, and sales professionals.

During Watson's first four years, revenues more than doubled to $9 million and the company's operations expanded to Europe, South America, Asia, and Australia.[20] On February 14, 1924, C-T-R was renamed the International Business Machines Corporation (IBM),[10] citing the need to align its name with the "growth and extension of [its] activities".
10:26 PM on 10/25/2011
IBM is a multi-national company. Agreed. It's alright to create positions to serve new markets. Sadly, IBM's outsourcing to hire the best and brightest engineers world-wide at the cheapest salaries comes at the expense of American engineers. These are American engineers who have given the prime of their lives to make IBM successful. Did the Watson's put profits before patriotism and at any expense to their country? That is the question.
10:45 PM on 10/25/2011
Great post, tleb.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
doublehappi
09:25 PM on 10/25/2011
and what % of revenues comes from overseas?

Why dont you tell the whole picture?