iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Tammy Baldwin To Introduce Resolution Opposing Immunity For Banks In Foreclosure Deal


First Posted: 11/03/11 10:00 AM ET Updated: 11/03/11 10:00 AM ET

WASHINGTON -- Rep. Tammy Baldwin (D-Wis.) is set to introduce a resolution in Congress this week calling on the Obama administration and state attorneys general to ensure that any deal reached with the nation's biggest banks on foreclosure abuses includes full investigations into what happened, awards proper compensation to victims and provides no immunity for potential wrongdoing.

U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder and the state AGs have been working with the nation's five largest mortgage firms -- Ally Financial, Bank of America, Citigroup, JPMorgan Chase and Wells Fargo -- to settle disputes over potentially illegal foreclosure practices, such as the so-called robo-signing of foreclosure documents.

Baldwin's resolution states that any settlement should follow three guidelines: 1) Banks that engaged in fraudulent behavior "should not be granted criminal or civil immunity for potential wrongdoing related to illegal mortgage and foreclosure practices," 2) the federal government and state AGs should "proceed with full investigations into claims of fraudulent behavior by mortgage servicers" and 3) any monetary sum paid by the banks should "appropriately compensate for, and accurately reflect, the extent of harm to all victims."

"We have to do the best we can to make innocent victims whole. But secondly, especially in light of the taxpayer bailout of the biggest banks, we owe taxpayers a solemn effort to do everything we can do to uncover what went wrong and whether laws were broken," Baldwin said in an interview with The Huffington Post. "Part of that is to make certain this won't happen again. That, to me, is one of the most basic responsibilities we have."

According to news reports of a possible settlement between the parties, banks would pay around $20-25 billion in return for immunity from state lawsuits.

"While I can't discuss the details of our negotiations, I will say that we are negotiating a limited -- not a broad -- civil liability release. We are discussing additional ways to help homeowners while still holding the banks accountable," said Geoff Greenwood, spokesman for lead negotiator Iowa Attorney General Tom Miller.

Baldwin's resolution follows a letter she wrote to Holder on Nov. 1, in which she argued that the low sum being discussed in settlement talks would be insufficient to help underwater homeowners. Twenty-four of her colleagues in the House of Representatives joined her on the letter.

"These underwater homeowners owe roughly $750 billion more than their homes are currently worth," she wrote. "This $750 billion stands in contrast to reports of a $20 billion settlement with mortgage servicers. We are concerned that this $20 billion will provide little help to the estimated 14.6 million struggling homeowners who are underwater. Indeed, many of these families have been victims of outright fraud, and they deserve justice and just compensation."

Obama administration officials, such as Housing and Urban Development Secretary Shaun Donovan and Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner, have repeatedly said they would like to see a quick resolution to the mortgage probe.

When asked why there is such a push for a settlement amongst some of the members involved in the probe, Baldwin replied, "What I've read is that there's an interest in resolving this prior to the next set of elections."

But, she cautioned, such a strategy could backfire. "I do fear that a settlement that is just a tiny drop in the bucket, given all the devastation that's occurred because of this, would have strong political ramifications," she said.

The negotiations originally involved AGs from all 50 states, but a handful of them have pulled out due to concerns reflected in Baldwin's resolution.

New York State Attorney General Eric Schneiderman (D) has been the leading voice pushing for a narrower deal, expressing concern that the proposed settlement would preclude state AGs from fully investigating and prosecuting banks found to have committed wrongdoing. In late August, he was kicked off of the 50-state task force after he refused to go along with the quick settlement the administration and his fellow state AGs were working out. Since then, several other state AGs have backed Schneiderman's position.

Congress is not directly involved in the negotiations, but Baldwin said it was important for the administration and the state AGs to hear from the people's representatives.

"I get a lot of constituents calling my office who are underwater in their mortgages, who are paid up but can't refinance, can't get lower interest rates. They're struggling financially because of the economy," said Baldwin. "Their calls aren't even responded to by the big banks. They'll call [my office] and say, 'How am I supposed to talk about these federal programs that are out there for refinancing and help for homeowners who are underwater, if my bank won't even call me back?'"

