iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Two-Thirds Of Americans Say Wealth Should Be Distributed More Evenly: Poll

Wealth Distribution

The Huffington Post   First Posted: 10/26/11 12:57 PM ET Updated: 10/26/11 07:16 PM ET

The economic grievances articulated by the Occupy Wall Street movement may represent the views of not just the fringe, but a large majority of Americans, a new poll suggests.

Two-thirds of Americans said they oppose tax cuts for corporations, support increasing income taxes for millionaires, and believe that wealth should be distributed more evenly across the country, according to New York Times/CBS poll results released on Tuesday. And 43 percent of Americans say that Occupy Wall Street represents the sentiment of most Americans.

Income inequality has been growing in the United States over the past three decades. The top one-percent's share of the national income more than doubled between 1979 and 2007, and their real after-tax income burgeoned 275 percent, according to a recent Congressional Budget Office report. Although the top 0.01 percent of earners in the United States controlled five percent of the nation's wealth in 2008, the median income dropped in 2010 to just $26,364.

As economists debate whether the United States is in danger of slipping into a recession, Americans have already decided that they're living in tough economic times. A September poll found only 9 percent of Americans expressing confidence the economy would not slide back into recession.

The unemployment rate has stayed stagnant at 9.1 percent, consumer confidence is at an all-time low, according to The Financial Times, housing prices fell 3.5 percent this year, according to Bloomberg News, and millions of Americans are overburdened with debt that they accumulated during the boom years. Americans' access to basic needs fell to a new low in September, and nearly 20 percent of Americans say they've had trouble putting food on the table in the past 12 months, according to Gallup.

A large majority of Americans also support more government spending in order to lift the economy out of the economic crisis, Tuesday's poll finds. Eighty percent of Americans said they think it is a good idea for the government to spend more on infrastructure to create jobs. Sixty-five percent support spending more on jobs for teachers, policemen, and firemen, and more than half of Americans favor hiring public employees to create jobs.

Nonetheless, Obama's jobs plan, which would include infrastructure spending, was blocked in the Senate by a Republican filibuster. Senate Democrats now will try to pass a piece of the jobs plan that would give $35 billion to state and local governments to rehire teachers, policemen, and firefighters who were laid off during state budget cuts.

U.S. Senator Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.), proposed a tax hike on millionaires in order to cover the cost of the Obama jobs plan or parts of it, but the proposal will likely face an uphill battle against Republican opposition. Schumer signaled on Tuesday that he is willing to entertain Republican ideas for paying to rehire teachers, policemen, and firefighters, according to Politico.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Money newsletter!
The economic grievances articulated by the Occupy Wall Street movement may represent the views of not just the fringe, but a large majority of Americans, a new poll suggests. Two-thirds of America...
The economic grievances articulated by the Occupy Wall Street movement may represent the views of not just the fringe, but a large majority of Americans, a new poll suggests. Two-thirds of America...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 1,844
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (27 total)
12:10 PM on 11/29/2011
How disappointing Huffpost is! Where are your statistics sources coming from? I know not one person that agrees with you and your statistics! Sad!
photo
marymeade2
I prefer liberty over tyranny
10:04 PM on 10/27/2011
I'm beginning to think I live in a foreign country. Does anyone speak English anymore? Have we gotten to a point where grammar and the English language has been diminished? Reading some of these posts, lead me to believe this may be the case.
photo
marymeade2
I prefer liberty over tyranny
08:19 PM on 10/27/2011
I was always warned that we couldn't get accurate news or information from the New York Times and this is one of those times, I will ignore this poll. This is a bunch of over emotional, hyped up nonsense.
photo
sloppybear16
"Dare we live, without molds"
07:09 PM on 10/27/2011
If you want wealth to be distributed more evenly, you haven't make government smaller. Wall St. and big biz feed off of the government because they have politicians in their pocket that will abuse their monopoly of force and give them what they want. Big biz loves regulations that they don't have to follow but small biz does. Big biz loves higher taxes that they will never pay and will simply receive more taxed dollars via subsidies, bailouts, etc.

