More

Switzerland Offers U.S. Multibillion-Dollar Settlement Over Tax Evasion Controversy

Credit Suisse

First Posted: 11/03/11 05:59 PM ET Updated: 11/03/11 06:10 PM ET

(Lynnley Browning) - The government of Switzerland has proposed a multibillion-dollar settlement with U.S. authorities over allegations that it helped wealthy Americans avoid billions of dollars in U.S. taxes, according to sources briefed on the matter.

The proposed civil settlement, put forward in recent months by Swiss authorities to the U.S. Internal Revenue Service, would cover all banks in Switzerland, numbering about 355, sources briefed on the matter said. It could reach $10 billion or more, said a source briefed on the matter.

The deal would include some 11 banks now under criminal investigation -- among them Credit Suisse AG and HSBC Holdings PLC -- by the U.S. Justice Department, which suspects them of having enabled wealthy Americans to hide billions of dollars in assets in offshore accounts. Some experts view the deal as a long shot, in the face of an unprecedented crackdown by U.S. authorities.

Switzerland, which has watched the Justice Department indict scores of Swiss bankers and their American clients, is eager to resolve the matter once and for all, especially following a letter in August from a senior U.S. law enforcement official threatening even tougher action.

JUSTICE DEPARTMENT SKEPTICAL

The proposal has been met with skepticism from the Justice Department, which wants to exclude those 11 or so banks from a civil settlement, sources briefed on the matter said. Instead, these sources said, the agency wants to negotiate separate deals with these banks, possibly deferred-prosecution or non-prosecution agreements. It remains to be seen how the IRS and Justice would resolve any differences.

Michael Ambuehl, Switzerland's state secretary for the Finance Ministry and the country's chief negotiator on international tax matters, was due to leave Washington on Thursday after days of talks with IRS officials on the matter. Asked Thursday in Bern about the talks, Mario Tuor, a spokesman for Ambuehl, said that "the negotiations are ongoing" but declined to provide details.

Anthony Burke, an IRS spokesman, declined on Thursday to comment.

The IRS, which referred the names of the 11 banks to the Justice Department, is conducting a civil investigation of scores of other Swiss banks among the 355. Under U.S. legal procedures, a civil settlement with banks over their American customers' unpaid taxes is generally the legal province of the IRS.

Credit Suisse AG, Switzerland's second-largest bank, last July received a target letter from the Justice Department notifying it that it was formally under advanced criminal investigation. Others under investigation include HSBC Holdings PLC and smaller Swiss private banks and cantonal banks, including Basler Kantonalbank, Wegelin and Julius Baer .

One tax expert not involved in the talks cast doubt on any notion that a civil settlement would prompt the Justice Department to drop its criminal cases against the 11 banks. "It is difficult to imagine that the Justice Department, having done what had previously been impossible, that is, made strong criminal cases against Swiss banks violating U.S. law, will just walk away," said Robert Katzberg, a white-collar criminal defense lawyer in New York with American clients of Swiss banks.

SWISS ATTACH STRINGS

The proposal has strings attached. The Swiss want to pay a large monetary fine without being required to turn over any client names or client data, a move that would breach a Swiss tradition of bank secrecy stemming from the Middle Ages.

But the Justice Department is opposed to any deal that involves only money and does not include a handover of client names and data, sources briefed on the matter said. It also wants a deal in which by 2013, no Swiss banks hold undeclared offshore accounts for Americans, though it is unclear how such a watershed in Swiss financial secrecy would be achieved or monitored.

There are some signs that the IRS may in fact be unwilling to craft a deal without a requirement for a turnover of names. Case in point: in September, the agency began mailing an unusual, one-page questionnaire to American taxpayers who entered its voluntary disclosure programs in recent years.

The questionnaire, a copy of which was obtained by Reuters, asks taxpayers to answer "yes" or "no" to 10 questions regarding their undeclared offshore accounts. Questions include "did a representative of the foreign financial institution visit you in the United States regarding the offshore account or asset?"

