More

Michele Bachmann Criticizes Obama's Student Loan Plan

Michele Bachmann

BRIAN BAKST   10/27/11 08:55 PM ET   AP

ST. PAUL, Minn. — Republican presidential candidate Michele Bachmann criticized a directive by President Barack Obama to ease student loan debt as an "abuse of power" that will give people incentive to dodge debt.

The candidates reacted Thursday to a decision Obama announced a day earlier to cap required payments for some college loan borrowers at a lower percentage of their income and forgive payments for others after 20 years. He used executive authority to accelerate a law that wasn't supposed to go into effect until 2014.

"I believe it is abuse of power from the executive to impose via an executive order a wholesale change in the student loan," Bachmann, a Minnesota congresswoman, said during an education forum in New York put on by The College Board and News Corp.

Appearing by satellite from Minneapolis where she was hosting a fundraiser later Thursday, Bachmann said that the loan breaks could push costs onto other taxpayers.

Bachmann said the change creates a "moral hazard" when it comes to student debt.

"There is a morality in keeping our financial promises, and I don't think we should push that off onto the taxpayer," she said. "The individual needs to repay and be responsible for repaying their student loan debt."

Another GOP candidate, former House Speaker Newt Gingrich, also took a dim view of Obama's action, calling it a "Ponzi scheme."

Gingrich said at the education forum that private loans should be reprivatized before the president "bankrupts the entire country by promising to every young person you will not have to pay your student loan as a student. However you will later have to pay off the national debt as a taxpayer."

Obama's plan will accelerate a measure passed by Congress that reduces the maximum required payment on student loans from 15 percent of discretionary income annually to 10 percent. The plan goes into effect in 2012, instead of 2014. In addition, the White House says the outstanding loan amount would be forgiven after 20 years, instead of 25. About 1.6 million borrowers could be affected.

The administration says the plan won't cost taxpayers anything and could actually save as much as $2 billion. Borrowers would be allowed to consolidate a direct loan from the government with one issued under the Federal Family Education Loan Program. The savings come from no longer having to a pay subsidy to the lender, the administration says.

Obama said on Wednesday that the plan will help boost the economy. Debt-saddled graduates will have more money to spend on things like buying homes, he said. Student loans are the No. 2 source of household debt. Total student debt now exceeds $1 trillion and the average indebtedness is rising.

Changes approved by Congress last year moved student loans to direct lending by eliminating banks as the middlemen. Before that, borrowers could get loans directly from the government or from the Federal Family Education Loan Program; the latter were issued by private lenders but basically insured by the government. The law was passed along with the health care overhaul with the anticipation that it could save about $60 billion over a decade.

___

Associated Press Education Writer Kimberly Hefling in Washington contributed to this report.

.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST COLLEGE

ST. PAUL, Minn. — Republican presidential candidate Michele Bachmann criticized a directive by President Barack Obama to ease student loan debt as an "abuse of power" that will give people incen...
ST. PAUL, Minn. — Republican presidential candidate Michele Bachmann criticized a directive by President Barack Obama to ease student loan debt as an "abuse of power" that will give people incen...
Filed by Rebecca Harrington  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 70
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
12:53 PM on 10/31/2011
Didn't she and her husband get all kinds of free loans and subsities?
11:29 AM on 10/31/2011
First, this will not effect ANY loans taken out before next year. Which means that everyone with an existing loan is off the table. This also means that in 2032, these loan will be eligible for forgiveness!! 2013!! For all of you who are complaining about having to pay for someone else's bad debt, why don't you worry about that in say ten years or so when we are not in the middle of recession. I would rather have those kids graduating in four years from now with more discretionary income to spend in local economies, then dumping it into the black hole of their loans. Second, a lot of your are talking about the 'taxpayer' having to pick up the tab on loans in default. Taxpayer are people with student loans!! They are not two separate groups of people. They are one and the same!! And for those of you who are fortunate enough to have been able to go to school without going into debt, would you rather have people spending money at your business then sending that money to student loan corporations? If my default gets spread to the rest of the economy, I'm OK with that, because I am covering for all of the other millions of students also in the same boat. As a business owner, I would rather my clients spend money on buying things then send it into the black hole of something that the should have been provided by our country anyway.
REDSTATEREFUGEE
Texan by birth ; Californian by choice
09:38 PM on 10/30/2011
I was undecided about my position on Obama's student loan plan, but, now that Michelle has weighed in against it, I know that I support the notion. MB is a bellweather for any controversial issue. Sane citizens need only determine her position and then take the opposite point of view.
05:09 AM on 10/29/2011
Oh yipee skippy, half a percentage point lower interest and that 22 year old in $100,000 grand of debt will be rid of it at age 42 not 48. Yeah, what a huge debt relief package *eye roll*
08:06 AM on 10/29/2011
It's a pretty significant change...if you seriously don't think paying only 10% of annual discretionary income to loans (instead of 15%) and being forgiven in 20 years (instead of 25 years) isn't significant, then I suggest you get out a pencil and paper and do the math for a student owing a $100k in debt who has $30k in after tax income.

