More

Occupy Wall Street's Message Gains Momentum In Congress

Tom Harkin

Posted: 11/02/11 04:15 PM ET

WASHINGTON -- Occupy Wall Street is finding a louder voice in Congress as lawmakers invoked its rhetoric repeatedly Wednesday in attempts to crack down on speculation, punish dangerous mine operators and pass a jobs bill.

Sen. Tom Harkin (D-Iowa) and Rep. Peter DeFazio (D-Ore.) acknowledged that the Occupy movement could help advance legislation they rolled out designed to "squeeze ... volatility out of the market."

Joined by Rep. Bruce Braley (D-Iowa), the chairman of the Populist Caucus, Harkin and DeFazio introduced the Targeted Wall Street Trading Tax bill. It would levy a tax equivalent to three cents for every $100 on transactions like stock trades, credit swaps and derivatives that were largely blamed for the mortgage market meltdown and financial crisis of 2008 that plunged the economy into recession.

Harkin said the bill targets large-scale investors. "By setting the tax rate very low, the measure is not likely to impact the decision to engage in productive economic activity," he said at a press conference. But he said the amounts would add up for the big players, serving as both a check on reckless speculation and a deficit-cutting measure that could bring in hundreds of billions to help rebuild the country.

The tax, Harkin said, "is a matter of simple prudence, fairness, and fiscal sanity."

Further, DeFazio argued that economic recovery requires tamping down the most excessive activities on Wall Street. "Part of the recovery effort would be aimed toward squeezing out the most speculative of traders, those that are trading either derivatives, contracts, futures, stocks, [a] thousand times a second," he said at the presser. "We think it's about equity, we think it's about fairness, we think it's about making Wall Street pay for the recovery on Main Street."

House Republicans are adamantly opposed to all such tax measures, including on transactions, so the measure stands little chance of becoming law. But Harkin said that with Occupy Wall Street in the backdrop, "more and more people around the country are supporting what they're seeing. ...There's been a great groundswell of support there and I think once they find out about this I think they're going to be very supportive."

DeFazio added that perhaps the Occupiers have channeled progressive Democrats in Congress, saying the movement offers "a clear visual image of the policies the three of us have been advocating since the collapse of our economy in 2007. And we've been talking about fixes and talking about reining in speculation and they're basically giving a human voice to the policies and principles we've been advocating."

The lawmakers spoke after Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) again invoked the 99 percent in his push to move a $60 billion infrastructure and jobs bill, repeating his claim that the 1 percent now earn more than the other 99 percent combined. It is that 1 percent who would pay a 0.7 percent tax on income above $1 million to fund the jobs measure.

Reid was echoed by Sen. Carl Levin (D-Mich.), who said there is only one group of Americans that has done well financially in the last few decades, and that is the wealthiest 1 percent. "The rest of Americans, middle-income Americans, have either lost ground or gotten nowhere," he said on the Senate floor.

And earlier, Rep. George Miller (D-Calif.) took to the House floor to hold up Massey Energy and the deadly Big Branch Mine explosion as an example of why the Occupy Wall Street movement is spreading. The methane explosion killed 29 people last year in a disaster that investigators found was entirely avoidable.

"If you wonder why people are talking about the 1 percent and the 99 percent, the 99 percent in the mine had their lives put in danger every day," Miller said in highlighting a new report on the catastrophe.

"But the 1 percent, the 1 percent walked away with $195 million for overseeing one of the most dangerous mining operations in the history of this country," he said, referring to the recent sale of Massey that generated those profits for the former company leaders.

"Now we understand the disparity, why people are occupying Wall Street, why people are occupying home towns all over the country," Miller said. "We understand this."


FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON -- Occupy Wall Street is finding a louder voice in Congress as lawmakers invoked its rhetoric repeatedly Wednesday in attempts to crack down on speculation, punish dangerous mine operators ...
WASHINGTON -- Occupy Wall Street is finding a louder voice in Congress as lawmakers invoked its rhetoric repeatedly Wednesday in attempts to crack down on speculation, punish dangerous mine operators ...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 182
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MichaelRCooke
A cartoonist and webmaster.
12:01 AM on 11/27/2011
I'd like to see a bill that if you want to speculate on oil, you must be prepared to accept a shipment.
photo
jim dorino
keep the middle class alive
09:17 PM on 11/03/2011
I'd love to see a pol have the courage to introduce a bill that takes away tax breaks for any profitable company that sends American jobs overseas and takes away benefits and pensions from their employees. Too many of these pols are in the back pocket of these greedy corporations.
12:50 PM on 11/03/2011
an immediate end to privately funded campaigns needs to be enacted, and the publicly funded ones need to limit the amount spent by candidates campaigning. No one I know wants to see candidates campaigning for a year and a half, wants to see these people in person, or watch countless attack ads for the 5-6 months leading up to the election. Also, any one currently holding public office, needs to vacate that office while on the campaign trail, as they are obviously not doing their job, and if they are, not to the best of their abilities.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lNSCOUT
06:27 AM on 11/03/2011
JUST REINSTATE GLASS STERAGALL! IDIOTS!

end the BRIBES
end the loopholes....yes millionaires in congress....raise your taxes!
end money as free speech
end the war machine
stop the idiocy!

and PRIMARY ANY DEM OR REPUBLICAN THAT IS AGAINST THIS AND VOTE THEM OUT!
02:07 AM on 11/07/2011
can we invite the UN to come monitor our elections as they monitor some elections in various "corrupt"
countries?
05:07 AM on 11/03/2011
I don't know why all you Occupiers are denying Socialism; Socialism is why Swedish Ikea workers make a living wage with fair benefits while the Ikea workers in Kentucky collect food stamps cause they make LESS THAN HALF their Swedish counterparts. When I shop in Ikea I will not touch ANYTHING made in the USA cause the Swedish products are so far superior. I OPENLY support Social Democracy similar to what the Scandinavian countries have. And I also support releasing EVERY victim of the war on drugs and filling those empty beds with the billionaires who have raped our country.

Where is the 'justice for all' when we give people 25 years for a single crack rock but give billions in bonuses to people that have literally destroyed millions of lives? This is such a perversion of justice that God himself must intervene; and if he wont intervene he is not God.
12:51 PM on 11/03/2011
unfortunately, it seems society has become so perverse, that it may only be God who can change it now.
01:39 AM on 11/03/2011
I myself is living through hardship. But the only thing I believe OWS will achieve is all the occupiers will be able to tell their kids and grandchildren that they participated. Really, when you think about it. What will it achieve? So far nothing have change and I seriously doubt that anything will change from it. All the politicians sleeps in a nice comfortable bed every night and get the next day to cater to big money. So does all the bigwigs on Wall St too. You want change? Find new leaders to run the country. And just hope they can't be bought with BIG MONEY.
03:02 AM on 11/03/2011
OWS has already changed the conversation. The Republicans keep trying to make it about whiny poor people, but people are really coming together over OWS. I know Tea Party people who support OWS, some of them even joining in with the protestors. OWS has re-focused the attention of the news media and some people in Congress. That's quite something.
05:57 AM on 11/03/2011
Oakland was shut down today by 20,000+ people. They even blockaded the city port.
02:10 AM on 11/07/2011
the white house was surrounded by 12,000 protesting the tar shale pipeline.
photo
vmf211
Fighting against Liberalism everyday
01:32 AM on 11/03/2011
That's the Democratic Party they run and need depnedent people to make up their party and to vote for them.
If you are dependent more than likely you are a democrat.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jesster
01:37 AM on 11/03/2011
I think you mean the better educated you are (self educated counts too) and the more you understand how life and society work - the more you will (finally) realize and understand that we are all INTERDEPENDENT.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LeftHandUTurn
How long have I been out?
02:18 AM on 11/03/2011
The effort to rein in the markets and get us away from speculation is because it is dangerous. It actually HURTS people. This isn't the 19th century any longer, please move into the present, Cons! Back then the entire country could be made to suffer because of irresponsible Wall St. speculators. And apparently this kind of thing is still permissible. IT. MUST. STOP.

