iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Millennial Voters Still Support Obama, But Enthusiasm Has Waned

First Posted: 11/04/2011 7:53 am Updated: 01/04/2012 4:12 am

WASHINGTON -- A massive new report released by the Pew Research Center has mixed news for President Barack Obama: The age gap in voting that opened up over the last seven years and helped elect him president in 2008 is persisting, but the political enthusiasm and engagement that younger voters demonstrated four years ago is "substantially depleted."

The declining economy has hit younger Americans hard, and Obama's approval ratings have declined as sharply with them as with other age groups. These trends have some speculating that Republicans might make a "significant dent" in Obama's share of younger voters, sometimes called Millennials or Generation Y.

Yet according to the Pew Research data released Thursday, Obama remains the overwhelming choice of younger voters when matched against Republican candidate Mitt Romney. Obama currently leads Romney among Millennial voters (ages 18 to 30) by a 61 to 37 percent margin. According to network exit polls, Obama's 2008 margin over Republican nominee John McCain among Millennials was larger (66 to 32 percent), but the president has lost ground across all age groups. The remarkable gap between the youngest and oldest voters' political preferences -- a relatively new phenomenon that first emerged in 2004 -- persists.

2011-11-03-Blumenthal-PewResearchagegappersists.png

What has changed since 2008 among the youngest voters is their level of enthusiasm and engagement. "There has been a substantial decline in interest among Millennials," the Pew Research analysts report, "combined with a spike in interest among older voters." The number of Millennials who say they have given a lot of thought to the candidates has declined from 28 percent at this point in 2007 to 13 percent now. Similarly, the number paying close attention to the campaign has fallen from 24 to 17 percent since 2007. Those changes have created what Pew Research calls "a wide generational gap in attention to the campaign that was not present in 2007."

2011-11-03-Blumenthal-PewResearchGapininterest.png

Digging deeper, the Pew analysts also find a "substantial partisan gap" on engagement and interest that interacts with the age gap. Republicans are generally following the campaign more closely now than four years ago, while Democrats are following it less closely. Thus, "it is the younger Democrats who are the most disengaged, while attention among the older Republicans has surged," Pew Research reports.

Why the drop in engagement among younger Democrats? Some of it may reflect the lack of a Democratic primary contest this year, which may mean the engagement gap will narrow later in the campaign. But the Pew analysts see "signs that the fundamental imperative to vote that Millennials felt in 2008 may be less intense in 2012," pointing to a 12 percentage-point drop since October 2007 (from 81 to 69 percent) in the number who say they care a good deal who wins the White House. No such decline is evident among older voters.

Michael Dimock, a Pew Research associate director, told The Huffington Post that opinions about Obama's performance explain some of the decline in enthusiasm among younger voters. "Obama hasn't brought about the kind of change that many Millennials were hoping for in the campaign," he said, "and so there's a certain disappointment with how things have turned out." Most are still likely to choose Obama over a Republican, but not with the same enthusiasm as in 2008.

Far more Millennials name Bill Clinton (48 percent) than Obama (14 percent) as the president who did the best job during their lifetimes, despite the fact that most were still children or teenagers when Clinton was president.

But Dimock added an important caveat: "A lot of the energy in 2008 was not due to Obama; it was due to George W. Bush." Youth turnout was relatively high in 2004 and 2006, and much of the interest and engagement measured by the Pew Research surveys occurred in late 2007 before Obama emerged as the frontrunner for the Democratic nomination.

"I think you have to remember that the context in '08 was so much about Bush and changing the nature of politics in this country," Dimock said. "Obama swooped in and picked up on that theme, and drew the support of a lot of those Millennials, but it wasn't necessarily him that brought them on board."

2011-11-03-Blumenthal-PewResearchpercentangry.png

The generational gap in engagement emerges out of both waning interest in the young and rising interest among the older cohorts. The latter is related to a growing anger at government. The Pew report finds that, although trust in government has fallen across all age groups, the percentage who describe themselves as "angry" at government has spiked upward with older voters.

"In the last four national elections," the Pew analysts write, "generational differences have mattered more than they have in decades." The Pew data tells us that the gap between younger and older voters will likely matter again in 2012.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
 
 
  • Comments
  • 7,393
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (81 total)
05:14 PM on 11/12/2011
Ron Paul 2012 - That's the real news - Ron Paul is the ONLY candidate that is citing real solutions for this mess the current administration, president, past democrats and republicans have created.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
PRONESE
Somewhat Opinionated Curmudgeon
09:28 PM on 11/10/2011
I try to think about President Obama as little as possible.
R/ PRONESE
10:01 AM on 11/08/2011
Obviously our educational system is not worth the space it occupies if young people think Clinton was the best president...he is the guy who signed NAFTA, sending millions of our jobs to China, he is the guy who removed Glass-Steagal and by so doing created the economic debacle we are experiencing today, he is the guy who destroyed the Democratic party by turning it into a wing of the Republican party. Not to mention he is a sexual predator. No wonder they fell for Obama snake oil.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Gerald Serlin
Retired lawyer. Perserverantia Vincit
11:04 AM on 11/07/2011
It appears that many of the younger voters are not paying attention. It is the policies instituted by the Obama Administration, which are killing jobs and widening the gap between the young and old, as well as the rich and poor. Further it is the class-struggle arguments put forth by the Obama crowd, which is causing the class-warfare seen in recent political conversations and events.

