More

HuffPost Social Reading

Chief Operating Officers Got More Bonuses, Bigger Paychecks In 2010, Study Finds

Executive Compensation

The Huffington Post   First Posted: 11/ 4/2011 1:51 pm Updated: 01/ 4/2012 4:12 am

CEOs aren't the only ones whose paychecks keep getting bigger.

For COOs, or chief operating officers, 2010 was a very good year. Many COOs experienced a sizable jump in compensation during that time, even as the economy tottered and millions struggled to find work, according to new research.

Though executive compensation took a dip in the immediate wake of the financial crisis, as public outrage spiked and the government took steps to regulate corporate behavior, the new findings reinforce the impression that business leaders wasted no time getting their pay packages back up to size.

The research, compiled by Equilar, an executive compensation data firm, looks at the compensation for nearly 300 chief operating officers in 2010. Equilar found that the median compensation among COOs rose by 30 percent in that year -- climbing to $2.2 million in 2010 from $1.7 million in 2009.

One reason was that bonuses got bigger, Equilar found, and there were more of them. The median bonus for chief operating officers jumped 27 percent, to about $542,000 in 2010 from $425,000 in 2009. And 93 percent of COOs in Equilar's study got bonuses in 2010, compared with just 84 percent in 2009.

Equilar's findings recall other reports of corporate pay skyrocketing while middle-class wages remain relatively flat. Earlier this year, USA Today reported that median CEO pay rose by 27 percent in 2010, while compensation for private-sector workers increased by just 2.1 percent.

A practice known as "peer benchmarking," recently covered by The Washington Post, has likely contributed to the rising tide of executive pay. In an effort to stay competitive, many companies set their CEO's compensation based on what other companies are paying their own CEOs -- meaning that paychecks for those at the top are simply getting larger and larger.

In general, the highest-paid Americans are seeing their salaries accelerate at a historic pace. A recent report from the Congressional Budget Office found that the highest 1 percent of earners in the U.S. have seen their incomes nearly triple since 1979, while the incomes of all other workers have risen only modestly -- a phenomenon that one economist characterized as "Gilded Age levels of inequality."

While COO compensation was climbing in 2010, more than two million people fell below the poverty line, bringing the number of Americans in poverty to a record 46 million, according to the Census Bureau.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS

CEOs aren't the only ones whose paychecks keep getting bigger. For COOs, or chief operating officers, 2010 was a very good year. Many COOs experienced a sizable jump in compensation during that tim...
CEOs aren't the only ones whose paychecks keep getting bigger. For COOs, or chief operating officers, 2010 was a very good year. Many COOs experienced a sizable jump in compensation during that tim...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 91
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
01:11 PM on 11/11/2011
The top 1% keep getting richer while the middle class pay is shrinking.

The Republicans are trying to give the top 1% even more tax breaks while cutting safety net programs for the middle class.

THey want to end Medicare and give you a voucher. They want to end Social Security and give you a 201K. They want to end the EPA and FEMA.

These Republicans are cruel, selfish and too extreme.

They call themselves Christians with family values but seem to have missed the passage about taking care of the least among us.

It is time for average Americans to wake up from their faux noise induced coma and see what Republican policies have done to the middle class. It is time to get active, organize, register and VOTE for people that support the middle class and to get corporate money out of politics.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
psnyder325
Yep, I'm a Socialist. Deal.
08:20 PM on 11/08/2011
The Good Ol' Boys network tells one another that executives are worth more and more money each year and that the rest of us are worth less and less. This, of course, is part of the oligarchy's plan to create just two classes: the truly greedy and the truly needy. This gives the government and the corporations (really, now, they're one and the same) control over people....which is the goal of both government and corporations....to make us all cookie cutter automatons making them money. We are the new serfs and this is the new feudalism.
07:39 PM on 11/07/2011
Executive compensation consulting firms make their money by increasing executive pay. At the same time, corporations hire employee comensation consultants who make their money by keeping pay for employees down.

At the same time, for thirty years we have been told that monetary compensations isn't good motivation. With rising costs of energy, food, education, healthcare, we are actually told that we don't want bigger paychecks. I actually had one HR type tell a group of people that he appreciated getting some free movie tickets more than a cash bonus because is was more personal. Give me a break.
photo
bethechangeok
prefer alcohol
12:18 PM on 11/07/2011
So Unions, Union Wages, Union provided Healthcare, living wage policy , according to the republicans who have been telling the dopes who vote for them, is what the problem is. Your job loss is due to high wages....that has never been the case. The simple minded cannot tear themselves away from issues like abortion, religion, race ...etc when voting...they need to protect themselves from the lying liars who lie for a living....that means reading more...but then at least they would know.
08:45 PM on 11/06/2011
Peer Benchmarking is a racket in that, of course, these aggressive narcissistic executives are going to demand more pay than the average person and this creates a "method" by which they can rapidly accelerate their rate of compensation. Much like an insiders agreement within the industry and it completely freezes out the average, or even above average worker who has no such argument to offer his superiors. Often the executives on the board are appointed by the CEO in the first place and then they approve his raises he proposes with the proper studies, props and graphs, , or through the formality of his compensation lawyer in a more formal fashion, but automatically. Its a total racket.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
munki
Global to Local now Local to Global
07:15 AM on 11/06/2011
It should read... TOP senior executives ... All inclusive...
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
12:32 AM on 11/06/2011
The boards of directors are made up of other corporations C-level officers...

http://sociology.ucsc.edu/whorulesamerica/power/corporate_community.html
Who Rules America: The Corporate Community

"Interlocking directorates -- defined as the linkages among corporations created by individuals who sit on two or more corporate boards -- have been a source of research attention since the Progressive Era at the turn of the 20th century, when they were used by famous muckraking journalists, and future Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis, to claim that a few large commercial and investment banks controlled most major corporations.