The Fed needs to be abolished as well. The Fed creates inflation that hurts the poor and middle class the most and transfers wealth the ĂĽber-rich. The Fed bails out the big boys and screws over the little guys.
photo
marymeade2
I prefer liberty over tyranny
10:06 PM on 10/27/2011
Hello out there. I can't make heads or tails out of what you are trying to articulate. Please clarify, your meaning.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jorg1776
Radical middle of the road
05:03 PM on 10/27/2011
I am in agreement with several posters on here that say redistrobution of wealth needs to be tied to employment not government taxation and handouts. Any time the government gets involved they make it worse. Our current economy is proof of that. However it needs to go both ways. If you feel deregulating industry grows the economy than by logical conclusion deregulation of labor strengthens buying power of the citizens. Execs will continue to grow the wealth gap as long as they can do so with impunity. Put the very real fear of lynch mobs with no police to stop them out there and wages and benefits will start to improve.
02:32 PM on 10/27/2011
Since the whiners...er...um... protesters (what exactly are they "protesting" against, again?) really want people who have more to hand over their money to people who have less, they are being incredibly stupid and unproductive with their current strategies. You nutjobs shouldn't be milling about around the homes of successful people or blocking office buildings and restaurants. You should be planting yourselves in areas where you know your "cause" is getting lots of sympathy. This would allow you to allow those who sympathize the opportunity to put their money where their mouths are. So, come on! Put on your birkenstocks (and grab your iPhones!) and march....
Occupy MSNBC! (lots of radically overpaid talking heads who work about 4 hours a day there. Hit up any of them and they'll be glad to split their salaries with you!)
Occupy the headquarters of the labor unions! They rake in millions from their members to funnel to political campaigns. Wouldn't it be more sincere if they gave it to YOU?
Occupy the White House! The prez loves you guys, and he took every possible deduction on his tax returns to keep more of his money (instead of giving it to the government - or you), so he should have plenty to spare!
Be smart! Go where you can get what you really want!
02:03 PM on 10/27/2011
Policies to shrink income inequality should be looked at closely and not just tax policy. Any capital gains that don't come from an IPO or venture capital get taxed at 40%. Capital gains on IPO or venture capital only taxed at 10%.

Secondly if a company accepts federal subsidies, grants, tax subsidies( you big oil) or government contracts they should only be allowed to offer total compensation 30 times higher to their highest compensated employee than their lowest. Salary and fringe benefits together.

