iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Japan Nuclear Disaster Released Higher Radiation Levels Than Previously Reported, Study Finds

Radiation Near Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Pla

MALCOLM RITTER   10/28/11 12:54 AM ET   AP

NEW YORK — The Fukushima nuclear disaster released twice as much of a radioactive substance into the atmosphere as Japanese authorities estimated, reaching 40 percent of the total from Chernobyl, a preliminary report says.

The estimate of much higher levels of radioactive cesium-137 comes from a worldwide network of sensors. Study author Andreas Stohl of the Norwegian Institute for Air Research says the Japanese government estimate came only from data in Japan, and that would have missed emissions blown out to sea.

The study did not consider health implications of the radiation. Cesium-137 is dangerous because it can last for decades in the environment, releasing cancer-causing radiation.

The long-term effects of the nuclear accident are unclear because of the difficulty of measuring radiation amounts people received.

In a telephone interview, Stohl said emission estimates are so imprecise that finding twice the amount of cesium isn't considered a major difference. He said some previous estimates had been higher than his.

The journal Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics posted the report online for comment, but the study has not yet completed a formal review by experts in the field or been accepted for publication.

Last summer, the Japanese government estimated that the March 11 Fukushima accident released 15,000 terabecquerels of cesium. Terabecquerels are a radiation measurement. The new report from Stohl and co-authors estimates about 36,000 terabecquerels through April 20. That's about 42 percent of the estimated release from Chernobyl, the report says.

An official at the Nuclear and Industrial Safety Agency, the Japanese government branch overseeing such findings, said the agency could not offer any comment on the study because it had not reviewed its contents.

It also says about a fifth of the cesium fell on land in Japan, while most of the rest fell into the Pacific Ocean. Only about 2 percent of the fallout came down on land outside Japan, the report concluded.

Experts have no firm projections about how many cancers could result because they're still trying to find out what doses people received. Some radiation from the accident has also been detected in Tokyo and in the United States, but experts say they expect no significant health consequences there.

Still, concern about radiation is strong in Japan. Many parents of small children in Tokyo worry about the discovery of radiation hotspots even though government officials say they don't pose a health risk. And former prime minister Naoto Kan has said the most contaminated areas inside the evacuation zone could be uninhabitable for decades.

Stohl also noted that his study found cesium-137 emissions dropped suddenly at the time workers started spraying water on the spent fuel pool from one of the reactors. That challenges previous thinking that the pool wasn't emitting cesium, he said.

___

Online:

New study: http://bit.ly/tFURSr

__

Associated Press Writer Malcolm Foster in Tokyo contributed to this report.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST WORLD

NEW YORK — The Fukushima nuclear disaster released twice as much of a radioactive substance into the atmosphere as Japanese authorities estimated, reaching 40 percent of the total from Chernobyl...
NEW YORK — The Fukushima nuclear disaster released twice as much of a radioactive substance into the atmosphere as Japanese authorities estimated, reaching 40 percent of the total from Chernobyl...
Filed by Jade Walker  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 483
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (9 total)
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jacobisrael
teapartying semiticbirther
07:00 PM on 11/04/2011
JAPANESE JOURNALIST ACCUSES ISRAEL OF FUKUSHIMA SABOTAGE
''in retaliation for Japan’s support of an independent Palestinian state''

By Richard Walker

A leading Japanese journalist recently made two incredible claims about the Fukushima power plant that suffered a nuclear meltdown in March 2011, sending shockwaves around the world. First, the former editor of a national newspaper in Japan says the U.S. and Israel knew Fukushima had weapons-grade uranium and plutonium that were exposed to the atmosphere after a massive tsunami wave hit the reactor. Second, he contends that Israeli intelligence sabotaged the reactor in retaliation for Japan’s support of an independent Palestinian state.
According to Yoishi Shimatsu, a former editor of Japan Times Weekly, these nuclear materials were shipped to the plant in 2007 on the orders of Dick Cheney and George W. Bush, with the connivance of Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert. The shipment was in the form of warhead cores secretly removed from the U.S. Nuclear warheads facility BWXT Plantex near Amarillo, Texas. While acting as the middleman, Israel transported warheads from the port of Houston, and in the process kept the best ones while giving the Japanese older warhead cores that had to be further enriched at Fukushima.

