iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Scott Brown Comes Out Against NRA-Backed Legislation

Scott Brown

First Posted: 11/07/11 06:10 PM ET Updated: 11/07/11 06:10 PM ET

WASHINGTON -- When Sen. Scott Brown (R-Mass) was still a state senator running a long-shot campaign to win Ted Kennedy's seat, a variety of traditionally conservative advocacy groups gravitated towards his candidacy, drawn by the possibility of a reliably liberal seat becoming occupied by a Republican.

The National Rifle Association was one of those groups, devoting money and mailers to Brown's campaign as it reached its final stretch. When Brown pulled off an upset victory over Attorney General Martha Coakley, his Democratic opponent, the gun-lobby called it a "stunning defeat for gun control extremists" and praised him for being "tough on criminals yet supportive of the rights of law-abiding Massachusetts gun owners."

More than a year-and-a-half later and with his reelection campaign in full swing, the dynamic has shifted. Last week, Brown let it be known that he was formally opposed to one of the NRA's top legislative priorities.

In a letter to Boston Mayor Tom Menino, Brown said that he would vote against a bill that would require states that allow concealed carrying of guns to recognize each other's permits. Opponents have described the bill as a "race to the bottom" in concealed weapon law.

"As you know, I support the individual right to keep and bear arms as guaranteed by the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution," Brown wrote. "I also believe that individual states should be allowed to decide what constitutes safe and responsible gun ownership so long as it does not violate that basic constitutional right."

"Under the proposed House legislation, a national concealed carry reciprocity amendment would obligate states like Massachusetts to recognize that concealed carry permits of other states, even if the bearer of that permit does not meet the requirements established by Massachusetts to receive such a concealed carry permit. I believe that the people of Massachusetts are best positioned to decide what is best for Massachusetts. Therefore, if H.R. 822 or similar legislation comes before the Senate, I will vote no."

Scott Brown

Brown has never cast himself as an expansive Second Amendment advocate, and his willingness to flout the NRA isn't entirely shocking, especially given that he faces a tough reelection campaign against Elizabeth Warren.

But the letter to Menino, who co-chairs the 550-member coalition Mayors Against Illegal Guns, is a major setback for advocates of gun-rights advocates. The National Right-to-Carry Reciprocity Act has 245 cosponsors in the House and is poised to comfortably pass through that chamber, but it needs 60 votes in the Senate to avoid a filibuster. The Coalition to Stop Gun Violence placed a full-page ad in the Boston Globe last Wednesday, urging Brown to vote no. Now that he has announced that he plans to do so, they and other gun control advocates can turn their attention to other moderate Republicans.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON -- When Sen. Scott Brown (R-Mass) was still a state senator running a long-shot campaign to win Ted Kennedy's seat, a variety of traditionally conservative advocacy groups gravitated toward...
WASHINGTON -- When Sen. Scott Brown (R-Mass) was still a state senator running a long-shot campaign to win Ted Kennedy's seat, a variety of traditionally conservative advocacy groups gravitated toward...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 1,975
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (25 total)
hagenjr
Shovel ready freeborn son of the Republic
10:41 PM on 11/12/2011
While a national reciprocit­y law would be nice, it is each individual state's right to decide on qaulifications to hold the permit. I support the state's right to decide, the feds should not be involved in the discussion. This is yet another attempted intrusion into state affairs by the feds.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
David Carson
11:45 AM on 11/13/2011
while reciprocity would be nice--what is important is nationwide shall issue CCW or Constitutional carrry
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:00 PM on 11/13/2011
Say, isn't "Constitutional Carry" the kind that doesn't require any special permit, you know, the kind that they offer in Arizona, that allowed Jared Loughner, just by merit of having bought his murder weapon, to legally carry it loaded and concealed? Just wondering.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dbrett480
09:23 PM on 11/10/2011
Common-sense move by Brown.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Rooster Coburn
Less Gov't + More Responsibility = A Better World
10:18 PM on 11/10/2011
http://davekopel.org/2A/Mags/dark-secret-of-jim-crow.html Go 2/3 down the page until you get to "Florida" and read how bans on the carrying of weapons really are intended to work.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:36 PM on 11/10/2011
Is opposing H.R. 822 akin to advocating for a gun ban? Is the plight of gun owners who might be unable to carry their weapons loaded and concealed when they are traveling to other states similar to the plight of African-Americans under segregation? Are such conflations intended to generate indignation among gun owners and sympathy for them among others? So many questions.
photo
SunnyDaySam
To Err is Human, to Forgive is Canine
12:45 PM on 11/10/2011
This is another example of conservative cognitive dissonance. They're for states rights and they're against states rights.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Rooster Coburn
Less Gov't + More Responsibility = A Better World
02:44 AM on 11/11/2011
From the website of GOAL, a leading Massachusetts civil rights organization. http://www.goal.org/ "In 1998, Massachusetts lawmakers passed what they said was one of the toughest gun control laws in the country. Yet, in the decade since the laws were passed, firearm-related crime has increased dramatically. Gun-related deaths alone have increased by 68%, and gun-related assault injuries have increased by 72%. Emergency room visits due to gun-related assaults have increased by a whopping 222%. The answer isn't more gun control laws. It's better laws. We need to take illegal weapons out of the hands of criminals and put those criminals in jail. We also need to respect law-abiding citizens' right to own a firearm. We believe we can do both. In 2011, we are working with members of the State Legislature to file a comprehensive rewrite of the Massachusetts gun law. The legislation, H.1568 is intended to bring reason and clarity back to our gun laws. We encourage you to review GOAL's approach to reform and then review the evidence we have provided throughout the site."
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:20 AM on 11/11/2011
According to "disastercenter.com", an informational website which, unlike "GOAL" has no affiliation with the gun lobby, the violent crime rate in Massachusetts is down almost 50% from 1998 levels.
12:29 PM on 11/10/2011
Is this a flip............or a flop? Amazing what happens when these guys get threatened with competition..............all of a sudden what the people think becomes part of THEIR thinking!