These two things will give the middle class back their American dream
02:39 PM on 10/27/2011
And, people should only be allowed to purchase homes that have mortgages of no more than 20% of their annual income.
And, people should only be allowed to have as many children as 25% of their income would allow to live in standards proscribed by the government.
And, there should be ceilings on all jobs in the country.
And, should there ever be another Steve Jobs in our midst, he should be able to retain only that portion of his salary that allows him to live no better or no worse than the guy who never came up with anything, never took a risk, never put in the hours.
I like it.
02:50 PM on 10/27/2011
If a company doesn't want the limit on compensation then they can get off the government teat. If they are accepting grants, subsidies, tax breaks and public contracts then the people have a right tonhave a say in how that company compensates it's employees. At the very least it would end corporate welfare in this country.
03:02 PM on 10/27/2011
follow up to my other reply...I didn't say their should be a limit on compensation but just that it shouldn't exceed a 30-1 ratio provided that company is on corporate welfare. if they pay their lowest person 30,000 a year then the top can get 900,000 a year. if the top wants a raise then the bottom gets a raise as well. the more they pay the bottom the more they can take home themselves. don't like it then pay your taxes, reject subsidies and don't take taxpayer money and you can then compensate people however you dang well please
photo
TygerLilly
ProgLib deprogramming ,555 GOT TRUTH?
04:09 PM on 10/27/2011
Warren Buffet should pay his BACK taxes first.
Mike Rock
Right wingers, prepare to lose debate.
12:50 PM on 10/27/2011
They'd better yield or I hope we'll have a revolution. We should have a revolution led by a principled president willing to send the Navy Seals after the Koch brothers. They've done more harm than bin Laden could ever dream of doing. Time for them to be captured, their vile wealthy confiscated and turned to the public good, and them and their ilk locked up in 3 x 3 cells with cyanide pills available for their use when they want.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jorg1776
Radical middle of the road
01:42 PM on 10/27/2011
you are too Liberal in your statement ;-). Just bomb their corperate offices before lunch on a random weekday and be done with the whole affair.
photo
TygerLilly
ProgLib deprogramming ,555 GOT TRUTH?
05:11 PM on 10/27/2011
This is a very serious statement, not snark. You need help. You have paranoid delusions and there are meds available for this type of disorder. Anyone who believes what you espouse has psychiatric issues and should NOT hesitate to be evaluated.
Mike Rock
Right wingers, prepare to lose debate.
08:53 AM on 10/28/2011
It is indeed a very serious statement, because, starting with Reagan, a cadre of ultra high net worth individuals declared war on the rest of us. This is war. That makes it serious. Estimates of folks dying due to lack of a national health care system are upwards of 45,000 people per year. War. Rise in suicide rate due to the great rip-off conducted by Bush/Cheney and their Wall St., oil industry, pharma etc. buddies. War. It's war. Get used to it.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dcbarton
12:19 PM on 10/27/2011
"A democracy cannot exist as a permanent form of government. It can only exist until the voters discover that they can vote themselves largesse from the public treasury. From that moment on, the majority always votes for the candidates promising the most benefits from the public treasury with the result that a democracy always collapses over loose fiscal policy, always followed by a dictatorship. The average age of the world's greatest civilizations has been 200 years."
"Great nations rise and fall. The people go from bondage to spiritual truth, to great courage, from courage to liberty, from liberty to abundance, from abundance to selfishness, from selfishness to complacency, from complacency to apathy, from apathy to dependence, from dependence back again to bondage."
"Attributed to ALEXANDER FRASER TYTLER, LORD WOODHOUSELEE. Unverified."
Welcome to the end of America.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jorg1776
Radical middle of the road
01:44 PM on 10/27/2011
yup F&F
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
12:14 PM on 10/27/2011
Not only can I not take bongo drumming seriously, I also just can't take anyone seriously who has a bull ring in their nose. There may just be a reason these people aren't earning any money… I can't quite put my finger on it though...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jie Jones
"Eat me!" -- Jesus, at the Last Supper
01:49 PM on 10/27/2011
Maybe it's because Wall St and corporations are sitting on a boatload of money instead of loaning/spending it.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
02:35 PM on 10/27/2011
What is their incentive to spend it?
02:52 PM on 10/27/2011
Okay... funny "occupy" story!
My friend sent me text and video from NYC - he's there on business and wanted to get some shots of the protesters.
Some guy comes up with his sign and his bag of McDonald's stuff, a fairly sizable bag, according to my friend.
Anyway, he sits down (he had a little portable stool! LOL!), starts eating and the people he was hanging with begin to tease him about all the food he has and then one asks for a chicken nugget.
The reply? "Get your own, man!"
I swear, you can't make this stuff up! LOL!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
04:47 PM on 10/27/2011
haha.
12:06 PM on 10/27/2011
Why don't people quit asking for handouts. Get an education or skill and get a job and move up in society. Don't blame people who worked hard for your own lot in life. 50% of Americans pay no taxes but that's not good enough they want more. Get a life & get a job!
02:57 PM on 10/27/2011
I'm guessing because it's easier than working? And, I'm guessing that these past few decades of building up entitlement programs and welfare states; of giving tax dollars to illegal aliens and stuffing the coffers of public unions and employees; of teaching our chldren that there is no virtue in winning and fawning over those that have lost - or not done as well - while insisting those who have accomplished anything remain silent; of the elected officials from the big media states getting fat on our tax dollars and cementing their lips to the butts of the powerful, rich and famous while sucking the middle class dry to pay for the programs for "us," is probably a good start on the answer to your question.
dididangerlove
subverting political perversion
03:08 PM on 10/27/2011
It isn't true that 50% percent of Americans don't pay taxes.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Joe Corbett
It's all hearsay.
11:10 AM on 10/27/2011
50% of Americans don't pay taxes, they must be underpaid.
photo
The Corporate Champion
Conservative, because someone's got to do the work
10:26 AM on 10/27/2011
If a majority of Americans want income equality, why doesn't the same majority work hard and make it happen by staying in school and getting a college degree that matters?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Joe Corbett
It's all hearsay.
11:45 AM on 10/27/2011
Bill Gates flunked out of college. Just sayin.
OldSchool4942
just passin through
02:42 PM on 10/27/2011
Staying in school requires a job or a loan.
08:51 AM on 10/27/2011
Taxing the rich more will do nothing for 75% of this country other than being able to say "the rich pay more in taxes"
It's not like by taxing the rich more, everyone else will receive a check from the government for $40,000 per year.
Taxing the rich more would help with lowering the national debt, and possibly over a longer term may help with school costs or even full medical coverage (but that would be way down the line).
The rich absolutely need to pay more taxes right now, but that will no tmagically turn around the economy.
What is hindering this economy is that 75% of this country earns $50k or less before taxes ($39K or less after taxes) while 1% of the country control 25% of the nation's wealth and 10% of the country controls more than 50% of the nations wealth.
This essentially creates a scenario where 75% of this country has little to no spending power. You can't expect an economy to flourish with 75% of your population having little to no spending power, simply can't happen.
The issues lies in the fact that Joe Exec is making $22.5 million this year, while Jim in the accounts department at that same company is earning $35K this year.
Fix the discrepancy in wages (which is higher in America than any other nation in the developed world) and you fix the economy.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jorg1776
Radical middle of the road
04:44 PM on 10/27/2011
You are at least mostly correct, I see no flaw in your arguement. The problem lies in how exactly do you make that happen? We have minimum wage laws on the books but the days when a minimum wage job is a living wage job ended by the 70's Minimum wage is for students and part time workers these days, not for supporting a family.