iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Voter ID Laws Draw Nationwide Protests From NAACP, Labor Groups

By SAMANTHA GROSS   11/08/11 10:50 PM ET  AP

NEW YORK -- The NAACP is joining with minority and labor groups for a series of protests around the country meant to move discussion of voter identification laws out of policy circles and onto street corners, the organization's president said Tuesday.

Benjamin Todd Jealous appeared on the steps of New York City Hall with the Rev. Al Sharpton, U.S. Rep. Charles Rangel and community and labor leaders to announce plans for nationwide protests on Dec. 10 and across the South in the following weeks, decrying what they described as a nationwide voter suppression effort.

The rallies are "intended to get this conversation out of the thought leader class and down to the street corners, so folks understand that their rights are being attacked," Jealous said, adding that the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People had already raised millions of dollars to support its campaign.

He said his group has been urging the Department of Justice, which is considering the legality of proposed policies in Texas and South Carolina, to block the laws.

"This is the greatest assault on voting rights, happening right now, that we have seen since the dawn of Jim Crow," he said.

Kansas, Tennessee and Wisconsin are among the states that passed voter identification measures this year. Civil-rights advocates have argued the laws target low-income and minority voters by requiring specific types of photo ID to cast ballots, by reducing the number of early voting days and by instituting tougher laws on collecting registrations.

They say that blacks, Hispanics, senior citizens, people with disabilities and the poor are less likely to have the required photo IDs. And they argue others could be disenfranchised, such as voters who don't carry ID with them, students whose school IDs are deemed unacceptable and women whose drivers' licenses do not reflect their married names or new addresses.

Supporters of the laws say that they are necessary to eliminate voter fraud, no matter how rare it is. And some argue that without ID checks at the polls, there's no way to track how many people may be casting illegal votes.

"I'm not sure how much fraud they think is acceptable," said Hans von Spakovsky, a senior legal fellow at the Heritage Foundation, a conservative Washington think tank. "The U.S. has a long history of voter fraud, and it could make the difference in a close election."

The NAACP announcement came on a day that voters in Mississippi approved a proposed constitutional amendment to require that voters present government-issued identification at the polls. Voters in Maine repealed a law requiring them to enroll at least two days before an election, restoring a four-decade policy of allowing registrations as late as Election Day.

Last week, Democrats in the U.S. House asked secretaries of state in all 50 states to oppose voter identification laws.

The United Federation of Teachers, the health care workers' union 1199SEIU, National Council of La Raza and the Asian-American Legal Defense Fund were among the groups represented at Tuesday's news conference. George Gresham, the president of 1199SEIU, said that his organization would bus 10,000 of its members from around the state and the mid-Atlantic region to participate in the Dec. 10 protests.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
Filed by Nick Wing  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 219
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4  Next ›  Last »  (4 total)
06:38 AM on 12/31/2011
Student IDs, real estate property records, or copies of a filed tax return should suffice.
If I lived in a state that required me to pay state and local income taxes or property taxes but yet denied me the right to vote - because I didn't show an ID - I would have to challenge it in court. Otherwise, it's taxation without representation. We've already fought one war against England over this basic issue. Now, we have a bunch of politicians behaving as kings and queens.
It’s devious and disingenuous for a legislator to knowingly disenfranchise millions of American citizens for the slight chance that he or she might be preventing what’s proven to be a very minimum case of voter fraud.
Some in our society may believe earnestly that requiring voters to have an ID is not much to ask. But unless we as taxpayers are willing to offset the cost for transportation, birth certificates, cost of photographs, or other requirement, it’s voter suppression. The American public should be outraged!
12:51 PM on 12/05/2011
Someone needs to explain to me why blacks, Hispanics, senior citizens, people with disabilities and the poor are less likely to have the required photo IDs. It sounds simple to me... if you want to drive, cash a check, or vote, you need an ID. There is no reason not to support this unless you are welcoming voter fraud.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
skibum415
I’m an Independent refusing to follow the herd.
12:52 AM on 11/14/2011
(Part 3/4)

Instituting voter ID laws (where student ID’s aren’t valid) ensure students aren’t fraudulently voting by conning the system through any number of ways ultimately voting multiple times. When one utilizes an absentee ballot they are numbered making it easier to discover fraud.

