iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Jack Abramoff Takes Shots At Enemies And Protects Friends In New Book

First Posted: 11/01/11 05:59 PM ET Updated: 11/01/11 06:33 PM ET

Jack Abramoff

WASHINGTON -- Jack Abramoff doesn't name names in his new book. He does, however, take a few shots at people he felt did him wrong.

In "Capitol Punishment: The Hard Truth About Washington Corruption From America's Most Notorious Lobbyist," Abramoff frankly admits that he engaged in a massive, ongoing campaign of de facto bribery, where quid pro quo deals with members of Congress were the rule, not the exception. (See our Oct. 28 story about the book.)

But Abramoff appears to offer no significant new details about his corrupt dealings beyond what's already in the public record. And by and large, his friends and colleagues get a free pass.

Instead, he attacks the people he feels wronged him, particularly the members of the Senate Indian Affairs Committee, whose blistering 2006 report exposed the extent of Abramoff's corruption.

"The worst part for me was the hypocrisy of the whole thing. Most of these senators had taken boatloads of cash and prizes from my team and our clients," Abramoff writes about the committee.

The committee's chairman, Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.), is a "classic narcissist" who has "continued to milk the scandal he helped ignite," he writes.

Abramoff recalls the experience of taking the Fifth before the former Republican senator from Colorado, Ben Nighthorse Campbell.

I stared stonefaced at Campbell as he hurled invectives at me. I wondered how he'd react if I reminded him about the twenty-five thousand dollars in campaign checks I delivered to him during our breakfast meeting at posh Capitol Hill eatery La Colline the morning of April 23, 2002. I'll never forget that breakfast. After I handed him the envelope full of campaign contributions, he let me know that my clients would be treated well by his Indian Affairs Committee. That's what I wanted to hear. We left arm in arm.

But Campbell said nothing remotely like that ever happened. "I would say he's a damned liar. Just a damned liar," he told HuffPost.

Campbell said it's conceivable that Abramoff "might have been at some damn reception" that they both attended. But, he said, "I didn't remember this guy from Adam, until I actually saw him in front of the committee. And if he's implying he gave me any money for a quid pro quo or something, he's a goddamned liar. "

"We looked through our campaign things and I can't find anything that related to Abramoff at all," Campbell added. "I don't know what he's talking about."

Republicans -- including George W. Bush, who was aided at times by the mainstream media -- have consistently tried to cast the Abramoff scandal as a bipartisan one, when it was primarily a Republican operation.

And in his book, Abramoff tries once again to ensnare Democrats.

He takes a shot at Byron Dorgan, the former Democratic senator from North Dakota: "Byron Dorgan railed against the 'cesspool of greed' surrounding my practice. I guess it wasn't a cesspool when he had his hand out to take over $75,000 in campaign contributions from our team and clients."

Dorgan's reaction: "He's probably pretty upset with me because I helped lead the investigation that helped send him to prison." The former senator told The Huffington Post that he never met Abramoff and never took any money from him. And though Dorgan said he did receive some money from tribal donors, the record shows that Abramoff steered Native American money away from Democrats, not toward them.

"He was both a liar and thief," Dorgan said. "What we do know is that he was corrupt. That's what we do know. For him to allege corruption of others is pretty Byzantine."

Abramoff repeats an old accusation that former Sen. Chris Dodd (D-Conn.) agreed to support an amendment in return for a $50,000 contribution to Democrats. But the record suggests that Dodd was not party to any such agreement, and Dodd has long denied it.

Abramoff also tries to raise suspicion about Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) and his relation to Abramoff's campaign to block a tribe from getting approval for a proposed casino.

Reid was very much a secret weapon in our lobbying efforts. In 2002, we hired Eddie Ayoob, Reid's legislative director and top political operative. Eddie was a master lobbyist and connected to virtually every office on the Hill, but his real power derived from his history with Reid. The clients showered Reid and his staff with contributions, tickets to events, and every other gratuity imaginable, and they responded in kind. During the first Jena battle, Reid fired off a firm letter to the Interior Department to protect our clients. When the next fight erupted, his staff coordinated with ours to stop the Jena tribe from gaining their casino.

But Reid spokesman Adam Jentleson told HuffPost: "The allegations made against Senator Reid by disgraced former lobbyist and convicted felon Jack Abramoff are false. The Abramoff affair has been thoroughly investigated and we have nothing further to add."