Baldwin is running for the U.S. Senate seat in Wisconsin being vacated by Sen. Herb Kohl (D) and currently has no Democratic primary challenger. The GOP field is more crowded: former governor Tommy Thompson, Wisconsin state Assembly Speaker Jeff Fitzgerald and former congressman Mark Neumann are all running.

Baldwin's Resolution:

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON -- Rep. Tammy Baldwin (D-Wis.) is set to introduce a resolution in Congress this week calling on the Obama administration and state attorneys general to ensure that any deal reached with th...
WASHINGTON -- Rep. Tammy Baldwin (D-Wis.) is set to introduce a resolution in Congress this week calling on the Obama administration and state attorneys general to ensure that any deal reached with th...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 288
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (10 total)
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
truthfinderddw
06:38 AM on 11/22/2011
Congradulations Rep. Baldwin, You are one of the few in Washington that has attempted to do something positive in the Housing Crisis. The others apparently still need their relationship with their bank for re-election. 2012 elections should be very interesting for both Demo's and Repub's. A record of your actions or inactions are in our playbooks.
07:16 PM on 11/07/2011
"Housing and Urban Development Secretary Shaun Donovan and Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner, have repeatedly said they would like to see a quick resolution to the mortgage probe."

"Let's sweep all these bothersome problems under the rug. So we can get back our lives,
and back to business as usual. Steal a lot and return some crumbs." That is it!
08:53 PM on 11/06/2011
So everyone knows that Geithner is behind the attorney general attempts to sweep this messy banking issue under the rug. I do not know why Geithner's conflict of interest as current treasure secretary and his involvement with the federal reserve is not repeatedly exposed. After all he was appointed by Obama, who claims he wants to help the "99%." I would think that OCW would make this message a priority since there are many who are not aware of this connection and Geithner's ongoing efforts to sabotage an economic recovery. Simply put "Geithner is in bed with the big banks and has no interest in helping the 99%."
07:18 PM on 11/07/2011
As Obama told Bill Mather: "Geithner has done a heck of a job." With a nod to the Katrina debacle.
12:24 AM on 11/05/2011
DOES SHE THINK THAT THE REPUBS MASTERS WILL LET THIS PASS????
Sorry for the caps but Congress really get to me.
05:37 PM on 11/04/2011
I like your style & enjoyed your article on US Senate women up for re election. The problem with our country is that we no longer live in a Democracy but a DOLLAROCRACY!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
02:27 PM on 11/04/2011
we are all hamsters on neocon "financially engineered" and "financially innovated" wheels

police protect the wealthiest as we are robbed blind WITH NO PROSECUTIONS! goldman sachs, bernanke, dimon and chase? they decimated the middle class, lowered their own taxes, SIT ON TRILLIONS and invest in OTHER countries NOT THE US where unemployment - foreclosures - lack of quality healthcare - college students with NO HOPE and huge BANK LOANS - homelessness - are all at historic levels.

call out the police to keep the rabble down and arrest them if they videotape so there's no evidence! there will be an "internal investigation" where there are never any prosecutions in cities across the country. That's local, now onto national "law enforcement," warrant-less wiretaps are rampant. the fbi knocks out hundreds of web businesses seizing web servers looking for spammers.

http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/06/21/f-b-i-seizes-web-servers-knocking-sites-offline/

this is all about the GREATEST REDISTRIBUTION OF WEALTH IN HISTORY that republicans droned on about during the last election.

they just LIED about who it was being redistributed to. it went to the WEALTHIEST OF THE WEALTHY. they want a constant state of war, huge prisons, and a police state because it's good for their businesses.

http://www.thefiscaltimes.com/Columns/2010/10/08/Neocons-Talk-Deficit-but-Wont-Budge-on-Defense-Cuts.aspx

welcome to serfdom 2.0
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
HomeGrower
Independent - so both sides hate me
11:21 AM on 11/04/2011
We need to re-install Glass-Steagall and pass a law that does not allow a lender to sell any kind of loan thay make.

