iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Oil Sands Label Defended By EU Commission Despite Canada Criticism

First Posted: 10/28/2011 10:33 am Updated: 12/28/2011 5:12 am

The European Union's climate commissioner announced this week that the EU's plans to label all fuel produced from oil sands as "highly polluting" are based on science and talks will be held with EU member states to discuss the proposed standard, according to Reuters.

The EU plan has been criticized by Canada, which possesses large deposits of the fuel source. Despite Canadian fears that the label would cause economic damage, the EU maintains that their move is not political.

Reuters reports Connie Hedegaard, the EU climate commissioner, said in a press conference, "We have the knowledge and the fact that oil sands are more CO2-polluting than other kinds of fuel." She added that oil sands fuel is not being targeted specifically, but is being labelled using the same methodologies as other fuel sources.

Before this labeling is enacted, it must be approved by the European Parliament. It would become a part of the EU's Fuel Quality Directive, which is "a plan that aims to reduce carbon emissions from transportation by six per cent by 2020," reported HuffPost Canada.

Canadian natural resources minister Joe Oliver responded to the EU proposal recently, saying, "Any proposed implementing measure that provides separate, more onerous treatment for oil sands derived crude oil relative to other crude oils with similar or higher GHG emissions intensities is discriminatory, and potentially violates the European Union's international trade obligations."

Under pressure from Canada, EU members delayed voting this week on the measure that would list oil sands as more polluting than other fuel sources. The Guardian reports that environmentalists have accused the UK of "urging more consultation and research in order to delay the EU's taking a position."

Despite opposition from Estonia, in addition to the UK and Canada, the EU measure is likely to pass. Waldemar Skrobacki, an EU expert and associate professor at the University of Toronto, told The Calgary Herald, "The opposition is not big enough or strong enough to prevail."

U.S. President Barack Obama has yet to make a decision as to whether a Canadian company will be allowed to construct a 1,700-mile pipeline connecting Canada's oil sands to refineries in the U.S. The proposed Keystone XL pipeline has sparked national protests in the U.S. and a number of prominent individuals have spoken out against it.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST GREEN

The European Union's climate commissioner announced this week that the EU's plans to label all fuel produced from oil sands as "highly polluting" are based on science and talks will be held with EU me...
The European Union's climate commissioner announced this week that the EU's plans to label all fuel produced from oil sands as "highly polluting" are based on science and talks will be held with EU me...
Filed by James Gerken  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 24
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
08:40 AM on 11/06/2011
I can see the label at the pump: "May be made from tar sand oil." The key is "may". At the pump, there is no way to tell where the original oil came from. And since every pump will have that label, it won't make any difference.
Genders
Love, Tolerance, Enlightenment
06:56 PM on 11/03/2011
How dare the government give the citizens the knowledge the need to make good choices.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
03:23 AM on 11/02/2011
Right now a pipeline delivers this oil to the Mid-Western US. Currently, oil is cheaper in that area than anywhere else in the US. The oil companies are very unhappy with that. They want to be able to charge the same price as OPEC. If they can start selling to Texas refineries they can make more profit. Once they can make more profit, they will increase supply so that the most profit is made without lowering the price too much. These are the only reasons for this pipeline. A short term surge in jobs would occur, but long term the increase would be minimal. Oil spills occur constantly with the current pipeline and so the same can be expected of this one. The risk of contamination to water supplies of the mid-west would be high. Right now the bulk of the extraction occurs in a manner that produces significantly more CO2 than any other oil production method. The more efficient ways are not being designed to make it more environmentally friendly, but rather, are an attempt to extract the most oil possible. It is scientific fact that oil sands can't be used to produce oil products without creating more CO2 than conventional oil sources. Considering gas prices would actually increase in the mid-west, as per the goal of this project, the only significant benefit from this project would be more money in the pockets of the oil tycoons, and a few thousand new jobs in Texas.
g9
conservation ,Your grandchildrens future
08:32 PM on 10/30/2011
At the end of this keystone pipeline is a tanker to take the oil offshore.....Canada looses millions & millions of barrels of fresh water...destroies the before mentioned forest....more polution into the air in china ='s acid rain & more deforrestation in n. america....
What do we get.....A industry that is wealthier....But it will not help but a few workers for a short time.....Polution will go on for generations....for a few more jobs for a short time....Maybe the 1% that gets wqealthier polluting Canada will share the wealth w/ all Canadians ....ha !
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
01:02 PM on 11/01/2011
Absolutely--that's why we should stop the Keystone Pipeline! Obama should deny the permit. Box in Transcanada and its cronies.
g9
conservation ,Your grandchildrens future
04:55 PM on 11/01/2011
Quakergardener......The name sounds like you are a person of peace & well connected to the earth and nature...
The people like that the better our world will be.......
The problem is not finding more sources of oil for china....but CREATING jobs thru a more GREEN energy source...( and about 4 billion less people on this planet would not hurt)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Rendy Bee Mulyono
Someone with constant stream of
01:39 PM on 10/30/2011
Good for EU!
10:41 AM on 10/29/2011
This story bodes well for the US - more fuel for our needs. Thank you EU.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
12:53 PM on 11/01/2011
Actually, the fuel is all scheduled for export--to South America, among other places. TransCanada boasts to investors that gas prices in the US Midwest will go up 20 cents a gallon.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
b525
05:06 AM on 10/29/2011
We can reduce our oil consumption by building more high mileage gas and electric cars (hopefully electric cars charged by home rooftop solar), by long-term investing in various forms of mass transit and making our cities more friendly to walking and biking. We can also reduce our oil, gasoline, jet fuel, ship fuel consumption by trading more with Western hemisphere Latino nations and less with the distant nations of the Far-East such as China etc.
Genders
Love, Tolerance, Enlightenment
09:24 PM on 10/28/2011
Let the market decide? Obviously not....
08:27 PM on 10/28/2011
con't...
...and she'll continue to do that as long as those elements she is MADE OF are withdrawn. How would YOUR body hold up if all your minerals were extracted? Think about that for awhile. Take away your minerals, you water, your plant life, and everything that gives human life, just to brag..."We've found more!! Success!" In the meantime, you'd expect that a human would fall flat on his/her face...and they would. Well brother...think of what you're all doing to Earth! How many more decades of surgery can she withstand before her complete collapse? Then who's to blame? We the people?? Or YOU, the corporations who call themselves people, but are nothing more than brick and mortar, standing on the only entity that gives life...it won't take much longer for her to chuck you all off of her like a bad case of fleas. It will happen...she doesn't like those who hurt her and she, as we will 'never forget.'
Genders
Love, Tolerance, Enlightenment
09:27 PM on 10/28/2011
So tax heavy metals. Heavy metal pollution is a good proxy for CO2 anyway.

