iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Extreme Weather Caused By Global Warming Is Going To Worsen, Scientists Say

By SETH BORENSTEIN   11/ 1/11 03:03 PM ET   AP

WASHINGTON -- For a world already weary of weather catastrophes, the latest warning from top climate scientists paints a grim future: More floods, more heat waves, more droughts and greater costs to deal with them.

A draft summary of an international scientific report obtained by The Associated Press says the extremes caused by global warming could eventually grow so severe that some locations become "increasingly marginal as places to live."

The report from the Nobel Prize-winning Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change marks a change in climate science, from focusing on subtle shifts in average temperatures to concentrating on the harder-to-analyze freak events that grab headlines, hurt economies and kill people.

"The extremes are a really noticeable aspect of climate change," said Jerry Meehl, senior scientist at the National Center for Atmospheric Research. "I think people realize that the extremes are where we are going to see a lot of the impacts of climate change."

The final version of the report from a panel of leading climate scientists will be issued in a few weeks, after a meeting in Uganda. The draft says there is at least a 2-in-3 probability that climate extremes have already worsened because of man-made greenhouse gases.

The most recent bizarre weather extreme, the pre-Halloween snowstorm that crippled parts of the Northeast last weekend, cannot be blamed on climate change and probably isn't the type of storm that will increase with global warming, according to four meteorologists and climate scientists.

Experts on extreme storms have focused more closely on the increasing number of super-heavy rainstorms, not snow, NASA climate scientist Gavin Schmidt said.

By the end of the century, the intense, single-day rainstorms that typically happen once every 20 years will probably happen about twice a decade, the report said.

The opposite type of disaster – a drought such as the stubbornly long dry spell gripping Texas and parts of the Southwest – could also happen more often as the world warms, said Schmidt and Meehl, who reviewed part of the climate panel report.

Studies have not yet specifically tied global warming to the continuing drought, but it is consistent with computer models that indicate current climate trends will worsen existing droughts, Meehl said. Scientifically connecting a weather disaster with global warming is a complicated and time-consuming task that can take more than a year and involve lots of computer calculations.

Researchers have also predicted more intense monsoons with climate change. Warmer air can hold more water and impart more energy to weather systems, changing the dynamics of storms and where and how they hit.

Thailand is now coping with massive flooding from monsoonal rains – an event that illustrates how climate is also connected with other manmade issues such as population growth, urban development and river management, Schmidt said.

In fact, the report says, "for some climate extremes in many regions, the main driver for future increases in losses will be socioeconomic" rather than a result of greenhouse gases.

The panel was formed by the United Nations and World Meteorological Organization. In the past, it has discussed extreme events in snippets in its report. But this time, the scientists are putting them all together.

The report, which needs approval by diplomats at the mid-November meeting, tries to measure the confidence scientists have in their assessment of climate extremes both future and past.

Chris Field, one of the leaders of the climate change panel, said he and other authors declined to comment because the report is still subject to change.

The summary chapter did not detail which regions of the world might suffer extremes so severe as to leave them only marginally habitable.

The report does say scientists are "virtually certain" – 99 percent – that the world will have more extreme spells of heat and fewer of cold. Heat waves could peak as much as 5 degrees hotter by mid-century and even 9 degrees hotter by the end of the century.

From June to August this year in the United States, blistering heat set 2,703 daily high temperature records, compared with only 300 cold records during that period. That made it the hottest summer in the U.S. since the Dust Bowl of 1936, according to Weather Underground Meteorology Director Jeff Masters, who was not involved in the study.

And there's an 80 percent chance that the killer Russian heat wave of 2010 would not have happened without the added push of global warming, according to a study published last week in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

Scientists expect future hurricanes and other tropical cyclones to have stronger winds, but they won't increase in number and may actually decrease.

Massachusetts Institute of Technology meteorology professor Kerry Emanuel, who studies climate's effects on hurricanes, disagrees and believes more of these intense storms will occur.

And global warming isn't the sole villain in future climate disasters, the climate report says. An even bigger problem will be the number of people – especially the poor – who live in harm's way.