Has nothing to do w/ dependency, as Jesster correctly identified: it has to do w/ Interdependence.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Annie LaChapelle
Has no clever screen name....
06:58 AM on 11/03/2011
Exactly. I personally couldn't care less how much money someone makes on Wall Street, but when (for example) their speculation causes my price at the pump, my heating fuel and eventually my grocery bill to skyrocket against all laws of supply and demand, yeah, that ticks me off. And that's what government regulation needs to do. Rein in that type of thing so the little guy doesn't get trampled.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Achilles1963
01:23 AM on 11/03/2011
Too bad Obama is not on board. He opposes the Wall Street tax and any attempts at regulation. And he expects us to believe that he will remove tax breaks for the rich "This Time" when he refused to do it "Last Time".
06:00 AM on 11/03/2011
lolz. It's a huge part of his Jobs bill. He's hugely in favor of it.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Achilles1963
07:05 AM on 11/03/2011
Unless he's changed his opinion in the last day you are sadly mistaken. (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/rose-ann-demoro/financial-transaction-tax-obama_b_1026017.html)...... Now try and keep up with the issue.
Wupta
Parent
01:16 AM on 11/03/2011
Every single law that has been passed has done so because of our politicians. They are all responsible for what has happened. They and they alone made it possible for corporations to gain control. Enough said.
05:21 AM on 11/03/2011
That's why need campaign finance reform.. politician­s need more and more money to run and in 94% the guy with the more money wins. So they are beholden to their big contributo­rs who happen to be the corporatio­ns and the very rich. We need mandatory public financing and revoke Citizens united.
02:22 AM on 11/07/2011
But they are the ones who debate, write the bills on campaign finance reform, AND vote for or against it so it will never happen.
Congress has been making all the rules for a country that is failing on many levels yet vote themselves raises every year.. Wall Street destroyed the economy and then called themselves "the best and brightest" they claimed they needed to keep happy and at their jobs to justify the millions/billions in bonuses they award each other.
THEY ARE THE EVIL-DOERS.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mlrose529
The world is watching in stupefied horror.
09:59 PM on 11/03/2011
It's interesting how OWS and the Tea Party search for accountability in different places. OWS is focused on Finance while the TP blames the government. The fact is, both groups are right. A large reason we are where we are is because of the fluidity that exists between government and private corporations. CEOs of major polluters head up the EPA, Goldman Sachs is entrenched in the White House...the former and future CEO of Halliburton, the American Vice-president, guided President Bush to a war that, for all intents and purposes, was sponsored by his own company. A war fought for the murkiest of political reasons but for the clearest of economic reasons. There is more than a whiff of the fox in the henhouse and it's been facilitated to varying degrees by both political parties.

Thus, the search for accountability is really a chicken-and-egg proposition. Adding to the confusion, the most politicized Supreme Court in memory has played their own huge role in the systemic breakdown. Bottom line:the whole power structure is rotted from within and from without by corruption and by the petty egos of below-average statesmen -- More rot, subpar candidates -- run amok. I deeply wish the TP and OWS could stop bickering over who's responsible for what and just come together in common cause. Things would start changing tomorrow.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dawn2dusk
ptsmkgblkhndideochrstnsocllibrlfsclmodrtmslm10%R
12:29 AM on 11/03/2011
As quiet as its kept, the average congressmen, not the senior, high profile ones, actually low paid civil servants who bunk together in dorms and hotels when in DC. the problem is low pay coupled with significant influence potential makes naturally, unavoidably fertile breeding ground for corruption. same goes for the judicial system.

