iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Could Pollution Increase Lung Cancer Risk?

Pollution Lung Cancer

The Huffington Post   Posted: 10/31/11 05:27 PM ET

Even people who've never touched a cigarette have a higher risk of dying from lung cancer if they live in highly polluted areas, according to a new study.

The findings, published in the American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, indicate that people who live in a place with high levels of air pollutants have a 20 percent higher risk of death from lung cancer than people who live in less-polluted areas, Reuters reported.

Researchers first took stock of the health statuses of more than 180,000 non-smokers around the U.S. who were followed for 26 hours. Of those people, 1,100 died from lung cancer, Philadelphia magazine reported.

Then, researchers looked at the ZIP codes of everyone in the study. Press TV reported that the lowest level of air pollution, called ambient fine particulate matter, hovered at 6 units (micrograms of air particles per cubic meter of air), the highest level of pollution was at 38 units and the average level of pollution was at 17 units.

University of Ottawa researchers found that for every 10 additional units of air pollution, the risk of lung cancer increased for a person by 15 to 27 percent, according to the study.

Study researcher Michelle Turner, a graduate student at the University of Ottawa, told Reuters that while there does seem to be an increased lung cancer risk associated with air pollution, it's still small compared to the increased lung cancer risk from smoking.

Reuters noted:

And the study team didn't prove that the pollution caused the cancer cases, but "there's lots of evidence that exposure to fine particles increases cardiopulmonary mortality," Turner told Reuters Health.

While smokers make up 85 to 90 percent of all lung cancer cases, up to 15,000 people die in the United States from lung cancer even though they never smoked, according to Harvard Medical School. Recently, doctors are increasingly recognizing that lung cancer among smokers and non-smokers may be different, taking into account that some drugs work better against the cancer among people who have never smoked before.

The new study certainly isn't the first research to examine a link between air pollution and lung cancer. The Associated Press reported back in 2002 that living in a big metro area and breathing in air pollution for a long period of time is linked with an increased risk of death from lung cancer. This study, which involved 500,000 people, showed that death caused by heart or lung problems increased by 6 percent for every 10 micrograms of air particles per cubic meter of air.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST HEALTHY LIVING

Even people who've never touched a cigarette have a higher risk of dying from lung cancer if they live in highly polluted areas, according to a new study. The findings, published in the American J...
Even people who've never touched a cigarette have a higher risk of dying from lung cancer if they live in highly polluted areas, according to a new study. The findings, published in the American J...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 21
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
stape45
No brag, just fact.
03:04 PM on 11/02/2011
To whom are you posing the question?
01:20 PM on 11/02/2011
take a look...

http://preferredpublishers.go2cloud.org/SHFV
photo
farmilyman
everything is illusion
10:49 AM on 11/02/2011
Daily breathing of cancer causeing agents causing harm? Depends on your political views.
08:31 AM on 11/02/2011
Ah, come on! When the Iron Curtain came down back in the 90's there was all this tree-hugger propaganda about how air pollution in Eastern Europe was causing cancer and birth defects and stuff. Listen! If it was good enough for the Communists, it's good enough for us!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Max Shaw
My micro-bio is no longer empty.
01:10 PM on 11/01/2011
Did they really just ask this??
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Silverfern
09:07 AM on 11/01/2011
It depends which lobbyist paid the most. As the polluters have the best lobbyists it is not bad for you.
04:45 PM on 11/01/2011
the damn lobbyists are what is killing our damn country - lobbying should be made totally illegal already
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
RhynoH
micro-bio [here]
05:22 PM on 11/01/2011
I agree completely!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ChasG
Unborn, unchanging, undying Universe
02:26 AM on 11/01/2011
This is a new discovery? Haven't we known this for about half a century already? Or do we now have scientific proof of what we can see with the naked eye? Smoke produced by burning any carbon (or plant) based fuel, from gasoline to logs in the wood stove, produces a variety of "natural" carcinogens like the tar than comes from smoking not just tobacco, but smoking any of a number of plants. Smog is like thirty of your best friends all smoking in the garage with all the doors and the windows shut. People getting sick? What a surprise! Where is the clean electric and/or hydro-energy cell transportation? Imagine, driving a small electric mini-van that plugs into your photo-voltaic roof-top array at home. Zero carbon foot print other than the air, my family and my cats breathe. Where I live, the power company is required to buy any surplus power my photo-voltaics produce (my meter literally runs backwards). Is this about clean air and energy independence? Come on! Let's do it on the grid!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
hayesatlbch
11:53 PM on 10/31/2011
Seems like a short study. They followed the people for 26 HOURS and 1,100 died . At that rate all 180,000 would be dead in 6 months.

Please pay attention to numbers and units . If the author and editors can't identify such obvious errors they shouldn't be involved with stories that are based on information derived from numbers.
little old lady
United citizens vs Citizens United
10:26 PM on 10/31/2011
This is news? Well, hardly NEW news.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kwaut lizard
Reductio ad Absurdum
07:14 PM on 10/31/2011
This headline should get the 'Look at the big brain on Brad' Award.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
shelbyanne
the unseen eye is watching you
06:50 PM on 10/31/2011
Go to LA and take a deep breath. We have the technology. We should have been phasing it in all these years. Now we are far behind the rest of the world. If polluters don't want to comply, simply shut them down, and replace them.
little old lady
United citizens vs Citizens United
10:25 PM on 10/31/2011
LA is nothing like it was in the 1960s. I hear that it's really "clean" comparatively.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
shelbyanne
the unseen eye is watching you
10:53 PM on 10/31/2011
You hear wrong. It is called smog. It kills you.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
06:15 PM on 10/31/2011
Talk about stating the obvious. No, maybe air pollution is good for your lungs. Who gives these so-called researchers money to come up with these new and startling results? And then who puts it out as news?
ThinkCreeps
Seriously, it's time.
06:35 PM on 10/31/2011
Camel: the doctors favorite....
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kwaut lizard
Reductio ad Absurdum
07:13 PM on 10/31/2011
Are you an insurance adjuster?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
06:09 PM on 10/31/2011
duh....
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tjconkster
Occupy the Voting Booth 2014
06:01 PM on 10/31/2011
Not to worry..once RepubliCorpse and the Di...ck Armey do away with the EPA & Clean Air Regulations & Pollution Standards on cars...the Free Market will adjust the parameters of the air that we breath and we will all get our very own free Self Contained Breathing Apparatus...and the corporations will thrive....
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
paulthamec
Proud to have served this great nation ..
05:06 PM on 10/31/2011
Just blame it on second hand cigarette smoke....everything will kill ya now days...