iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

House Democrats Want House Republicans To Work More Days

House Democrats Republicans Calendar

By JIM ABRAMS   10/27/11 04:57 PM ET   AP

WASHINGTON -- The House will be in session less than one out of every three days next year, a slight decline from past years. House Republicans say they are running the place more efficiently and lawmakers need the time to be with constituents in an election year. Democrats say that's too few days on the job during an economic crisis.

The announcement of the 2012 schedule even led to a Twitter battle between the press offices of House Majority Leader Eric Cantor, R-Va., and the No. 2 Democrat, Steny Hoyer of Maryland, over how Congress is being run.

"As with this year, the goal of next year's calendar is to create certainty and productivity in the legislative process, protect committee time and afford members the opportunity to gain valuable input from their constituents at home," Cantor said in a letter to colleagues as he released the calendar scheduling 109 legislative days in 2012.

Under the tentative calendar, the House would have only six voting days in January. There would be three working days in August, when Congress usually takes off, and the House would be off from Oct. 5 until a week after Election Day on Nov. 6. The last scheduled session of the year would be on Dec. 14.

In 2008, the last presidential election year when Democrats controlled the House, the House met for 119 days.

"The American people deserve better," House Democratic leader Nancy Pelosi of California said at a news conference, referring to congressional inaction on creating jobs and the House's six-day schedule in January. "We have work to do."

Hoyer said the House has had only 111 days of legislative business this year and the floor schedule "has prevented the House from getting anything done to create jobs."

Republicans responded at a news conference where they highlighted what they called the "forgotten 15," bills that the House has passed and Republicans say will lead to job growth but which the Democratic-controlled Senate has ignored.

The 15 bills focus on promoting development of domestic energy and reducing or eliminating regulations imposed by the Environmental Protection Agency and other federal agencies.

Differences over the schedule and who's to blame for lack of productivity played out on Twitter. Cantor's office derided the "fake outrage" of Hoyer and Pelosi and claimed that the House will be in session more days than it was under Democratic control.

Hoyer's office shot back, "You mean days like today when last votes started before 11 a.m. and we jetted out of town for the week?"

House Republicans, when they gained the majority in January, put into effect several changes to make the chamber operate more smoothly. They reduced the number of votes on minor legislation such as naming post offices, cut back on morning votes so committee hearings would not be interrupted, and reduced late-night sessions. Cantor said the House has taken 800 roll call votes through Oct. 14 this year, compared to 565 last year.

The Library of Congress says the House has met 139 times through Wednesday. That includes several dozen "pro forma" sessions that last a few minutes and where no business is conducted. This year such sessions have been convened to prevent President Barack Obama from making federal appointments when Congress is away.

The number hasn't varied much in recent years, with legislative sessions generally going down in election years. According to the Library of Congress, the House met 127 times in 2010, 159 times in 2009, 119 times in 2008 and 164 times in 2007.

The Senate has met 136 times so far this year and convened 157 times last year, including pro forma sessions.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON -- The House will be in session less than one out of every three days next year, a slight decline from past years. House Republicans say they are running the place more efficiently and lawm...
WASHINGTON -- The House will be in session less than one out of every three days next year, a slight decline from past years. House Republicans say they are running the place more efficiently and lawm...
Filed by Luke Johnson  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 553
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (16 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
OldBear
We Have Met The Enemy and He Is Us.
01:20 AM on 11/08/2011
A $174,000/yr. part time job which is why their other job is for the 1%ers and with this hr, rate no wonder they are among the richest Americans.
Destroying full time jobs now makes so much more sense, Congress doesn't see any value in full time work, if they can work time the natime can work 1/3 time or less. It's all in how you view the world.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
VonMarco
Common Sense is not so Common
03:01 PM on 11/04/2011
At a salary of $174,000/yr. and working approximatly 10 days/mo. and they and their ill informed voters complain and want to destroy jobs for teachers, police, firefighters, etc. that earn much less.....makes idiotic sense.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
l78lancer
Wisdom is the principal thing
02:12 PM on 10/30/2011
It is actually pretty easy to be efficient when your answer is the same for every issue, NO. It requires no though, analysis, research or action. That allows for a travel day on Monday, come to the office on Tuesday, then take the rest of the week off.