Republican commitments to the seven rules of the party obviously amount to no way to govern.

1. Tax cuts for the rich (us, our relatives, and our pay-to-play friends)
2. Do nothing
3. Tax the poor (more for us, our relatives, and our pay-to-play friends).
4. Do nothing
5. Provide Welfare for corporations (more jobs for us, our relatives, and our pay-to-play friends)
6. Do nothing
7. Cut programs for the people (more for us, our relatives, and our pay-to-play friends)
photo
OdinsEye
Korean-Latino cop and retired military combat vet
08:52 PM on 11/10/2011
At least 34 democrats are co-sponsoring this bill.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:30 PM on 11/10/2011
That unequivocally confirms that pandering is not exclusive to any political party.
11:31 AM on 11/10/2011
Whatever his motives, I'm glad he's voting against this disgusting legislation.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
enlightened45
09:45 AM on 11/10/2011
Despite the extravagant welcome and loud braying from the conservatives, it would appear that the Lion's senate seat is once again returning to the liberal fold of the Democrats. Brown was the brief hope of the conservatives and now in an attempt to retain his Senate seat he is giving the literal finger to the NRA. Brown's pseudo-Tea Party election was nothing but a blip on the national scene and even the NRA is continuing to lose support among those who are tilting to a more moderate stance.

In conclusion, a final question.......what happened to the sacrosanct states' rights stance of the gun crowd?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
David Carson
11:40 AM on 11/10/2011
U45--governments have powers--not rights, and if it is unConstitutional for the Feds to do something--it is unConstitutional for states to do it
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:48 AM on 11/10/2011
May we interpret your answer to mean that gun rights activists only advocate for states' rights as far as they suit their agenda?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
01:42 PM on 11/10/2011
To the extent that a state may impair constitutional rights protected by the Bill of Rights as an adjunct of "states' rights", that was effectivly eliminated by the 14th amendment and the adoption of the doctorine of selective incorporation, effectively overruling Barron v.Baltimore, 32 U.S. (7 Pet.) 243 (1833).