Hope the Reps dont stall this one.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
irishlion7
11:07 AM on 11/04/2011
I will give 100 to 1 odds that the Republicans will unite 100% agains this resolution! aliming that among other things it will tye up the forclosure process that the 1% of people who thought they were going to scam the banks would bet relief. And that it would be better to let the banks have free unrestricted freedom to forclose atany time onany property they wanted. With out any restrictions.
The banks know they have bypassed and broken a have doxen regulations and laws, but then they pay there legislatures well so that they can break any laws they want with out restrictions.
So my offer stands!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Howie Sheinfeld
02:15 PM on 11/04/2011
At those odds I would take your bet. This resolution is not binding on the Obama administration. It does not have the force of law. It is not a direct threat to bank assets. The banks may well decide to let the congresspersons they own vote for the resolution rather than to risk losing them in next year's elections.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
conchcept
Sir Peter Anderson Secretary Gen'l. Conch Republic
11:00 AM on 11/04/2011
Thank you Rep. Baldwin! This needs to be done...really. These banks are about to get a free pass for patently illegal activities. Hold them to the same standards that we would holdf any criminal to.

If corporations want to be people, they need to be held to the same standards as people.
10:49 AM on 11/04/2011
Here's what I see might possibly happen. You put banks into such a position that they simply hold an extremely hard line on any new mortgage applications. Or even possibly just reduce the number of mortgages they want to handle period. If that happens, who will make the mortgages that can assist the country in getting out of the mess we're in? Without the banks mortgages going full bore, there is less of an opportunity, or a long drawn out one at best, for a housing recovery. After all, without the money, no mortgage gets done. So, let's continue to shoot ourselves in the foot, even when we are trying to get out of the quicksand we got ourselves into. If you look into the full picture, banks who made the mortgages, agencies who proposed and got government approval for reduced qualifications, the government who approved the reduced qualification plan, the government who gave government grants to cities who then passed the money around for personal down payments on homes, and the people who took the money and knowing they were really unqualified for a home mortgage are all equally responsible for this housing mess. Period. And unfortunately, we, the taxpayers will have to pay for it. The bottom line is this. When government produces a program that essentially helps them to "buy" votes from those being helped by the program, we the taxpayer are the ones getting screwed. It happens every time.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
irishlion7
11:11 AM on 11/04/2011
It sound as if you are a banker or a mortgage broker who prefer to put all the blame for the banks ignoring the laws that were on the books, by blaming the govt. The poor bankers were just following the rules that allowed them to scam the govt. and to earn millions of dollard in profit and now you wish to let them off the hook. For they stealing along with a few unscruples mortgage brokers. Who saw a way to scam the goverment!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Al Jolson
regressive republicans give me gas
03:19 PM on 11/04/2011
My house is paid for, and my property taxes are low due to the housing crash. I don't care if the banks ever write another mortgage loan. The banks, like the GOP are a bunch of crooks!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Michael D Ballantine
Texas Justice Party - Chairperson
05:00 AM on 11/04/2011
If the President signs a deal that lets banks off the hook, it will be difficult for all Democrats in November. No deals without jail time.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Cleverboots
07:07 AM on 11/04/2011
Hooray for Baldwin but Obama won't support it.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Siebenstein
> there is no endless growth
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Siebenstein
> there is no endless growth
03:07 AM on 11/04/2011
Here, thank her for not selling us out!

https://tammybaldwin.house.gov/contact/email-me.shtml
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
giftsthatpurr
zestful life
02:58 PM on 11/06/2011
Only Wisconsin residents are allowed to use this link to write to her.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Siebenstein
> there is no endless growth
03:05 AM on 11/04/2011
If this administration wants civil unrest beyond what they have ever seen, go ahead and give banks immunity !

OWS !!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kvh
kvh
02:41 AM on 11/04/2011
Let's hope those Financial Terriorists on Wall Street FINALLY get theirs. I wish I could vote for her.