Each state with VID laws implemented have “free” ID’s if obtaining one via normal means or everyday living creates a hardship. Note to the Rev. I don’t know of any state requiring individuals to take multiple days off of work as implied. Unless one doesn’t do his/her homework and fails to bring proper documentation, but that’s not the laws fault that is the fault of the individual. If an individual can’t take his or her lunch to accomplish this task, or do it on a Saturday (if available) then that is an excuse; not a reason (especially because most employers would permit taking a long lunch to register if no other means were available (i.e. Saturday or evening)). Obtaining an ID is a onetime thing. I hate my DMV photo but every 10 years I pay online and receive a new ID in the mail. If I was using a “voter’s ID” it’d be the same process because it is the same ID just paid for by the state instead of the individual.

(con’t)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
skibum415
I’m an Independent refusing to follow the herd.
12:52 AM on 11/14/2011
(Part 2/4)

One specific reason to vote absentee is because one is in college, and he or she is unable to vote. It is wrong for out of state students to vote in local elections. These students have no vested interest, so often looking to benefit him or her knowing he or she departs in under four years. Passing a tax increase to reduce tuition doesn’t hurt the out of state student because he or she departs after graduating leaving the burden of their vote & tax increase on the local community after reaping the benefits of reduced tuition.

Votes are to take place where you reside; not where you’re located for 12 weeks where November is part of those 12 weeks. Therefore, if he or she uproots to move permanently to a new state for college, registered his or her car with the new state’s DMV, files taxes with the new state, etc. then s/he should vote where s/he attends school. However, if s/he simply occupies a dorm, returning home concluding each semester, taking his or her property home (or storing it) for the summer: s/he lacks residency and NEEDS to legally vote via absentee where s/he is ACTUALLY from.

Absentee voting is easy, free, and registration is typically online or via mail for his or her “home” election.

Absentee is so easy & cheap some states are going mail only. Having very few polling places open on Election Day.

(con’t)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
skibum415
I’m an Independent refusing to follow the herd.
12:51 AM on 11/14/2011
(Part 1/4)

I’m most concerned my vote is no longer fully counted along with all other legal voters who have fought for the right to have free elections, including African-Americans. Here’s why, if I vote a specific way on a measure, but someone who is not entitled to vote, votes in the opposition then my voice has essentially been muted. This isn’t a measure of city or state issues being voted on. Consider the 2000 Presidential election putting aside who you think should have won it the decision ultimately came down (after a full recount requested via press) to less than 70,000 votes. This means a different President could have been in office if people not authorized to vote, were not voting; conversely, the issue could have been resolved more quickly because the margin would have been greater if you look at it from a Conservative perspective.

Where does Reverend Al obtain a nice round number like 25% of the African-American community not having proper ID when one of the most common is simply a state ID card or driver’s license (Op-Ed HuffPo 2011 Nov 03)? Perhaps having everyone with a state issued ID would resolve issues of misidentification, one of the most common reasons individuals are wrongfully locked up. The majority of the laws read, they will even arrange to pick you up and bring you to the DMV or other registration facility if needed.

(con’t)
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
hjo4
Don't make your problems mine
11:51 AM on 11/10/2011
I am an adult American Black man, although I understand the NAACP position I still believe EVERY Adult American citizen must have at least one piece of picture identification to produce when voting. Especially in the current times we live where we are almost a sanctuary nation with illegal aliens who demand to be afford the same rights as American citizens.There have been little to no voter fraud in the past but we never had the number of bold illegal aliens in our country as we do today. Our policies are not set in stone and must change along with our practices , producing id to vote is now a necessity.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
PWM
Eisenhower Republican. Liberalism = Liberty
11:49 AM on 11/10/2011
From the ACLU

Reason #3: A national ID card system would require creation of a database of all Americans