You have a problem with that?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
01:51 PM on 11/10/2011
Concealed carry of a loaded gun is a constitutional right? Why the permit process, then? If gun owners could legally carry concealed without having to sit through those boring two hour classes, or shoot a round at a picture of a bad guy, or lie on some form about their drug use, or load their weapon without shooting themselves, why would they bother with any of that stuff?
photo
NHGranite
Killer Koala escapes diner, eats shoots & leaves
09:45 AM on 11/10/2011
While I for sure would prefer Elizabeth Warren take the MA senate seat, sometimes this guy does surprise me for independent thought. Wow, going against the NRA? That takes guts.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
June25
11:14 AM on 11/10/2011
Has Elizabeth taken any stances that deviate from the Democrat cookie mold.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:38 AM on 11/10/2011
Why? Do you feel that if Warren "deviated from the Democrat cookie mold", and advocated for relaxed gun laws, or tax breaks for corporations, or against women's right to choose, she might broaden her base, and gain political traction?
photo
NHGranite
Killer Koala escapes diner, eats shoots & leaves
09:25 PM on 11/10/2011
Such a bright, gifted, educated, realistic, supportive caring person, YES! that is the Democrat cookie mold. Mean, heartless, self-absorbed, nasty, misogynistic, power hungry haters - regressives, and not just in JUNE
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dave elliott
4 more years
07:58 AM on 11/10/2011
so they are indeed in favor of taking states rights away? which is it gop? you want the states to decide for themselves or do you want to force them to observe other states laws? people who don't see the b.s. and hypocricy in the republican party are a danger to this country for voting these people into office. wake up dead heads! your party is a party of lies and hypocricy and if those are the standards for which we are suppoosed to use to determine who leads this country then we have already failed, as a nation and as a race. who would have thought that there would come a time in our nations history when the citizens would denounce common sense when choosing the leaders of the free world? it's truly mind blowing.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
pherron lowe
i know it when i see it - potter stewart
07:29 AM on 11/10/2011
Scott Brown...Mr. EXPEDIENT..was..MITT..his mentor...
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
authorized-user
macho macho man
06:28 AM on 11/10/2011
Wall Street pays more than the NRA.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:11 PM on 11/09/2011
May I, on behalf of gun rights thread posters from both sides of the aisle, invite the poster "InanimateObject" to share his shrewd, intelligently-voiced observations more frequently, and more visibly than he has in the past? Our dialogue, and particularly the case in favor of expanded gun rights, can only benefit from his maturity, clear-headedness and erudition. "Shout it out!", "Inanimate". We eagerly await your dispatches.
09:25 AM on 11/10/2011
Those who live in glass houses shouldn't throw stones.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:25 AM on 11/10/2011
In the words of "Inanimate" himself - "ROTFLMFAO! ROTFLMFAO! Uh. Yeah right NOT!"
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Duc Tran
11:08 PM on 11/09/2011
Brown only did that so he can continue to be a shill for Wall Street and his corporate backers
IndependentAndProud
Stop trying to change the subject!
10:02 PM on 11/09/2011
Sen Brown's only hope of retaining his seat is to start sliding it further Left.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Michael Valentine
Retired SEIU Member
12:36 AM on 11/10/2011
Can't do that without getting T.P.ed.
IndependentAndProud
Stop trying to change the subject!
01:22 AM on 11/10/2011
Indeed. A bit of a dilemma for the young senator.
photo
CarolinaDem
they DID take the last train for the coast!
09:39 PM on 11/09/2011
Why does the Constitution apply only to gun ownership? Aren't other 'arms' similarly protected? Why can't I buy C-4?
photo
NHGranite
Killer Koala escapes diner, eats shoots & leaves
09:48 AM on 11/10/2011
Yeah, why not? Can't think of any reasons beyond terrorism, can you? I want a classic SR-71 Blackbird to be a set with my Classic Repro 2002 Thunderbird in turquoise, aka Thunderbird Blue. Birds of a feather!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
ElmCreekSmith
I hunt the things that go bump in the night.
11:07 PM on 11/11/2011
The SR-71 is an unarmed reconnaissance aircraft. I see no reason why you shouldn't be able to have one provided you can pay for it and its operating operating costs.

ECS
photo
OdinsEye
Korean-Latino cop and retired military combat vet
02:24 PM on 11/10/2011
You are employing what has become known as "the nuke argument". Sorry, but it failed decades ago when with was first tried.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
David Carson
12:42 PM on 11/11/2011
and last time I checked, explosives are used routinely in demolition work, mining, stump clearing etc
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
moose and squirrel
Very soon we would both be completely twisted...
09:24 PM on 11/09/2011
its a sound position, but that wont get him the republican vote, and i'm still pulling for elizabeth warren!