And Ayoob dismissed Abramoff's argument as preposterous and said his facts are made up. "His assertions are just plain wrong. He knows very well that I was never Senator Reid's legislative director nor would ever claim to be his top political operative," said Ayoob, who worked for Reid from 1997 to 2002 as legislative counsel.

Ayoob also insisted that Reid's "decision to sign or send letters is always based on what's in the best interest of Nevada. Any suggestion otherwise is clearly self-serving."

The people who were actually close to Abramoff generally fare pretty well in the book.

Former Rep. Robert Ney (R-Ohio) -- the only member of Congress jailed in the Abramoff scandal after confessing that he essentially sold himself and his office -- comes off as a pliant tool.

Despite evidence that Republican activist and power broker Grover Norquist solicited and funneled funds from Abramoff's Indian gaming clients, Abramoff insists in the book that Norquist simply got money because the tribes admired his stand against taxation.

Former House Majority Leader Tom DeLay -- who Abramoff lavished with trips, gifts and donations -- "never once asked me for a contribution, let alone strong-armed me," Abramoff writes.

Resurgent GOP operative Ralph Reed, who secretly worked with Abramoff on behalf of the Coushatas Tribe, is depicted as a bad sport at golf and a bit of a blowhard. When Reed told Abramoff that newly-elected president George W. Bush "personally" told him "that his presidency would make all of us very rich," Abramoff discounted it as Reed's "hard sell." But Abramoff thinks Reed's only real mistake was in publicly denying that he took money from tribes: "He should have been proud about it."

In the last chapter of his book, Abramoff portrays himself as someone who supports genuine reform -- advocating, for instance, that members of Congress and congressional staffers be barred for life from ever working for any organization that lobbies.

But he doesn't help identify the people he corrupted who are still on the Hill.

And when he advocates on behalf of a new organization to fight the influence of money, he writes that it "should be modeled like the effective and powerful group Grover built, Americans for Tax Reform."

* * * * *

Dan Froomkin is senior Washington correspondent for The Huffington Post. You can send him an e-mail, bookmark his page, subscribe to his RSS feed, follow him on Twitter, friend him on Facebook, become a fan and get email alerts when he writes.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON -- Jack Abramoff doesn't name names in his new book. He does, however, take a few shots at people he felt did him wrong. In "Capitol Punishment: The Hard Truth About Washington Corruptio...
WASHINGTON -- Jack Abramoff doesn't name names in his new book. He does, however, take a few shots at people he felt did him wrong. In "Capitol Punishment: The Hard Truth About Washington Corruptio...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 104
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4  Next ›  Last »  (4 total)
08:01 AM on 11/13/2011
Jeff Froomkin, It appears Sen. Byron Dorgan (D-ND) is shading the truth a bit with his denials of taking Abramoff funds as the Washington Post reported in Dec 2005 (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/12/13/AR2005121301582.html) that, while chairman of the Senate Indian Affairs Committee, Dorgan accepted $67,000 from the Indian Tribe clients Abramoff represented and was forced to return the money after the Abramoff scandal broke. So, while Dorgan may not have received money from Abramhoff's hand, he did take illegal donations that he was forced to give back. You might want to correct your story as it currently reads as if Dorgan was a relatively innocent bystander rather than what he actually was which was a major player who got his hand caught in the illegal donations cookie jar but was excused because he was a powerful DEMOCRAT Senator.
Personally, I believe the main mistake Abramoff made was giving most of his donations to Republicans ($4.2 million vs $3.1 million to Dems). If he had been giving most of his money to the Dems they would have done what they've done so many times before and, with the assistance of their friends in the Mainstream Media, swept the whole thing under the rug. Then Abramoff wouldn't have spent a day in jail.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
TXconfidnz
Schpelling Bea Regect
10:38 AM on 11/02/2011
I think the republicans may have found their next candidate...
photo
spud3
Forward into oblivion
03:25 PM on 11/11/2011
In total, Senate Democrats and their national committees have accepted $3.1 million, compared with $4.3 million in contributions to Republicans from Abramoff, his clients and his associates.
Not that much different....how do you feel now?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
TXconfidnz
Schpelling Bea Regect
08:49 AM on 11/13/2011
What your post has to do in response to my post, I don't understand. My comment was regarding this man's tactics... nothing to do with campaign contributions. Nice spin, though!
photo
guveqzero
Inventor and Innovator
08:06 AM on 11/02/2011
If we lived in a just world, Dick Cheney would just be getting out jail. But, we don't. Our system of law needs to be reformed to change from promoting commerce to insuring justice.
07:09 AM on 11/02/2011
Abramoff should watch his back. Literally.

