iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

FCC To Rule On Online Political Advertisement Disclosure

First Posted: 10/27/2011 6:39 pm Updated: 12/27/2011 4:12 am

WASHINGTON -- Everyone is used to seeing a flood of political advertising, whether they are vicious attack ads or saccharine puff pieces, in the months before an election. Soon, the public may get a huge amount of information about the source and cost of all of those advertisements in a way that has never been done before.

The Federal Communications Commission held a meeting on Wednesday during which they promised to move forward in the process to enact rules governing the online disclosure of broadcasters' political files. The move comes as interest and concerns rise about the increase in political spending by outside groups, with the funding sources often remaining undisclosed, after the Supreme Court opened the door in January 2010 to unlimited independent spending by corporations and unions in the Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission ruling.

The political files in question are documents retained by each individual broadcaster that contain information provided by campaigns and groups related to the request to run an advertisement. The files include the name of the campaign, candidate, or group, a general reason for the ad's broadcast, the time and placement of the ad, and the cost of the purchase. Political files are available to inspect in person at the office of each broadcaster, but not over the Internet.

FCC Commissioner Michael Copps explained the proposal before the commission in Wednesday's meeting. "It proposes that television broadcasters move their public files online, to a site hosted by the FCC, which I hope will be searchable and aggregative and therefore offer real opportunity for comparative analysis and wide public understanding," he said. "Without that kind of searchability, online disclosure would be small improvement over having the file kept in the broadcast station's basement."

The end result of the proposal will likely not be available until next spring, when it could then apply to the majority of the elections in the 2012 cycle.

The decision to move to rule-making on the disclosure provision drew praise from media watchdogs, campaign finance and transparency groups, and Capitol Hill.

"In an age of secretive political spending by unregulated outside groups like Super PACs, consumers deserve to know who is using the public airwaves, and for what purpose," Rep. Anna Esho (D-Calif.), a leader in efforts to enact disclosure for groups empowered by the conservative nonprofit Citizens United, said in a statement. "Larger issues of campaign finance disclosure remain unresolved by today's proposal, but putting this information online is an important first step."

Andrew Jay Schwartzman, the senior vice president and policy director of the Media Access Project, issued a statement saying, "Today's action makes useful information available, and makes it much more accessible to the public. Much more needs to be done, and the public is counting on the Chairman's assurances that the Commission will move quickly to complete its newly initiated proceedings."

Schwartzman continued, "We've asked that the information in the political file to be expanded to who actually wrote the check. ... There's [currently] no requirement to do due diligence and go ... and find out who wrote the check."

If the FCC were to require this level of disclosure, it would be the first successful effort to enact a disclosure rule for contributors to groups that run political advertisements and operate under the nonprofit tax code -- would would ordinarily exempt them from revealing funding sources.

Lisa Rosenberg, government affairs consultant with the Sunlight Foundation, a nonprofit dedicated to government transparency, wrote in a blog post, "If robust disclosure rules are put in place before the 2012 elections get into full swing, it will be a huge victory for the public, who has a right to know who is paying for the avalanche of political ads that will blast from their televisions in the months ahead."

First Televised Attack Ad?
1  of  11
PLAY
FULLSCREEN
ZOOM
SHARE THIS SLIDE 
In 1952, Democratic presidential candidate Adlai Stevenson ran this ad accusing the Republican Party of talking out of both sides of its mouth on issues related to the Korean War and the United Nations. The ad is thought to be one of the first televised negative ads. Stevenson lost the election to Republican Dwight Eisenhower.
FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
 
 
  • Comments
  • 50
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
10:43 PM on 11/09/2011
YES!
12:42 PM on 11/01/2011
Yes! This would be a great move, possibly & hopefully removing screens of ignorance from television watchers, causing them to become more discerning. For those of us who are already there, http://BeYourGovernment.org has completely removed the concept of TV advertising and replaced it with a system we are obviously already acquainted with: social networking.
12:03 PM on 11/01/2011
This would be a very important decision; in the wake of citizen's United. Along with www.BeYourGovernment.org, which has formed, to allow citizens to replace the TV ads that corrupt so many politicians, and use their social networks to elect candidates who refuse corporate money to stand with the 99% (and not their campaign funders) . I agree with the Sunlight Foundation (quoted in article) that who actually wrote checks ought to be included. If the FCC caves on this, you have to wonder why their Commissioners have jobs at taxpayer expense.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
amaboss52
Jesus died for your sins...get your moneys worth!
05:44 PM on 10/28/2011
Why not just take all the outside money out of campaigns, public financing only, no corporate donors. Let's kick the lobbyists to the curb while we're at it.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
knott wrench
05:29 PM on 10/28/2011
Shocked! I'm absolutely Shocked that:

The "Tentacles of the 'Kochtopus'" would be revealed in their campaign funding!

Go For It FCC!
photo
Gestas
Mountain Man
01:40 PM on 10/28/2011
"Never pick a fight with a guy that buys Ink by the Tank Car."
12:53 PM on 10/28/2011
Surely the gops wouldn't object to the American people's Right to Know.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
knott wrench
05:30 PM on 10/28/2011
You know, Of Course they Would!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jeff Parfitt
Two democrats walk into a bar. Three walk out.
10:47 AM on 10/28/2011
We've already lost the ability to see where the money comes from. There has to be transparency somewhere. Campaign financing has turned into a world of smoke and mirrors, and the people are being deceived on a daily basis about who is bankrolling our "representatives".
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
aznurse
12:08 AM on 10/28/2011
the sad part is that guy is only 26 years old!!!
photo
somebody9191
At long last, have you left no sense of decency?
11:26 PM on 10/27/2011
Was that Alan Reed aka Fred Flintstone?
10:01 PM on 10/27/2011
Well, let's just see how long it takes the lobbyists to convince the congress to pass a law against transparency in these matters.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ljkcan
I don't let geographical borders limit my thinking
10:06 PM on 10/27/2011
This ad is so creepy, he looks like a flasher biding his time having a smoke.
SirCoolBreeze
GOP'ers = Alleged Unindicted Co-conspirators
04:03 PM on 10/28/2011
Jon Stewart said he looks like the owner of an adult book store.
:-)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ljkcan
I don't let geographical borders limit my thinking
09:07 PM on 10/28/2011
exactly he looks creepy.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
election2012
An independent voice for the greater good.
09:40 PM on 10/27/2011
What kind of disclosure, a surgeon general's warning? He's lobbying for big tobacco.
08:46 PM on 10/27/2011
Soon we will know the size of each candidate's...and as with Hilllary, just because they're bigger is not always...oh nevermind.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
07:43 PM on 10/27/2011
More bureaucratic overhead, expense and opportunity to deceive! Just a Big Government waste initiative.

I approve of this ad! Billy Board, Actual Citizen