iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

College Costs Outpace Inflation: College Board

Money

First Posted: 10/27/11 09:30 AM ET Updated: 10/27/11 09:41 AM ET

By Linda Stern

(Reuters) - The cost of college in the United States rose sharply for the 2011-2012 school year, continuing a multiyear pattern in which public school increases outpaced private school hikes and both eclipsed the average rate of inflation by significant amounts, the College Board reported on Wednesday.

At public 4-year schools, average tuition and fees rose 8.3 percent to $8,244 for in-state students and 5.7 percent to $20,770 for out-of-state students, not including room, board, or extra expenses like travel, laptops and midnight pizzas.

Private nonprofit four-year schools raised their tuition and fees by 4.5 percent, to an average of $28,500, according to the study, Trends in College Pricing 2011, released by the College Board Advocacy & Policy Center. The Consumer Price Index increased 3.6 percent between July 2010 and July 2011, the study noted.

In-state tuition and fees for public two-year colleges averaged $2,963, an 8.7 percent increase from the previous year.

So-called net prices -- the amount that families pay after receiving grant aid and taking advantage of tax credits -- have increased by an average of about 1.4 percent a year for the last 5 years at public four-year schools, the College Board said. Those increases made college less affordable, as average family inflation-adjusted incomes have fallen in the decade between 2000 and 2010, the College Board said.

"While the importance of a college degree has never been greater, its rapidly rising price is an overwhelming obstacle to many students and families," said College Board President Gaston Caperton.

Financial aid rose as well, the College Board said in a companion report, but not enough to cover increases in tuition and fees at four-year public schools. In the 2010-2011 year, undergraduate students received an average of $12,455 per full-time equivalent student in financial aid, including $6,539 in grant aid, $4,907 in federal loans, and $1,009 in a combination of tax credits and deductions and federal work-study jobs.

Many students supplement that with private loans, a figure that the College Board estimated at about $6 billion in total volume. In a separate development, President Obama unveiled a program on Tuesday that he said would help some 1.6 million student borrowers lower their student loan payments.

"College costs are still outpacing family incomes and available aid," said Lauren Asher, president of the Institute for College Access & Success, an advocacy group.

"The maximum Pell Grant covers barely a third of the full cost of four years of college and we have more people with student loans than ever before, and they are borrowing more than ever."

Asher has emphasized the bottom line cost of college, including all of those extra expenses such as travel and supplies, and noted that they make college even less affordable than the tuition, room, board and fees figures upon which the College Board focuses.

Beginning on October 29, U.S. colleges are required to post net price calculators on their web sites. These calculators are supposed to go beyond sticker prices to include estimates of total cost of attendance, including the extras, as well as estimates of typical aid paid to students at the school.

Advocates do advise applicants to look for those calculators and use them in weighing how much it would cost to attend individual schools.

But Asher says there are already some problems with them. Some colleges have buried the calculators so they are difficult to find, she said. Others have made the calculators extremely complex and may ask dozens of questions of students. She suggests that students using the calculators focus on net prices and not other figures, such as after-loan out of pocket costs, that some schools are posting.

Caperton suggested that the board's efforts to analyze college affordability and price changes were complicated by the variability of prices from one state to another.

The large and well publicized increases in the California state system had a big impact on the averages; that state enrolls about 10 percent of the nation's full-time public four year college students and raised in-state fees 21 percent and 37 percent for full-time public two-year college students. Without the California figures included in its data, that 8.3 percent public four-year in-state school increase would have been 7 percent, and the 8.7 percent increase logged for two-year public schools would have been 7.4 percent.

Copyright 2010 Thomson Reuters. Click for Restrictions.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST COLLEGE

Filed by Rebecca Harrington  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 9
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
onionboy
Blessed are the Cheese Makers
03:15 PM on 10/27/2011
It's just another effort in the class war that's been going on for 30 years. Education can be a great equalizer. By making it too expensive, the smart and poor won't have a chance unless they're willing to go into massive debt.
photo
hypnotoad72
Freedom = real democracy = living wages
03:12 PM on 10/27/2011
"But not everybody is good enough for college". How is that determined? Middle and high school grades? (What if external influences like bullies hamper an intelligent child and get away with it?) Besides, to suggest education is a waste of a person's time just demeans and devalues everyone. Hmmm...
01:25 PM on 10/27/2011
One has to wonder any more, if the cost of getting an education is worth the end result. I say that thinking that there are other ways to learn a craft that are in many ways just as good but don't result in that piece of paper at the end of it all.
photo
hypnotoad72
Freedom = real democracy = living wages
03:15 PM on 10/27/2011
If we only place value on "cost", then we're all screwed. Yes, there are many ways to obtain education. But I'd be concerned about the paradigm. After all, workers moving from one unpaid internship to another (despite showing growth and ability) won't resolve our country's problems... http://management.fortune.cnn.com/2011/03/25/unpaid-jobs-the-new-normal/ -- so it's probably for the best that some big businesses don't even like free labor: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/10/06/obamas-bridge-to-work-pro_n_998185.html
01:40 PM on 10/28/2011
That's a good point about unpaid internships. And you're right. Putting all the value on "Cost" is a huge mistake. I just get frustrated when I see the level of educational insight that kids are leaving the higher education institutions with. Many if not most just don't have any idea of application of what they were supposed to have learned. Frankly I'm not sure what the answer is at this point.
photo
TROOPER-X
Opportunity is Equal, not Wealth.
12:39 PM on 10/27/2011
When the OWS mobs finally figure out who sets tuition rates, they'll have the slight resemblence of a clue.
12:31 PM on 10/27/2011
In light of this, Obama's student loan forgiveness plan is downright rettarded. What will loan forgiveness do except prompt universities to charge even higher rates of tuition? Obama is merely shifting some burden from the student to the taxpayer while the higher ed racket gets away with all the dough. We need to introduce serious constraints on how much we are willing to dole out in loans.
photo
hypnotoad72
Freedom = real democracy = living wages
03:16 PM on 10/27/2011
We need jobs that pay the wages that render the damn need for loans less to begin with. $12/hr jobs won't earn enough to pay cash for the degree that the companies want in order for the $12/hr job in the first place.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ackezzy
give me a job huff post! im giving you gold here!
10:24 AM on 10/27/2011
duh