Obama is enthusiastically supporting the same policies which got us into this mess and is proposing more of the same. For some reason, the young voters are inclined to allow Obama continued leeway in his failed attempts to "create jobs". It may be the force of Obama's personality, or inertia, but whatever it is, so long as the support is there, Obama will keep on trying the same failed policies.

Obviously, it is time for a new President.
photo
SpookyAnnya
RN for higher teachers' salaries
04:11 AM on 11/07/2011
Tea Party is not very popular these days. There is no Republican choice. Obama 2012
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Just logic
11:42 AM on 11/07/2011
Please Obama is a republican in a different party. Both sides do the same thing every time they get elected. The only clear choice is someone who proves they do what they say and that is Ron Paul.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bar1ed
midnight toker!
08:25 AM on 11/08/2011
Folks just Google Ayn Rand and you'll see what Mr. Paul is all about. In short, He's got his, and that's just to bad for You! Mr. Paul and his like do not care about you! You are not in their class, and they want to keep that way!
10:03 AM on 11/08/2011
He is a Republican...he's working for the 1%. Read "Confidence Men" and you will see what kind of president he is. Fighting progressive moves by the House all the way. Appointing wall Street shills as his top advisors, managed by Geithner, who is really running the show. Coming up with one make pretend reform after the other, no real reform at all. He's all for the 1%.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
surfette72
Hang on tight Libs...we'll be back.
11:48 AM on 11/06/2011
Oh great. Another article about "young voters." I think the best thing these people can do is decide what they truly believe in; not what their friends believe in, not what the media believes in, and not (Heaven forbid) what their college professors believe in. You don't vote for President of the United States because the candidate is "cool." You don't vote for someone because "everyone else is doing it." You don't vote for someone because they are white, black, male, female, etc. I fully support partisan pollitics for a reason; it is part of what can define each of us at our core. If you want to be a Democrat, great. If you want to be a Republican, great. Just do your homework and please don't get caught up in election year "fashion." Class dismissed.
11:22 AM on 11/06/2011
Young people generally don't vote in large enough numbers to have much effect in a general election. It wasn't too tough in '08 to get their attention given the disaster of GW and the historic election of America's 1st black president. Unfortunately for Obama the lustre is gone and he appears to be just another dissembling polititian. He probably can't produce any quick fix for the economy but there are many issues where he could have brought some of the "change" promised through the excutive branch. Just a few examples: Wall Street bankers are still in charge of Treasury and the FED, the wars continue on and the drone war expands radically, the war on drugs continues without interruption, Gitmo, corporate welfare for Solyndra et.al. etc. With every passing day he sounds more like a partisan and less like a statesman. I didn't vote for Obama because, being from Illinois, I suspected he was a lefty lightweight based upon his performance here. Still on balance I hoped he'd be the lesser of the evils (McCain has always scared the crap out of me). Turns out my initial impression was correct. The only candidate who would actually bring real change is Ron Paul. But we're gonna get Obamaromney and four years from now the republicrats will ask "are you better off now than you were four years ago?" The answer will of course be no.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Endogenous Light Nexus
There actually is light within you
12:11 PM on 11/06/2011
Nice to see some people are waking up, albeit slowly.

Except Ron Paul is beholden to the corporate oligarchs too. Otherwise you'd hear him calling for war crimes trials and prosecution of the Wall Street criminals at Goldman Sachs etc.
01:04 PM on 11/06/2011
Just for the record, Ron Paul has stated that both GW and Obama should face impeachment for their military adventures and violations of the constitution. Far from being "beholden" to corporate oligarchs Ron Paul warned the FED chairman in multiple House hearings that we would experience a huge bubble and a devastating economic collapse. In order to prosecute Wall Street criminals a crime would have to have been commited. As Obama has explained no laws were violated. In point of fact Ron Paul voted against the Bush/Obama taxpayer bailouts of Goldman Sachs. If you follow the money, Wall Street political contributions are going to Obama and the Republican top tier, not Ron Paul. Who's "beholden"?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Just logic
11:45 AM on 11/07/2011
Really? He has been doing this over and over. The problem is nobody is listening yet. He has repeatedly said that people who commit offenses should be procecuted, yet our gov bails them out. Research and you will find that he is very misquoted and under a black out of his message. These people that he calls for trials give the money to the other canidates including Obama.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LeftyNeoCon
What happens when extreme left and right combine.
01:08 AM on 11/06/2011
I don't hate Obama but he has lied flatly about his drug policy and failed to simply admit he will not co-operate with state legislature as he originally said he would. Bush told the pot community quite simply he didn't support them and we had less raids on MMJ dispensaries under BUSH then we do now.