The 18-page summary report isn't completely grim. It says some "low-regrets measures" can help reduce disaster risks and costs, including better preparedness, sustainable land and water management, better public health monitoring and building improvements.

University of Victoria climate scientist Andrew Weaver, who was not among the authors, said the report was written to be "so bland" that it may not matter to world leaders.

But Masters said the basic findings seem to be proven true by actual events.

"In the U.S., this has been the weirdest weather year we've had for my 30 years, hands down."

___

Online:

FOLLOW HUFFPOST GREEN

WASHINGTON -- For a world already weary of weather catastrophes, the latest warning from top climate scientists paints a grim future: More floods, more heat waves, more droughts and greater costs to d...
WASHINGTON -- For a world already weary of weather catastrophes, the latest warning from top climate scientists paints a grim future: More floods, more heat waves, more droughts and greater costs to d...
Filed by Joanna Zelman  |  Report Corrections
 
 
  • Comments
  • 746
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (10 total)
PATOISJAM
reason: strategize: succeed
10:34 AM on 11/15/2011
We humans take for granted the air we breathe. If the ocean can have oxygen-depleted zones so can the earth. You wait till that happens and then you will see human selfishness at its zenith.

The average adult at rest inhales and exhales something like 7 or 8 liters (about one-fourth of a cubic foot) of air per minute. That totals something like 11,000 liters of air (388 cubic feet) in a day.

Another version:

A person takes about 22,000 breaths each day. That means you probably inhale more than 11,000 quarts of air each day
photo
Norge
Rolf K. Artist, worker of metal, writer of poems
08:15 AM on 11/09/2011
I remember my times at the university in the 70s we were perading and chanting:

Though no one listened, they did not know how, perhaps they will listen now.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
realpolitic
Proud member of the reality-based community!
11:19 PM on 11/06/2011
Ironically, the U.S. is the major polluter per capita and we are seeing many of the effects of this freakish weather with the Texas drought and flooding in other areas of the country happening periodically. Warmer-than-usual water temperatures in the Atlantic Ocean are helped push Hurricane Irene farther north along the Eastern seaboard than most tropical storms, say meteorologists, and this trend will continue. However, third world countries will see the major disasters, although they have contributed least to the problem. Thailand can not channel flood waters out to sea given the rise in sea levels. Those who deny climate change, like Governor Perry, will see they are not immune to the freakish weather.
photo
gallon
Those who fail to remember history are, um
12:19 AM on 11/07/2011
Perry will be a problem. He prayed for rain and Texas burst into flames. His solution is to pray harder. He does not acknowledge global warming. This is divine.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Joe Goforth
contempt for the status quo
09:10 PM on 11/06/2011
Triumph the insult dog comments on the plight of the world- We are going to poop on you!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
03:51 PM on 11/06/2011
Orkneygal denies shilling for New Zealand's ICSC chapter.

ICSC is a global warming denier group funded by Heartland Institute, in turn funded by Exxon and the Koch brothers (who own America's largest private oil/gas company)

http://www­.sourcewat­ch.org/ind­ex.php?tit­le=Interna­tional_Cli­mate_Scien­ce_Coaliti­on

http://www­.sourcewat­ch.org/ind­ex.php?tit­le=Heartla­nd_Institu­te

Bob Carter and Chris de Freitas are two of its “science advisors".

http://dee­pclimate.o­rg/2009/08­/01/meet-a­lan-gibbs-­builder-of­-amphibiou­s-humvees-­and-climat­e-science-­coalitions­/#more-568

Carter draws phony negative trend lines for temperatur­e, implying they're statistica­lly valid. For detailed analysis, see:

http://tam­ino.wordpr­ess.com/20­11/07/13/b­ob-carter-­does-his-b­usiness/”

de Freitas initiated chief editor resignations for two science journals.

In 2011, Remote Sensing's Dr. Wolfgang Wagner resigned, after publishing the fraudulent Spencer/Br­aswell paper favorably peer-revie­wed by deFreitas.

