More

Emoticons At Work: Unprofessional Or Necessary Evil?

The Huffington Post   First Posted: 10/29/11 01:30 PM ET Updated: 10/29/11 01:30 PM ET

Emoticons Work

Many of us spend most of our day corresponding with people electronically. In my office we actually instant message each other instead of talking even though we are literally close enough to hold hands (we never hold hands). We try to combat the tonelessness of email by doing things like using multiple exclamation points and even throwing in the occasional emoticon. But do these smiley faces undermine our professional credibility or are they actually necessary?

Emoticons, or combinations of symbols that loosely depict the human face, have made their smiley way from tween texts to the outboxes of legitimate business people. There are arguments against them of course. They are childish, lazy, and indicate that you don’t trust your reader to understand the written language. But the truth is that until we have an "I’m not mad just busy" font, these silly symbols are the best way we’ve got to quickly convey tone and emotion electronically.

This is because as far as email is concerned, sarcasm or any other tone just doesn’t exist. Emails are necessarily one dimensional which makes it nearly impossible to convey nuance. In other words, when we read email we get stupid. In a traditional face to face conversation, besides the other person’s words we have facial expression, tonality, hand gestures, foot shuffling, belly patting, arm touching and lots of other tiny cues to figure out what the hell is going on. In email all we have is, “Did you set up that meeting with Richard?? Thx.”

If you thought that sounded mean, you’re not alone. Everyone thinks emails sound mean. Studies have shown that people have a natural negativity bias toward email. When an email is objectively positive the receiver thinks it’s neutral, and when it’s neutral they think it’s negative. Which is why we have to use emoticons.

Emoticons may be a necessary evil, but that doesn’t mean there isn’t a right way and a wrong way to use them. First off, smiley faces are the ONLY kind of emoticon allowed in business correspondence. No shocked faces. No winks. And no frowny faces. A frowny face is somehow inherently sarcastic, and is never a good way to convey actual sadness or sympathy. Throwing “:-(“ on the end of a request to work on Saturday is going to make people hate you, and deservedly so. If you need a more complicated emoticon than the smiley, use your words.

Secondly, smileys are only really appropriate when you’re trying to convey actual happiness or sarcasm. For example, they can be used when you thank someone for a job well done, or when you tell them about the great coverage your new client got in The Wall Street Journal. They can also be used when you make a joke that could come off as serious in an email, like, “I didn’t think his article was boring at all :-)”

Smileys don’t work if you’re trying to manipulate someone into being happy about doing something they don’t want to do. For example, don’t ask someone to do a huge horrible project and then end the request with a smiley. Even if what the smiley is saying is “I know this sucks. I’m sorry” it looks like you're trying to convince them to be happy about something sucky by putting a a colon next to a parenthesis. It’s an emoticon not a psychotropic drug. Its powers of mood alteration are just not that powerful.

Finally, there is a big difference between the smileys that look like this :) and smileys that look like this . The simple or “unconverted” smiley is just better. It’s classier and looks less like something that was dreamed up in human resources to improve employee morale. It’s basically the difference between In-N-Out and McDonald's: they’re both essentially gross, but one manages to be cool and retro while the other is just corporate and horrible.

You may have noticed that when you're chatting online, your simple smileys get automatically converted into grinning yellow circles of horror. Luckily, most programs including Gchat allow you to set unconverted emoticons as your default in the preferences menu. While AIM does have an option for changing pictorial emoticons to text, your changes only show up in your own chat window. The person you're chatting with will still see emoticons as whatever their preferences are set to. On Facebook, yellow smileys are the default for chat, and there doesn't appear to be anything you can do about it.

Got a story about emoticon misuse? Tell us what happened in the comments section below.

Please send your tech etiquette questions to ramona.emerson@huffingtonpost.com

FOLLOW HUFFPOST TECH

Many of us spend most of our day corresponding with people electronically. In my office we actually instant message each other instead of talking even though we are literally close enough to hold hand...
Many of us spend most of our day corresponding with people electronically. In my office we actually instant message each other instead of talking even though we are literally close enough to hold hand...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 70
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
11:40 PM on 12/04/2011
I work in an environment where most of my colleagues speak English as a second language, and I can understand that trying to convey meaning through pictures may be more helpful. However, I find it adds very little to a conversation and confuses the context when my concise messages are met with smiley faces and the occasional "bwahahahaha!"

I just asked when the technician was coming to fix the photocopier. There is no need for emoticons or wild, unrestrained laughter. Providing the time that the technician will arrive is the sole piece of information that I need. This situation really doesn't call for an emotional response.
10:07 PM on 11/01/2011
Glad to see more conversation about this:
http://www.usatodayeducate.com/staging/index.php/blog/keep-smileying-in-defense-of-the-emoticon
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
08:45 AM on 10/31/2011
Emoticons existed long before tweens were texting.