Shimatsu credits retired CIA agent and mercenary Roland Vincent Carnaby with learning the warheads were being transported from Houston. In a strange twist, Carnaby was mysteriously shot dead ...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Callme Ish
05:18 AM on 11/04/2011
show me the Corium? Simple, they can't do it.
End nuclear, it is too powerful for humans.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Sock De Jour
Democracy is an illusion
08:45 PM on 11/02/2011
Japan Update: New Fukushima Documents Warrant Public Attention
by Nelle Maxey
"Over the last few weeks many independent reports have been released regarding the true levels of Fukushima contamination. These have come from independent scientists, citizen groups and European agencies. However two postings yesterday are of particular importance and I wanted to bring them to the attention of the public."
http://www.pacificfreepress.com/news/1-/10076-fukushima-meltdown-documents-released.html
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
03:00 PM on 11/01/2011
Here's an interesting video that clearly explains how the Nuclear industry started, up through Chernobyl to 1992. Things haven't changed all that much since then... some of the first generation reactors are still running today, despite the known risks.

"A is for Atom"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1ON-EnaRtAw&feature=player_embedded

But one thing is different today - three reactors at Fukushima have not only melted down, they have melted THROUGH their containment, into the ground below, something that has never happened before. And the cleanup will take 30 years.

Meanwhile, the radiation that is being released there is threatening the lives of people, especially children and fetuses who are most at risk to DNA damage, resulting in mutations that occur when a radioactive particle strikes a developing cell.
11:42 AM on 11/01/2011
"Saw Chairman Jaczko speak today and it was very inspiring to the nuclear future. Most of the Fukushima radiation effects have been grossly overexagge­rated. The real concern is for worker health and safety and no one here cares."
Here's Jazko about worker safety http://enenews.com/top-us-nuclear-official-bursts-into-laughter-after-question-on-deaths-of-irradiated-fukushima-workers-video DISGUSTING!

Experts are saying children in are sick as in Belarus and should be evacuated immediately.
http://enenews.com/physicians-diagnose-japan-children-hes-affected-radiation-dark-circles-eyes-pale-face-fatigue-be-better-move-video
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Atoms4Peace1
Applying the atom peacefully since 1978
12:01 AM on 11/01/2011
Saw Chairman Jaczko speak today and it was very inspiring to the nuclear future. Most of the Fukushima radiation effects have been grossly overexaggerated. The real concern is for worker health and safety and no one here cares.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Callme Ish
05:21 AM on 11/04/2011
show me the corium? simple question isnt it? Why don't they have a picture of the coriums that they can post up?

there are uncontained nuclear reactions going on, and you still have the nerve to be a PNP, Pro Nuke Pimp
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Atoms4Peace1
Applying the atom peacefully since 1978
10:11 AM on 11/04/2011
It was 10 years before they could lift the head off TMI's PV.

Patience grasshopper. Patience.

"Uncontained nuclear reactions"? I really dont understand what that means. Its not in the professional lexicon.

Please elaborate on "uncontained nuclear reactions".

Thanks

PS If I were an airline pilot would I be a Pro Air Pimp? PAP? Ive got 30 years in the enterprise.

Its just my job 5 days a week.

You have a job too. Care to elaborate?
Genders
Love, Tolerance, Enlightenment
09:45 PM on 10/31/2011
But But their experts! Professionals....they care!

Clean and green, zero environmental footprint rooftop solar, offshore wind and waste bio fuels plants are routinely build around the word in 4 years and cost 6-15 cents kwh going down to 1 cents per KWH for solar after 20 years.

Meanwhile nuclear power is irradiating the entire planet one disaster at a time. Causing cancers deaths in the thousands, insidiously, under the rates of background case and identical to "natural" cancers, thus the Perfect Mass murder.

New nuclear power in the USA is at most optimistic estimated at 15 cents per KWH and going up. But you will hear 3 cents. A world nuclear lie, that does not include capital costs.

http://cleantechnica.com/2011/03/18/offshore-wind-energy-cheaper-than-nuclear-energy-eu-climate-chief-says/

http://solarcellcentral.com/companies_page.html first solar 2.5$ per Wp installed.

http://cleantechnica.com/2011/06/10/solar-power-graphs-to-make-you-smile/ rooftop solar cheaper than nukes.

with Waste bio fuels as the "backup" and the source of the chemical and fuels we need, there is no excuse for nuclear power.

http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Comparative_electrical_generation_costs
Conservative, old for solar 2009, but useful for dispelling widely crazy numbers from the pro nuke anti solar folks.
photo
Neets101
politely asking for mod squad approval
04:59 PM on 10/31/2011
Well, that sure restores my faith in all the "experts"....