The IRS questionnaire could be a warm-up to a broad request, known as a John Doe summons, to Swiss banks to disclose client data, sources briefed on the matter said.

UNUSUAL LETTER

In August, James Cole, the deputy attorney general and the second-highest ranking law enforcement official in the United States, wrote to Swiss officials in an unusual, three-page letter dated August 31 that the IRS and Justice Department intended to serve a John Doe summons on 11 Swiss banks if the banks did not turn over broad statistical data, not including client names, on their accounts. At least some banks turned over the data, according to sources briefed on the matter.

A fresh summons would mirror one served on Swiss bank giant UBS AG in 2008 that sought to force the bank to turn over 52,000 names of American clients. That summons was dropped only in 2010, more than a year after UBS averted indictment and reached a $780 million deferred-prosecution agreement with the Justice Department over charges it sold tax evasion services to rich Americans. UBS ultimately turned over 4,450 client names.

The Swiss are pushing for a civil settlement by year's end, but any potential deal would likely not take place until next spring, according to sources briefed on the matter.

Switzerland, a noted tax haven that is the global capital of offshore private banking, holds 27 percent, or $2 trillion, of the world's offshore wealth, according to a 2010 study by the Boston Consulting Group.

U.S. officials say Swiss banks and their American clients have yet to declare the bulk of the hidden wealth, and point to two recent IRS disclosure programs that brought in only $2.7 billion from 30,000 American taxpayers with accounts in 140 countries. "It's a fraction of the total still out there," said one U.S. government official briefed on the matter, adding that perhaps one quarter of the $2 trillion, or $500 billion, could be undeclared money held by American taxpayers.

Copyright 2011 Thomson Reuters. Click for Restrictions.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Money newsletter!
(Lynnley Browning) - The government of Switzerland has proposed a multibillion-dollar settlement with U.S. authorities over allegations that it helped wealthy Americans avoid billions of dollars ...
(Lynnley Browning) - The government of Switzerland has proposed a multibillion-dollar settlement with U.S. authorities over allegations that it helped wealthy Americans avoid billions of dollars ...
Filed by Maxwell Strachan  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 231
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4  Next ›  Last »  (4 total)
JDOK
Listen, Read, Think and then Post
10:48 AM on 11/07/2011
This is a great example of the greed and criminality that the 99% er's are protesting. On the one hand we have young people who can't pay their college debt because they can't find jobs, and on the other hand you have these slugs that bury their money overseas in hidden accounts to avoid taxes as our country slowly slides into bankruptcy. I hope that somebody is able to uncover the names and addresses of the owners of these accounts and publishes them. Now that's a book that I would buy and also an address that I would march on.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Patriot86
Compassion is the basis of all morality.
04:50 AM on 11/07/2011
No because the rich tax scofflaws will keep stealing our money.
02:33 AM on 11/07/2011
Accepting a settlement for criminal action is corruption again only on a larger scale.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dtallwalk
06:17 PM on 11/06/2011
See how this is working it sounds like a payoff can they buy off the IRS like that
That's not right
And in the mean time the rich tax evaders go Scott free and continue to keep there accounts
Off shore and not pay there taxes
They should all have to go to jail for a long time but they will get away with it
Not. Right
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
nyjjc
Dark Lord of the Facts
10:20 AM on 11/06/2011
Let's think about this for a second. If the Swiss are willing to simply hand over $10 billion in exchange for not having to provide any information, how much money do you think that these tax evaders will ACTUALLY owe? Answer: multiples of that $10 billion figure.

Tell them to take their deal and shove it where the sun doesn't shine.
barbra1971
Sherry Hunt my hero
11:14 AM on 11/06/2011
$ 10 billion?

