iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Highland Park, Michigan Tearing Out Its Streetlights To Cut Costs

Highland Park Streetlights

The Huffington Post   First Posted: 11/07/11 01:10 PM ET Updated: 11/07/11 07:58 PM ET

The economic slowdown has put countless people out of work and eliminated millions of dollars in homeowner wealth. States and cities haven't been immune to its effects, either.

Faced with shrinking tax revenues and pressure to cut costs, more than half of U.S. cities have cut staff, cancelled construction projects or raised fees this year, according to The National League of Cities, and many communities have had to scale back the kinds of public services that in more robust times people simply took for granted.

Highland Park, Michigan, a city in the greater Detroit area, is the latest town to implement dramatic austerity measures, according to the Associated Press.

With $58 million in municipal debt and a $60,000 monthly electric bill that it can't pay, Highland Park has elected to remove 1,000 of its 1,500 streetlights -- not just turning the power off, but tearing the poles themselves out of the ground.

It's a strategy that's unlikely to fix most of Highland Park's economic woes. The town's unemployment rate is 22 percent -- more than twice the national rate -- and 42 percent of residents live below the poverty line.

Still, Highland Park needs to trim expenses, and it isn't the first town to turn off its lights in the name of doing so. Clintonville, Wisconsin has stopped operating 10 percent of its streetlights, reportedly saving $7,000, according to local news station WHBL. Santa Rosa is in the midst of a four-year effort to remove thousands of streetlights, and similar steps have been taken in North Andover, Massachusetts; Montgomery, Pennsylvania; and South Portland, Maine, according to USA Today.

But cutting back on public lighting may be giving rise to new problems. Oakland, California has been using lower-output bulbs in its streetlamps for the past several years, and locals believe the dimmer light has contributed to an uptick in crime, according to The New York Times.

Other public services have suffered as struggling local governments look for ways to make ends meet. Last year, Denver slashed $500,000 from its trash-collection budget, leading to complaints that the city was becoming clogged with garbage. Public libraries across the country have been closed down or had their hours curtailed. And more than half of the nation's county and city health departments have cut back on at least one program in the past year, according to The Wall Street Journal.

As state and local governments continue to bleed out -- shedding jobs at about the same rate that the private sector is adding them -- many are turning to contract employees to do the same jobs as former government employees for less money, the NYT reports. But experts are divided on whether these measures have had the intended effect of saving money.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Money newsletter!
The economic slowdown has put countless people out of work and eliminated millions of dollars in homeowner wealth. States and cities haven't been immune to its effects, either. Faced with shrinkin...
The economic slowdown has put countless people out of work and eliminated millions of dollars in homeowner wealth. States and cities haven't been immune to its effects, either. Faced with shrinkin...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 1,197
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (30 total)
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dbrett480
02:18 PM on 11/10/2011
This is not nearly as bad as Foley, MN. They are stopping their law enforcement contract with the Sheriff and hiring private security as cops.
03:31 PM on 11/09/2011
State of Colorado has a bare-bones budget, too. There's been talk of closing a prison and furloughing school teachers. Yet the State has managed to cobble together enough bucks to send lawyers and investigators to Aspen during high season to prosecute a 75-year-old guy here who gives people free rides in his car, making ends meet from voluntary tips. The old guy has already been in jail once for his enterprise, but says he'll keep giving free rides because it's his right. Sterling Greenwood/AspenFreepress
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
AlanBannacheck
President of the Deep Thoughts Association (DTA)
03:18 PM on 11/09/2011
Looks like some are headed back to the dark ages....
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
PunKinPai
Tact is just not saying true stuff. I’ll pass.
03:01 PM on 11/09/2011
These cities apparently believe the economy will never recover.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lyredragon
Obey My Dog!
01:59 PM on 11/09/2011
so, it's going to cost money to tear them out. Why not use the money you were going ot pay the contractors to tear out the lights to instead pay them to put in little solar panels and take the lights off of the grid entirely?
01:02 PM on 11/09/2011
Tear them out? What a waste and who is paying for that. How about when they have more income? Who pays to put new ones in? Someone is getting some $$$ in this stinky deal.