In fact, I'll do it for you. This student will only have to pay $3k/year for 20 years under the new plan instead of $4.5k/year for 25 years. Which translates to $60k of payments vs $112.5k.

The student will save $52.5k. That's enough for a down payment on a house or the purchase of multiple cars, or a sizable contribution to one's retirement fund.
12:08 PM on 10/29/2011
who is going to have to pay for the default.Oh the tax payers.It's not the lender at fault. The halls of higher learning have blown tuition thru the roof .Thats were the gov. should regulate not business. Besides the saving is only about 8 dollars a month on the payment.I guess Obama thinks he can buy votes for 8 dollars. That is how smart this regime thinks we are.
07:15 PM on 10/30/2011
5% not .5%
05:51 PM on 10/28/2011
Who cares what this woman says?
05:36 PM on 10/28/2011
I would rather have my taxes go to the college students than the banksters
09:55 PM on 10/30/2011
I would rather pay less in taxes.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Andra Claudia Garcia
Avant-Garde Journalist
05:28 PM on 10/28/2011
So MORAL says the one who charges thousands of dollars to come to a location and talk smack for an hour.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PaulaMV
Tea parties are for little girls.
04:02 PM on 10/28/2011
Who needs a higher educashun anyway, Meeshell?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
paid trawler
reply to me for a half penny
03:51 PM on 10/28/2011
it looks as if you'll have to GIVE away those fleece jackets now shelly. you have forks sticking out of your back.
03:30 PM on 10/28/2011
Did the Tea Party just tell her to give up running for Prez....
02:00 PM on 10/28/2011
Bachmann and her family are the recipients of a great deal of government money...she defends it, but don't let anyone else benefit from the government. She is just another Republican me me me candidate.
01:00 PM on 10/28/2011
She and Dubya show the futility of getting the unqualified children of the rich into college and buying their "success." It denies a seat to someone who is qualified but can't afford it, and no matter how much you rub it, you can't shine s---!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
wwhitfie81
We may not agree, but we can coexist!
12:47 PM on 10/28/2011
She's got a nerve! "There is a morality in keeping our financial promises, and I don't think we should push that off onto the taxpayer," - That's the largest most hypocritical remark ever made. The GOP AND the Dems have s_crew_ed the po_och on that one. Now, students want some sort of something from the government who 1) can't guarantee that these students will get SS when they get older, 2) can't guarantee that they're leaving the next generation on a better note...these are your future scholars, scientists, engineers, inventors, teachers, designers, philosophers etc, the least you can do is forgive students loans for less than it took to bail out the banks who were the antithesis of the aforementioned remark made by Bachmann!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
madcityy
12:44 PM on 10/28/2011
she is right,,,he is buying votes in a way that costsss me $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$

what a rat..................
firstwizard
Never trust anyone that says "Trust me.."
02:08 PM on 10/28/2011
and how is this costing you money?
03:21 PM on 10/28/2011
Since 1985, college costs have risen more than 450 percent, which is about 4.5 times the rate of inflation. There is no justification for higher-education costs to have soared so dramatically. Faculty salaries have increased in most cases, but at only about a 10th of the rate of overall growth. Colleges and universities cite a variety of other factors, such as higher administrative costs and overhead, but these claims are unconvincing. The real reason schools charge more is because they can get away with it. ...

The higher-education establishment has no incentive to control costs so long as government continues to make it easy for students to get into debt and then have it forgiven. Mr. Obama would have us believe this racket can continue at no cost to the taxpayer. You don’t need a college degree to see through that one.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bdoug25000
Bio? Nope, Mostly mechanical
12:34 PM on 10/28/2011
I bet she just went up a notch in popularity with the student population. Michelle, college students vote- and if you haven't noticed, they are politically active these days....
12:45 PM on 10/28/2011
She is just trying to stop anyone who is smarter than her from getting an education because by contrast, it will make herlook bad, and that includes a whole bunch of people!