What a way to reduce the deficit and debt.
06:15 PM on 10/29/2011
The best way to get re elected is to do a good job. They are going to have a pension for life anyway, so they have no excuse to take any time off at all. We all remember that Bush was on vacation when the file was handed to him hat warned of the terrorist attacks coming on Septembet 11, and he was too lazy to read it. We can no longer afford politicians who act like their campaigns are more important than their responsibility to the people.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
OldBear
We Have Met The Enemy and He Is Us.
01:28 AM on 11/08/2011
That equals all of them. So what are we going to do other than delouse the US Congress? They leave us no other option.
A new face for every chair.
photo
roads
Strange days have found us....
02:39 PM on 10/29/2011
If repubs are only working 1 out of 3 day....their pay and benefits should be cut.
04:12 PM on 10/29/2011
Gosh, if the house would vote "present" they could be just like senator Obama.
photo
nmcginni
No pledges, except the Pledge of Allegiance
07:14 PM on 12/10/2011
Now if they would be present and work for the good of the American people it would be perfect. They might even agree on a few issues to get people back to work.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
OldBear
We Have Met The Enemy and He Is Us.
01:28 AM on 11/08/2011
Retroactively
photo
rudyg43
2014 Mid-term is a coming!
02:23 PM on 10/29/2011
Every politician should not get paid any monies for the days they're not there in Washington. There are two theories to arguing with a TEA party-er or a Republican. Neither of them work a full time at their job.
04:13 PM on 10/29/2011
Like Obama in the senate, voting "present" on most bills, when he bothered to show up.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
l78lancer
Wisdom is the principal thing
02:07 PM on 10/30/2011
Your argument fails because he did show up.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
CA93010
Pest Controller
01:50 PM on 10/29/2011
"House Republicans... put into effect several changes... They reduced the number of votes on minor legislation... cut back on morning votes so committee hearings would not be interrupted, and reduced late-night sessions."

Why is it that every time you turn on C-SPAN, or get a news clip on a committee hearing, most of the members chairs are empty? There are more people in the audience than there are members attending any hearing.

This is why the American people are getting screwed, lobbyists writing bills, politicians, especially House members, are always in "gimme money" campaign mode, and the "he who can afford it" gets what they want.

The biggest shame is that the American people can't fix the problem by Initiatives at the national level. If we could, I'd put their pay and perks first on the list followed by campaign reform. If you want Congress to act, you need to get them where they're vulnerable, the wallet!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
02:18 PM on 10/29/2011
Initiatives, eh? So the nation could be run as efficiently as California? I don't think so. But a revolution would do the trick.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
CA93010
Pest Controller
01:28 PM on 10/29/2011
Congress is the epitome of "dysfunctional" !!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Wolfwoman
01:19 PM on 10/29/2011
Cantor, what have you produced in the way of jobs and phasing out wars that are hugely expensive?

The GOP needs to start producing so they do not lose some of their Congressional seats. As I see it, you folks have little credibility for facilitating growth in America.
photo
skeeterandbucky
Rebel with a cause. Or six
01:16 PM on 10/29/2011
Come on moderator. I used the words no and diaper in a 9 word response. Are these words banned? The turn around time on posting comments has long since become absurd!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
arecibo48
Clinton in 2016
01:04 PM on 10/29/2011
RepugBlicans, are you listening? Urge your buddies, Boehner and Cantor to get back to work!
photo
skeeterandbucky
Rebel with a cause. Or six
12:54 PM on 10/29/2011
Maybe Mr. "Get a Job" Cain has a solution.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
kareemachan
watashi ha tororu ga oroka da to omoi masu。
12:34 PM on 10/29/2011
Gee, if they actually worked a little instead of frothing at the mouth with bills that have zilch chance of making it into law, maybe - just maybe - they could come up with some job creation ideas.

But I doubt it.
tricked by bush
retired banker and certified financial planner
12:43 PM on 10/29/2011
Did Cantor actually say that getting rid of some EPA regulations will create jobs?
That comes straight out of the mouths of the Koch Bros., who are masters at polluting. What about the environment? Does protecting it mean less than money? Apparently.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
pmoschetta
Where are the Jobs, Speaker Boehner?
01:51 PM on 10/29/2011
http://majorityleader.gov/JobsTracker/

Bills our current Congress has passed and/or are waiting for Senate approval

Tax cuts and less regulations on the environment mostly
11:59 AM on 10/29/2011
Well, I say we cut their pay by 2/3. Then, since they are only working part time, we cut their health insurance off, and of course, they should not qualify for any retirement benefits, either. I say, pay them like Wal-mart.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
OldBear
We Have Met The Enemy and He Is Us.
01:31 AM on 11/08/2011
Now that a plan I can support
photo
nmcginni
No pledges, except the Pledge of Allegiance
07:18 PM on 12/10/2011
Perfect solution, save the nation money and lower the amount of hot air in the enviornment.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
11:08 AM on 10/29/2011
Congress can work less days as they say the are now more efficient? What is that place? The set of an old TV show called Laugh In?