Our old town back East turned off 50% of the lights, every other one. If you didn't like your local light off, you could "sponser" one for the year. Split between neighbors it wasn't much. However, they did take care to leave intersections well lit at the same time.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gjackson
11:39 AM on 11/09/2011
Here's the 'con' to that story... 'let'm eat cake'.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
brandon20678
Corporations have 99 problems and I'm 1
09:13 AM on 11/09/2011
It's sad that something like this is happening in America. God bless this country.
11:46 PM on 11/08/2011
Get the new LED bulbs ... the light is amazing and the cost is a fraction of the old bulbs.
04:36 PM on 11/09/2011
@brux -- curious what the actual math on this is. Would love to see real world numbers being compared here.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
trashcup
08:33 PM on 11/08/2011
How stupid can you get? Maybe spending the money for ripping them out brings the DRAMA that Highland Park wants to bring to the table. Hello! Just turn them off! While you're at it turn the thermostat down in the winter, and up in the summer.
07:21 PM on 11/08/2011
Maybe just turn them off? Instead of spending all the money to have someone take them out?
07:36 PM on 11/08/2011
but then they can scrap the metal in them for $$
11:47 PM on 11/08/2011
And then when things are back they can pay triple to have them put back in? Unless they are being stolen they should just keep them up and turn them off.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
billw8017
History looks like this
03:36 PM on 11/08/2011
Michigan is hurting and has been for some time. Detroit has discussed dissolving its city government and letting the suburbs annex parts. Highland Park is just being sensible: Let the last person out, turn off the lights...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SickHippie
No, YOUR micro-bio is empty.
03:11 PM on 11/08/2011
I fail to understand how this will save money.

Consider the following: electricity is currently (on the high end) $0.16 per kWh. Streetlights are generally 250W bulbs. Currently the day (dawn to dusk) is about 11 hours long, we'll call it 12 for good measure. Turning off 1,000 streetlights will trim the bill from $720 a day to $240 a day, a savings of $480 a day, or $14,400 a month.

However, to remove the poles requires heavy equipment and a team of at least 3 people. If those 3 people are being paid $12 an hour (a low rate for construction work), that's $288 a day in labor costs alone. Now add in fuel expenses (both for vehicles and power sources), equipment rentals, mileage pay, and so on. It very quickly adds up to much more than $480 a day.

Then consider that, if by some miracle this team of 3 can pull out one post every hour, it would still take about 6 months to remove them all. Of course, eventually some will get put back in over time, leading to even more expense.

So, to recap, Highland Park's way to save money is to waste more month then they save.

I fail to understand how this will save money.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
billw8017
History looks like this
03:51 PM on 11/08/2011
Presumably, they have found a buyer for the materials. There is obviously a savings as they use less electricity. If the money isn't there, they don't have much choice. Private businesses will still light their own parking lots or entrances. Cars have their own headlights in the city just as they do in the country. The city simply won't extend the lights for them anymore.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SickHippie
No, YOUR micro-bio is empty.
04:21 PM on 11/08/2011
Even if they were to have a buyer lined up for the materials, I don't see that making up more than a slice of the cost they're paying to have them removed in the first place.

There is a savings, as I've calculated in the post above. The savings is not as much as the cost of removing the poles, therefore there is no real savings, but a very real additional cost.

They could cut their costs by a similar amount simply switching to LED streetlights. The initial capital outlay for all streetlights would be less than the cost of removing 2/3rds, and the total savings begin immediately instead of 6+ months down the road.

It still doesn't make any sense, and your post is too lacking in actual figures to change my opinion. Bring back some math if you want to continue.
07:23 PM on 11/08/2011
Exactly!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:55 PM on 11/08/2011
Highland Park is sending the citizens a new bill. In the way of higher electric rates. Surely the electric company will be raising the rates because of it's now loss in revenue.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
01:15 PM on 11/09/2011
Of all the things that might be happening, I don't think that is one of them. I read an article a few days ago on this very town. The electric bill wasn't getting paid anyway, and the only reason the lights were still on was the electric company didn't want to turn them off merely because they weren't getting paid. It was a combination of a little civic minded concern for public safety, and probably more than a pinch of concern by the electric company could be sued if they turned them off and someone got hurt.

So this is actually a savings to the company.
photo
4everright
My heart went boom
02:21 PM on 11/08/2011
when all the taxpayers leave due to poor fiscal management by the city...this is what you end up with, a town full of welfare recipients crying about how things are not fair.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
billw8017
History looks like this
03:43 PM on 11/08/2011
People don't actually go on welfare because the welfare office is so convenient in their new car. A town full of welfare recipients is hurting. Why do you blame welfare so quickly anyway? Even Newt Gingrich's church took up a collection for his first wife and their kids when he was trying to make her agree to their divorce settlement. Good people care about one another.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lyredragon
Obey My Dog!
02:08 PM on 11/09/2011
If the entire town is on welfare, I would argue that the situation is not one of fairness, but one of justice. Is it just that people should have to take a wage that cannot pay for their living expenses, and is it just that the government should shore up the citizens because private enterprise cannot or will not meet the needs of their employees? Is it just that people should use credit just to pay for groceries? is it just that corporate interests and the government working together could contribute to the extended misery of an entire town. If the taxpayers left due to poor fiscal management, than it is a case of taxpayer laziness and inability to accept fault. The elected officials of the cities are made of a base of taxpayers, as the only people that can afford to run for office are those that already have a sizable income. the taxpayers are the ones that caused the problem by voting in yahoos that couldn't manage, and then skipped town leaving the impoverished, who have limited means of escaping their situation, to hold the bill for taxpayer mistakes.