Too many powerful people do not want him to speak up.
12:37 PM on 11/02/2011
The DC madam found that out.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
John Boyle
Disabled Viet Nam Vet
06:59 AM on 11/02/2011
After reading this I wonder when dancing Tom DeLay will be going to prison.
07:10 AM on 11/02/2011
Or Reid.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Skeetshooter
Artist, writer, provocateur
04:46 AM on 11/02/2011
We can now add pathological vindictive liar to Abramoff's formidable list of credits. We can only hope this book of slanders generates civil suits that negate any profits he might earn.
07:11 AM on 11/02/2011
Or book might be true. In this case many powerful people will decide to leave politics.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
hsspringman
We can cure fundamentalist.
03:39 AM on 11/02/2011
He is out already? We really need to increase the time to serve for these criminals that purchase our representatives, I think life without a chance of parole would be sufficient... and they can share a cell with the politicians and civil servants that they purchased. The sentences should be carried out in the general population of a State Prison, no special treatment allowed.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
jsgaetano
Legum servi sumus ut liberi esse possimus
02:47 AM on 11/02/2011
So crook, liar, thief, and convicted felon Jack Abramoff says he wants to be just like Grover Norquist? Yeah, of course- Norquist is a crook, liar, thief, and has never been in prison.
SirCoolBreeze
GOP'ers = Alleged Unindicted Co-conspirators
04:56 AM on 11/02/2011
Um, Norquist was getting money from Abramoff's Native American Gaming
clients for lobbying efforts.
Norquist wishes he could be monetarily as big as Abramoff was.
Abramoff was a serious Shark and Norquist was, and still is, a parasite.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
jsgaetano
Legum servi sumus ut liberi esse possimus
11:43 AM on 11/02/2011
But Norquist is a puppetmaster of the Goop... and he didn't go to jail and get nationally disgraced.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
jsgaetano
Legum servi sumus ut liberi esse possimus
02:21 AM on 11/02/2011
So as always, the standard conservative non-apology is they aren't sorry for what they did, they're sorry they got caught.
photo
yukoner1
Living way up the left coast.
01:44 AM on 11/02/2011
Not to worry Jack, redemption is at hand at HuffPo. Witness the resurrection of one convicted felon, currently residing in a Florida prison, namely Conrad Black who has secured himself a blog post here. You too can find life after prison at HuffPo.
11:31 PM on 11/01/2011
Myah, see, myah! Lissen here copper. I'm in jail now but just wait til I get out and you'll be wearing concrete galoshes see, myah!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
CPAwADD
Always look on the bright side of life.
10:58 PM on 11/01/2011
Money is the problem but Jack Abramoff and the Republicans took it took another level.
photo
zelda777
transcend the B. S.
11:56 PM on 11/01/2011
He should run for president on the GOTP ticket. He'd fit right in!
photo
spud3
Forward into oblivion
03:35 PM on 11/11/2011
In total, Senate Democrats and their national committees have accepted $3.1 million, compared with $4.3 million in contributions to Republicans from Abramoff, his clients and his associates.
Would you care to include Democrats in your statement?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
benney44
10:57 PM on 11/01/2011
How did he get out of prison so quickly?
SirCoolBreeze
GOP'ers = Alleged Unindicted Co-conspirators
04:49 AM on 11/02/2011
He had a superb lawyer. Abbe Lowell.
09:24 PM on 11/01/2011
This man's allegations may be suspicious, but I find it even harder to believe that he was only corrupt liar in Washington, or even the worst.

There are exactly zero people immune to the corruption of power.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Johnny Galileo
10:45 PM on 11/01/2011
Hah! FYI, I'm immune from power, because I'll never have it.

Damn.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Irene Rubaum-Keller
author of the book Foodaholic, psychotherapist