Not.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Joffan
Time is an illusion. Lunchtime doubly so.
12:36 AM on 10/31/2011
The paper itself is available for discussion here:
http://www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/11/28319/2011/acpd-11-28319-2011.pdf

One of the striking things on a skim-through is how often the authors talk about assumptions. They are especially free with their assumptions about spent fuel #4.
01:00 PM on 10/30/2011
Peer reviewed science published in reputable journal shows an extremely low cancer rate in Ramsar, Iran where the population receives far higher annual background radiation doses than a person would have received standing at the front gate of the Fukushima reactor.
Genders
Love, Tolerance, Enlightenment
09:42 PM on 10/31/2011
study that never should have been published.

Ramsey study used 14 controls and 21 subjects. It never should have passed peer review, of course the HPS organization couldn't survive without nuclear power. The people of Ramsey are completely biased toward maintaining the myth the radium baths are good for you. It's really sad this has not been caught before.

They admit to using ONLY anecdotal evidence of no increased cancer rates.

It's a joke of a paper.
http://www.probeinternational.org/Ramsar.pdf
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Sock De Jour
Democracy is an illusion
08:49 PM on 11/02/2011
You believe data coming out of Iran? LMAO!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SLS11
Its all there, if we just open our eyes...
08:40 AM on 11/07/2011
He believes the data when it suits his agenda.
photo
FaceTheTruth00
I'm a girl.
04:52 AM on 10/30/2011
I still would like to know the impact of the meltdown on the worldwide auto trade. How many cars in the U.S. are sporting radioactive components? If I recall, even cars that are largely assembled here got many of their parts, and paint, from areas that were affected by the nuclear meltdown/fallout.
photo
FaceTheTruth00
I'm a girl.
04:45 AM on 10/30/2011
Is there anyone who is surprised by this revelation? Anyone?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Joffan
Time is an illusion. Lunchtime doubly so.
01:29 AM on 10/31/2011
I'm not surprised that people are studying the issue. And I'm not that surprised that some groups rush out a press release before their paper has been published, or even peer-reviewed. I'm not even surprised that media outlets do all that they can to make a rather tentative conclusion into a dramatic-sounding story.

I am sometimes surprised by the number of people who only read headlines and jump to a whole hurdle race of conclusions without even reading the article.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rocknhula
We are all here because we are all not there
03:20 PM on 10/29/2011
I'm wonder if this means there will be discounted vacation packages to Hawaii and California if radioactive debris floats that way?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Truckcabbie
Blame the feds and the banks.
03:26 PM on 10/29/2011
I truly hope that not all you care about.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rocknhula
We are all here because we are all not there
03:58 PM on 10/29/2011
I was being funny. We are really worried about that out here in Hawaii.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
04:11 PM on 10/29/2011
What radioactive debris?

The debris from the tsunami was swept out to see hours if not days before the reactors released anything. And they have already been floating in the ocean for months with winds, waves and storms, if there had been anything radioactive it would have been washed off by now.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
alvdh1
02:08 PM on 10/30/2011
Are we to believe you or the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institute. These reading were taken in late July. In addition, the Kuroshio Large Current Marine Ecosystem is just off of the coast of Fukushima where bioaccumulation and biomaginifcation of the radiation is working itself up the marine food chain.


http://green.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/09/28/fukushimas-contamination-produces-some-surprises-at-sea/

http://www.eoearth.org/article/Kuroshio_Current_large_marine_ecosystem

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kuroshio_Current

http://new.iwlearn.org/publications/misc/dudasherman_lme.pdf
02:29 PM on 10/29/2011
lets build more of them, even more on fault lines. we will ruin this planet for our gods greed power
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Truckcabbie
Blame the feds and the banks.
02:08 PM on 10/29/2011
The people I feel sorry for the most have yet to be born.Just look at what they get to clean up. Only some of us get the benefit (if you want to call this benefit ) from cheaper electricity . Humans born 100 years from now might see some of the nuclear generated power, but how about the ones born 200 years from now? 300 years ? How about 1,000 years and beyond that? IF ANY. And ALL of them for the next 50,000 years (lmao about that far into the future ) will get the benefit of the mess we are leaving behind for our personnel comfort.

WTF do we think we are doing?
photo
mbkeefer
Elder Amateur Scientist
08:15 PM on 10/29/2011
People born 100 years from now and later will probably wonder what all the fuss was about. It was merely ionizing radiation. Did they think there were evil spirits with it or something.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Atoms4Peace1
Applying the atom peacefully since 1978
12:04 AM on 11/01/2011
Nuclear plants 100 years ago will seem so foreign to those of today, like how modern airplanes are to the biplanes and modern automobiles are to the Model T.

Probably Gen V or Gen VI by then.