What happens when an ID card is stolen? What proof is used to decide who gets a card? A national ID would require a governmental database of every person in the U.S. containing continually updated identifying information. It would likely contain many errors, any one of which could render someone unemployable and possibly much worse until they get their ""file"" straightened out.And once that database was created, its use would almost certainly expand. Law enforcement and other government agencies would soon ask to link into it, while employers, landlords, credit agencies, mortgage brokers, direct mailers, landlords, private investigators, civil litigants, and a long list of other parties would begin seeking access, further eroding the privacy that Americans have always expected in their personal lives.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
PWM
Eisenhower Republican. Liberalism = Liberty
11:51 AM on 11/10/2011
Reason #5: ID cards would foster new forms of discrimination and harassment
Rather than eliminating discrimination, as some have claimed, a national identity card would foster new forms of discrimination and harassment of anyone perceived as looking or sounding "foreign."That is what happened after Congress passed the Employer Sanctions provision of the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1985: widespread discrimination against foreign-looking American workers, especially Asians and Hispanics. A 1990 General Accounting Office study found almost 20 percent of employers engaged in such practices. A national ID card would have the same effect on a massive scale, as Latinos, Asians, Caribbeans and other minorities became subject to ceaseless status and identity checks from police, banks, merchants and others. Failure to carry a national I.D. card would likely come to be viewed as a reason for search, detention or arrest of minorities. The stigma and humiliation of constantly having to prove that they are Americans or legal immigrants would weigh heavily on such groups.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
PWM
Eisenhower Republican. Liberalism = Liberty
11:47 AM on 11/10/2011
All a national ID card is is an internal passport. Are we to become N. Korea?
11:03 AM on 11/10/2011
If you are a legal resident, you have no problem with someone asking for a picture ID at the polling place. If you are an illegal alien with no identification, you have a big problem as you have none.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
PWM
Eisenhower Republican. Liberalism = Liberty
11:54 AM on 11/10/2011
The National ID Card allows the feds to track citizens even better than it can now. It will allow for a single database ( and woe to anyone whose information is messed up by the government). This is big government and such a card is nothing but an internal passport. It would be used to check on people by the authorities at will.
07:59 AM on 11/10/2011
The conservs want to have it both ways. On one hand they say this is suppopse to stop non US Citizens from voting in our elections yet at the same time they say that these people already have I.D.'s . They work, cash checks, drive, buy prescription medicine, etc. So who are we really trying to stop from voting? Call it like it is and stop trying to hide the true intent of this measure.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
PWM
Eisenhower Republican. Liberalism = Liberty
11:53 AM on 11/10/2011
The pubs want an internal passport, just like Cuba. All it does is allow for BIG GOVERNMENT.
07:34 AM on 11/10/2011
This measure is not to stop voter fraud. It's to stop minorties from voting. Minorties mostly vote Democratic.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
PWM
Eisenhower Republican. Liberalism = Liberty
11:18 AM on 11/10/2011
It will require people to purchase what amounts to a voting card. Since the pubs are against anything free, the card will have to be purchased. What prevents the government from putting a purchase price on the card of say $500 -- nothing.

This is a new form of Jim Crow.
04:58 AM on 11/10/2011
Mississippi voters approved Voter ID in this week’s election.
http://www.clarionledger.com/article/20111109/NEWS04/111090358/Voter-ID-initiative-passes?odyssey=mod%7Cdefcon%7Cimg%7CHome

Add one more state to the growing list.
http://www.ncsl.org/default.aspx?tabid=16602
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
PWM
Eisenhower Republican. Liberalism = Liberty
11:55 AM on 11/10/2011
So.
photo
Karissa36
Saving lost boys and fighting pirates.
01:30 AM on 11/10/2011
If these people actually cared about dis-enfranchised voters, they would be busy helping people obtain the proper ID. Once again, this just proves my automatic gut reaction. No matter what the issue, if Al Sharpton is involved, it's a scam.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
PWM
Eisenhower Republican. Liberalism = Liberty
11:19 AM on 11/10/2011
So if Al Sharpton said gravity was real - you would doubt him.
10:39 PM on 11/09/2011
I wonder how many times Obama's formally illegal aunt and uncle have voted in this country? It is a well known fact that Obama's illegal aunt was living in government subsidized housing.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
PWM
Eisenhower Republican. Liberalism = Liberty
11:56 AM on 11/10/2011
Any evidence she voted?

And I don't know about you, but I don't keep track of my relatives.
12:17 PM on 11/10/2011
None that I know of. Are you telling me you don't have a problem with illegals being subsidized by legal tax paying citizens and legal immigrants? It is a fact that Obama's illegal uncle had a valid social security card........how does that happen?
10:37 PM on 11/09/2011
Sorry NAACP, La Raza, etc.........there are consequences to allowing our borders to stay wide-open and not enforcing our immigration laws.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
PWM
Eisenhower Republican. Liberalism = Liberty
11:56 AM on 11/10/2011
Laws are enforced. If you want them better enforced tell your congresspeople to increase spending to immigration services and border patrol - or are you not really serious.
12:14 PM on 11/10/2011
Have you being living in a void somewhere? Our border is wide-open and our laws are not being enforced nearly enough. You need to pay more attention to the news.......work place enforcement is down 70% under Obama.....Obama has directed ICE to not enforce our immigration laws against illegals in our colleges and universities that could be eligible for the Dream Act.....Obama administration is currently reviewing over 300,000 illegals under a deportation order in an effort to halt many of their deportations. These are folks that have already been ordered deported by an immigration judge. ICE, under Obama's leadership, has recently stopped checking buses depots, buses, and trains for illegals along our Northern border. Our Southern BP has been directed not to apprehend illegal crossers at the border, just force them back across the border. The list goes on and on...........you need to read more.