Now where is your argument against that?

BTW, CO2 is not just an asphyxiant, it is toxic at a just a few percent causing intellectual impairment, something we cannot afford these days. Even 1% http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carbon_dioxide#Toxicity
08:26 PM on 10/28/2011
I don't understand 'why' people keep saying Carbon Dioxide as being a source of pollutants. It's NOT. What is dangerous is Carbon Monoxide, which I think would be released in the processing and extraction of the fuel from the sand.

I'm trying to figure out where people's heads are at, but I can sure take a good guess!

And it's not a persons honest opinion that should be seen as a determent, but instead the mere fact that they cannot tell CO2 and Monoxide from each other. The trees take care of the CO2, just as it takes care of the air we exhale. That's not an issue. I've seen the 'true' research of the impact of humans. Don't blame us; blame industry. Put that tack on the map where it belongs.

Sand with oil deposits should be left alone, for Earth's sake. Give her a chance to restore what she's already lost. Oil companies are exactly like a fast Cancer. You can dig all you want, but what is left afterward? The Earth scars just as we do; we are part of her and people are also like the trees. She needs time to heal, and governments and big oil want to take from her bleeding wounds. Just how long do you think this planet will last, once all of her elements are taken from her. Did anyone even bother to ask her IF they could dig? She does groan and make noises, she quakes when they FRACK her.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
04:45 PM on 10/28/2011
How ironic is this, more pollution from this process . Big oil continues to do whatever they can to insure domination over energy sources and maximizing their profit margins. I hope our government sees what a ponzi like scheme this is and does not endorse this scam.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Malcolm Hensley
Last of the Reagan Republicans
02:19 PM on 10/28/2011
From a purely economic stand point Americans win. The Europeans won't buy Canadian Oil Sands, diminishing it's price. Now if we can stop the pipeline to the Gulf, keeping the oil locked in away from the Asians and other American countries we will continue to get a good deal!

And think we do do this is the name of the environment! Talk about an American Win Win.

We get so few of these with Unrestricted Free Trade!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
CraigNazor
03:47 PM on 10/28/2011
Mining, refining and/or burning ANY of this oil IS NOT a win for the environment. Merely limiting the amount of this tar sands oil that is refined and burned is like smoking one pack a day instead of two. MAYBE you won't die as quickly, but there is a whole lot more progress that needs to be made before you could ever call yourself healthy.

If you want to see the damage that JUST THE EXTRACTION of this tar sands oil does to the boreal forests, look here:

http://www.sierraclub.org/sierra/201111/tar-sands/

There is NOTHING about tars sands oil that even approaches what might be called a "good deal," except for the industrialists, corporations, and their investors who are making billions by destroying a huge forest ecosystem without paying the true cost of the damage.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Malcolm Hensley
Last of the Reagan Republicans
04:14 PM on 10/28/2011
I moved to a CNG (Compressed Natural Gas) Honda over 2 years ago. Cost me about $0.025/mile fuel cost to operate. To but that in perspective, a 90 mile/gallon scooter cost about $0.04/mile.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Malcolm Hensley
Last of the Reagan Republicans
11:38 PM on 10/28/2011
I checked and I never said it was a win for the environment, it's an economic win.
photo
artleads
Let's have a national retreat.
11:25 AM on 10/28/2011
Nice to see an important agency doing their job.