Today corporate interlocks are analyzed with bigger databases and sophisticated network programs, thanks to desktop computers. The databases are large matrices that contain information on the linkages between persons and groups. Either a corporate/organizational network, based on common directors, or an interpersonal/social network, based on shared board memberships, can be derived from these matrices. That is, the matrices contain a "duality of persons and groups" (Breiger, 1974). This is worth mentioning because this essay will discuss both "corporate networks," that is, the linkages among corporations created by interlocking directorates, and "social networks," that is, the linkages among people by virtue of the fact that they sit on the same corporate board..."
Shesme
My micro-bio will no longer be silent
12:25 AM on 11/06/2011
This is not work these people are doing. It is organized crime. Paying oneself millions of dollars to scheme up ways to pay oneself and one's friends more and more is not honest work.
07:53 PM on 11/06/2011
Are you so ignorant that you actually believe this isn't work?

Not only is this work, it is work that you are nowhere near capable of handling. If you were, you would be getting paid large sums of money to do it.
Shesme
My micro-bio will no longer be silent
12:29 AM on 11/07/2011
I know I'm not capable of being a chief officer of a multinational corporation. Nor would I want to be.
Multinational corporations have ceased being businesses. They are syndicates and conglomerates designed to take money out of consumers accounts and add it to their own. Any benefit they add to the countries in which they operate is collateral to their express goal of increasing the wealth of their stockholders, i.e., themselves.
In other words, they exploit a country's economy, attempt (and often succeed) in gaining political power, and return very little to that country. Yes, they spend a very small fraction of their profits in "charitable" donations and other "philanthropies," but the damage they do, economically, socially, and ecologically cannot be undone by these pittances. They have co-opted the government of the US and most other nations, and use public services as their own, including the armed forces.
This, to me, is criminal activity, highly organized, and difficult to dislodge.
I don't need large sums of money. Perhaps you do.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
James Walton
Fair and Balanced
05:07 PM on 11/05/2011
COO's and CEO's are not the only ones getting richer. Congress is set to vote on a 10% pay increase for themselves amid their spending slashes for the rest of the nation.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tmrn31m
10:25 PM on 11/05/2011
That is the new corporate culture. Cut, cut, cut then get a huge bonus. It's ugly, unfair and only a matter of time before the tides turn. They always do.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
radiojunkie
tune addict
02:57 AM on 11/06/2011
Congress shouldn't get more than the cost of living increase and only if we have the money to pay. Otherwise... sorry suck3rs!

450 grand ain't that outrageous for a president but 174 grand for lawmakers to say "no" every other word is ridiculous.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
12:17 PM on 11/05/2011
Workers' share of national income is at an all-time low:

http://news.yahoo.com/s/yblog_thelookout/20110614/bs_yblog_thelookout/workers-share-of-national-income-plummets-to-record-low
Workers' share of national income plummets to record low - Yahoo! News

"Over the last decade, the share of U.S. national income taken home by workers has plummeted to a record low.

Check out the chart below, compiled by the Labor Department, and posted this week by conservative writer David Frum. It shows that the decline began with the brief recession that followed 9/11 in 2001. But it continued even as the economy picked up again, and got even worse once the Great Recession hit. In the weak recovery since then, workers' share of income just kept on falling..."

Corporate earnings are up:

http://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/series/CP
FRED« Corporate Profits After Tax

http://www.commondreams.org/view/2011/07/25-0
CEOs to Workers: More for Me, Less for You | Common Dreams

"...It’s no accident wages are down while corporate profits are up. As JPMorgan’s July 11 “Eye on the Market” newsletter put it, “Reductions in wages and benefits explain the majority of the net improvement in [profit] margins… US labor compensation is now at a 50-year low relative to both company sales and US GDP...”
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bynddrvn5
My micro-bio is unwritten.
03:09 PM on 11/06/2011
Thanks for the links!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
03:20 PM on 11/06/2011
You're welcome.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
njgal4obama
All others will be towed.
10:59 AM on 11/05/2011
In the minds of the American people, there is little difference between a CEO and a COO.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
nofriendofrepublicans
Mother friendly.
10:01 AM on 11/05/2011
Seems to be the corporate playbook. Lay off employees, give customers poor service, give self big raise.
09:32 PM on 11/06/2011
Yes its really that simple and it usual generates a quarter or two's higher profits which can bump up the stock price making executive stock options worth hugely more. The stock market benifits executives more than most stock holders as they get tens of thousands of shares for little or nothing, so leverage comes into play. Some companys buy back shares to raise the stock price rather than pay shareholders difvidends. If people even knew how they were being gypped by this mugs game they would be truly shocked.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
nofriendofrepublicans
Mother friendly.
12:38 PM on 11/07/2011
I think they're starting to get a hint.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
munki
Global to Local now Local to Global
05:23 AM on 11/05/2011
When will it stop? Ever or.never?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kamact
Market Observer
09:06 PM on 11/04/2011
C-level thieves,....no question,...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
munki
Global to Local now Local to Global
05:22 AM on 11/05/2011
Top EXECUTIVES... Yup
photo
Rational Thought Plz
Is the Micro Bio Half
08:51 PM on 11/04/2011
When I clicked the story, I was really hoping that some study had found that one particular plebian profession had had a good year, but no, just COOs. Imagine that.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Aleks Hunter
Keep your greedy Mitt off our country!
04:03 PM on 11/06/2011
Sorry Pollyanna, That letter to Virginia was wrong.