incentive compensation structures drive behavior, ALWAYS. eg investment banking (M&A), for- profit-prisons, for-profit secondary education, etc
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Achilles1963
01:33 AM on 11/03/2011
The pay for a freshman congressman is $174,000/yr. You call that low pay? They just spent the better part of a day debating a commemorative coin for major league baseball. They are highly overpaid. If they were paid what they are worth $10/hr might be excessive.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jesster
01:33 AM on 11/03/2011
In the House, the pay is modest by Wall Street standards - but not THAT low and anyone who wants to know can easy find out what they are paid (the benefit and perks are somewhat less easy to identify.) Most Senators are independently wealthy and it's not like they won't just about kill for the privilege of holding such "high" office....

I fully agree about the temptations and enormous potential for corruption. Beyond getting the big money and lobbyists out of the act - I don't know what the best solutions are - and I'm not sure what you are proposing. Care to elaborate?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dawn2dusk
ptsmkgblkhndideochrstnsocllibrlfsclmodrtmslm10%R
08:06 AM on 11/03/2011
Before I descend into all out demonization of our congresspeople, I wanted to attempt to offer some balance. Not everyone congress is evil and all of them are not rich. I wanted to acknowledge those that have to maintain two households, to acknowledge their "99 percent-ness" as it were, That being said...

Proposal is that we need to understand the inherent conflicts of interest in our political process between our congress who are our stewards and fiduciaries who are paid modestly (its all relative) to hold our trust, meanwhile deep pocketed lobbyists exist solely to influence them against our (99.8%) interests The removal of "big money and lobbyists" is a solid strategy although easier said than done Unfortunately, I have no magic bullet nor sadly much that's new
photo
knewsreply
PhD: International Educator and Marketer
11:03 PM on 11/02/2011
Was there no GOP support or are they all on the side of the 1%?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jesster
11:22 PM on 11/02/2011
They prefer to march in "goose-step" - er lock step...
photo
FilthyHarry
Expletive Deleted
08:52 PM on 11/02/2011
Given that the ultimate message of OWS is to get money out of politics I'm pretty sure its not really gaining momentum in congress. What is gaining momentum in congress is the recognition that they must pay lip service to OWS.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jesster
11:26 PM on 11/02/2011
Good distinction.
Not good news - but the distinction that you point out is an important one.
Thanks.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dawn2dusk
ptsmkgblkhndideochrstnsocllibrlfsclmodrtmslm10%R
12:19 AM on 11/03/2011
so true FilthyHarry! i was trying not to be cynical (again)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Derni
08:41 PM on 11/02/2011
lest the Congress forget they have a 9% approval rating..and it is not due to the fact that Americans are angry..upset..those Americans that are informed and read the news regularly know that the GOP has consistently blocked attempts to move on legislation to help the economy and the unemployed. We also realize that the OCCUPY Wall St movement is about riding America of the PLUTOCRACY that rules ..we know our votes are not meaningful..we know Wall st and corporate America run the USA..we know that the Supreme Court has made glaring errors -one even breaking with the Constitution-in order to make corporations individuals...this is about major social and economic changes that need to happen...V for Vendetta
tonybfine
fractional reserve lending is counterfeiting
01:34 AM on 11/07/2011
"This not a simple reform. This is a revolution"
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
08:22 PM on 11/02/2011
Interesting ALL DEMOCRATS...imagine that!!
Republicans want to keep the world safe for massive fraud I guess.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Dosadi
Political agnostic
09:18 PM on 11/02/2011
"Republican­s want to keep the world safe for massive fraud I guess. " You are so right. Congratulations you figured them out.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jesster
11:45 PM on 11/02/2011
Well, that is their primary "raisin d'etre" - the rest is just to add a dash of depth and drama.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lulubelle1956
08:21 PM on 11/02/2011
Thank you OWS and Dems, in that order!