If that's not a reason to consider alternatives I'm not sure what is.
DoTheMath
We're outspent, but they're outnumbered
10:19 PM on 11/05/2011
To anyone of any age who doesn't already know this:

The president is not your boyfriend.
If you feel angry with him, if the thrill is gone,
you are, of course, entitled to your feelings.
By all means, speak your piece;
do what you need to do.
At the same time, keep in mind
"breaking up" with the president
will not leave you free to play the field
until someone more suitable comes along.
Someone will be president on January 21, 2013,
whether you vote or not.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lordgamble
ATWWWHG And They Wonder Why We Hate Gov't
12:54 AM on 11/06/2011
Just let that 'someone' not be Obama
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LeftyNeoCon
What happens when extreme left and right combine.
01:02 AM on 11/06/2011
Obama over any Republican besides Ron Paul.
10:08 AM on 11/08/2011
Write somebody in who you really believe in. Don't cooperate with evil.
06:32 PM on 11/05/2011
Statistics are a scary thing....they can lean one way or another depending on who interprets the results (and where they get the data). The reason that young Republicans are following the presidential race more than their Democratic peers is obvious to anyone who watches the news. The Republican party (and their debates, gaffes, etc.) have been in the media daily whereas young Democratic voters have no circus to follow. The issue will be how many of these young Republicans like what they see........
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
06:05 PM on 11/05/2011
Obama is history! Good riddance!
06:32 PM on 11/05/2011
Not yet Charlie :-)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
08:34 PM on 11/05/2011
One year to go before we are rid of the biggest mistake the American electorate has ever made.

Obama! The Mistake!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
archstantn
I came, I saw, I conked out
05:44 PM on 11/05/2011
Obama will win because the Republicans offer no alternative. Romney is the best hope for Republicans, only because he is least like them, and thus more attractive to the "center". But, without serious support from his own party, he is doomed to failure. I'm afraid "four more years" is the chant Republicans will have to endure come November 2012. Wait and see.
06:16 PM on 11/05/2011
I agree.
photo
drdrepublican
Believe in something or fall for anything
11:38 PM on 11/05/2011
Unfortunately Obama will win because just like in Nazi Germany his braindead minions in the position of the Brownshirted SA will cause the domestic disturbances to keep the Conservatives at home and enable the President to enact martial law to cancel the elections. In Nazi Germany the SS slaughtered the SA when they were finish with them. Obama will jail the Wall Street crowd at a minimum.. Blaming it on the Republicans is a cop out. This thing is already plannned.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
05:16 AM on 11/07/2011
Here’s what will happen in 2012. Obama, knowing he is going to lose re-election, will manufacture some crisis to use as a pretext to suspend the elections, then declare martial law and make himself dictator. Many Americans, however, thanks to their 2nd Amendment right to bear arms, will resist his usurpation of powers and fight back. The US will fall into civil war, and that will be pretty much the end of a united states of America. Which is what Obama and his puppet-masters were seeking to do all along, one way or another. It’s a win-win situation for him and his masters either way. He is a “Manchuria­n candidate” whose mission is to destroy the US by either taking it over or tearing it apart.
photo
Sundalecat
We love Obama!, by an angry White Man
05:18 PM on 11/05/2011
Ya know what I notice! if there is the least bit of negative towards our President on this site. The Right comes running. A word to the wise. You will never win on this site. You can whine all you want but we will never believe your innuendo or untruths.
06:33 PM on 11/05/2011
Unlike your innuendo???
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LeftyNeoCon
What happens when extreme left and right combine.
01:05 AM on 11/06/2011
Obama has annoyed and antagonized a lot of grassroots voting blocs like the anti-war blocs and marijuana advocates that truly did the door to door grassroots work that got Obama into power. If you follow the pulse of pot culture at all you would be surprised at how unanimously Obama was supported. Now the temperature is totally different and we don't have any viable option other then Ron Paul.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sivachok
05:14 PM on 11/05/2011
Mr. Obama has made his mark in the history of USA. After the great humanist FDR, he has brought about a noble change in the minds of most right-minded Americans. They will now agree that a nation or a government is measured by the way it treats its poor as another great president , Mr.Theodore Roosevelt said.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kimbanyc
LIBERAL NY DEMOCRAT
05:07 PM on 11/05/2011
NO MORE LEFT

OVER 125 POSTS HERE SINCE 9.30 AM

THAT'S A LOT OFH8

AND A LOT OF B/ESS

ALL IN ONE PLACE