Any "business" person who is involved in a business that uses the Internet as a communications medium (e-mail, blogging, texting) and doesn't understand emoticons is stuck in the 1970s - and should have retired a decade ago.

Otherwise, I share your preference for text-based emoticons over image based emoticons - if only because the &&^%^((^ image consumes far more bandwidth and disk space than the two-or-three-octet emoticon. Which reasoning makes me very old-school.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
onlythetruthcounts
Golden Rule: whoever got the gold, rule.
04:46 AM on 10/31/2011
"Emoticons" sounds like something CBS News made up.
AllyCat7
Snarks need not reply.
02:35 AM on 10/31/2011
This is so funny. I felt like I was reading an article written by me. I have contemplated all of these issues dealing with smilies and I, also, have concluded that they are appropriate and that simple smiles work best :)
08:34 PM on 10/30/2011
People somehow forget they can actually meet people face to face or talk over the phone. An email is one type of communication but it can not replace all other. No smiley faces needed.
08:04 PM on 10/30/2011
Do you like it when Paris Hilton puts smileys on her handwritten messages, or do you find it childish?
08:09 PM on 10/30/2011
...I mean 'emoticons'
photo
Kev Bat
Fiber is good for my micro-bio !
06:23 PM on 10/30/2011
I knew I should have trademarked " The Smiley Face " when I was four .
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JustJoy7
Give your best, expect the best from others.
03:14 PM on 10/30/2011
I'd LOVE to be able to use them here at HuffPost. Messages sometimes NEED them.
07:47 PM on 10/30/2011
I would be happy with a minimal HTML, just "italic" and "bold".
11:22 AM on 10/30/2011
I agree they are becoming more necessary wherever speaking is not possible or practical. Putting smilies in your messages is no different than physically smiling at someone during a real conversation. The fact is whether it is in person, or electronic, a conversation is a conversation.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ancientuno
09:44 AM on 10/30/2011
How lazy can society get when people cannot open their mouths and speak when the person is right next to you. So pathetic.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ran6110
Mac, iPhone & iPad developer.
10:58 AM on 10/30/2011
Even though I tend to agree with you I have found IM'ing and Skype to be handy in keeping a record of the conversation.

These days too many people will suddenly deny they've said something and you need proof.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Nick Tarlton
06:30 AM on 10/31/2011
I agree. I have seen couples arguing with each other via facebook when they are in the same house. It quite frankly pisses me off and I usually end up posting a comment telling them to get the heck off the computer and talk to their significant other instead of broadcasting it to the world besides if your relationship is so bad that you can't talk to someone in the same room in your house then you probably shouldn't be with that person. Its ridiculous.
07:53 AM on 10/30/2011
Emoticons have no place in business writing. It is not professional.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Greg Albright
09:09 AM on 10/30/2011
Yes, I am sure when basic punctuation was invented, commas, periods, question marks, the elder scribes of their day railed against it...

:P
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ChelleAgain
It's Chelle ... again.
12:38 PM on 10/30/2011
While I agree with you, the danger is all-out office wars.
photo
Sorenson
Time for a Revolt of No Confidence
05:02 AM on 10/30/2011
The problem with image-based emotes is that few people know how to make GOOD emotes: they're typically loaded with such extraneous detail and engorged to such a size that implimenting them typically winds up creating a massive break in the flow of whatever conversation is taking place and the resulting product winds up looking creepy or janky as heck.

If you want an example of good emotes, take those of Something Awful and similar forums. (NSFW: http://forums.somethingawful.com/misc.php?action=showsmilies) They're relatively minimalist, but manage to hit the nail square on the head for whatever they're trying to convey. They're styleistically non-offensive and cohesive, and when they get used they usually manage to slip into the conversation so unobtrusively that it goes right on without even the slighest of pauses. Even those that're slightly more complex or format-breaking (such as :smug: or :negative:) they still manage to get across that particular, y'know, emotion that words alone may not be able to express.

In this day and age text emotes honestly come across as lazy, to be honest. If you're gonna' do an emote, go all the way with a good image one, not some screwy string of letters and symbols that you have to read with your head tilted sideways.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jabailo
(Participant) Texeme.Construct()
12:53 AM on 10/30/2011
As one comedian said, no man over 30 should use an emoticon ( or 'leet of any form...my addon).
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Nick Hatch
I'm So Meta Even This Acronym
01:08 PM on 10/30/2011
Nice quote in the context of a comedy show but how about real life (and real office politics)?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jabailo
(Participant) Texeme.Construct()
02:21 PM on 10/30/2011
In real life...no, never, don't use emoticons at all.
11:51 PM on 10/29/2011
"while the other is just corporate and horrible"

Ahh, I like you. =)