"...he (Wagner) took the unusual step of publicly criticizin­g Spencer and the paper's reviewers (Chris deFreitas)­. He criticized the science behind the paper, stating that it had "fundament­al methodolog­ical errors" and "false claims"

http://en.­wikipedia.­org/wiki/R­oy_W._Spen­cer#cite_n­ote-20

In 2003 Willie Soon and Sallie Baliunas published a paper in Climate Research favorably reviewed by de Freitas.

von Storch and half the editorial staff resigned. Von Storch said climate change sceptics "had identified Climate Research as a journal where some editors are not rigorous.

http://en.­wikipedia.­org/wiki/S­oon_and_Ba­liunas_con­troversy
This comment has been removed due to violations of our [Guidelines]
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
KarlaElisa
The atmosphere is Toxic
02:24 PM on 11/04/2011
all i seem to be able to do is focus on 'low regret measures'.
04:06 AM on 11/04/2011
RE: 'every exhalation is dooming the Earth'
It is not funny - at all, for when the Party starts up it will have a positive feedback which will send the atmosphere of the Earth in the Dimension X, and taking into consideration that the water vapors are also a greenhouse 'gas' I am not sure this will be funny at all.
Do you have any vaguest idea of how to 'disconnect' a positive feedback in the atmosphere of the Earth, for nobody doesn't.
BTW all the 7 bln humans on the Earth at present are producing not more than 7% of the CO2 produced by their vehicles. What we are talking about.
photo
rivertrat2
Cuomo's SAFE act is just wrong
09:40 PM on 11/03/2011
global warmists must just walk around all mopey and sad, knowing that every exhalation is dooming the earth. Real Global warmists would do the right thing....
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
chrisd3
Excelsior!
10:42 PM on 11/03/2011
Actually, 'global warmists' know a little science that you don't. Specifically, they know that respiration is part of the short-term carbon cycle and has nothing at all to do with global warming.

'Global warmists' know this and you don't because 'global warmists' have studied the science and you haven't.
photo
rivertrat2
Cuomo's SAFE act is just wrong
09:02 PM on 11/06/2011
actually, "global warmists" have no sense of humor. Keep in mind there scientist....if you can't laugh at yourself, others will do it for you
10:45 PM on 11/03/2011
Someone figured that industrial civilization is like a quarter-mile wide exhaust pipe gushing CO2 at a very fast clip. Compared to that, breathing, which all of us must do to stay alive, is completely trivial.

You know that, I suppose, but I guess you want to take a cheap shot at people who disagree with you.

How very big of you.
02:57 PM on 11/03/2011
RE: 'And putting into place economic policies that will further destroy our republic will fix the weather. Am I right?'
No you are not.
1. New steam power plants are built in some places... every four days.
2. The destruction of the economy will cause panic and hysteria, and this will lead to the destruction of everything that can be devastated (incl. food, fuels -petroleum, coal, and forests). Believe it or not but this will not 'fix the weather'.
At this stage the best thing that can be done is to avoid spoiling it too fast, in order to have more time to do something (eventually).
As it is seen some people will need years to start understanding obvious things.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JoeTheProgrammer
I love dogs.
09:16 AM on 11/03/2011
And putting into place economic policies that will further destroy our republic will fix the weather. Am I right?
photo
TheEmptyMonty
President of Antarctica
09:57 AM on 11/03/2011
The costs of greenhouse gas mitigation are less than the costs of adaptation. Look up "social cost of carbon."
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JoeTheProgrammer
I love dogs.
11:48 AM on 11/03/2011
Green house gas cannot be "mitigated" by schemes to transfer wealth. NO decrease in worldwide greenhouse gas would be realized. The ONLY thing that would happen is the creation of yet another speculation scheme and yet more money into the hands of tin pot dictators the world over.