How the US sent $12bn in cash to Iraq. And watched it vanish

Special flights brought in tonnes of banknotes which disappeared into the war zone
How the US sent $12bn in cash to Iraq. And watched it vanish

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2007/feb/08/usa.iraq1

Where is the logic here? We drop billions to disappear and then we go on spending spree with investigations to get mere half back?
I don't understand this game at all.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
nyjjc
Dark Lord of the Facts
02:21 PM on 11/06/2011
So, let me get this straight: Because the government i.diotically spent $12 billion in Iraq it can't account for, we should just let tax evaders go?

Astoundingly asinine logic.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
forestnfama
I was born at a very early age....
03:36 AM on 11/06/2011
If the US accepts a deal it will be with the devil and it will be for the soul of America... Rich Americans need to be prosecuted and thrown in jail in order for those who follow will not try and do the same thing..... Greed is a powerful elixir when exercised in secrecy. Throw the corporate trolls in jail including the rich old ladies who are hiding the wealth of their pass away husbands. Less this and nothing will change.......If Martha Stewart can serve time then anyone who breaks the law should be too....
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Patriot86
Compassion is the basis of all morality.
04:52 AM on 11/07/2011
I owed the IRS after unemployment ...and all..I had to pay it ...why should these people pay noting...they are criminals and should be jailed.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Mondayboy
Rebel with a cause
09:06 AM on 11/05/2011
If they are offering $10 billion, then the real money at stake may be about $1 Trillion or $1000 billion. US should not accept this deal and go ahead and prosecute the tax evaders and punish those Swiss banks.
12:38 PM on 11/05/2011
Unlikely. Individual foreign accounts in Switzerland are estimated at $660billion. The US part is probably a small part of that.
How can you punish Swiss banks if they don't even have a presence in the US. US laws stop at the US borders but Americans seem to have a tough time with that concept.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Mondayboy
Rebel with a cause
05:29 PM on 11/05/2011
You are wrong on many counts.

1. The Swiss banks do a lot of business in the U.S. They can be banned from trading on U.S exchanges and the like.
2. They are breaking U.S law by providing escape avenues for U.S. citizens to evade taxes.
3. When there is an international agreement and a country breaks it, the U.S reserves the right not to do business with that country or even to impose sanctions against it. Switzerland is no exception. For e.g. let Switzerland try and do business with Iran and see if there will be no repercussions.
4. U.S. citizens are bound by U.S. law and any nation that tries to undermine that is going against the U.S. directly.

In short, if the U.S bans these banks from doing business with or within the U.S. they will be in big trouble.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Nobody78
A little left of Center
01:07 PM on 11/06/2011
We punished Saddam and Bin laden and they were far beyond our borders, so what's your point. I'm sure you didn't care about borders when it came to Iraq. When has the US ever respected borders?
05:04 PM on 11/04/2011
An OECD study in 20 countries found that increased cooperation meant the campaign against use of tax havens prompted 100,000 wealthy taxpayers to disclose assets and pay 14 billion in taxes, Mr. Owen said. He said an estimated 1 trillion in assets still is hidden from tax authorities.
12:27 PM on 11/04/2011
Let those pay their fair share
11:50 AM on 11/04/2011
Good move, too little for our deficit
12:28 PM on 11/04/2011
I agree
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Nobody78
A little left of Center
11:39 AM on 11/04/2011
And the wealthy tax dodgers walk away with no jail time, No Thanks!!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
2garen
11:26 AM on 11/04/2011
When such a settlement lets criminal behavior continue on it will make a mockery of our legal system.... Oh yah that is what has been going on for the years now..
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Dennis Higgins
10:50 AM on 11/04/2011
No transparency can be expected from the GOP and the 1% they represent. Get use to it, or vote them out of office.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kelleyajones
10:18 AM on 11/04/2011
...and the American 99% deserve names!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kelleyajones
10:15 AM on 11/04/2011
Absolutely No to any settlement that protects banks and depositors from criminal prosecution. If the banks are offering 10 billion it leads me to believe the evasion amount is in the 10s of trillions.