Don't be naive.
photo
qwert1234
haha, charade you are
10:37 AM on 11/03/2011
sounds like fear mongering to me, alarmist
photo
ONLYGRAYCLOUDS
Karma will get you
08:19 AM on 11/03/2011
This is not surprising since it has already been foretold , soon everything will die out because of the extreme weather .Crops will die out and food will become scarce , i dont know if this has anything to do with that device that changes the weather that the military has or traveling into space polluting the earths atmosphere but its scary
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
12:57 AM on 11/04/2011
the thing that worries me most and first is the food situation
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
KarlaElisa
The atmosphere is Toxic
02:28 PM on 11/04/2011
it's going to be bad, no doubt. and all that genetic garbage out there in the way of transgenic (GMO) crops, polluting and creating super bugs and weeds will just be planted like mad where ever possible as all safeguards go out the window because they've allowed them to drive conventional seed out of the market to force their crap on everyone.

besides which, between built in pesticided crops and all the spraying they do TO the crops, the bees are dying. we have so many fires to put out if everybody WAS on board it'd still be nightmarishly impossible.
Steve68112
Provoking thought through sarcasm
03:22 AM on 11/03/2011
There have always been areas too marginal for people to easily live in and there always will be. Climate changes will mostly just shift these around, so while some areas may become 'more' marginal, others will become 'less' marginal. Plus, a lot of areas that are 'less' marginal now are that way because there are already too many people there, not because of the climate. And as far as global warming goes, there is also probably a 10 - 30% chance it could actually lead to an ice age, rather than just warming everything up.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
12:27 PM on 11/03/2011
"There have always been areas too marginal for people to easily live in and there always will be. Climate changes will mostly just shift these around, so while some areas may become 'more' marginal, others will become 'less' marginal. "

Will people in low-lying countries like Bangladesh (population about 150,000,000) just pack their bags, climb into their SUVs, and drive to their new homes in less marginal areas?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Katmandu01
10:58 PM on 11/03/2011
This article in Foreign Policy Magazine shows just how anxious India will be to receive those climate refugees:
http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2011/06/20/fortress_india
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tarzan322
07:00 PM on 11/04/2011
More than likely there will be no marginal climate change, it will be much worse. CO2 is only part of the problem. That will raise the average temp around 2-3 degrees. The real threat is Methane in the form of Methane Hydrate which is frozen Methane. It's in large reserves in the oceans, and 3 times the greenhouse gas of CO2. All it needs is a it for the oceans to warm up a few degrees, and it will melt. That's what you call an avalanche effect, it's irreversible. At that point, expect 10-15 degrees average temp shifts globally. Average temps can translate into 8-15 degree shifts in an area. With Methane, your looking at the possibility of deserts expanding and having temps of over 200 degrees.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
CadOps
A small blue dot, in a big red state
01:52 PM on 11/03/2011
Wrong again Hillbilly.
Did Faux tell you to think that?
This comment has been removed due to violations of our [Guidelines]
03:15 AM on 11/03/2011
RE: '... it is about overpopulation of the world'
It is not about overpopulation - it is about irresponsibility.
If some people have no means to feed three children, why are they making 5th and 8th one, and why do they start doing this at the age of 12-14 ... and how is this called by law.
If some other people do not have the slightest idea of how to handle CO2, why do they boost its production and how is this called.
If still others see that Modern Money Mechanics and Future Value of Money are the trouble of all troubles why do they still continue to consolidate the so called 'financial' system. If this financial system is not funding the economy what it is funding then and how is this called - irresponsibility or the masterpiece of irresponsibility of any age.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
KarlaElisa
The atmosphere is Toxic
02:32 PM on 11/04/2011
um, it's not really about making more children so much as it is about HOW MUCH ARE YOU USING?

first worlders use a boat load more resources than a 3rd worlder does. a large 3rd worlder family can be dwarfed by the average american. so maybe you should ask, why are we allowing people to live like first worlders? the developed nation's populace is the culprit in that argument.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
silverwolf13
I know that I do not know.
09:19 PM on 11/11/2011
Farm populations have traditionally had large families because they needed their sons as cheap labor. And they needed to have many children because so many of the children died. This led to a system in which a man with many sons was respected, while a man with few children was not respected. Now that more children are surviving, and people are living longer even in third world countries, we see a population explosion.

So, to reduce population, we need to ensure that rural children will survive, so that farmers will not feel the need to Insure against their sons' dying. Also, we need to empower women, both to give them education about and access to reliable birth control and so that daughters can be seen as a source of future wealth for the family.